MRI-based contrast clearance analysis shows high differentiation accuracy between radiation-induced reactions and progressive disease after cranial radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Pseudoprogression (PsP) or radiation necrosis (RN) may frequently occur after cranial radiotherapy and show a similar imaging pattern compared with progressive disease (PD). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-based contrast clearance analysis (CCA) in this clinical setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with equivocal imaging findings after cranial radiotherapy were consecutively included into this monocentric prospective study. CCA was carried out by software-based automated subtraction of imaging features in late versus early T1-weighted sequences after contrast agent application. Two experienced neuroradiologists evaluated CCA with respect to PsP/RN and PD being blinded for histological findings. The radiological assessment was compared with the histopathological results, and its accuracy was calculated statistically. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients were included; 16 (48.5%) were treated because of a primary brain tumor (BT), and 17 (51.1%) because of a secondary BT. In one patient, CCA was technically infeasible. The accuracy of CCA in predicting the histological result was 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.95; one-sided P = 0.051; n = 32]. Sensitivity and specificity of CCA were 0.93 (95% CI 0.66-1.00) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.52-0.94), respectively. The accuracy in patients with secondary BTs was 0.94 (95% CI 0.71-1.00) and nonsignificantly higher compared with patients with primary BT with an accuracy of 0.73 (95% CI 0.45-0.92), P = 0.16. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, CCA was a highly accurate, easy, and helpful method for distinguishing PsP or RN from PD after cranial radiotherapy, especially in patients with secondary tumors after radiosurgical treatment.

Mortality after mechanical thrombectomy in anterior circulation stroke may be higher at nighttime and on weekends.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcome and procedural differences of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) during on-call with regular operating hours. We particularly focused on dosimetric data which may serve as potential surrogates for patient outcome. METHODS: A total of 246 consecutive patients who underwent MT in acute anterior circulation stroke between November 2017 and March 2020 were retrospectively included. Patients treated (1) during standard operational hours (n = 102), (2) daytime on-call duty (n = 38) and (3) nighttime on-call duty (n = 106) were compared with respect to their pre-interventional status, procedural specifics, including dosimetrics (dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time and procedural time), and outcome. RESULTS: The collectives treated outside the regular operational hours showed an increased in-hospital mortality (standard operational hours 7% (7/102), daytime on-call duty 16% (6/38), nighttime on-call duty 20% (21/106), p = 0.02). Neither the dosimetric parameters nor baseline characteristics other procedural specifics and outcome parameters differed significantly between groups (p > 0.05 each). In most cases (> 90%), a successful reperfusion was achieved (TICI ≥ 2b). CONCLUSIONS: We found an increased in-hospital mortality in patients admitted at night and during weekends which was not explained by technical aspects of MT. KEY POINTS: • There is an increased mortality of stroke patients admitted at night and on weekends. • This is not explained by technical aspects of mechanical thrombectomy. • There were no statistical differences in the comparison of parameters linked to the radiation exposure, such as DAP, fluoroscopy time and procedure time.

Assessment and treatment planning of lateral intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas in 3 T MRI and DSA: A detailed analysis under consideration of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) and ce-MRA sequences.

OBJECTIVES: The current gold standard in the assessment of lateral intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (LDAVF) is digital subtraction angiography (DSA). However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive emerging tool for the evaluation of such lesions. The aim of our study was to compare the DSA to our 3 T MR-imaging protocol including a highly spatial resolved (ce-MRA) and a temporal resolved ("time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics", TRICKS) contrast-enhanced MR angiography to evaluate if solely DSA can remain the gold-standard imaging modality for the treatment planning of LDAVF. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed matched pairs of DSA and 3 T MRI examinations of 24 patients with LDAVF (03/2008-04/2014) by the same list of relevant criteria for an endovascular LDAVF treatment planning. In particular, we determined intermodality agreement for the Cognard classification, the identifeication of arterial feeders, and the detailed assessment of each venous drainage pattern. RESULTS: Intermodality agreement for the Cognard classification was excellent (ĸ = 1.0). Whereas MRI failed in identifying small arterial feeders, it was superior to the DSA in the assessment of the sinus and the venous drainage pattern. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of MRI and DSA is the new gold standard in LDAVF treatment planning. KEY POINTS: • DSA is superior to the MRI in detecting LDAVF arterial feeders. • MRI excellently evaluates the venous side of an LDAVF. • MRI can replace DSA in initial diagnosis and monitoring of LDAVF. • MRI and DSA combined are the new gold standard in LDAVF treatment planning.