Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pediatr ; 221: 165-173.e2, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32446476

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the 11-year incidence trend of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at and after the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study using a population-based administrative cohort diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at <20 years of age from 2002 to 2012 in British Columbia, Canada. DKA at (1 episode per individual) and DKA after (multiple episodes per individual) the diagnosis of diabetes were defined as DKA occurring ≤14 days or >14 days, respectively, from diagnosis, identified using International Classification of Diseases,9th and 10theditions codes. Incidence rate ratios were estimated using Poisson regression and DKA trends using Joinpoint regression analyses. RESULTS: There were 1519 individuals (mean age at first-DKA, 12.6 ± 5.9 years; 50% male) with ≥1 DKA episode identified. Of 2615 incident cases of type 1 diabetes, there were 847 (32.4%; mean age, 9.9 ± 4.8 years; 52% male) episodes of DKA at the diagnosis of diabetes. Among prevalent cases of type 1 diabetes (1790 cases in 2002 increasing to 2264 in 2012), there were 1886 episodes of DKA after the diagnosis of diabetes (mean age at first DKA, 15.7 ± 5.2 years). The rates per 100 person-years of DKA at diabetes diagnosis (ranging from 24.1 in 2008 to 37.3 in 2006) and DKA after diabetes diagnosis (ranging from 4.9 in 2002 to 7.7 in 2008) remained stable. Females showed a 67% higher rate of incidence of DKA after the diagnosis of diabetes compared with their male counterparts (incidence rate ratio, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.50-1.86; P < .001), adjusted for the temporal trend by fiscal year. Younger age at diagnosis (<5 years) was associated with a greater risk of DKA at the time of diabetes diagnosis and older children (≥10 years) had a greater risk of DKA after the diagnosis of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of DKA at the time of diagnosis of diabetes was greater with younger age and the risk of DKA after the diagnosis of diabetes was higher in females and older children and youth.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Cetoacidose Diabética/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Distribuição por Idade , Colúmbia Britânica/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Pediatr ; 220: 101-108.e2, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32044100

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical impact of a congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) newborn screening program and incremental costs relative to benefits in screened vs unscreened infants. We hypothesized that screening would lead to clinical benefits and would be cost effective. STUDY DESIGN: This was an ambispective cohort study at British Columbia Children's Hospital, including infants diagnosed with CAH from 1988-2008 and 2010-2018. Data were collected retrospectively (unscreened cohort) and prospectively (screened cohort). Outcome measures included hospitalization, medical transport, and resuscitation requirements. The economic analysis was performed using a public payer perspective. RESULTS: Forty unscreened and 17 screened infants were diagnosed with CAH (47% vs 53% male). Median days to positive screen was 6 and age at diagnosis was 5 days (range, 0-30 days) and 6 days (range, 0-13 days) in unscreened and screened populations, respectively. In unscreened newborns, 55% required transport to a tertiary care hospital, 85% required hospitalization, and 35% required a fluid bolus compared with 29%, 29%, and 12% in screened infants, respectively. The cost of care was $33 770 per case in unscreened vs $17 726 in screened newborns. In the screened cohort, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $290 in the best case analysis and $4786 in the base case analysis, per hospital day avoided. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with unscreened newborns, those screened for CAH were less likely to require medical transport and had shorter hospital stays. Screening led to a decrease in hospitalization costs. Although screening did not result in cost savings, it was assessed to be cost effective considering the clinical benefits and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.


Assuntos
Hiperplasia Suprarrenal Congênita/diagnóstico , Hiperplasia Suprarrenal Congênita/economia , Triagem Neonatal/economia , Colúmbia Britânica , Estudos de Coortes , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Hidratação/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Transporte de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA