Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Health Care Manag (Frederick) ; 20(1): 59-69, 2001 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11556554

RESUMO

Workplace drug testing has become standard business practice in America. With increasing costs, however, many corporations look for more cost-effective testing alternatives. The study compared the cost of two testing strategies: urinalysis at the work site versus testing that occurs elsewhere. Employees from seven company locations were tested for illicit drugs. Four sites conducted the initial screening test at the workplace and three sites performed testing off site. On-site testing was found to have significantly lower variable costs, and total costs were lower once a threshold of 27 employees tested was attained. On-site testing also provided immediate access to negative test results, thereby facilitating personnel decisions.


Assuntos
Serviços Contratados/economia , Custos de Saúde para o Empregador/estatística & dados numéricos , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/economia , Urinálise/economia , Eficiência , Humanos , Indústrias/economia , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA