Resection of Intracochlear Schwannomas With Immediate Cochlear Implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Intralabyrinthine schwannomas, including the intracochlear variety, are rare benign tumors. They can cause a number of symptoms and have the potential to grow to involve other critical structures of the inner ear and skull base. While surgical resection is feasible, there is typically permanent hearing dysfunction as a result of resection and subsequent fibrosis. Here, we present 2 cases of intracochlear schwannomas (ICS) that were successfully resected with simultaneous cochlear implant placement. METHODS: Patient 1 presented with an intravestibulocochlear schwannoma. This patient underwent a translabyrinthine approach. Endoscopic assistance was used to dissect the tumor from the vestibule and basal turn of the cochlea, through an enlarged round window approach. A cochlear implant was placed via a round window cochleostomy. Patient 2 presented with an intracochlear schwannoma involving the basal and middle turns of the cochlea. The patient underwent a trans-otic approach for resection. A large portion of the cochlear promontory required unroofing for complete exposure of the tumor. A cochlear implant was then placed via a round window cochleostomy. RESULTS: Upon cochlear implant activation, Patient 1's sound field thresholds using the implant were near the normal range of hearing, ranging from 25 to 50 dB HL from 250 to 6000 Hz. Patient 2's 6-month post-operative cochlear implant sound field testing ranged from 20 to 30 dB HL from 250 to 6000 Hz and speech recognition testing revealed 59% on AZ Bio sentences compared to 0% pre-operatively. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous cochlear implantation after resection of intracochlear schwannomas is safe and successful in restoring hearing. Attention to adequate exposure and endoscopic assistance, when required, allow for gross total resection while minimizing trauma to cochlear structures. In such cases, immediate cochlear implantation allows for hearing rehabilitation before likely cochlear fibrosis can occur.

Evaluation of galectin-3 and intestinal fatty acid binding protein as serum biomarkers in autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) causes fibrocystic kidney disease, congenital hepatic fibrosis, and portal hypertension. Serum galectin-3 (Gal-3) and intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) are potential biomarkers of kidney fibrosis and portal hypertension, respectively. We examined whether serum Gal-3 associates with kidney disease severity and serum I-FABP associates with liver disease severity in ARPKD. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 29 participants with ARPKD (0.2-21 years old) and presence of native kidneys (Gal-3 analyses, n = 18) and/or native livers (I-FABP analyses, n = 21). Serum Gal-3 and I-FABP were analyzed using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Kidney disease severity variables included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and height-adjusted total kidney volume (htTKV). Liver disease severity was characterized using ultrasound elastography to measure liver fibrosis, and spleen length and platelet count as markers of portal hypertension. Simple and multivariable linear regression examined associations between Gal-3 and kidney disease severity (adjusted for liver disease severity) and between I-FABP and liver disease severity (adjusted for eGFR). RESULTS: Serum Gal-3 was negatively associated with eGFR; 1 standard deviation (SD) lower eGFR was associated with 0.795 SD higher Gal-3 level (95% CI - 1.116, - 0.473; p < 0.001). This association remained significant when adjusted for liver disease severity. Serum Gal-3 was not associated with htTKV in adjusted analyses. Overall I-FABP levels were elevated, but there were no linear associations between I-FABP and liver disease severity in unadjusted or adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Serum Gal-3 is associated with eGFR in ARPKD, suggesting its value as a possible novel biomarker of kidney disease severity. We found no associations between serum I-FABP and ARPKD liver disease severity despite overall elevated I-FABP levels.

Outcomes of curative treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in very elderly adults ≥80 years old.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancer treatment can be difficult and advancing age is associated with greater frailty. It is unclear if curative treatment for very elderly patients is beneficial. This study compared outcomes to curative treatment in patients ≥80 aged with HNSCC to patients aged 70-79. METHODS: Retrospective study of 114 patients diagnosed with HNSCC. Overall survival (OS), Disease-Free Survival (DFS), and local-regional control (LRC) were compared and adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: Patients aged 70-79 had a higher median OS (35 months [95% CI, 19.58-50.42]) compared with patients aged ≥80 (19 months [11.72-26.28]; p = 0.008) but similar DFS and LRC. KPS < 90 was the stand-alone independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 2.14 [1.05-4.38]). CONCLUSION: Very elderly HNSCC patients (aged ≥80) can have favorable outcomes with curative therapy and advanced chronological age alone should not prohibit patients from receiving treatment. Performance status may be a greater predictor of survival outcome than age alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Paclitaxel use in pregnancy: neonatal follow-up of infants with positive detection of intact paclitaxel and metabolites in meconium at birth.

Paclitaxel is often excluded during pregnancy for women with breast cancer due to limited neonatal follow-up. We confirmed in utero fetal Paclitaxel exposure for 8 newborns. Birth details and follow-up to 36 months of age is reported. Meconium samples from newborns exposed to chemotherapy were screened by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry while blinded to maternal treatment during pregnancy. Newborn information at birth and annually was obtained. Mean gestational age (GA) at cancer diagnosis and start of chemotherapy was 8.7 + 6.2 weeks and 17.1 ± 3.5 weeks. Paclitaxel was started at a mean GA of 27.0 ± 5.8 weeks. Paclitaxel followed Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide in 6 cases, 5-Fluouracil/Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide in 1, and was used alone in 1. Mean number of days between Paclitaxel and birth was 23 ± 15. Identification of Paclitaxel and/or metabolites was made in all meconium from paclitaxel-exposed fetuses. Birthweight was < 10% for GA in 3 infants. Three anomalies occurred: mild hip dysplasia without further treatment and mitral valve stenosis. The third child was diagnosed with Cleidocranial Dysostosis, a familial anomaly. Mean age at pediatric follow-up is 18.7 + 9.3 months. Pediatricians report eczema and recurrent otitis media in 1 child, iron deficiency anemia and upper respiratory infection in 2. One child is < 10% for height and weight at 15 months. All are meeting developmental milestones at median age of 18.7 months, range: 6-36 months. CONCLUSION: Up to 3 years of age, follow-up of neonates exposed to Paclitaxel in utero is reassuring. Continued observation of neonatal development is essential. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Chemotherapy during the second and third trimester of pregnancy does not result in an increase in congenital malformations or developmental delay. • In non-human primate studies by Van Calsteren et al., variable plasma and/or tissue concentrations of taxanes, carboplatin, and trastuzumab were encountered in the fetal compartment. • Pilot data reported by the current investigators proved that paclitaxel crosses the human placenta. WHAT IS NEW: • This current article provides medical and developmental follow up on the newborns from this exposure for 3 years after birth.

A Virtual Curriculum to Prepare Medical Students to Achieve Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Level-1 Milestones in Orthopaedic Surgery.

As a part of the American healthcare system's response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic, the Association of American Medical Colleges recommended that medical schools temporarily remove students from clinical settings and transition to an entirely online learning environment. This posed an unprecedented challenge to students in the clinical years of their medical education. To address this unexpected shift, we modified an in-person workshop to teach orthopaedic trauma basics to 5-week virtual course for third year medical students from several schools in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. We focused on moving students toward the Level-1 milestones for basic fracture care with a combination of weekly lectures and virtual interactive small group sessions, all conducted via WebEx and proctored by an orthopaedic attending or resident. The course was well received by students. Participation in the course was completely voluntary and did not count for credit at any institution. The course was valuable to students because the students who registered chose to fully complete the 5-week course and no student missed more than one small group session. On a postcourse survey, 100% of students said they would be highly likely to recommend the course to a future student, and the average rating for educational value of the course was 4.98 of 5. Given the current limitations in clinical education because of the COVID-19 pandemic, our course provides a reasonable alternative to clinical experience and prepares students with the knowledge and many of the skills that are required to succeed as orthopaedic interns. Furthermore, the success of our course this year suggests that similar programing may be a useful adjunct to clinical experiences even when it is safe to return to more traditional medical school scheduling.