Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 43
Filtrar
2.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 2024 Mar 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38472738

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Prior discrete choice experiments (DCE) in oncology found that, on average, clinicians rank survival as the most important treatment attribute. We investigate heterogeneity in clinician preferences within the context of first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma in Spain, France, Italy, Germany, and the UK. METHODS: The online DCE included 12 treatment choice tasks, each comparing two hypothetical therapy profiles defined by treatment attributes: grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), induction and maintenance administration schedules, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). We used a random parameters logit model to estimate attribute relative importance (RI) (0-100%) and generate preference shares for four treatment profiles. Results were stratified by country. Preference heterogeneity was evaluated by latent class analysis. RESULTS: In August and September 2022, 498 clinicians (343 oncologists and 155 urologists) completed the DCE. OS had the strongest influence on clinicians' preferences [RI = 62%; range, 51.6% (Germany) to 63.7% (Spain)] followed by frequency of grade 3/4 TRAEs (RI = 27%). Among treatment profiles, the chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitor maintenance therapy profile had the largest preference share [51%; range, 38% (Italy) to 56% (UK)]. Four latent classes of clinicians were identified (N = 469), with different treatment profile preferences: survival class (30.1%), trade-off class (22.4%), no strong preference class (40.9%), and aggressive treatment class (6.6%). OS was not the most important attribute for 30.0% of clinicians. CONCLUSION: While average sample results were consistent with those of prior DCEs, this study found heterogeneity in clinician preferences within and across countries, highlighting the diversity in clinician decision making in oncology.

3.
Prev Med Rep ; 27: 101766, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35369114

RESUMO

Medicare Fee for Service (FFS) claims data, including inpatient (Part A) and outpatient (Part B) services, provide a valuable resource for research on older adults (≥65 year) in linked U.S. cohorts. Here we describe our experience linking the Agricultural Health Study cohort, including 47,501 licensed pesticide applicators and spouses from North Carolina (NC) and Iowa (IA) to Medicare claims data from 1999 to 2016. Given increased Part C (i.e., managed care/Medicare Advantage) enrollment during this period, and a resulting lack of available Part C claims data prior to 2015, we also explored potential for informative missingness. We compared those with partial or limited/no FFS to those with complete FFS coverage (i.e., ≥11 months per year parts AB, but not C, throughout Medicare enrollment) in relation to baseline farm size, general pesticide use, and mortality, in logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, race, education, and smoking, and stratified by state. While 46,689 participants (98%) were linked to Medicare IDs, only 33,487 (70%) had complete FFS, 9353 (20%) had partial FFS (≥1 year FFS but not complete), and 3849 (8%) had limited/no FFS (Part A or Part C-only). Incomplete FFS was more common in NC, mostly due to Part C, and was associated with farm characteristics, pesticide use, and mortality. These findings indicate that, in addition to reduced sample size in analyses limited to complete FFS, missingness may not be random. The potential impact of incomplete FFS data and changes in coverage type need to be considered when planning linked analyses and interpreting results.

4.
J Addict Dis ; 38(3): 301-310, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32378481

RESUMO

Background: Opioid overdose is a national health priority and curbing inappropriate prescribing is critical. In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued appropriate prescribing guidelines.Objectives: Examine associations between care networks defined by shared patients and problematic opioid prescribing.Methods: Analysis was at the provider-year level. Social network analysis (SNA) applied to the Medicaid MarketScan® Research Database for the years 2010-2015 identified care communities, each community's level of integration (centralization), and each provider's integration (centrality). Nested multivariable logistic regressions controlling for patient mix and provider specialty simultaneously examined the risk of any (incident) and repeated (prevalent) inappropriate prescribing.Outcomes: Four behaviors defined by the CDC guidelines were examined: (1) more than 90 days continuous supply of high-dose opioid analgesics for chronic pain, (2) overlapping opioid supplies, (3) overlapping opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions, and (4) prescribing an extended release opioid for an acute pain diagnosis.Results: Provider centrality was associated with reduced incidence of outcome (2) (OR: 0.95) and decreased prevalence of outcomes (1), (2), and (3). However, higher incidence (OR: 1.32) and prevalence (OR: 1.027) of outcome (4) were observed. Conversely, centralization associated with decreased incidence of (1) and (2) and lower prevalence of (1), (2), and (3).Conclusions: Greater provider integration is associated with a lower risk of a provider's patients repeatedly having potentially inappropriate prescription fills; however, the association with a provider having any potentially problematic prescription is more ambiguous.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Medicaid , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Estados Unidos
5.
Health Serv Res ; 53(6): 4543-4564, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29845999

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Examine how behavioral health (BH) integration affects health care costs, emergency department (ED) visits, and inpatient admissions. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases. STUDY DESIGN: Social network analysis identified "care communities" (providers sharing a high number of patients) and measured BH integration in terms of how connected, or central, BH providers were to other providers in their community. Multivariable generalized linear models adjusting for age, sex, number of prescriptions, and Charlson comorbidity score were used to estimate the relationship between the centrality of BH providers and health care utilization of BH patients. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Used outpatient, inpatient, and pharmacy claims data from six Medicaid plans from 2011 to 2013 to identify study outcomes, comorbidities, providers, and health care encounters. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Behavioral health centrality ranged from 0 (no BH providers) to 0.49. Relative to communities at the median BH centrality (0.06), in 2012, BH patients in communities at the 75th percentile of BH centrality (0.31) had 0.2 fewer admissions, 2.1 fewer all-cause ED visits, and accrued $1,947 fewer costs, on average. CONCLUSIONS: Increased behavioral centrality was significantly associated with a reduced number of ED visits, less frequent inpatient admissions, and lower overall health care costs.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
6.
Crit Care Med ; 45(12): e1209-e1217, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28906287

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: As sepsis hospitalizations have increased, in-hospital sepsis deaths have declined. However, reported rates may remain higher among racial/ethnic minorities. Most previous studies have adjusted primarily for age and sex. The effect of other patient and hospital characteristics on disparities in sepsis mortality is not yet well-known. Furthermore, coding practices in claims data may influence findings. The objective of this study was to use a broad method of capturing sepsis cases to estimate 2004-2013 trends in risk-adjusted in-hospital sepsis mortality rates by race/ethnicity to inform efforts to reduce disparities in sepsis deaths. DESIGN: Retrospective, repeated cross-sectional study. SETTING: Acute care hospitals in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases for 18 states with consistent race/ethnicity reporting. PATIENTS: Patients diagnosed with septicemia, sepsis, organ dysfunction plus infection, severe sepsis, or septic shock. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In-hospital sepsis mortality rates adjusted for patient and hospital factors by race/ethnicity were calculated. From 2004 to 2013, sepsis hospitalizations for all racial/ethnic groups increased, and mortality rates decreased by 5-7% annually. Mortality rates adjusted for patient characteristics were higher for all minority groups than for white patients. After adjusting for hospital characteristics, sepsis mortality rates in 2013 were similar for white (92.0 per 1,000 sepsis hospitalizations), black (94.0), and Hispanic (93.5) patients but remained elevated for Asian/Pacific Islander (106.4) and "other" (104.7; p < 0.001) racial/ethnic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that hospital characteristics contribute to higher rates of sepsis mortality for blacks and Hispanics. These findings underscore the importance of ensuring that improved sepsis identification and management is implemented across all hospitals, especially those serving diverse populations.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar/etnologia , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Sepse/etnologia , Sepse/mortalidade , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Coleta de Dados , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/etnologia , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco Ajustado , Choque Séptico/etnologia , Choque Séptico/mortalidade , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
7.
Ann Fam Med ; 15(1): 14-22, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28376457

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's provisions for first-dollar coverage of evidence-based preventive services have reduced an important barrier to receipt of preventive care. Safety-net providers, however, still serve a substantial uninsured population, and clinician and patient time remain limited in all primary care settings. As a consequence, decision makers continue to set priorities to help focus their efforts. This report updates estimates of relative health impact and cost-effectiveness for evidence-based preventive services. METHODS: We assessed the potential impact of 28 evidence-based clinical preventive services in terms of their cost-effectiveness and clinically preventable burden, as measured by quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) saved. Each service received 1 to 5 points on each of the 2 measures-cost-effectiveness and clinically preventable burden-for a total score ranging from 2 to 10. New microsimulation models were used to provide updated estimates of 12 of these services. Priorities for improving delivery rates were established by comparing the ranking with what is known of current delivery rates nationally. RESULTS: The 3 highest-ranking services, each with a total score of 10, are immunizing children, counseling to prevent tobacco initiation among youth, and tobacco-use screening and brief intervention to encourage cessation among adults. Greatest population health improvement could be obtained from increasing utilization of clinical preventive services that address tobacco use, obesity-related behaviors, and alcohol misuse, as well as colorectal cancer screening and influenza vaccinations. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies high-priority preventive services and should help decision makers select which services to emphasize in quality-improvement initiatives.


Assuntos
Prioridades em Saúde/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Provedores de Redes de Segurança , Uso de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos
8.
Ann Fam Med ; 15(1): 23-36, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28376458

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Our aim was to update estimates of the health and economic impact of clinical services recommended for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) for the comparative rankings of the National Commission on Prevention Priorities, and to explore differences in outcomes by sex and race/ethnicity. METHODS: We used a single, integrated, microsimulation model to generate comparable results for 3 services recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force: aspirin counseling for the primary prevention of CVD and colorectal cancer, screening and treatment for lipid disorders (usually high cholesterol), and screening and treatment for hypertension. Analyses compare lifetime outcomes from the societal perspective for a US-representative birth cohort of 100,000 persons with and without access to each clinical preventive service. Primary outcomes are health impact, measured by the net difference in lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost-effectiveness, measured in incremental cost per QALY or cost savings per person in 2012 dollars. Results are also presented for population subgroups defined by sex and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Health impact is highest for hypertension screening and treatment (15,600 QALYs), but is closely followed by cholesterol screening and treatment (14,300 QALYs). Aspirin counseling has a lower health impact (2,200 QALYs) but is found to be cost saving ($31 saved per person). Cost-effectiveness for cholesterol and hypertension screening and treatment is $33,800 per QALY and $48,500 per QALY, respectively. Findings favor hypertension over cholesterol screening and treatment for women, and opportunities to reduce disease burden across all services are greatest for the non-Hispanic black population. CONCLUSIONS: All 3 CVD preventive services continue to rank highly among other recommended preventive services for US adults, but individual priorities can be tailored in practice by taking a patient's demographic characteristics and clinical objectives into account.


Assuntos
Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Hipercolesterolemia/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Prevenção Primária/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Aconselhamento , Etnicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Distribuição por Sexo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
9.
Ann Fam Med ; 15(1): 37-47, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28376459

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To help clinicians and care systems determine the priority for tobacco counseling in busy clinic schedules, we assessed the lifetime health and economic value of annually counseling youth to discourage smoking initiation and of annually counseling adults to encourage cessation. METHODS: We conducted a microsimulation analysis to estimate the health impact and cost effectiveness of both types of tobacco counseling in a US birth cohort of 4,000,000. The model used for the analysis was constructed from nationally representative data sets and structured literature reviews. RESULTS: Compared with no tobacco counseling, the model predicts that annual counseling for youth would reduce the average prevalence of smoking cigarettes during adult years by 2.0 percentage points, whereas annual counseling for adults will reduce prevalence by 3.8 percentage points. Youth counseling would prevent 42,686 smoking-attributable fatalities and increase quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 756,601 over the lifetime of the cohort. Adult counseling would prevent 69,901 smoking-attributable fatalities and increase QALYs by 1,044,392. Youth and adult counseling would yield net savings of $225 and $580 per person, respectively. If annual tobacco counseling was provided to the cohort during both youth and adult years, then adult smoking prevalence would be 5.5 percentage points lower compared with no counseling, and there would be 105,917 fewer smoking-attributable fatalities over their lifetimes. Only one-third of the potential health and economic benefits of counseling are being realized at current counseling rates. CONCLUSIONS: Brief tobacco counseling provides substantial health benefits while producing cost savings. Both youth and adult intervention are high-priority uses of limited clinician time.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Aconselhamento/economia , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Fumar/terapia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
10.
Acad Emerg Med ; 24(4): 447-457, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27992953

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In 2006, the American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released field triage guidelines with special consideration for older adults. Additional considerations for direct transport to a Level I or II trauma center (TC) were added in 2011, reflecting perceived undertriage to TCs for older adults. We examined whether age-based disparities in TC care for severe head injury decreased following introduction of the 2011 revisions. METHODS: A pre-post design analyzing the 2009 and 2012 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Emergency Department Databases and State Inpatient Databases with multivariable logistic regressions considered changes in 1) the trauma designation of the emergency department where treatment was initiated and 2) transfer to a TC following initial treatment at a non-TC. RESULTS: Compared with adults aged 18 to 44 years, after multivariable adjustment, in both years TC care was less likely for adults aged 45 to 64 years (odds ratio [OR] = 0.76 in 2009 and 0.74 in 2012), aged 65 to 84 years (OR = 0.61 and 0.59), and aged 85+ years (OR = 0.53 and 0.56). Between 2009 and 2012, the likelihood of TC care increased for all age groups, with the largest increase among those aged 85+ years (OR = 1.18), which was statistically different (p = 0.02) from the increase among adults aged 18 to 44 years (OR = 1.12). The analysis of transfers yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Although patterns of increased TC treatment for all groups with severe head trauma indicate improvements, age-based disparities persisted.


Assuntos
Fatores Etários , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Transferência de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Traumatologia/normas , Triagem/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/terapia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
11.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 29(4): 482-95, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27390380

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Research connecting patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) with improved quality and reduced utilization is inconsistent, possibly because individual domains of change, and the stage of change, are not incorporated in the research design. The objective of this study was to examine the association between stage and domain of change and patterns of health care utilization. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional observational study that including 87 Minnesota clinics certified as medical homes. Patients included those receiving management for diabetes or cardiovascular disease with insurance coverage by payers participating in the study. PCMH transformation stage was defined by practice systems in place, with measurements summarized in 5 domains. Health care utilization was measured by total utilization, frequency of outpatient visits and prescriptions, and occurrence of inpatient and emergency department visits. RESULTS: PCMH transformation was associated with few changes in utilization, but there were important differences by the underlying domains of change. We demonstrate meaningful differences in the impact of PCMH transformation by diagnosis cohort and comorbidity status of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Because the association of health care utilization with PCMH transformation varied by transformation domain and patient diagnosis, practice leaders need to be supported by research incorporating detailed measures of PCMH transformation.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Minnesota , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Projetos de Pesquisa
12.
Ann Intern Med ; 164(12): 777-86, 2016 06 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27064573

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Evidence indicates that aspirin is effective for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and colorectal cancer (CRC) but also increases the risk for gastrointestinal (GI) and cerebral hemorrhages. OBJECTIVE: To assess the net balance of benefits and harms from routine aspirin use across clinically relevant age, sex, and CVD risk groups. DESIGN: Decision analysis using a microsimulation model. DATA SOURCES: 3 systematic evidence reviews. TARGET POPULATION: Men and women aged 40 to 79 years with a 10-year CVD risk of 20% or less, and no history of CVD and without elevated risk for GI or cerebral hemorrhages that would contraindicate aspirin use. TIME HORIZON: Lifetime, 20 years, and 10 years. PERSPECTIVE: Clinical. INTERVENTION: Low-dose aspirin (≤100 mg/d). OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes are length and quality of life measured in net life-years and quality-adjusted life-years. Benefits include reduced nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, fatal CVD, CRC incidence, and CRC mortality. Harms include increased fatal and nonfatal GI bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Lifetime net quality-adjusted life-years are positive for most adults initiating aspirin at ages 40 to 69 years, and life expectancy gains are expected for most men and women initiating aspirin at ages 40 to 59 years and 60 to 69 years with higher CVD risk. Harms may exceed benefits for persons starting aspirin in their 70s and for many during the first 10 to 20 years of use. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Results are most sensitive to the relative risk for hemorrhagic stroke and CVD mortality but are affected by all relative risk estimates, baseline GI bleeding incidence and case-fatality rates, and disutilities associated with aspirin use. LIMITATIONS: Aspirin effects by age are uncertain. Stroke benefits are conservatively estimated. Gastrointestinal bleeding incidence and case-fatality rates account only for age and sex. CONCLUSION: Lifetime aspirin use for primary prevention initiated at younger ages (40 to 69 years) and in persons with higher CVD risk shows the greatest potential for positive net benefit. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.


Assuntos
Anticarcinógenos/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Prevenção Primária , Adulto , Idoso , Anticarcinógenos/administração & dosagem , Anticarcinógenos/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Medição de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/induzido quimicamente
13.
Am J Prev Med ; 50(5 Suppl 1): S34-S44, 2016 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27102856

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Team-based interventions for hypertension care have been widely studied and shown effective in improving hypertension outcomes. Few studies have evaluated long-term effects of these interventions; none have assessed broad-scale implementation. This study estimates the prospective health, economic, and budgetary impact of universal adoption of a team-based care intervention model that targets people with treated but uncontrolled hypertension in the U.S. METHODS: Analysis was conducted in 2014-2015 using a microsimulation model, constructed with various data sources from 1948 to 2014, designed to evaluate prospective cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related interventions in the U.S. POPULATION: Ten-year primary outcomes included prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension; incident myocardial infarction, stroke, CVD events, and CVD-related mortality; intervention and net medical costs by payer; productivity; and quality-adjusted life years. RESULTS: About 4.7 million (13%) fewer people with uncontrolled hypertension and 638,000 prevented cardiovascular events would be expected over 10 years. Assuming $525 per enrollee, implementation would cost payers $22.9 billion, but $25.3 billion would be saved in averted medical costs. Estimated net cost savings for Medicare approached $5.8 billion. Net costs were especially sensitive to intervention costs, with break-even thresholds of $300 (private), $450 (Medicaid), and $750 (Medicare). CONCLUSIONS: Nationwide adoption of team-based care for uncontrolled hypertension could have sizable effects in reducing CVD burden. Based on the study's assumptions, the policy would be cost saving from the perspective of Medicare and may prove to be cost effective from other payers' perspectives. Expected net cost savings for Medicare would more than offset expected net costs for all other insurers.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Hipertensão/economia , Modelos Econômicos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Doenças Cardiovasculares/economia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Hipertensão/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Estados Unidos
14.
Am J Prev Med ; 47(5): 604-12, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25175764

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity prevalence remains high in the U.S., especially among racial/ethnic minorities and low-income populations. Federal policy is important in improving public health given its broad reach. Information is needed about federal policies that could reduce childhood obesity rates and by how much. PURPOSE: To estimate the impact of three federal policies on childhood obesity prevalence in 2032, after 20 years of implementation. METHODS: Criteria were used to select the three following policies to reduce childhood obesity from 26 recommended policies: afterschool physical activity programs, a $0.01/ounce sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) excise tax, and a ban on child-directed fast food TV advertising. For each policy, the literature was reviewed from January 2000 through July 2012 to find evidence of effectiveness and create average effect sizes. In 2012, a Markov microsimulation model estimated each policy's impact on diet or physical activity, and then BMI, in a simulated school-aged population in 2032. RESULTS: The microsimulation predicted that afterschool physical activity programs would reduce obesity the most among children aged 6-12 years (1.8 percentage points) and the advertising ban would reduce obesity the least (0.9 percentage points). The SSB excise tax would reduce obesity the most among adolescents aged 13-18 years (2.4 percentage points). All three policies would reduce obesity more among blacks and Hispanics than whites, with the SSB excise tax reducing obesity disparities the most. CONCLUSIONS: All three policies would reduce childhood obesity prevalence by 2032. However, a national $0.01/ounce SSB excise tax is the best option.


Assuntos
Política de Saúde , Obesidade Infantil/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Bebidas Gaseificadas/economia , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Atividade Motora , Obesidade Infantil/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/organização & administração , Impostos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
15.
Implement Sci ; 9: 177, 2014 Dec 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25603497

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Significant national investments have aided the development of practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in both medicine and dentistry. Little evidence has examined the translational impact of these efforts and whether PBRN involvement corresponds to better adoption of best available evidence. This study addresses that gap in knowledge and examines changes in early dental decay among PBRN participants and non-participants with access to the same evidence-based guideline. This study examines the following questions regarding PBRN participation: are practice patterns of providers with PBRN engagement in greater concordance with current evidence? Does provider participation in a PBRNs increase concordance with current evidence? Do providers who participate in PBRN activities disseminate knowledge to their colleagues? METHODS: Logistic regression models adjusting for clustering at the clinic and provider levels compared restoration (dental fillings) rates from 2005-2011 among 35 providers in a large staff model practice. All new codes for early-stage caries (dental decay) and co-occurring caries were identified. Treatment was determined by codes occurring up to 6 months following the date of diagnosis. Provider PBRN engagement was determined by study involvement and meeting attendance. RESULTS: In 2005, restoration rates were high (79.5%), decreased to 47.6% by 2011 (p < .01), and differed by level of PBRN engagement. In 2005, engaged providers were less likely to use restorations compared to the unengaged (73.1% versus 88.2%; p < .01). Providers with high PBRN involvement decreased use of restorations by 15.4% from 2005 to 2008 (2005: 73%, 2008: 63%; p < .01). Providers with no PBRN involvement decreased use by only 7.5% (2005: 88%, 2008: 82%; p = .041). During the latter half of 2008 following the May PBRN meeting, attendees reduced restorations by 7.5%, compared to a 2.4% among non-attendees (OR = .64, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Based on actual clinical data, PBRN engagement was associated with practice change consistent with current evidence on treatment of early dental decay. The impact of PBRN engagement was most significant for the most-engaged providers and consistent with a spillover effect onto same-clinic providers who were not PBRN-engaged. PBRNs can generate relevant evidence and expedite translation into practice.


Assuntos
Cárie Dentária/terapia , Odontologia Baseada em Evidências , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Padrões de Prática Odontológica/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Odontológica/normas , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade , Cárie Dentária/classificação , Humanos , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos
16.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 10: E25, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23428084

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of a price reduction on salad bar purchases in a corporate cafeteria. We reduced the price of salad bar purchases by 50% during March 2012 and analyzed sales data by month for February through June 2012. We also conducted an anonymous survey. Salad bar sales by weight more than tripled during the price reduction and returned to baseline afterward. Survey respondents reported that the high price of salad relative to other choices is a barrier to purchases. Policies that make the price of salads equal to other choices in cafeterias may significantly increase healthful food consumption.


Assuntos
Serviços de Alimentação/normas , Corporações Profissionais , Verduras/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Humanos , Cultura Organizacional
17.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 104(23): 1785-95, 2012 Dec 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23197490

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommended that patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are candidates for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy have their tumors tested for KRAS mutations because tumors with such mutations do not respond to anti-EGFR therapy. Limiting anti-EGFR therapy to those without KRAS mutations will reserve treatment for those likely to benefit while avoiding unnecessary costs and harm to those who would not. Similarly, tumors with BRAF genetic mutations may not respond to anti-EGFR therapy, though this is less clear. Economic analyses of mutation testing have not fully explored the roles of alternative therapies and resection of metastases. METHODS: This paper is based on a decision analytic framework that forms the basis of a cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for KRAS and BRAF mutations in mCRC in the context of treatment with cetuximab. A cohort of 50 000 patients with mCRC is simulated 10 000 times, with attributes randomly assigned on the basis of distributions from randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: Screening for both KRAS and BRAF mutations compared with the base strategy (of no anti-EGFR therapy) increases expected overall survival by 0.034 years at a cost of $22 033, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of approximately $650 000 per additional year of life. Compared with anti-EGFR therapy without screening, adding KRAS testing saves approximately $7500 per patient; adding BRAF testing saves another $1023, with little reduction in expected survival. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for KRAS and BFAF mutation improves the cost-effectiveness of anti-EGFR therapy, but the incremental cost effectiveness ratio remains above the generally accepted threshold for acceptable cost effectiveness ratio of $100 000/quality adjusted life year.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/economia , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inibidores , Testes Genéticos/economia , Mutação , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas/genética , Proteínas ras/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/economia , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/metabolismo , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras) , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estados Unidos
18.
Am J Manag Care ; 18(11): 677-86, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23198711

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine the long-term relationships between costs, utilization, and patient-centered medical home (PCMH) clinical practice systems. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical practice systems were evaluated at baseline by the Physician Practice Connections-Research Survey (PPC-RS). Annual costs and utilization of a retrospectively constructed cohort of 58,391 persons receiving primary care at 1 of 22 medical groups over a 5-year period (2005-2009) were compared. METHODS: Multivariate regressions adjusting for patient demographics, health status, and autoregressive errors compared PPC-RS scores and study outcomes for the entire cohort and 3 subcohorts defined by medical complexity (medication count 0-2 [n = 29,657], 2-6 [n = 19,505], >7 [n = 9229]). Outcomes (adjusted to 2005 dollars) were total costs, outpatient costs, inpatient costs, inpatient days, and emergency department (ED) use. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, a 10% increase in PPC-RS scores was associated with 3.9 (medication count: 0-2), 6 (3-6), and 11.6 (>7) fewer ED visits per 1000 in 2005; and 5.1, 7.6, and 13.6 fewer ED visits in 2009. That 10% increase was not associated with the 0-2 medication subcohort's total (-$22/person in 2005; $184/person in 2009), outpatient (-$11/person in 2005; $42/person in 2009), or inpatient ($26/person in 2005; $29/person in 2009) costs. However, it was associated with significantly decreased total (-$446/person in 2005; -$184/person in 2009) and outpatient (-$241/person in 2005; -$54/person in 2009) costs for the most medically complex subcohort (>7 medications). CONCLUSIONS: Association of PCMH clinical practice systems with reduced costs appears limited to the most medically complex patients.


Assuntos
Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/organização & administração , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Crônica , Custos e Análise de Custo , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos
19.
Am J Manag Care ; 18(8): 450-7, 2012 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22928760

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To measure continuity among medical groups of insured patients over a 5-year period and to test whether group continuity of care is associated with healthcare utilization and costs. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: We studied natural patient behavior by using insurance claims data in the absence of any medical group or health plan incentives for continuity. We conducted the study through a retrospective analysis of administrative data of 121,780 patients enrolled from 2005 to 2009 in HealthPartners, a large nonprofit Minnesota health plan. Each year, patients were attributed to the medical group where they received the greatest number of primary care visits. Multilevel multiple regression models were used to estimate the association of annualized medical cost and utilization with attribution and continuity categories. RESULTS: Although patients with high medical group continuity were older and had more comorbidities than patients with medium or low continuity of care, they had a consistently lower probability of any inpatient expenditure or any emergency department (ED) utilization and lower total medical costs. CONCLUSIONS: Although a small proportion, health plan members who visited a primary care provider but had low or medium continuity among medical groups had higher inpatient and ED use than those with high continuity. Improved coordination and integration has potential to lower utilization and costs in this group.


Assuntos
Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática de Grupo/estatística & dados numéricos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Prática de Grupo/economia , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
20.
West J Emerg Med ; 13(2): 186-93, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22900111

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Teaching ability and efficiency of clinical operations are important aspects of physician performance. In order to promote excellence in education and clinical efficiency, it would be important to determine physician qualities that contribute to both. We sought to evaluate the relationship between teaching performance and patient throughput times. METHODS: The setting is an urban, academic emergency department with an annual census of 65,000 patient visits. Previous analysis of an 18-question emergency medicine faculty survey at this institution identified 5 prevailing domains of faculty instructional performance. The 5 statistically significant domains identified were: Competency and Professionalism, Commitment to Knowledge and Instruction, Inclusion and Interaction, Patient Focus, and Openness and Enthusiasm. We fit a multivariate, random effects model using each of the 5 instructional domains for emergency medicine faculty as independent predictors and throughput time (in minutes) as the continuous outcome. Faculty that were absent for any portion of the research period were excluded as were patient encounters without direct resident involvement. RESULTS: Two of the 5 instructional domains were found to significantly correlate with a change in patient treatment times within both datasets. The greater a physician's Commitment to Knowledge and Instruction, the longer their throughput time, with each interval increase on the domain scale associated with a 7.38-minute increase in throughput time (90% confidence interval [CI]: 1.89 to 12.88 minutes). Conversely, increased Openness and Enthusiasm was associated with a 4.45-minute decrease in throughput (90% CI: -8.83 to -0.07 minutes). CONCLUSION: Some aspects of teaching aptitude are associated with increased throughput times (Openness and Enthusiasm), while others are associated with decreased throughput times (Commitment to Knowledge and Instruction). Our findings suggest that a tradeoff may exist between operational and instructional performance.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...