Rapid transitional response to the COVID-19 pandemic by opioid agonist treatment programs in Ukraine.

On March 16, 2020, Ukraine's Ministry of Health issued nonspecific interim guidance to continue enrolling patients in opioid agonist therapies (OAT) and transition existing patients to take-home dosing to reduce community COVID-19 transmission. Though the number of OAT patients increased modestly, the proportion receiving take-home dosing increased from 57.5% to 82.2%, which translates on average to 963,952 fewer clinic interactions annually (range: 728,652-1,016,895) and potentially 80,329 (range: 60,721-84,741) fewer hours of in-person clinical encounters. During the transition, narcologists (addiction specialists) expressed concerns about overdoses, the guidance contradicting existing legislation, and patient dropout, either from incarceration or inadequate public transportation. Though clinicians did observe some overdoses, short-term overall mortality remained similar to the previous year. As the country relaxes the interim guidance, we do not know to what extent governmental guidance or clinical practice will change to adopt the new guidance permanently or revert to pre-guidance regulations. Some future considerations that have come from COVID-19 are should dosing schedules continue to be flexible, should clinicians adopt telehealth, and should there be more overdose education and naloxone distribution? OAT delivery has improved and become more efficient, but clinicians should plan long-term should COVID-19 return in the near future. If the new efficiencies are maintained, it will free the workforce to further scale up OAT.

Estimating HIV and HCV prevalence among people who inject drugs in 5 Ukrainian cities using stratification-based respondent driven and random sampling.

BACKGROUND: Ukraine, a country of 45.5 million people, has one of the most volatile HIV and HCV epidemics in the world. In this paper, we estimate the prevalence of HIV and HCV among PWID in five Ukrainian cities. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2014-2015, based on stratified hybrid sampling with random and respondent driven sampling in five cities: Kyiv, Odesa, Mykolaiv, Dnipro and Lviv. Using data on HIV and HCV antibody testing from 1613 respondents, we evaluate selection bias in the sampling methods by analyzing spatial and network patterns of sampling processes. We develop and apply inverse probability weights in order to estimate the HIV and HCV prevalence in each city, as well as in the overall sample. FINDINGS: The aggregate HIV prevalence for the five cities is 35.1% (95% CI: 29.5%-38.5%) but this varied considerably by city: in Kyiv the HIV prevalence is 26.6% (95% CI: 20.3.8%-33.4%), in Odesa - 38.2% (95% CI: 29.8% and 47.1%), in Mykolaiv - 42.0% (95% CI: 34.3%-49.2%), in Dnipro - 58.8% (95% CI: 52.2%-65.8%), and in Lviv 24.6% (95% CI: 18.8%-30.8%). The aggregate HCV prevalence estimate for the five cities is 58.6% (95% CI: 54.9%-61.7%). The highest HCV prevalence is estimated in Kyiv - 84.8% (95% CI: 78.5%-90.1%). HCV prevalence in Odesa is the lowest and estimated to be 36.5% (95% CI: 29.5%-45.1%), in Mykolaiv - 49.1% (95% CI: 41.5%-57.0%), in Dnipro - 56.1% (95% CI: 50.3%-63.4%) and in Lviv 38.5% (95% CI: 31.8%-45.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring behavioral and health outcomes of PWID on a regular basis is necessary for determining prevention and treatment priorities for HIV and HCV infections in Ukraine and elsewhere. The heterogeneity of the local epidemics provides insights into the best prevention and treatment strategies to be deployed in low-resource settings.

Using nominal group technique among clinical providers to identify barriers and prioritize solutions to scaling up opioid agonist therapies in Ukraine.

BACKGROUND: Opioid agonist therapies (OAT) like methadone and buprenorphine maintenance treatment remain markedly under-scaled in Ukraine despite adequate funding. Clinicians and administrators were assembled as part of an implementation science strategy to scale-up OAT using the Network for Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) approach. METHODS: Nominal Group Technique (NGT), a key ingredient of the NIATx toolkit, was directed by three trained coaches within a learning collaborative of 18 OAT clinicians and administrators to identify barriers to increase OAT capacity at the regional "oblast" level, develop solutions, and prioritize local change projects. NGT findings were supplemented from detailed notes collected during the NGT discussion. RESULTS: The top three identified barriers included: (1) Strict regulations and inflexible policies dictating distribution and dispensing of OAT; (2) No systematic approach to assessing OAT needs on regional or local level; and (3) Limited funding and financing mechanisms combined with a lack of local/regional control over funding for OAT treatment services. CONCLUSIONS: NGT provides a rapid strategy for individuals at multiple levels to work collaboratively to identify and address structural barriers to OAT scale-up. This technique creates a transparent process to address and prioritize complex issues. Targeting these priorities allowed leaders at the regional and national level to advocate collectively for approaches to minimize obstacles and create policies to improve OAT services.