RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of lipoabdominoplasty on diaphragmatic mobility (DM) and lung function in healthy women. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study using high-resolution ultrasound and forced spirometry to assess DM and lung function, respectively, prior to lipoabdominoplasty, as well as on postoperative day (POD) 10 and POD 30. DM was measured under two conditions: during tidal volume breathing and during a VC maneuver. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 20 women, with a mean age of 39.85 ± 7.52 years and a mean body mass index of 26.21 ± 2.0 kg/m2. Comparing the preoperative and postoperative periods, we found that DM and lung function values were significantly lower after lipoabdominoplasty, the mean DM on POD 10 being 17% and 15% lower during tidal volume breathing and during the VC maneuver, respectively, in comparison with the preoperative mean (p = 0.009 and p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, FEV1, FVC, and PEF were significantly lower on POD 10 than in the preoperative period (p = 0.046, p = 0.002, and p < 0.001, respectively), returning to preoperative values by POD 30. CONCLUSIONS: Lipoabdominoplasty appears to have negative short-term repercussions for DM and lung function in healthy women. However, lung function and DM are both apparently restored to preoperative conditions by POD 30. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02762526 [http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/]).
Assuntos
Diafragma/fisiologia , Lipoabdominoplastia , Pulmão/fisiologia , Adulto , Diafragma/diagnóstico por imagem , Dispneia/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Período Pós-Operatório , Período Pré-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Espirometria , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the impact of lipoabdominoplasty on diaphragmatic mobility (DM) and lung function in healthy women. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study using high-resolution ultrasound and forced spirometry to assess DM and lung function, respectively, prior to lipoabdominoplasty, as well as on postoperative day (POD) 10 and POD 30. DM was measured under two conditions: during tidal volume breathing and during a VC maneuver. Results: The sample consisted of 20 women, with a mean age of 39.85 ± 7.52 years and a mean body mass index of 26.21 ± 2.0 kg/m2. Comparing the preoperative and postoperative periods, we found that DM and lung function values were significantly lower after lipoabdominoplasty, the mean DM on POD 10 being 17% and 15% lower during tidal volume breathing and during the VC maneuver, respectively, in comparison with the preoperative mean (p = 0.009 and p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, FEV1, FVC, and PEF were significantly lower on POD 10 than in the preoperative period (p = 0.046, p = 0.002, and p < 0.001, respectively), returning to preoperative values by POD 30. Conclusions: Lipoabdominoplasty appears to have negative short-term repercussions for DM and lung function in healthy women. However, lung function and DM are both apparently restored to preoperative conditions by POD 30. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02762526 [http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/])
RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o impacto da lipoabdominoplastia na mobilidade diafragmática (MD) e na função pulmonar de mulheres saudáveis. Métodos: Estudo prospectivo de coorte com ultrassonografia de alta resolução e espirometria forçada para a avaliação da MD e da função pulmonar, respectivamente, antes da lipoabdominoplastia, no 10º dia do pós-operatório e no 30º dia do pós-operatório. A MD foi medida durante a respiração em volume corrente e durante uma manobra de CV. Resultados: A amostra foi composta por 20 mulheres, com média de idade de 39,85 ± 7,52 anos e média de índice de massa corporal de 26,21 ± 2,0 kg/m2. Ao compararmos os períodos pré e pós-operatório, observamos que a MD e a função pulmonar foram significativamente menores após a lipoabdominoplastia; a média de MD no 10º dia do pós-operatório foi 17% menor durante a respiração em volume corrente e 15% menor durante a manobra de CV do que a média pré-operatória (p = 0,009 e p < 0,001, respectivamente). Além disso, o VEF1, a CVF e o PFE foram significativamente menores no 10º dia do pós-operatório que no pré-operatório (p = 0,046, p = 0,002 e p < 0,001, respectivamente), retornando aos valores pré-operatórios até o 30º dia do pós-operatório. Conclusões: A lipoabdominoplastia parece ter repercussões negativas em curto prazo na MD e função pulmonar de mulheres saudáveis. No entanto, tanto a função pulmonar como a MD aparentemente retornam ao estado pré-operatório até o 30º dia do pós-operatório. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02762526 [http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/])
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diafragma/fisiologia , Lipoabdominoplastia , Pulmão/fisiologia , Período Pós-Operatório , Espirometria , Medição da Dor , Diafragma/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Ultrassonografia , Dispneia/fisiopatologia , Período Pré-OperatórioRESUMO
OBJETIVO: A ventilação mecânica associa-se à retenção de secreções traqueobrônquicas. A tosse manualmente assistida contribui para o deslocamento do muco brônquico, enquanto a pressão positiva ao final da expiração incrementa a ventilação colateral e mantêm a patência da via aérea. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar os efeitos da aplicação da tosse manualmente assistida isoladamente ou associada ao incremento da pressão expiratória final positiva e do tempo inspiratório (tosse manualmente assistida otimizada) sobre o pico de fluxo expiratório e a mecânica do sistema respiratório de pacientes em ventilação mecânica. MÉTODOS: Ensaio clínico controlado e randomizado, em que foram avaliados a mecânica respiratória e o pico de fluxo expiratório de pacientes de ambos os sexos submetidos à aspiração traqueal isolada, tosse manualmente assistida seguida de aspiração traqueal e tosse manualmente assistida otimizada seguida de aspiração traqueal. RESULTADOS: Trinta e cinco pacientes completaram o estudo. A resistência do SR (Rsr) reduziu significativamente após a realização da tosse manualmente assistida otimizada (16,0 ± 3,6 vs 12,4 ± 3,1 cmH2O/L/s; p = 0,04). O pico de fluxo expiratório durante a realização da tosse manualmente assistida otimizada foi significativamente maior que o observado durante a tosse manualmente assistida (112,3 ± 15,6 vs95,8 ± 18,3 Lpm; p < 0,05)e ambas foram significativamente maiores que aquele observado no grupo submetido à aspiração traqueal isoladamente (52,0 ± 7,6 Lpm; p < 0,001). CONCLUSÃO: A tosse manualmente assistida otimizada aumenta o pico de fluxo expiratório quando comparada à tosse manualmente assistida, promovendo redução da resistência do sistema respiratório.
OBJECTIVE: Mechanical ventilation is associated with retained airway secretions. Manually assisted cough contributes to the displacement of bronchial mucus, whereas positive end-expiratory pressure increases collateral ventilation and maintains airway patency. This study aimed to assess the effects of manually assisted cough, either alone or added to increased positive end-expiratory pressure and inspiratory time (optimized manually assisted cough), on the expiratory peak flow and respiratory system mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: In this controlled and randomized clinical trial, respiratory mechanics and expiratory peak flow were assessed in male and female patients undergoing either tracheal suctioning alone, manually assisted cough followed by tracheal suctioning or optimized manually assisted cough followed by tracheal suctioning. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients completed the trial. Respiratory system resistance was significantly reduced after optimized manually assisted cough (16.0 ± 3.6 versus 12.4 ± 3.1 cmH2O/L/s; p = 0.04). The expiratory peak flow during optimized manually assisted cough was significantly higher in comparison with the values observed during manually assisted cough (112.3 ± 15.6 versus 95.8 ± 18.3 Lpm; p < 0.05). Both values were significantly higher than the values observed in the group undergoing tracheal suctioning alone (52.0 ± 7.6 Lpm; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Optimized manually assisted cough increases the expiratory peak flow in comparison with manually assisted cough; in addition, this procedure reduces respiratory system resistance.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Mechanical ventilation is associated with retained airway secretions. Manually assisted cough contributes to the displacement of bronchial mucus, whereas positive end-expiratory pressure increases collateral ventilation and maintains airway patency. This study aimed to assess the effects of manually assisted cough, either alone or added to increased positive end-expiratory pressure and inspiratory time (optimized manually assisted cough), on the expiratory peak flow and respiratory system mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: In this controlled and randomized clinical trial, respiratory mechanics and expiratory peak flow were assessed in male and female patients undergoing either tracheal suctioning alone, manually assisted cough followed by tracheal suctioning or optimized manually assisted cough followed by tracheal suctioning. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients completed the trial. Respiratory system resistance was significantly reduced after optimized manually assisted cough (16.0 ± 3.6 versus 12.4 ± 3.1 cmH2O/L/s; p = 0.04). The expiratory peak flow during optimized manually assisted cough was significantly higher in comparison with the values observed during manually assisted cough (112.3 ± 15.6 versus 95.8 ± 18.3 Lpm; p < 0.05). Both values were significantly higher than the values observed in the group undergoing tracheal suctioning alone (52.0 ± 7.6 Lpm; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Optimized manually assisted cough increases the expiratory peak flow in comparison with manually assisted cough; in addition, this procedure reduces respiratory system resistance.