Altered Ulnar Variance With Full-Body Weight-bearing During Handstands With Upper Extremity Weight-bearing CT.

PURPOSE: Ulnar variance (UV) is a radiographic measurement relating the articular surface heights of the distal radius and ulna. Abnormal UV increases the risk for wrist pathology; however, it only provides a static measurement of an inherently dynamic bony relationship that changes with wrist position and loading. The purpose of this study was to investigate how full-body weight-bearing affects UV using weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT). METHODS: Ten gymnasts completed two 45-second scans inside a WBCT machine while performing a handstand on a flat platform (H) and parallettes (P). A non-weight-bearing CT scan was collected to match clinical practice (N). Differences in UV between weight-bearing conditions were evaluated separately for dominant and nondominant sides, and then, UV was compared between weight-bearing conditions on pooled dominant/nondominant data. RESULTS: Pooled analyses comparing weight-bearing conditions revealed a significant increase in UV for H versus N (0.58 mm) and P versus N (1.00 mm), but no significant change in UV for H versus P (0.43 mm). Significant differences in UV were detected for H versus N, P versus N, and H versus P for dominant and nondominant extremities. The change from N to H was significantly greater in the dominant versus nondominant side, but greater in the nondominant side from N to P. CONCLUSIONS: Ulnar variance changed with the application of load and position of the wrist. Differences in UV were found between dominant and nondominant extremities. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Upper extremity loading patterns are affected by hand dominance as defined by a cartwheel and suggest skeletal consequences from repetitive load on a dominantly used wrist. Although statistically significant, subtle changes detected in this investigational study do not necessarily bear clinical significance. Future WBCT research can lead to improved diagnostic measures for wrist pathologies affected by active loading and rotational wrist behavior.

Efficacy of Ultrasonic Tenotomy and Debridement and Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy.

Purpose: To determine the efficacy of treatment of lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection and ultrasonic tenotomy and debridement (USTD) as well as risk factors for treatment failure. Methods: This was a retrospective study including patients treated for LET with PRP or USTD between January 2018 and December 2021. The efficacy of both procedures was assessed using pain-related patient-reported outcome measures at the 12-week follow-up. Baseline subject characteristics and diagnostic ultrasound findings were analyzed as risk factors for failure of treatment. Failure was classified as a surgical indication for LET within a year of the PRP or USTD. Results: Ultrasonic tenotomy and debridement and PRP both led to significant improvement in patient pain within the 12-week follow-up period. There was no significant difference in efficacy between the two procedures. Common extensor tendon tearing on ultrasound and Worker's Compensation cases were found to be risk factors for failure of USTD. Lateral collateral ligament complex involvement and injection were found to be risk factors for failure of PRP. Conclusions: Platelet-rich plasma and USTD are both effective interventions for LET. They have separate risk factors for failure that should be taken in consideration while deciding the treatment approach. These procedures are minimally invasive alternatives to some of the more invasive surgical options to treat LET. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic III.

Early Versus Delayed Surgery for Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Background: Orthopaedic surgeons debate the timing of and necessity for surgical intervention when treating displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (MCFs). This systematic review evaluates the available literature regarding functional outcomes, complication rates, nonunion, and reoperation rates between patients undergoing early versus delayed surgical management of MCFs. Methods: Search strategies were applied in PubMed (Medline), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Elsevier), Sport Discus (EBSCO), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley). Following an initial screening and full-text review, demographic and study outcome data was extracted for comparison between the early fixation and delayed fixation studies. Results: Twenty-one studies were identified for inclusion. This resulted in 1158 patients in the early group and 44 in the delayed. Demographics were similar between groups except for a higher percentage of males in the early group (81.6% vs. 61.4%) and longer time to surgery in the delayed group (4.6 days vs. 14.5 months). Disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores (3.6 vs. 13.0) and Constant-Murley scores (94.0 vs. 86.0) were better in the early group. Percentages of initial surgeries resulting in complication (33.8% vs. 63.6%), nonunion (1.2% vs. 11.4%), and nonroutine reoperation (15.8% vs. 34.1%) were higher in the delayed group. Conclusion: Outcomes of nonunion, reoperation, complications, DASH scores, and CM scores favor early surgery over delayed surgery for MCFs. However, given the small cohort of delayed patients who still achieved moderate outcomes, we recommend a shared decision-making style for treatment recommendations regarding individual patients with MCFs. Level of Evidence: II.

Safety and Efficacy of Forearm Tourniquet Compared to Upper Arm Tourniquet for Local Intravenous Regional Anesthesia in Hand Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Forearm tourniquets may offer decreased doses of anesthetic, shorter procedure times, and less pain compared to upper arm tourniquets. There is limited data comparing the clinical efficacy of forearm Bier blocks to conventional upper arm Bier blocks. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness, complications, duration, cost, and patient satisfaction between forearm and upper arm Bier blocks during surgery. METHODS: Sixty-six carpal tunnel release, ganglion excision, or trigger finger procedures were performed. Patients were randomized to 3 groups: upper arm tourniquet for 25 minutes, forearm tourniquet for 25 minutes, or forearm tourniquet with immediate deflation following the procedure (<25 minutes). The efficacy of surgical anesthesia, tourniquet discomfort, and supplementary local anesthetic administration were recorded. Pain was assessed intraoperatively and postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was assessed on the first postoperative day. RESULTS: No difference was observed between groups with respect to pain, satisfaction, or administration of supplemental medication. The tourniquet time for the group with immediate deflation following procedure was shorter by an average of 9.3 minutes. Total hospital charges were 9.95% cheaper with immediate tourniquet deflation compared to procedures where the tourniquet remained inflated for at least 25 minutes. CONCLUSION: The forearm Bier block is a safe, efficient, cost-effective technique for intravenous regional anesthesia during hand surgery, and tourniquet deflation immediately following the procedure (<25 minutes) does not increase incidence of complications. The forearm tourniquet reduces the dose of local anesthetic and therefore risk for systemic toxicity, with similar effectiveness as compared to the upper arm technique.Level of Evidence: II.