Evolution of Globus Pallidus Targeting for Parkinson's and Dystonia Deep Brain Stimulation: A 15-Year Experience.

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the evolution of GPi DBS targeting. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included patients implanted with GPi DBS leads for dystonia or PD during the years 2004 to 2018 at the University of Florida Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases. Each patient underwent a high-resolution targeting study on the day prior to the surgery, which was fused with a high resolution CT scan that was acquired on the day of the procedure. Intraoperative target location was selected using a digitized 3D Schaltenbrand-Bailey atlas. All patients underwent a high-resolution head CT scan without contrast approximately one month after lead implantation and accurate measurement of neuroanatomical lead position was acquired after fusion of pre-operative and post-operative image studies. Results: We analyzed 253 PD patients with 352 leads and 80 dystonia patients with 141 leads. During 15 years of follow-up, lead locations in the PD group migrated more laterally (ß = 0.09, p < 0.0001), posteriorly [slope (ß) = 0.04, p < 0.05], and dorsally (ß = 0.07, p < 0.001), whereas leads in the dystonia group did not significantly change position aside from a trend in the dorsal direction (ß = 0.06, p = 0.053). Conclusion: The evolving target likely results from multiple factors including improvements in targeting techniques and clinical feedback intraoperatively and post-operatively. Our demonstrates the potential importance of a systematic post-operative DBS lead measurement protocol to ensure quality control and to inform and optimize DBS programming.

Unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor demonstrates long-term ipsilateral effects.

INTRODUCTION: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of thalamus in essential tremor (ET) is effective for the treatment of contralateral tremors. Bilateral DBS controls tremors on both sides but is associated with increased morbidity and risks. We evaluated if unilateral surgery had ipsilateral benefits on tremors and thus could be a potentially safer alternative to bilateral DBS. METHODS: Medication refractory ET patients undergoing unilateral thalamic DBS were included and longitudinally followed. Tremor rating scale was used to record total motor, arm tremor and activities of daily living (ADL) scores at baseline, six months and at last visit (three or more years after surgery). Postoperative scores were recorded with DBS turned OFF and ON. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with a mean follow-up 3.4 ± 0.14 years were enrolled. When baseline scores were compared to scores with the DBS turned ON, significant improvements were noted in total tremor (40%), ADL (67%) and arm tremor scores both on the ipsilateral and the contralateral side at six months and at the last visit of follow-up (all p < 0.05). Ipsilateral arm tremor (∼56%) improvements were milder compared to the contralateral side (∼73%) tremors. CONCLUSION: Unilateral thalamic DBS in ET demonstrates significant long-term benefits for ipsilateral arm tremors and can be offered to higher risk and to select patients.