Metformin therapy and risk of cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Diabetes treatments were related with either an increased or reduced risk of cancer. There is ongoing debate about a potential protective action of metformin. To summarize evidence on the association between metformin and risk of cancer and cancer mortality in patients with diabetes. DATA SOURCE: MEDLINE and EMBASE (January 1966-April 2012). We selected randomized studies comparing metformin and other hypoglycaemic agents and observational studies exploring the association between exposure to metformin and cancer. Outcomes were cancer mortality, all malignancies and site-specific cancers. RESULTS: Of 25307 citations identified, 12 randomized controlled trials (21,595 patients) and 41 observational studies (1,029,389 patients) met the inclusion criteria. In observational studies there was a significant association of exposure to metformin with the risk of cancer death [6 studies, 24,410 patients, OR:0.65, 95%CI: 0.53-0.80], all malignancies [18 studies, 561,836 patients, OR:0.73, 95%CI: 0.61-0.88], liver [8 studies, 312,742 patients, OR:0.34; 95%CI: 0.19-0.60] colorectal [12 studies, 871,365 patients, OR:0.83, 95%CI: 0.74-0.92], pancreas [9 studies, 847,248 patients, OR:0.56, 95%CI: 0.36-0.86], stomach [2 studies, 100701 patients, OR:0.83, 95%CI: 0.76-0.91], and esophagus cancer [2 studies, 100694 patients, OR:0.90, 95%CI: 0.83-0.98]. No significant difference of risk was observed in randomized trials. Metformin was not associated with the risk of: breast cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancer, uterus cancer, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, and melanoma. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Results suggest that Metformin might be associated with a significant reduction in the risk of cancer and cancer-related mortality. Randomized trials specifically designed to evaluate the efficacy of metformin as an anticancer agent are warranted.

Development and validation of a questionnaire evaluating the impact of hepatitis B immune globulin prophylaxis on the quality of life of liver transplant recipients.

To date, there is still a lack of instruments for specifically assessing the impact of anti-hepatitis B virus prophylaxis after liver transplantation (LT) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and treatment satisfaction. Focusing on the use of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG), we developed and validated the Immunoglobulin Therapy After Liver Transplantation Questionnaire (ITaLi-Q), which includes 41 items and covers 5 domains (side effects, positive and negative feelings, impact on the flexibility of daily activities, support, and satisfaction). The questionnaire was tested by 177 consecutive LT patients [71.8% were male, 38.4% were more than 60 years old, 58.8% were on intramuscular (IM) HBIG, and 41.2% were on intravenous (IV) HBIG]. A factor analysis confirmed the hypothesized structure, and a multitrait, multi-item analysis showed favorable psychometric characteristics for ITaLi-Q: item-scale correlations > 0.40 for all items but 1, high scaling success rates (>90% for all scales but 1), excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α ≥ 0.8 for all scales), and good reproducibility (test-retest coefficient > 0.70 for all scales but 2). ITaLi-Q was able to discriminate between subgroups of patients according to their clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. In comparison with patients on IV HBIG, patients on IM HBIG reported significantly better HRQOL scores on the Flexibility (81.5 ± 21.4 versus 73.1 ± 24.2, P = 0.01) and Negative Feelings scales (90.1 ± 17.3 versus 85.4 ± 20.7, P = 0.04), but they reported worse HRQOL scores on the Side Effects scale (81.8 ± 22.8 versus 95.6 ± 7.4, P < 0.001). No differences were found between the route of HBIG administration and the Satisfaction, Positive Feelings, Impact, and Support scales. In conclusion, ITaLi-Q showed adequate psychometric characteristics and revealed that the route of HBIG administration has a significant impact on specific HRQOL domains beyond a patient's satisfaction.

Adiponectin gene polymorphisms and their effect on the risk of myocardial infarction and type 2 diabetes: an association study in an Italian population.

OBJECTIVE: While many studies have shown an association between the gene coding for adiponectin (ADIPOQ) and adiponectin levels, much more controversy surrounds its association with metabolic traits such as insulin resistance, obesity and type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, very few studies have looked into the relations between ADIPOQ variants and risk of cardiovascular disease. The present study assessed the influence of four common ADIPOQ Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), rs17300539 (-11391G→A), rs266729 (-11377C→G), rs2241766 (+45T→G) and rs1501299 (+276G→T) on the risk of myocardial infarction and type 2 diabetes. METHODS: and RESULTS: A large genetic association case-control study was conducted in 2008 Italians, including patients with myocardial infarction, type 2 diabetes, or both, and a reference group of healthy controls. Homozygotes TT for the rs1501299 (+276) had half the risk of either myocardial infarction alone or in association with type 2 diabetes when compared to the carriers of the G allele (OR = 0.58, p =0.01, and OR = 0.55, p =0.006 respectively). SNPs rs17300539 (-11391), rs266729 (-11377) and rs2241766 (+45) showed no significant association with any of the three case groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that homozygotes TT for the adiponectin polymorphism rs1501299 (+276) are protected from the risk of myocardial infarction.

Common genetic variants on chromosome 9p21 are associated with myocardial infarction and type 2 diabetes in an Italian population.

BACKGROUND: A genomic region on chromosome 9p21 has been identified as closely associated with increased susceptibility to coronary artery disease (CAD) and to type 2 diabetes (T2D) although the evidence suggests that the genetic variants within chromosome 9p21 that contribute to CAD are different from those that contribute to T2D.We carried out an association case-control study in an Italian population to test the association between two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the 9p21 locus, rs2891168 and rs10811661, previously reported by the PROCARDIS study, and respectively myocardial infarction (MI) and T2D. Our aim was to confirm the previous findings on a larger sample and to verify the independence of their susceptibility effects: rs2891168 associated with MI but not with T2D and rs10811661 associated with T2D but not with MI. METHODS: Genomic DNA samples of 2407 Italians with T2D (602 patients), who had had a recent MI (600), or had both diseases (600) and healthy controls (605) were genotyped for the two SNPs. The genotypes were determined by allelic discrimination using a fluorescent-based TaqMan assay. RESULTS: SNP rs2891168 was associated with MI, but not with T2D and the G-allele odds ratio (OR) was 1.20 (95% CI 1.02-1.41); SNP rs10811661 was associated with T2D, but not with MI, and the T-allele OR was 1.27 (95% CI 1.04-1.55). ORs estimates from the present study and the PROCARDIS study were pooled and confirmed the previous findings, with greater precision. CONCLUSIONS: Our replication study showed that rs2891168 and rs10811661 are independently associated respectively with MI and T2D in an Italian population. Pooling our results with those reported by the PROCARDIS group, we also obtained a significant result of association with diabetes for rs10811661 in the European population.

Comorbidity affects the relationship between glycemic control and cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown mixed results regarding the effectiveness of intensive glucose-lowering therapy in reducing risk for cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether attaining hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) targets of 6.5% or less or 7.0% or less for glycemic control at baseline provides differential benefits for patients with high versus low-to-moderate levels of comorbidity. DESIGN: 5-year longitudinal observational study of patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients were categorized into high and low-to-moderate comorbidity subgroups by using the Total Illness Burden Index (TIBI), a validated patient-reported measure of comorbidity. SETTING: 101 diabetes outpatient clinics and 103 general practitioners' clinics in Italy. PATIENTS: 2613 (83%) of 3074 patients with type 2 diabetes, sampled randomly from diabetes outpatient clinic rosters and recruited consecutively from general practitioners' clinics, who completed the baseline questionnaire. MEASUREMENTS: TIBI score, total mortality, and incident cardiovascular events. Hazard ratios (HRs) were adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: Attaining an HbA(1c) level of 6.5% or less at baseline was associated with lower 5-year incidence of cardiovascular events in the low-to-moderate comorbidity subgroup (adjusted HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.85]; P = 0.005) but not in the high comorbidity subgroup (adjusted HR, 0.92 [CI, 0.68 to 1.25]; P = 0.61; P for subgroup by HbA(1c) interaction = 0.048). Similarly, attaining a baseline HbA(1c) level of 7.0% predicted fewer cardiovascular events in the low-to-moderate comorbidity subgroup (adjusted HR, 0.61 (CI, 0.44 to 0.83; P = 0.001) but not in the high comorbidity subgroup (adjusted HR, 0.88 [CI, 0.66 to 1.17]; P = 0.38; P for subgroup by HbA(1c) interaction = 0.093). LIMITATIONS: The observational nature of the study does not allow causal inference. The length of the data collection period was limited. Information on clinical management was not available. CONCLUSION: Patients with the high levels of comorbidity common in type 2 diabetes may receive diminished cardiovascular benefit from intensive blood glucose control. Comorbidity should be considered when tailoring glucose-lowering therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Pfizer of Italy.

Management of erectile dysfunction in general practice.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, the availability of effective oral pharmacological treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) has revolutionized its management; however, it is still unclear how everyday clinical practice has changed in response to this evolving scenario. AIM: The aim of this study is to describe general practitioners' (GPs) beliefs and attitudes toward the management of ED. METHODS: Each GP was asked to recruit consecutive men aged >or=18 years and sexually active, with already known erectile problems or with newly diagnosed ED. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: A written questionnaire was used to investigate GPs' sociodemographic characteristics and their beliefs toward the management of ED. RESULTS: Overall, 127 GPs (53.4%) returned the questionnaire and 124 enrolled patients for the study. Only 9.5% of the GPs reported routinely inquiring about ED of patients >40 years of age, whereas 45.7% did it only when the patient raised the problem. GPs' gender and age were associated with their beliefs about ED treatment and referral to specialist care. Overall, 932 patients were enrolled, of whom 38% had newly diagnosed ED. The problem came to light for initiative of patient in 80% of cases, and 84.8% of men were prescribed a treatment. Patients who on their own initiative discussed of their condition had an almost 3-fold increased probability to be treated than those whose GP began the discussion about ED (odds ratio [OR] = 2.6, confidence interval [CI] 95% 1.5-4.5). Patients followed by female physicians were significantly more likely to be referred to a specialist than those followed by male physicians (OR = 3.3, CI 95% 1.4-5.0). CONCLUSIONS: The management of ED has become an integral component of clinical practice in primary care. Nevertheless, barriers in addressing sexual issues still persist. Appropriate training is needed for a proactive approach to ED screening and management in men over 40s.

Quality of diabetes care predicts the development of cardiovascular events: results of the QuED study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In the context of the QuED Study we assessed whether a quality of care summary score was able to predict the development of cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The score was calculated using process and intermediate outcome indicators (HbA1c), blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, microalbuminuria) and ranged from 0 to 40. Overall, 3235 patients were enrolled, of whom 492 developed a CV event after a median follow-up of 5 years. The incidence rate (per 1000 person-years) of CV events was 62.4 in patients with a score < or =10, 54.8 in those with a score between 15 and 20, and 39.8 in those with a score >20. In adjusted multilevel regression models, the risk to develop a CV event was 89% greater in patients with a score of < or =10 (rate ratio [RR]=1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-2.50) and 43% higher in those with a score between 10 and 20 (RR=1.43; 95% CI 1.14-1.79), as compared to those with a score >20. A difference between centers of 5 points in the mean quality score was associated with a difference of 16% in CV event risk (RR=0.84; 95% CI 0.72-0.98). CONCLUSION: Our study documented for the first time a close relationship between a score of quality of diabetes care and long-term outcomes.

Identifying patients at risk for microalbuminuria via interaction of the components of the metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional analytic study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate correlates of risk for having microalbuminuria in individuals with one or more cardiovascular risk factors. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The study involved 1919 individuals who attended general practice settings, were aged 55 to 75 yr, and did not have a history of cardiovascular events or diabetes but had one or more cardiovascular risk factors. A tree-based regression technique and multivariate analysis were used to identify distinct, homogeneous subgroups of patients with different likelihood of having microalbuminuria; interaction between correlates of microalbuminuria and risk for microalbuminuria was also investigated. RESULTS: The prevalence of microalbuminuria was 5.9%. Patients who did not have hypertension and had postload glycemia < 140 mg/dl showed the lowest prevalence of microalbuminuria (1.9%) and represented the reference class. The likelihood of microalbuminuria was seven times higher in men with hypertension and homeostatic model assessment levels in the upper tertile and four times higher in women with the same characteristics. Individuals with hypertension and lower homeostatic model assessment levels and normotensive individuals with postload glycemia > or = 140 mg/dl had a more than three-fold increased likelihood of having microalbuminuria. Treatment with statins was associated with a 54% reduction in the likelihood of having microalbuminuria, whereas levels of triglycerides > 150 mg/dl and fibrinogen levels in the upper tertile were associated with a significantly higher risk for microalbuminuria. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of having microalbuminuria in a population-based study of elderly individuals is strongly related to the interaction between the components of the metabolic syndrome, particularly hypertension, insulin resistance, and impaired glucose tolerance.

Clinical and psychological predictors of incidence of self-reported erectile dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the predictors of the incidence of erectile dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and identified subgroups of patients in whom the interaction between clinical and psychological characteristics determined an increase in the risk of erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was based on 670 individuals. The presence of erectile dysfunction and the severity of depressive symptoms were investigated with a questionnaire filled in every 6 months for 3 years. Poisson regression was used to calculate incidence rates. To evaluate interactions among the different variables and identify distinct and homogeneous subgroups in terms of incidence of erectile dysfunction, RECursive Partitioning and AMalgamation method was used. RESULTS: Overall erectile dysfunction developed in 192 men with type 2 diabetes, with an incidence rate of 166.3 per 1,000 person-years. Age, insulin treatment, hemoglobin A1c greater than 8.0%, total cholesterol greater than 3.88 mmol/l and severity of depressive symptoms represented independent predictors of erectile dysfunction. RECursive Partitioning and AMalgamation analysis identified 5 classes with a marked variation in the risk of erectile dysfunction. Patients with low levels of depressive symptoms and hemoglobin A1c 8.0% or less showed the lowest risk of erectile dysfunction. Compared with this subgroup patients with higher levels of depressive symptoms and treated with insulin had a 3-fold risk of erectile dysfunction. Age, smoking, high cholesterol levels and neuropathy were globally predictive variables associated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of erectile dysfunction is predicted by modifiable risk factors. Even in diabetes, psychological problems can contribute to the pathogenesis of erectile dysfunction, in addition to organic causes.

Are Type 2 diabetic patients offered adequate foot care? The role of physician and patient characteristics.

In the context of a nationwide outcomes research program on Type 2 diabetes, we investigated physician and patient practices related to foot care. Patients filled in a questionnaire investigating whether they had received information about foot care, how often they had had their feet examined in the last year, and how often they usually checked their feet. Analyses were adjusted for patient case-mix and physician-level clustering. Overall, 3564 patients were recruited by 125 diabetes outpatient clinics (DOCs) and 103 general practitioners (GPs), of whom 6.8% suffered form lower limb complications. The presence of foot complications was correlated with insulin treatment, cigarette smoking, low levels of school education, and the presence of other diabetic complications. More than 50% of the patients reported that they had not had their feet examined by their physician and 28% referred that they had not received foot education. Patients with lower levels of school education and income, as well as overweight individuals, were less likely to receive foot education. Physicians tended to perform foot examination more often in males, low-income patients, those with foot complications, and those treated with insulin, but not in patients with the highest risk of foot complications, that is, those with diabetic neuropathy or peripheral vascular disease (PVD). GPs tended to perform foot examination less frequently than diabetologists do. Foot self-examination was not performed by 33% of the patients. Those individuals who had received foot education or had had their feet examined were more likely to check their feet regularly. A substantial proportion of Type 2 diabetic patients is not offered adequate foot care, even in the presence of major risk factors for lower limb complications. Patient knowledge and practices are strongly related to physicians' attitudes.

Twelve-year mortality results of a randomized trial of 2 versus 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen for postmenopausal early-stage breast carcinoma patients (SITAM 01).

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the impact on overall survival (OS) of 2 versus 5 years adjuvant tamoxifen in early breast carcinoma patients after 12 years of follow-up. METHODS: Women with breast carcinoma T1-3, N0-3, M0, aged 50-70 years, were eligible for this multicenter randomized Phase III trial. Patients event-free after 2 years of tamoxifen therapy (TAM) were randomly assigned to stop or continue TAM (20 mg/day) for an additional 3 years. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints included OS and toxicity. RESULTS: From 1989 through 1996, 1901 patients were randomly assigned either to stop treatment (n = 958) or to continue TAM (n = 943). Overall, 98% of patients alive at the previous report (n = 1611) had updated information about OS, of whom 549 had died. The median duration of postrandomization follow-up was 115 months (interquartile range, 86-137). No statistically significant differences between the two arms were detected in the whole population (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.22) and in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive patients (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.72-1.13). In the latter group, survival curves started to diverge after 90 months, showing a trend in favor of the 5-year arm. In younger (age < or =55 yrs) ER-positive patients longer TAM was associated with a 44% decrease in the risk of death (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.31-1.00), while no clear benefit was documented in women older than 55 years of age (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.77-1.25). CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of longer TAM on OS start to emerge only after 9 years from diagnosis and seem to be more relevant in younger ER-positive women.

Longitudinal assessment of quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes and self-reported erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: In the context of the QuED (Quality of Care and Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes) project, we evaluated the longitudinal changes over 3 years in quality of life (QoL) in patients with type 2 diabetes according to the presence or the development of erectile dysfunction (ED). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were requested to fill in a questionnaire investigating the presence of ED and QoL (SF-36 Health Survey, depression symptoms [Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression], and quality of sexual life) every 6 months for 3 years. The analyses were based on multilevel models, adjusted for patient clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: The study involved 1,456 patients, of whom 34% reported frequent erectile problems at baseline; 192 developed ED during the follow-up. No changes in QoL measures were detected in patients without ED; in those with ED at baseline, a worsening in all SF-36 scales was observed, reaching statistical significance for physical functioning (P = 0.03). Among patients who developed ED during the study, a deterioration in all SF-36 dimensions and a worsening in depressive symptoms preceded the development of ED. The onset of ED was associated with a further marked worsening in physical functioning (P = 0.0008), general health perception (P = 0.02), and social functioning (P = 0.04) on SF-36 subscales, as well as in the summary physical and mental components scores (P = 0.04 and P = 0.07, respectively). The development of ED was also associated with a highly significant increase in depressive symptoms (P = 0.001) and a marked decrease in quality of sexual life (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This longitudinal study documents for the first time the impact of ED onset on several aspects of QoL in patients with type 2 diabetes. The study also shows that QoL tended to further decrease during 3 years in patients with ED at baseline but not in those without this condition.

Use of the diabetes risk score for opportunistic screening of undiagnosed diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance: the IGLOO (Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Long-Term Outcomes Observational) study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an opportunistic screening strategy addressed to individuals with one or more cardiovascular risk factor, based on the Diabetes Risk Score (DRS) as the initial instrument, for the identification of individuals with type 2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The DRS, a simple self-administered questionnaire, was completed by individuals identified by general practitioners and presenting with one or more cardiovascular risk factor. All patients underwent a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The optimal DRS cutoff was calculated by applying the receiver-operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Overall, 1,377 individuals aged between 55 and 75 years received an OGTT and completed the DRS. Mean DRS values showed a marked variation according to glucose metabolism categories, as follows: 8.7 +/- 3.0 in normoglycemic individuals, 9.5 +/- 3.1 in individuals with impaired fasting glucose, 9.9 +/- 3.3 in individuals with IGT, and 12.0 +/- 3.5 in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The receiver-operating characteristic curve showed that, with a cutoff of 9, the sensitivity of DRS in detecting individuals with glucose abnormalities (type 2 diabetes or IGT) was 77% and the specificity 45%. The use of the DRS as an initial screening instrument, followed by the measurement of fasting blood glucose in individuals with a score > or =9 and by the OGTT in individuals with a fasting blood glucose between 5.6 and 6.9 mmol/l, would lead to the identification of 83% of the case subjects with type 2 diabetes and 57% of the case subjects with IGT, at a cost of an OGTT in 38% of the sample and a fasting blood glucose in 64%. CONCLUSIONS: The DRS can represent a valid inexpensive instrument for opportunistic screening and a useful alternative to indiscriminate fasting blood glucose measurement, not readily available in general practice.

Impact of physicians' beliefs and practices on cholesterol levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal assessment.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials demonstrate significant benefit from cholesterol management for patients with type 2 diabetes. The aim of this work was to explore the correlates of lipid management in patients with type 2 diabetes, including the subjective beliefs of physicians, setting of care, and patient-related factors. METHODS: This longitudinal outcomes research study involved 2359 patients with type 2 diabetes recruited by 111 general practitioners and 214 physicians practicing in diabetes clinics. Physicians' beliefs were assessed through a questionnaire administered when the study started in 1998. Main outcome measures were total cholesterol (TC) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels over 3 years and the proportion of patients treated with lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs). RESULTS: Less than one-third of the physicians (27%) stated that they routinely started pharmacologic therapy for TC values > or =200 mg/dL (more aggressive), whereas 46% considered a TC level > or =240 mg/dL as the threshold for the initiation of treatment (less aggressive). During 3 years of observation, mean TC and LDL-C levels decreased from 215 +/- 40 mg/dL to 203 +/- 37 mg/dL and from 135 +/- 36 mg/dL to 126 +/- 35 mg/dL respectively, while the proportion of patients treated with LLDs increased from 13.2% to 24.6%; in particular, among individuals cared for by the more aggressive physicians, 30.0% were taking LLDs after 3 years, while only 17.7% of those followed by the less aggressive physicians and 18.1% of those followed by >1 physician were being treated with LLDs. Multilevel analysis showed that physicians' beliefs were an independent predictor of TC levels over the 3-year period. In patients treated with LLDs, TC levels decreased on average by 14%, and LDL-C levels decreased by 20%. CONCLUSION: Our data show that physicians' beliefs in more aggressive management strategies will result in better mean TC values over a 3-year period.

Correlates of satisfaction for the relationship with their physician in type 2 diabetic patients.

In the context of an Italian nation-wide outcomes research program on type 2 diabetes, we investigated the contribution of both patient and setting-related factors to patient satisfaction with their relationship with their physicians. The level of patient satisfaction was measured using the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) 14 patient satisfaction questionnaire. The main results were obtained using multilevel analysis, a statistical technique that takes into account the clustered nature of our data. Overall, 3563 patients were recruited by 101 diabetologists and 103 general practitioners (GPs). Information on patients' satisfaction was available for 2515 patients (71% of the whole sample). Patients' satisfaction was related to patient characteristics and attitudes, but not with physician's sex, age, speciality, and setting of care. In particular, patients who were less likely to delegate to physicians responsibility for diabetes management and those perceiving a lower degree of involvement in disease management showed lower levels of satisfaction. Lower satisfaction scores were also related to lower levels of school education, more severe clinical conditions, and lower psychological adaptation to diabetes. However, patients reporting higher levels of diabetes related worries and more frequent encounters with health care providers showed higher levels of satisfaction. In conclusion, patient satisfaction with physicians' humanness and communication skills is strongly related to personal characteristics, attitudes, expectations, and perceived health. In deciding the best decision-making approach to adopt in individual patients, it is of primary importance to measure how the patient perceives and engages in relationships.

Quality of care and outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients: a comparison between general practice and diabetes clinics.

OBJECTIVE: The role of general practice and diabetes clinics in the management of diabetes is still a matter of debate. Methodological flaws in previous studies may have led to inaccurate conclusions when comparing the care provided in these different settings. We compared the care provided to type 2 diabetic patients attending diabetes outpatient clinics (DOCs) or being treated by a general practitioner (GP) using appropriate statistical methods to adjust for patient case mix and physician-level clustering. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the process and intermediate outcome measures over 2 years in a sample of 3,437 patients recruited by 212 physicians with different specialties practicing in 125 DOCs and 103 general practice offices. Process measures included frequency of HbA(1c), lipids, microalbuminuria, and serum creatinine measurements and frequency of foot and eye examinations. Outcome measures included HbA(1c), blood pressure, and total and LDL cholesterol levels. RESULTS: Differences for most process measures were statistically significantly in favor of DOCs. The differences were more marked for patients who were always treated by the same physician within a DOC and if that physician had a specialty in diabetology. Less consistent differences in process measures were detected when patients followed by GPs were compared with those followed by physicians with a specialty other than diabetology. As for the outcomes considered, patients attending DOCs attained better total cholesterol levels, whereas no major differences emerged in terms of metabolic control and blood pressure levels between DOCs and GPs. Physicians' specialties were not independently related to patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Being followed always by the same physician in a DOC, particularly if the physician had a specialty in diabetes, ensured better quality of care in terms of process measures. In the short term, care provided by DOCs was also associated with better intermediate outcome measures, such as total cholesterol levels.

Identifying patients with type 2 diabetes with a higher likelihood of erectile dysfunction: the role of the interaction between clinical and psychological factors.

PURPOSE: We estimated the prevalence of erectile dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes and identified subgroups of patients in which the interaction among clinical, psychological and sociodemographic characteristics determined an increased likelihood of erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The presence of erectile dysfunction was based on patient self-reporting. Clinical information was collected by participating physicians. The severity of depressive symptoms was investigated using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale. To evaluate interactions among the variables investigated and identify distinct, homogeneous subgroups of patients with different odds ratios for erectile dysfunction a tree growing technique was used. RESULTS: In the 1,460 patients studied the prevalence of severe and mild-moderate erectile dysfunction was 34% and 24%, respectively. While severe erectile dysfunction was mainly related to the severity of diabetes, mild-moderate dysfunction was independent of clinical variables and only associated with the severity of depressive symptoms. The tree growing technique led to the identification of 6 classes characterized by a marked difference in the prevalence of severe erectile dysfunction of between 19% and 65%. Patients on diet alone showed the lowest prevalence of erectile dysfunction and were considered the reference category, while patients treated with insulin who had neuropathy represented the subgroup with the highest likelihood of erectile dysfunction (OR = 7.2, 95% CI 3.9 to 13.2). In patients treated with oral agents the odds ratio for erectile dysfunction was 2.7 (95% CI 1.8 to 3.9) for those with severe depressive symptoms and 1.9 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.7) for current/former smokers with low depressive symptoms. Patient age, retinopathy and cardiac-cerebrovascular disease were globally predictive variables associated with an increased likelihood of erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Our data illustrate the interplay of clinical and psychological factors in determining the risk of erectile dysfunction in type 2 diabetes and can help identify those for whom much greater attention is needed to detect erectile problems.

Role of organizational factors in poor blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes: the QuED Study Group--quality of care and outcomes in type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: A large body of evidence supports the need for reducing the cardiovascular burden of diabetes. Only indirect and occasional data describe the adequacy of routine management of hypertension in patients with diabetes. The aim of this study was to explore the interplay of some potential key determinants of quality of antihypertensive care, including the settings, physicians' beliefs about blood pressure (BP) control, and patient-related factors. METHODS: We evaluated physicians' beliefs about BP control using questionnaire responses at study entry. A sample of 3449 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, of whom 1782 (52%) were considered to have hypertension, was recruited by 212 physicians practicing in 125 diabetes outpatients clinics (DOCs) and 106 general practitioners (GPs). We evaluated the type and number of antihypertensive agents used and the BP values at study entry and after 1 year of follow-up. We used multilevel analysis to investigate correlates of poor BP control (> or =160/90 mm Hg). RESULTS: Only 16% of GPs and 14% of DOC physicians targeted BP values of less than 130/85 mm Hg. At study entry, 6% of the patients had values below 130/85 mm Hg, whereas 52% showed values of 160/90 mm Hg or greater. Only 12% of subjects were treated with more than 2 drugs at study entry, compared with 16% at the 1-year follow-up (P =.001). Multilevel analysis showed that patients attending DOCs had a more than 2-fold increased risk for inadequate BP control, compared with those treated by GPs. The risk for poor BP control was 2 times higher for patients treated by male physicians compared with those treated by female physicians, and it was halved when the physician responsible for the diabetes care specialized in diabetology or endocrinology. CONCLUSION: In a model situation of comorbidity, the overall quality of care depends on structural and organizational factors, which are likely to be more influential than existing guidelines.

Erectile dysfunction and quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients: a serious problem too often overlooked.

OBJECTIVE: Within the context of a large, nationwide outcomes research program in type 2 diabetes, we assess the prevalence of self-reported erectile dysfunction and evaluate its impact on quality of life. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study involved 1,460 patients enrolled by 114 diabetes outpatient clinics and 112 general practitioners. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire investigating their ability to achieve and maintain an erection. Various aspects of quality of life were also assessed depressive using the following instruments: SF-36 Health Survey, diabetes health distress, psychological adaptation to diabetes, depressive symptoms (CES-D scale), and quality of sexual life. RESULTS: Overall, 34% of the patients reported frequent erectile problems, 24% reported occasional problems, and 42% reported no erectile problems. After adjusting for patient characteristics, erectile dysfunction was associated with higher levels of diabetes-specific health distress and worse psychological adaptation to diabetes, which were, in turn, related to worse metabolic control. Erectile problems were also associated with a dramatic increase in the prevalence of severe depressive symptoms, lower scores in the mental components of the SF-36, and a less satisfactory sexual life. A total of 63% of the patients reported that their physicians had never investigated their sexual problems. CONCLUSIONS: Erectile dysfunction is extremely common among type 2 diabetic patients and is associated with poorer quality of life, as measured with generic and diabetes-specific instruments. Despite their relevance, sexual problems are seldom investigated by general practitioners and specialists.