Quantification of Pain and Distress Associated With Intranasal Midazolam Administration in Children and Evaluation of Validity of Four Observational Measures.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to quantify the pain and distress associated with the administration of intranasal (IN) midazolam in young children using 4 observational measures and to evaluate the degree of validity of these measures. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational pilot study. Children aged 1 to 7 years requiring IN midazolam were enrolled. Children were videotaped, and scores were assigned to baseline and administration phases using the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress-Revised (OSBD-R), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS), and the Faces-Legs-Activity-Cry-Consolability (FLACC) scale. The cry duration following administration was assessed. Interrater reliability and convergent validity were determined for all 4 measures. Internal consistency and responsivity for the OSBD-R, CHEOPS, and FLACC scales were determined. RESULTS: We enrolled 20 children. The mean OSBD-R, CHEOPS, and FLACC scores associated with administration of IN midazolam were 27.1 (SD, 13.5), 11.5 (SD, 1.2), and 8.9 (SD, 2.7), respectively. The mean cry duration was 105.5 (SD, 68.8) seconds. The intraclass correlation coefficients for all measures ranged from 0.82 to 0.99. The Cronbach α's for the OSBD-R, CHEOPS, and FLACC were between 0.71 and 0.97. Pearson correlation coefficients for comparisons between OSBD-R, CHEOPS, and FLACC were between 0.82 and 0.96 but were between 0.32 and 0.51 for comparisons involving cry duration. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified estimates of pain and distress associated with administration of IN midazolam in young children that can be used to determine desired effect sizes for trials that study interventions to treat this pain and distress. The OSBD-R, CHEOPS, and FLACC scales are suitable choices for outcome measures.

WITHDRAWN: Comparison of Preadministered and Coadministered Lidocaine for Treating Pain and Distress Associated With Intranasal Midazolam Administration in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the authors and editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal.

Comparison of preadministered and coadministered lidocaine for treating pain and distress associated with intranasal midazolam administration in children: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Pain and distress associated with intranasal midazolam administration can be decreased by administering lidocaine before intranasal midazolam (preadministered lidocaine) or combining lidocaine with midazolam in a single solution (coadministered lidocaine). We hypothesized coadministered lidocaine is non-inferior to preadministered lidocaine for decreasing pain and distress associated with intranasal midazolam administration. METHODS: Randomized, outcome assessor-blinded, noninferiority trial. Children aged 6 months to 7 years undergoing laceration repair received intranasal midazolam with preadministered or coadministered lidocaine. Pain and distress were evaluated with the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress-Revised (OSBD-R) (primary outcome; non-inferiority margin 1.8 units) and the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scales and cry duration (secondary outcomes). Secondary outcomes also included adverse events, clinician and caregiver satisfaction, and pain and distress associated with intranasal lidocaine administration. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were analyzed. Mean OSBD-R scores associated with intranasal midazolam administration were 6.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5, 7.8) and 7 (95% CI 5.2, 8.9) units for preadministered and coadministered lidocaine, respectively. The difference of 0.6 (95% CI -1.7, 2.8) units represented an inconclusive non-inferiority determination. CHEOPS and FLACC scores and cry duration were similar between groups. OSBD-R, CHEOPS, and FLACC scores and cry duration associated with intranasal lidocaine administration were 3.8, 9.9, and 6 units, and 56 seconds, respectively. Clinicians considered coadministered lidocaine easier to administer. CONCLUSION: Pain and distress associated with intranasal midazolam administration were similar when using coadministered or preadministered lidocaine, but our non-inferiority determination was inconclusive. Administration of intranasal lidocaine by itself was associated with a measurable degree of pain and distress.Keywords: intranasal, midazolam, anxiolysis, sedation, emergency department, emergency medicine, pain, distress, pediatric, lidocaine, laceration.

Insulinorresistencia / Insulin resistance

La resistencia insulínica o insulinorresistencia (IR) es una disminución en la función biológica de esta hormona caracterizada por un alto nivel de la insulina plasmática que es requerido para mantener la homeostasis metabólica.Se ha estimado que aproximadamente un 25% de individuos tienen IR. Su estudio ha cobrado gran importancia en los últimos años en el ámbito médico, pues se ha demostrado que la IR conduce al desarrollo de un “síndrome de insulinorresistencia” (SIR), que comprende un conjunto de alteraciones metabólicas (hiperinsulinismo, obesidad visceral, hipertensión arterial sistólica y diastólica y dislipidemia). Todas estas alteraciones son factores de riesgo conocidos de enfermedad cardiovascular, siendo ésta una de las principales causas de morbilidad y mortalidad a nivel mundial. Fue Reaven quien en 1988 sugirió que la diabetes mellitus, la hipertensión arterial y la dislipemia eran factores que tendían a ocurrir en un mismo individuo en la forma de un síndrome, al que denominó “X”, en el que la IR constituía el mecanismo fisiopatológico básico.El incremento en la incidencia de enfermedades como la diabetes tipo 2, enfermedad cardiovascular y obesidad, es producido en muchos casos, por el aumento en la prevalencia de IR en la población, lo que podría atribuirse, en parte, a los cambios en el estilo de vida que ha experimentado la sociedad occidental a lo largo de las últimas décadas.

Insulin resistance (IR) is a decrease of the biological function of this hormone characterized by a high level of plasmic insulin which is required for the metabolic homeostasis.It is estimated that approximately 25% of people have IR. Its’ study has acquired great importance in the last years, because it has been demonstrated to lead to an insulin resistance syndrome (IRS), which includes various metabolic disorders: hiperinsulinesm, visceral obesity, systolic and diastolic hypertension, dislipidemia. All these alterations are well known to be risk factors for coronary heart disease, constituting one of the main causes of morbimortality worldwide.It was reaven who suggested in 1988, that diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension and dislipidemia are factors which tended to occur in this the same individual as a syndrome, which he demonstrated “X”, where the IR constituted the basic fisiopathological mechanism.The increase in the incidence of diseases such as DM2, cardiovascular disease, and obesity is due mainly, to the increase in the prevalence of IR among the population, which could be attributed to the life style changes experimented by the occidental society during the last decades.