Laser in situ keratomileusis for undercorrection after radial keratotomy.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in treating residual myopia and/or astigmatism following refractive keratotomy. METHODS: Fourteen eyes that had previously undergone radial and/or arcuate keratotomy were included. The surgeries were performed using the Chiron Automated Microkeratome and the VISX 20/20B excimer laser. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 12.64+/-5.02 months. Mean spherical equivalent refraction was reduced from -3.48+/-3.52 D preoperatively to -0.04+/-0.87 D postoperatively. At the last follow-up examination there were 8 eyes (57.1%) with a refraction within+/-0.50 D, and 10 eyes (71.4%) within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 4 eyes (28.6%) and 20/40 or better in 10 eyes (71.4%). Vector analysis of the astigmatic correction showed an index of success of 80%. There was no significant loss (> or = or =2 lines) of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. We observed interface epithelial ingrowth in one eye. CONCLUSIONS: The correction of residual myopia and/or astigmatism with LASIK in eyes with prior refractive keratotomy proved to be safe and effective. Careful preoperative evaluation may help to avoid complications such as reopening of incisions during surgery or postoperative ingrowth of epithelium beneath the corneal flap.

Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct refractive errors after keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct refractive myopia, astigmatism, or both after keratoplasty. SETTING: Eye Clinic Day Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: Twenty-two eyes that had previously had corneal transplantation were studied. Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed using the Chiron automated microkeratome and the VISX Twenty-Twenty B excimer laser. RESULTS: Mean follow-up after LASIK was 10.09 months +/- 3.87 (SD). The spherical equivalent refraction dropped from -4.55 +/- 3.66 D before LASIK to -0.67 +/- 1.24 D after surgery. At the last examination, 72.7% of patients had a refractive error within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia and 54.5% had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Vector analysis of astigmatic correction showed an index of success of 54.0%. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was unchanged in 8 cases, improved in 9, and decreased in 5. Significant endothelial cell loss, keratoplasty wound dehiscence, and other serious complications did not develop in any eye. CONCLUSION: The correction of refractive error with LASIK in postkeratoplasty patients proved to be safe, effective, and predictable. Further studies with longer follow-up are needed to determine the method's clinical value.