RESUMO
Preparedness to endure extreme situations such as natural disasters or military conflicts is not commonplace in healthcare training programs. Moreover, multidisciplinary teams in health services rarely (if ever) include experts in security. However, when emergency situations occur, prevailing healthcare demands do not cease to exist, and unexpected demands often surge due to the shortage of other services and supplies or as a consequence of the emergency condition itself.With services in 45 countries, AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) has operated in several conflict zones, facing broad and challenging security demands. Since 2017 AHF has implemented the Global Department of Safety and Security (GDSS), a dedicated intelligence and safety program that had a key role in the security monitoring, preparedness, and defense responses, assisting staff members and clients during recent conflicts.In this manuscript, we describe the experience of AHF's GDSS in three recent military conflicts in Ethiopia, Myanmar, and Ukraine, and provide insights into steps that can be taken to assure staff safety and support the mission of caring for patients throughout catastrophic events.
RESUMO
Ukraine stands out among European countries concerning HIV epidemiological data. Since February 2022, the military conflict with Russian forces has posed unprecedented challenges to HIV prevention and care. AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF), a global non-profit organisation with operations in Ukraine since 2009, implemented a preparedness plan to protect staff members and support local facilities in the continuity of care throughout the war. In this manuscript, we describe the strategies adopted by AHF to anticipate the risk of military conflict, steps to implement a preparedness plan, main challenges faced by local staff members and managers, adaptations needed as the conflict evolved, and indicators of HIV care 1 year before and 1 year after the onset of the conflict. Our experience shows that safeguarding the organisation's human resources has been a prerequisite to sustain services throughout the war.
Assuntos
Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida , Conflitos Armados , Infecções por HIV , Humanos , Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/epidemiologia , Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/prevenção & controle , Europa (Continente) , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , UcrâniaRESUMO
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral load (VL) during pregnancy is a critical determinant of the risk of HIV mother-to-child transmission (MTCT). Prior studies suggest that VL suppression is influenced by antiretroviral regimen. In this study, using secondary real-life data from the Ministry of Health of Brazil, we compared VL suppression at 60-180 days after the first antiretroviral therapy (ART) prescription during pregnancy and time to undetectable VL among pregnant women under treatment with double nucleoside/nucleotide regimens combined with efavirenz, boosted lopinavir, boosted atazanavir, or raltegravir, with adjustment for potential confounders in multivariable models. A total of 18,997 pregnant women living with HIV were included in the study. Compared to regimens containing lopinavir, we found that atazanavir-, efavirenz-, and raltegravir-based regimens were superior in achieving both outcomes after adjustment for age, social vulnerability index, time under ART, baseline CD4+ cell count, and baseline HIV VL. Raltegravir-containing regimens had the highest adjusted odds/rates of VL suppression compared to patients with other regimens. Elimination of HIV MTCT is still a critical public health issue in many countries. Our findings suggest that raltegravir-based regimens were superior when compared to efavirenz-, lopinavir-, and atazanavir-based antiretroviral regimens in achieving suppression of HIV VL.