Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for high-risk cardiac catheterisation procedures.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides circulatory or respiratory support, or both, to patients with severe but potentially reversible cardiac or respiratory failure refractory to standard therapy. The use of ECMO in the paediatric cardiac surgical population is established. Likewise, the use of ECMO for severe adult respiratory failure has recently been established and has been the subject of recent clinical trials. However, its use as a means of cardiac support in the adult population is not routine in clinical practice. We herein review the indications, technical procedure, complications and outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as pertinent to cardiac disease in general, and specifically, to catheter-based interventions. We describe two cases of high-risk cardiac catheterisation laboratory procedures performed with veno-arterial ECMO support in adult patients who were deemed to be at unacceptably high risk for conventional open-heart surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass.

Massive intraoperative pulmonary embolism: it may not be as bad as it looks....

An elderly patient suffered a cardiac arrest while undergoing repair of a pathological femoral fracture. Intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography demonstrated massive pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary embolectomy was considered inappropriate in view of her underlying terminal disease, so a decision was made to withdraw all further supportive measures. Despite this, the patient's haemodynamics improved spontaneously. The embolic material was presumed to be bone marrow fat. Fat may traverse the pulmonary circulation; hence the clinical consequences (and management implications) of massive intraoperative pulmonary embolism may vary, depending on the composition of the embolic material. As there are no reliable means of determining the composition of embolic material intraoperatively, the clinical suspicion of fat embolism poses a management dilemma. Should these cases be managed surgically or conservatively?

The impact of intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography on an unselected cardiac surgical population: a review of 2343 cases.

Although intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) has an established role in the management of some cardiac surgical procedures, there is little data on its impact on coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) cases that are stratified for clinical risk. This is a retrospective review of the surgical impact of intraoperative TOE on 2,343 unselected cardiac cases. The surgical impact of TOE findings were rated E (essential)--resulted in changes to the proposed surgical procedure or V (valuable)--the surgical technique for the planned surgery was altered. The surgical impact that routine TOE had on low-, medium- and high-risk CABG cases was also examined. The surgical impact of TOE for the total study population (E + V) was 4.5%. The impact was greatest in combined CABG + mitral valve procedures (18%). The impact in CABG cases was 3.5% overall, with an estimated impact in low-risk patients of 2.8% (95% CI. 2.7-3.0%) versus 6.7% (95% CI. 5.9-7.7%) in high-risk cases. The commonest E-impact in CABG patients was unscheduled valve surgery (2.6% of high-risk patients). The complication rate attributable to TOE was 0.09%. These findings provide indirect evidence for a potential patient benefit from the routine use of TOE in cardiac surgery.

Scottish adjuvant tamoxifen trial: a randomized study updated to 15 years.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The Scottish Adjuvant Tamoxifen Trial (main trial) was initiated in April 1978 to assess the effect of tamoxifen given to patients with breast cancer immediately after mastectomy (or mastectomy plus radiation therapy) (adjuvant arm) or only after the patients had had a relapse (control arm); 1323 patients were randomly assigned (667 to the adjuvant arm and 656 to the control arm). Results have been reported for the follow-up period from 2.5 through 8 years. In this article, we report updated results after a median follow-up of 15 years. If agreeable and eligible, patients who were disease free at 5 years in the adjuvant arm of the main trial were entered into a duration trial and randomly assigned either to stop taking tamoxifen (169 patients) or to continue taking it indefinitely until relapse or death (173 patients). For this update, we analyzed information on death, recurrence, survival, and other malignancies for all but 21 of the 560 living patients from the original and duration trials to determine the probabilities of total survival, systemic relapse of disease, and death from breast cancer. All statistical tests are two-sided. RESULTS: The beneficial effect of adjuvant tamoxifen given for 5 years on the probability of total survival (P =.006), systemic relapse (P =.007), and death from breast cancer (P =.002) has been maintained through 15 years. No additional benefit was observed in those randomly assigned to continue taking tamoxifen beyond 5 years. CONCLUSION: Information from this study suggests that, if adjuvant tamoxifen is given to women with operable breast cancer, it need not be for more than 5 years.

Pathology characteristics that optimize outcome prediction of a breast screening trial.

The ability of pathology characteristics to predict outcome was tested with the 1029 cancers accumulated in the Edinburgh Randomized Trial of breast screening after 14 years follow-up. The majority (55.7%) were in the screening arm, which also had more operable cases (81.3% vs 62.2%); the reduction in the proportion of inoperable breast cancers in a UK female population invited to mammographic screening is a notable effect of the trial. In the 691 operable invasive cases the size, histological type, grade, node status and node number group individually showed highly significant (P<0.001) association with survival. In multivariate analysis the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) derived from these features showed highly significant association with survival (P<0.001). However, when first adjusted for NPI, combined addition of pathological size in 6 categories and histological type as special or not had an independent association with survival that was statistically firmly based (P<0.001). For operable breast cancer the gains are in smaller sizes, better histological features, and higher proportion node negative. The weighting factors applied to pathology indicators of survival in the NPI are not optimal for a population included in a trial of screening. In particular, a linear trend of the index with pathological size is not appropriate. Inclusion of histological type as special or not improves the index further.

14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: The Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening recruited women aged 45-64 years from 1978 to 1981 (cohort 1), and those aged 45-49 years during 1982-85 (cohorts 2 and 3). Results based on 14 years of follow-up and 270,000 woman-years of observation are reported. METHODS: Breast-cancer mortality rates in the intervention group (28,628 women offered screening) were compared with those in the control group (26,026) with adjustment for socioeconomic status (SES) of general medical practices. Rate ratios were derived by means of logistic regression for the total trial population and for women first offered screening while younger than 50 years. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Initial unadjusted results showed a difference of just 13% in breast-cancer mortality rates between the intervention and control groups (156 deaths [5.18 per 10,000] vs 167 [6.04 per 10,000]; rate ratio 0.87 [95% CI 0.70-1.06]), but the results were influenced by differences in SES by trial group. After adjustment for SES, the rate ratio was 0.79 (95% CI 0.60-1.02). When deaths after diagnosis more than 3 years after the end of the study were censored the rate ratio became 0.71 (0.53-0.95). There was no evidence of heterogeneity by age at entry and no evidence that younger entrants had smaller or delayed benefit (rate ratio 0.70 [0.41-1.20]). No breast-cancer mortality benefit was observed for women whose breast cancers were diagnosed when they were younger than 50 years. Other-cause mortality rates did not differ by trial group when adjusted for SES. INTERPRETATION: Our findings confirm results from randomised trials in Sweden and the USA that screening for breast cancer lowers breast-cancer mortality. Similar results are reported by the UK geographical comparison, UK Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer. The results for younger women suggest benefit from introduction of screening before 50 years of age.

Primary systemic therapy for operable breast cancer--10-year survival data after chemotherapy and hormone therapy.

Between 1984 and 1990, 94 women presenting to the Edinburgh Breast Unit with operable breast cancer of 4 cm or greater in diameter (T2, T3, N0, N1, M0) were given preoperative systemic therapy. Initially, all women received hormone therapy, with CHOP (cyclophosphamide 1 g m(-2), doxorubicin 50 mg m(-2), vincristine 1.4 mg m(-2) to a maximum of 2 mg and prednisolone 40 mg per day orally for 5 days) chemotherapy being administered to those who failed to respond by 3 months. After April 1987, first-line hormone therapy was only offered to women with oestrogen receptor (ER)-moderate/-rich (> 20 fmol mg(-1) protein) tumours, and CHOP was reserved for those women whose tumours failed to respond to hormone therapy and for those with ER-negative/-poor tumours. Response data have been published previously (Anderson et al, 1991). After a median follow-up of 7.5 years, there is no difference in survival between those women given initial hormone therapy and those given chemotherapy, with neither group having yet reached its median survival. The two key factors that predicted for a poor survival were the number of involved axillary nodes after preoperative systemic therapy (P < 0.00001) and a lack of response to preoperative therapy (P < 0.05). These data suggest that many women with ER-moderate/-rich tumours will have a good prognosis after preoperative hormone therapy alone. However, it is possible to identify, by their post-systemic therapy axillary node status, a group of women who still have an appalling prognosis after preoperative chemotherapy or hormone therapy.

Randomised controlled trial of conservation therapy for breast cancer: 6-year analysis of the Scottish trial. Scottish Cancer Trials Breast Group.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether, when primary breast cancer is treated by local excision supported by systemic therapy appropriate to the oestrogen receptor status (ER) of the tumour, local radiotherapy can be avoided. METHODS: We carried out a randomised controlled trial in 585 patients aged less than 70 years with primary breast cancers of 4 cm or less in size in four specialist units and seven other hospitals in Scotland. After local excision of the tumour (1 cm margin) and an axillary lymph-node clearance or sample, all patients received systemic therapy with oral tamoxifen 20 mg daily or six 3-weekly intravenous bolus injections of cyclophosphamide 600 mg, methotrexate 50 mg, and fluorouracil 600 mg per m2, depending upon the ER concentration in the primary tumour. Patients were then randomly allocated to postoperative radical radiotherapy (50 Gy to breast with boost to the tumour bed) or to no further local treatment. The median follow-up of living patients was 5.7 years. The primary analysis was by intention to treat but since some patients did not receive systemic therapy appropriate to their ER status, a subsidiary analysis was restricted to 464 patients in whom all details of the protocol had been observed. FINDINGS: In the primary analysis survival was equal in the radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.67-1.44). Event-free survival showed an advantage in the irradiated patients (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.39-0.74), largely due to fewer loco-regional relapses (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.12-0.33). The relapse rate in the ipsilateral breast was 24.5% in the non-irradiated group and 5.8% following breast irradiation. The subsidiary analysis confirmed these findings and indicated the advantage of radiotherapy irrespective of ER concentration. There was a non-significant trend towards fewer distant metastases in the irradiated group. INTERPRETATION: After local excision of a primary breast cancer, we conclude that radiotherapy to the residual breast tissue is advisable even when selective adjuvant systemic therapy is given.

Randomised comparison of 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen with continuous therapy for operable breast cancer. The Scottish Cancer Trials Breast Group.

In 1985 a second randomisation was initiated for women in the treatment arm of the Scottish Tamoxifen Trial either to stop tamoxifen at 5 years or to continue indefinitely. A preliminary analysis of outcome in 342 patients at a median follow-up of 6 years suggests that a worthwhile gain in disease control from continuing adjuvant tamoxifen beyond 5 years is unlikely. [Hazard ratio for events (relapse or death without relapse) is 1.27, 95% CI = 0.87 - 1.85.] There is a suggestion that therapy for longer than 5 years may increase the risk of endometrial carcinoma (P = 0.064).

The Edinburgh randomized trial of axillary sampling or clearance after mastectomy.

Between January 1980 and October 1983, 417 patients were randomized for mastectomy followed by axillary node sampling or full axillary clearance. The aim of the study was to determine whether a standard 'four-node' axillary sample, followed by careful dissection of removed tissue, could accurately indicate the extent of local treatment required. Axillary radiotherapy was given only to patients with histological involvement of sampled nodes and not to any having axillary clearance. The incidence of involved nodes was similar for both groups, as were distant relapse and survival rates. Currently 62.6 percent are alive after clearance and 65.0 percent after sampling. A non-significant increase in the rate of locoregional relapse was observed for those treated by axillary node clearance, this being due mainly to increased relapse on the unirradiated chest wall (clearance 21 percent versus sampling 12 percent in patients with node-positive disease). There was only a minor difference in axillary relapse, favouring axillary clearance (3.0 versus 5.4 percent). In patients with operable breast cancer, mastectomy with axillary node sampling gives equal control to mastectomy with axillary node clearance but, as morbidity is greater, surgical clearance of the axilla is the preferred option.

Cardiac and vascular morbidity in women receiving adjuvant tamoxifen for breast cancer in a randomised trial. The Scottish Cancer Trials Breast Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine any cardiac or vascular morbidity associated with long term treatment with tamoxifen given after mastectomy for primary breast cancer. DESIGN: Cohort study using linkage between database of a randomised trial and statistics of Scottish hospital inpatients to identify episodes of cardiac and vascular morbidity. SETTING: NHS hospitals in Scotland. SUBJECTS: 1312 women who had undergone mastectomy for breast cancer and who were randomised either to a treatment group to receive adjuvant tamoxifen or to a control group to be given tamoxifen only on first relapse of disease. Maximum duration of tamoxifen treatment was 14 years. Total woman years of follow up were 9943. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Randomised and observational comparisons of risk (expressed as hazard ratios) of myocardial infarction, other cardiac event, cerebrovascular disease, or thromboembolic event according to treatment allocated and between nonusers, former users, and current users of tamoxifen. RESULTS: Use of tamoxifen was associated with lower rates of myocardial infarction. Hazard ratio for women in control group was 1.92 (95% confidence interval 0.99 to 3.73) compared with women allocated to adjuvant treatment. The association was stronger for current use: hazard ratio for non-users was 3.49 (1.52 to 8.03) compared with current users. Current users of tamoxifen, however, had higher rates of thromboembolic events:hazard ratio for non-users was 0.40 (0.18 to 0.90) compared with current users. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide further evidence that tamoxifen reduces the risk of myocardial infarction. Thromboembolic events should be carefully monitored in trials of tamoxifen, particularly those of prophylactic treatment, in which tamoxifen is given to healthy women.

Adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil for breast cancer of likely poor prognosis: 15-year results of a randomized trial.

In a trial conducted in southeast Scotland between April 1974 and December 1979, 332 women with invasive breast cancer of Stage I and II with histological evidence of node involvement, or who had operable or inoperable Stage III disease, were randomized, after primary local therapy (mastectomy, node biopsy and radiotherapy for all except the inoperable disease patients who underwent radiotherapy alone) to receive 12 4-weekly intravenous injections of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 700 mg/m2 or no systemic therapy. After a median follow-up of 15 years from randomization, no difference is shown between the two groups in terms of distant relapse (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.02; 95% CI 0.78-1.32), event free survival (HR = 1.23; 95% CI 0.97-1.56), or total survival (HR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.93-1.52). Locoregional relapse is significantly reduced by 5-FU administration (HR = 1.88; 95% CI 1.20-2.96). The results are similar for the trial as a whole or when mastectomy patients are considered alone. Toxicity was minimal with marrow suppression in only 19 of 147 patients receiving more than one injection; only five patients discontinued therapy due to nausea and vomiting. However, retrosternal pain occurred in 16 patients, nine of whom had their treatment curtailed as a result. Seventy-seven per cent of patients have died, the majority from breast cancer. Only 1.2% of deaths are considered attributable to cardiac causes of 5-FU is not associated with excess cardiac deaths in these patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The Edinburgh randomised trial of breast cancer screening: results after 10 years of follow-up.

The Edinburgh Randomised Trial of Breast Cancer Screening recruited 44,288 women aged 45-64 years into the initial cohort of the trial during 1978-81, and 10 years of follow-up is now complete. A total of 22,944 women were randomised into the study group and were offered screening for 7 years; the remaining women formed the control group. After 10 years, breast cancer mortality is 14-21% lower in the study group than in the controls depending on the precise definition of the end point. These differences are not statistically significant; for breast cancer as the underlying cause of death the relative risk is 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.61-1.11). Rates of locally advanced and metastatic cancer were substantially lower in the study group, but screening has failed to achieve marked reductions in rates of small node-positive cancers. Those women who accepted the final invitation to screening have been monitored over the 3 year period prior to their first screen under the UK service screening programme. Interval cases, expressed as a proportion of the control incidence, increased from 12% in the first year to 67% in the third year. The reduction in breast cancer mortality for older women (aged at least 50 years) is the same as that for the total study group for this duration of follow-up. For analyses of breast cancer mortality in younger women updates recruited to the trial from 1982 to 1985 (10,383 women with 6-8 years' follow-up) have been included. The reduction in breast cancer mortality for women aged 45-49 years at entry was 22% (relative risk = 0.78, 95% confidence interval = 0.46-1.31).

The management of operable breast cancer in Scotland surgeons' opinions. The Scottish Cancer Trials Breast Group.

This report gives the responses of general surgeons in Scotland to two questionnaires. Satisfactory rates were obtained: 82% for the more detailed survey in 1988 and 62% for the second survey (1991), where nonrespondents were not followed up. In 1988 the rationale was the poor participation in the Scottish breast conservation trial while the 1991 survey further investigated the diversity of surgical opinion identified in the first. The limited trial support in 1988 was mainly due to reluctance to accept all treatment options. The majority were prepared to consider trial participation although 47% believed this compromised doctor-patient relationships. Although breast-conserving therapy was widely supported, many different views on management were encountered, both in the degree of influence of specific factors and in the decisions taken in relation to them. We believe these surveys have re-inforced a need for management guidelines, particularly as around half the patients with symptomatic breast cancer were being treated in non-specialist units.

Interval cancers and sensitivity in the screening centres of the UK trial of early detection of breast cancer.

The incidence rates of interval cancers following a negative breast screen in two screening centres which offered women aged 45-64 annual screening by mammography and/or clinical examination are examined. Sensitivity of screening is estimated by comparing the incidence rate of interval cancers with that expected in the absence of screening, and the results are compared with those from alternative methods of calculating sensitivity. The incidence rate of cancers diagnosed within 12 months of a negative screen by mammography plus clinical examination was reduced by 70% for women aged 45-54, and 84% for women aged 55+. There is no indication from this that sensitivity in the UK trial was substantially lower than in other studies which have achieved larger reductions in mortality.