The impact of progesterone receptor negativity on oncological outcomes in oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Oestrogen receptor (ER) status provides invaluable prognostic and therapeutic information in breast cancer (BC). When clinical decision making is driven by ER status, the value of progesterone receptor (PgR) status is less certain. The aim of this study was to describe clinicopathological features of ER-positive (ER+)/PgR-negative (PgR-) BC and to determine the effect of PgR negativity in ER+ disease. METHODS: Consecutive female patients with ER+ BC from a single institution were included. Factors associated with PgR- disease were assessed using binary logistic regression. Oncological outcome was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 2660 patients were included with a mean(s.d.) age of 59.6(13.3) years (range 21-99 years). Median follow-up was 97.2 months (range 3.0-181.2). Some 2208 cases were PgR+ (83.0 per cent) and 452 were PgR- (17.0 per cent). Being postmenopausal (odds ratio (OR) 1.66, 95 per cent c.i. 1.25 to 2.20, P < 0.001), presenting with symptoms (OR 1.71, 95 per cent c.i. 1.30 to 2.25, P < 0.001), ductal subtype (OR 1.51, 95 per cent c.i. 1.17 to 1.97, P = 0.002) and grade 3 tumours (OR 2.20, 95 per cent c.i. 1.68 to 2.87, P < 0.001) were all associated with PgR negativity. In those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (308 patients), pathological complete response rates were 10.1 per cent (25 of 247 patients) in patients with PgR+ disease versus 18.0 per cent in PgR- disease (11 of 61) (P = 0.050). PgR negativity independently predicted worse disease-free (hazard ratio (HR) 1.632, 95 per cent c.i. 1.209 to 2.204, P = 0.001) and overall survival (HR 1.774, 95 per cent c.i. 1.324 to 2.375, P < 0.001), as well as worse overall survival in ER+/HER2- disease (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In ER+ disease, PgR- tumours have more aggressive clinicopathological features and worse oncological outcomes. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapeutic strategies should be tailored according to PgR status.

Impact of rapid molecular screening for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in surgical wards.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to establish the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of rapid molecular screening for hospital-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in surgical patients within a teaching hospital. METHODS: In 2006, nasal swabs were obtained before surgery from all patients undergoing elective and emergency procedures, and screened for MRSA using a rapid molecular technique. MRSA-positive patients were started on suppression therapy of mupirocin nasal ointment (2 per cent) and undiluted chlorhexidine gluconate bodywash. RESULTS: A total of 18,810 samples were processed, of which 850 (4.5 per cent) were MRSA positive. In comparison to the annual mean for the preceding 6 years, MRSA bacteraemia fell by 38.5 per cent (P < 0.001), and MRSA wound isolates fell by 12.7 per cent (P = 0.031). The reduction in MRSA bacteraemia and wound infection was equivalent to a saving of 3.78 beds per year (276,220 pounds sterling), compared with the annual mean for the preceding 6 years. The cost of screening was 302,500 pounds sterling, making a net loss of 26,280 pounds sterling. Compared with 2005, however, there was a net saving of 545,486 pounds sterling. CONCLUSION: Rapid MRSA screening of all surgical admissions resulted in a significant reduction in staphylococcal bacteraemia during the screening period, although a causal link cannot be established.