Testing preload responsiveness by the tidal volume challenge assessed by the photoplethysmographic perfusion index.

BACKGROUND: To detect preload responsiveness in patients ventilated with a tidal volume (Vt) at 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight (PBW), the Vt-challenge consists in increasing Vt from 6 to 8 mL/kg PBW and measuring the increase in pulse pressure variation (PPV). However, this requires an arterial catheter. The perfusion index (PI), which reflects the amplitude of the photoplethysmographic signal, may reflect stroke volume and its respiratory variation (pleth variability index, PVI) may estimate PPV. We assessed whether Vt-challenge-induced changes in PI or PVI could be as reliable as changes in PPV for detecting preload responsiveness defined by a PLR-induced increase in cardiac index (CI) ≥ 10%. METHODS: In critically ill patients ventilated with Vt = 6 mL/kg PBW and no spontaneous breathing, haemodynamic (PICCO2 system) and photoplethysmographic (Masimo-SET technique, sensor placed on the finger or the forehead) data were recorded during a Vt-challenge and a PLR test. RESULTS: Among 63 screened patients, 21 (33%) were excluded because of an unstable PI signal and/or atrial fibrillation and 42 were included. During the Vt-challenge in the 16 preload responders, CI decreased by 4.8 ± 2.8% (percent change), PPV increased by 4.4 ± 1.9% (absolute change), PIfinger decreased by 14.5 ± 10.7% (percent change), PVIfinger increased by 1.9 ± 2.6% (absolute change), PIforehead decreased by 18.7 ± 10.9 (percent change) and PVIforehead increased by 1.0 ± 2.5 (absolute change). All these changes were larger than in preload non-responders. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) for detecting preload responsiveness was 0.97 ± 0.02 for the Vt-challenge-induced changes in CI (percent change), 0.95 ± 0.04 for the Vt-challenge-induced changes in PPV (absolute change), 0.98 ± 0.02 for Vt-challenge-induced changes in PIforehead (percent change) and 0.85 ± 0.05 for Vt-challenge-induced changes in PIfinger (percent change) (p = 0.04 vs. PIforehead). The AUROC for the Vt-challenge-induced changes in PVIforehead and PVIfinger was significantly larger than 0.50, but smaller than the AUROC for the Vt-challenge-induced changes in PPV. CONCLUSIONS: In patients under mechanical ventilation with no spontaneous breathing and/or atrial fibrillation, changes in PI detected during Vt-challenge reliably detected preload responsiveness. The reliability was better when PI was measured on the forehead than on the fingertip. Changes in PVI during the Vt-challenge also detected preload responsiveness, but with lower accuracy.

The Effect of PEEP on Pulmonary Vascular Resistance Depends on Lung Recruitability in ARDS Patients.

Rationale. A U-shape relationship should exist between lung volume and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), with minimal PVR at functional residual capacity. Thus, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) should increase PVR if it induces significant lung distension compared to recruitment. However, this has never been proven in patients. Objectives. To study the effects of PEEP on PVR according to lung recruitability, evaluated by the recruitment-to-inflation (R/I) ratio. Methods. In patients with ARDS, we measured hemodynamic (pulmonary artery catheter), echocardiographic and ventilatory variables (including esophageal pressure), at both low PEEP and higher PEEP by 10 cmH2O. Preload responsiveness was assessed by the passive leg raising test at high PEEP. Measurements and Main Results. We enrolled 23 patients, including 10 low recruiters (R/I <0.5) and 13 high recruiters (R/I ≥0.5). Raising PEEP from 4 (2-5) to 14 (12-15) cmH2O increased PVR in low recruiters (from 160 (120-297) to 243 (166-380) dyn.s/cm5, p<0.01), while PVR was unchanged in high recruiters (from 224 (185-289) to 235 (168-300) dyn.s/cm5, p=0.55). Right-to-left ventricular end-diastolic areas ratio simultaneously increased in low recruiters (from 0.54 (0.50-0.59) to 0.64 (0.56-0.70), p<0.01), while remaining stable in high recruiters (from 0.70 (0.65-0.79) to 0.68 (0.58-0.80), p=0.48). Raising PEEP decreased cardiac index only in preload responsive patients. Conclusions. PEEP increases PVR only when it induces significant lung distension compared to recruitment according to the recruitment-to-inflation ratio. Tailoring PEEP on this recruitability index should mitigate its hemodynamic effects.

Clinical significance of thrombocytopenia in patients with septic shock: An observational retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Whether thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients accounts for a bystander of severity or drives specific complications is unclear. We addressed the effect of thrombocytopenia on septic shock, with emphasis on intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired bleeding, infections and thrombotic complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective (2008-2019) single-center study of patients with septic shock. Thrombocytopenia was assessed over the first seven days and was defined as severe (nadir <50 G/L), mild (nadir 50-150 G/L) and relative (30% decrease with nadir >150 G/L). Outcomes were ICU mortality and ICU-acquired complications defined by severe bleeding, infections and thrombotic events during the ICU stay. RESULTS: The study comprised 1024 patients. Severe, mild and relative thrombocytopenia occurred in 33%, 40% and 9% of patients. The in-ICU mortality rate was 27%, independently associated with severe thrombocytopenia. ICU-acquired infections, hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications occurred in 27.5%, 13.3% and 11.6% of patients, respectively. Patients with severe, mild or relative thrombocytopenia exhibited higher incidences of bleeding events (20.3%, 15.3% and 14.4% vs. 3.6% in non-thrombocytopenic, p < 0.001), infections (35.2%, 21.9% and 33.3% vs. 23.1% in non-thrombocytopenic, p < 0.001) and thrombotic events (14.6%, 10.8% and 17.8% vs. 7.8% in non-thrombocytopenic, p = 0.03). Only severe thrombocytopenia remained independently associated with increased risk of bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Severe thrombocytopenia was independently associated with ICU mortality and increased risk of bleeding, but not with infectious and thrombotic events.