RESUMO
Purpose Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is an unusual and potentially life-threatening condition with variable and nonspecific clinical symptoms and high morbimortality rates. Standard therapy consists of systemic anticoagulation; although there is no clear evidence about the best choice for treatment, intravenous heparin is used as the first-line treatment modality. Intravenous sinus thrombolysis can be an effective and relatively safe treatment for acutely deteriorating patients who have not responded to conventional therapy. This case report presents the possibility of endovascular treatment in multiple steps with mechanical thrombolysis with balloon, local pharmacological thrombolysis and stenting, in a patient with a severe form of CVST. Case summary A 67-year-old woman presented severe headache, agitation and confusion with diagnosis of venous sinus dural thrombosis in both lateral sinus and torcula. After 24 h there was neurological worsening evolving with seizures and numbness even after starting heparin, without sinus recanalization; CT scan showed left temporal intracerebral hemorrhage. We decided to take an endovascular approach in multiple steps. The first step was mechanical static thrombolysis with balloon; the second step was dynamic mechanical thrombolysis with a balloon partially deflated and "pulled"; the third step was local thrombolysis with Actilyse™; finally, the fourth step was angioplasty and reconstruction of the sinuses using multiple carotid stents and complete angiographic recanalization of both sinuses and torcula. After 24 h of endovascular treatment there was full clinical recovery and no tomographic complications. Conclusion This result shows that mechanical clot disruption, intrasinus thrombolysis and reconstruction of wall sinuses with stenting can be an endovascular option in the severe form of CVST with intracerebral hemorrhage and rapid worsening of neurological symptoms. Although this type of treatment can re-channel the occluded sinuses, further comparative and randomized studies are needed to clarify its efficacy versus other therapeutic modalities.
