Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAMA Oncol ; 2(9): 1209-16, 2016 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27270617

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Progress in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma has been minimal; it remains the only major cancer type with a 5-year survival rate of less than 10%. OBJECTIVE: To explore why a large proportion of advanced pancreatic cancer clinical trials executed over the past 25 years have had negative results and to identify benchmarks that could have predicted success. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Phase 3 studies of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were identified by searching clinicaltrials.gov and the scientific literature. FINDINGS: Thirty-two phase 3 studies in 13 675 chemotherapy-naive patients resulted in 3 agents or combinations being considered clinically meaningful. Nineteen agents or combinations (70%) were tested in phase 2 trials preceding the phase 3 trial. In cases with paired phase 2 and 3 results, meeting the primary end point of the phase 2 trial predicted the outcome of the phase 3 trial 76% of the time but proceeded despite phase 2 negative results in 10 cases. We applied criteria for a clinically meaningful result identified by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Cancer Research Committee to these historical cases. Overall, progression-free and 1-year survival of experimental arms was compared with time period-controlled median values of control arms to normalize for the observed increase in response to gemcitabine over time. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Applying the benchmark of a 50% improvement in overall survival as the primary end point to phase 2 data, or secondary end points of a 90% increase in 1-year survival or an 80% to 100% increase in progression-free survival, showed the greatest ability to predict a clinically meaningful phase 3 trial. Had these criteria been applied to these trials over the past 25 years, more than 11 571 patients enrolled in phase 3 trials that did not meet the primary end point could theoretically have been diverted to earlier-stage trials in an attempt to more rapidly advance the field.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Benchmarking , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Taxa de Sobrevida
2.
Pancreas ; 44(8): 1178-84, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26465947

RESUMO

A meeting of North American Pancreatic Cancer Organizations planned by Kenner Family Research Fund and Pancreatic Cancer Action Network was held on July 15-16, 2015, in New York City. The meeting was attended by 32 individuals from 20 nonprofit groups from the United States and Canada. The objectives of this inaugural convening were to share mission goals and initiatives, engage as leaders, cultivate potential partnerships, and increase participation in World Pancreatic Cancer Day. The program was designed to provide opportunities for informal conversations, as well as facilitated discussions to meet the stated objectives. At the conclusion of the meeting, the group agreed that enhancing collaboration and communication will result in a more unified approach within the field and will benefit individuals diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. As a first step, the group will actively collaborate to participate in World Pancreatic Cancer Day, which is planned for November 13, 2015, and seeks to raise the level of visibility about the disease globally.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Canadá , Comunicação , Comportamento Cooperativo , Humanos , Objetivos Organizacionais , Pesquisadores/economia , Pesquisadores/educação , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/economia , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Estados Unidos
3.
Cancer Res ; 74(11): 2913-21, 2014 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24840647

RESUMO

Cancer incidence and deaths in the United States were projected for the most common cancer types for the years 2020 and 2030 based on changing demographics and the average annual percentage changes in incidence and death rates. Breast, prostate, and lung cancers will remain the top cancer diagnoses throughout this time, but thyroid cancer will replace colorectal cancer as the fourth leading cancer diagnosis by 2030, and melanoma and uterine cancer will become the fifth and sixth most common cancers, respectively. Lung cancer is projected to remain the top cancer killer throughout this time period. However, pancreas and liver cancers are projected to surpass breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers to become the second and third leading causes of cancer-related death by 2030, respectively. Advances in screening, prevention, and treatment can change cancer incidence and/or death rates, but it will require a concerted effort by the research and healthcare communities now to effect a substantial change for the future.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Previsões , Humanos , Incidência , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Masculino , Modelos Estatísticos , Mortalidade/tendências , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/mortalidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
J Clin Oncol ; 31(27): 3432-8, 2013 Sep 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23960185

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Pancreatic cancer clinical trials open in the United States and their accrual were examined to identify opportunities to accelerate progress in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Pancreatic cancer-specific clinical trials open in the United States in the years 2011 and 2012 were obtained from the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network database. Accrual information was obtained from trial sponsors. RESULTS: The portfolio of pancreatic cancer clinical trials identified by type (adenocarcinoma or neuroendocrine), phase, disease stage, and treatment approach is reported. More than half of trials for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma applied biologic insights to new therapeutic approaches, and 38% focused on optimization of radiation or chemotherapy delivery or regimens. In 2011, pancreatic cancer trials required total enrollment of 11,786 patients. Actual accrual to 93.2% of trials was 1,804 patients, an estimated 4.57% of the patients with pancreatic cancer alive in that year. The greatest need was for patients with resectable cancer. Trials open in 2011 enrolled an average of 15% of their total target accrual. Physician recommendations greatly influenced patients' decision to enroll or not enroll onto a clinical trial. Matching to a clinical trial within a 50-mile radius and identifying trials for recurrent/refractory disease were documented as challenges for patient accrual. CONCLUSION: Overall trial enrollment indicates that pancreatic cancer trials open in 2011 would require 6.7 years on average to complete accrual. These results suggest that harmonizing patient supply and demand for clinical trials is required to accelerate progress toward improving survival in pancreatic cancer.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiologia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...