Efficacy of antimicrobial and nutraceutical treatment for canine acute diarrhoea: A systematic review and meta-analysis for European Network for Optimization of Antimicrobial Therapy (ENOVAT) guidelines.

Systemic antimicrobial treatments are commonly prescribed to dogs with acute diarrhoea, while nutraceuticals (prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics) are frequently administered as an alternative treatment. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of antimicrobials and nutraceutical preparations for treatment of canine acute diarrhoea (CAD). The results of this study will be used to create evidence-based treatment guidelines. PICOs (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) were generated by a multidisciplinary expert panel taking into account opinions from stakeholders (general practitioners and dog owners). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. The systematic search yielded six randomised controlled trials (RCT) for antimicrobial treatment and six RCTs for nutraceutical treatment meeting the eligibility criteria. Categories of disease severity (mild, moderate, and severe) were created based on the presence of systemic signs and response to fluid therapy. Outcomes included duration of diarrhoea, duration of hospitalization, progression of disease, mortality, and adverse effects. High certainty evidence showed that antimicrobial treatment did not have a clinically relevant effect on any outcome in dogs with mild or moderate disease. Certainty of evidence was low for dogs with severe disease. Nutraceutical products did not show a clinically significant effect in shortening the duration of diarrhoea (based on very low to moderate certainty evidence). No adverse effects were reported in any of the studies.

The International Consortium on Primary Graft Dysfunction: Redefining Clinical Risk Factors in the Contemporary Era of Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality early after heart transplantation (HT). The International Consortium on PGD is a multicenter collaboration dedicated to identifying the clinical risk factors for PGD in the contemporary era of HT. The objectives of the current report were (1) to assess the incidence of severe PGD in an international cohort; (2) to evaluate the performance of the most strongly validated PGD risk tool, the RADIAL score, in a contemporary cohort; and (3) to redefine clinical risk factors for severe PGD in the current era of HT. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study of consecutive adult HT recipients between 2010 and 2020 in 10 centers in the United States, Canada and Europe. Patients with severe PGD were compared to those without severe PGD (comprising those with no, mild and moderate PGD). The RADIAL score was calculated for each transplant recipient. The discriminatory power of the RADIAL score was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and its calibration was assessed by plotting the percentage of PGD predicted vs that which was observed. To identify clinical risk factors associated with severe PGD, we performed multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression modeling to account for among-center variability. RESULTS: A total of 2746 patients have been enrolled in the registry to date, including 2015 (73.4%) from North America, and 731 (26.6%) from Europe; 215 participants (7.8%) met the criteria for severe PGD. There was an increase in the incidence of severe PGD over the study period (P value for trend by difference sign test = 0.004). The Kaplan-Meier estimate for 1-year survival was 75.7% (95% CI 69.4-80.9%) in patients with severe PGD as compared to 94.4% (95% CI 93.5-95.2%) in those without severe PGD (log-rank P value < 0.001). The RADIAL score performed poorly in our contemporary cohort and was not associated with severe PGD; it had an AUC of 0.53 (95% CI 0.48-0.58). In the multivariable regression model, acute preoperative dialysis (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.31-4.43), durable left ventricular assist device support (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.13-2.77), and total ischemic time (OR 1.20 for each additional hour, 95% CI 1.02-1.41) were associated with an increased risk of severe PGD. CONCLUSIONS: Our consortium has identified an increasing incidence of PGD in the modern transplant era. We identified contemporary risk factors for this early post-transplant complication, which confers a high mortality risk. These results may enable the identification of patients at high risk for developing severe PGD in order to inform peri-transplant donor and recipient management practices.