Pre-Emptive Retransplantation in Patients With Chronic Kidney Graft Failure.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the group of patients receiving a new kidney transplant before starting dialysis again (pre-reTR) with a group of patients receiving a new kidney transplant after restarting dialysis (reTR). METHODS: This retrospective cohort included all the kidney retransplantations (second transplantations) between 2000 and 2012 performed at our center and their follow-up until July 2014. We analysed graft and patient survival, rejection rates, and immunologic parameters of these patients. RESULTS: We studied 18 patients who had pre-reTR and 83 who had reTR. In the pre-reTR group no patient had panel-reactive assay (PRA) >10% at any time. In the reTR group 26.5% had PRA >10% at the time of transplantation (P = .014) and 54.2% had a historical highest PRA >10% (P < .001). The rejection rate was 11.1% in the pre-reTR group and 27.7% in the reTR group during the first year post-retransplantation (P = .227). Patient survival rate was 100% in the pre-reTR group at 5 years of follow-up, whereas in the reTR group at 1 year it was 95.2% and 85.9% at 5 years after retransplantation. Allograft survival at 1 and 5 years was 88% and 89%, respectively, in the pre-reTR group. On the other hand, in the reTR group it was 89% after the first year and 65% at 5 years post-retransplantation. CONCLUSION: Pre-emptive renal retransplantation is a feasible option that should be assessed in patients with kidney graft failure and may help to minimize the morbidity associated with dialysis reinitiation.

Living Donor Transplantation: Long-Term Evolution Related to Age Matching.

The lack of donors is favoring living kidney donor (LKD) transplantation worldwide, quite often beyond the classic age-matching rules. We analysed renal function (RF) at 1 and 5 years in all donor and recipients as well as death-censored graft and patient survival. LKD recipients were divided into 4 subgroups: young recipients-young donors (YR-YD; N = 355), elderly recipients-young donors (ER-YD; N = 13), young recipients-elderly donors (YR-ED; N = 67), and elderly recipients-elderly donors (ER-ED; N = 38). "Elderly" was defined as ≥60 years. RF was better in those who received a young allograft (YR-YD/ER-YD) at any time (P < .001). There was a trend toward higher proteinuria among the recipients of an old allograft (YR-ED/ER-ED) at any time (P = not significant [NS]). However, our population showed low levels of proteinuria and this was not a risk factor for graft failure. Logistic regression model showed that creatinine level at 1 year is a good predictor of graft losses. Graft survival was worse in the allografts from elderly donors (P < .001). Analysing the young recipients, renal survival was inferior in those who received an old kidney (YR-ED; P < .00005) as well as mortality rates at 14 years (P = .03). The RF of young (N = 295) and elderly donors (N = 98) was optimal with no progression to ESRD or deaths registered during follow-up. In conclusion, young recipients of elderly kidneys pay the price of a worse RF, allograft prognosis, and patient prognosis. The pair YR-ED is a doable option, but we recommend age matching when it is possible.

Anemia in kidney transplants without erythropoietic agents: levels of erythropoietin and iron parameters.

AIM: To study the association between hemoglobin, endogenous erythropoietin (EPO) levels and ferric parameters in kidney recipients not treated with EPO-stimulating agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transverse study of 219 kidney transplant outpatients. The median time after transplantation was 54 months (P(25-75), 23-107). We assessed blood counts, ferric parameters, EPO levels, renal function (MDRD-4), and adjuvant treatment. We performed a linear regression analysis to predict hemoglobin. RESULTS: Median EPO values were 14.05 mUI/mL (P(25-75) = 10.2-19.7). Applying the formulas described by Beguin, kidney transplant recipients showed a low observed/expected ratio of erythropoietin and of transferrin. Considering anemia to be an hemoglobin of < 12 g/dL in women and < 13 g/dL in men, 24.2% of subjects were anemic (n = 53), including 2.3% with hemoglobin < 11 g/dL. Anemic patients displayed worse renal function (49.2 ± 18.5 versus 55.46 ± 16.58 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in nonanemic; P = .021). There were no differences in C-reactive protein. The patients receiving a combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) showed the highest prevalence of anemia compared with other groups (42.9%, P = .027). EPO levels were significantly lower among patients treated with these drugs (P = .041), without differences in transferrin and ferritin. The percentage of anemic patients treated with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) was 31% versus 22.2% among those not receiving these immunosuppressants (P = .23). Although there were no differences in hemoglobin levels, patients treated with mTORi, showed higher EPO levels (P = .005) and lower mean corpuscular volume (P < .001). Regarding the etiology of chronic kidney disease, less frequently anemic patients were those with polycystic kidney disease (8.6% versus 26.7% in the rest, P = .021). The formula obtained by multiple linear regression to calculate hemoglobin was: hemoglobin = 11829-0909 log (EPG level) - 0455 (if female) + 0.010 0.013 transferrin + 0.013 creatinine clearance (r = .424, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ACEI and/or ARBs seemed to produce a defect in the synthesis of EPO, while those treated with mTORi, a hyporesponsive state.