Evaluation of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations detection in plasma using an automated system for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cell-free DNA detection is becoming a surrogate assay for tumor genotyping. Biological fluids often content a very low amount of cell-free tumor DNA and assays able to detect very low allele frequency mutant with a few quantities of DNA are required. We evaluated the ability of the fully-automated molecular diagnostics platform Idylla for the detection of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF hotspot mutations in plasma from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, we evaluated the limit of detection of the system using two set of laboratory made samples that mimic mCRC patient plasma, then plasma samples from patients with mCRC were assessed using Idylla system and BEAMing digital PCR technology. RESULTS: Limits of detection of 0.1%, 0.4% and 0.01% for KRAS, NRAS and BRAF respectively have been reached. With our laboratory made samples, sensitivity up to 0.008% has been reached. Among 15 patients' samples tested for KRAS mutation, 2 discrepant results were found between Idylla and BEAMing dPCR. A 100% concordance between the two assays has been found for the detection of NRAS and BRAF mutations in plasma samples. CONCLUSIONS: The Idylla system does not reach as high sensitivity as assays like ddPCR but has an equivalent sensitivity to modified NGS technics with a lower cost and a lower time to results. These data allowed to consider the Idylla system in a routine laboratory workflow for KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations detection in plasma.

Evaluation of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF hotspot mutations detection for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using direct DNA pipetting in a fully-automated platform and Next-Generation Sequencing for laboratory workflow optimisation.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of KRAS, NRAS (RAS) and BRAF mutations is a standard in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Mutations could be assessed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) or real-time PCR-based assays. Times to results are 1 to 2 weeks for NGS and 1 to 3 days for real-time PCR-based assays. Using NGS can delay first-line treatment commencement and using PCR-based assays is limited by the number of possible analysed targets. The Idylla system is a real-time PCR cartridge-based assay, able to analyse hotspots mutations using one section of FFPE tumour tissue sample. To combine short delays and analysis of a large gene-panel, we propose here a laboratory workflow combining the Idylla system and NGS and compatible with FFPE samples with low tissue quantity. In this study we evaluated and validated the Idylla system for the analysis of RAS and BRAF mutations by pipetting directly DNA in the cartridge instead of FFPE section as recommended by the manufacturer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNA extracted from 29 FFPE samples from mCRC patients with NGS-characterized RAS and BRAF mutations were tested with the Idylla KRAS and the Idylla NRAS-BRAF mutation tests to assess sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility and limit of detection of each test. RESULTS: A 100% concordance was found between NGS and Idylla results for the determination of KRAS (12/12), NRAS (12/12) and BRAF (11/11) mutations with a sensitivity and a specificity of 100%. The system showed a good reproducibility with CV inferior to 3%. LOD was reached with 2.5 ng of DNA for KRAS and NRAS mutations and 5 ng of DNA for BRAF mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of RAS and BRAF mutations using DNA pipetted directly in the cartridge of the Idylla system showed a good sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility and LOD, and can be integrated in a laboratory workflow for samples with few tissue without compromising a further complete tumour characterization using NGS.

Uncommon mutational profiles of metastatic colorectal cancer detected during routine genotyping using next generation sequencing.

RAS genotyping is mandatory to predict anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) therapy resistance and BRAF genotyping is a relevant prognosis marker in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Although the role of hotspot mutations is well defined, the impact of uncommon mutations is still unknown. In this study, we aimed to discuss the potential utility of detecting uncommon RAS and BRAF mutation profiles with next-generation sequencing. A total of 779 FFPE samples from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with valid NGS results were screened and 22 uncommon mutational profiles of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes were selected. In silico prediction of mutation impact was then assessed by 2 predictive scores and a structural protein modelling. Three samples carry a single KRAS non-hotspot mutation, one a single NRAS non-hotspot mutation, four a single BRAF non-hotspot mutation and fourteen carry several mutations. This in silico study shows that some non-hotspot RAS mutations seem to behave like hotspot mutations and warrant further examination to assess whether they should confer a resistance to anti-EGFR mAbs therapy for patients bearing these non-hotspot RAS mutations. For BRAF gene, non-V600E mutations may characterise a novel subtype of mCRC with better prognosis, potentially implying a modification of therapeutic strategy.

Global Burden Related to Nitrous Oxide Exposure in Medical and Recreational Settings: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.

The risk of adverse effects of nitrous oxide (N2O) exposure is insufficiently recognized despite its widespread use. These effects are mainly reported through case reports. We conducted an individual patient data meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of clinical, laboratory, and magnetic resonance findings in association with N2O exposure in medical and recreational settings. We calculated the pooled estimates for the studied outcomes and assessed the potential bias related to population stratification using principal component analysis. Eighty-five publications met the inclusion criteria and reported on 100 patients with a median age of 27 years and 57% of recreational users. The most frequent outcomes were subacute combined degeneration (28%), myelopathy (26%), and generalized demyelinating polyneuropathy (23%). A T2 signal hyperintensity in the spinal cord was reported in 68% (57.2-78.8%) of patients. The most frequent clinical manifestations included paresthesia (80%; 72.0-88.0%), unsteady gait (58%; 48.2-67.8%), and weakness (43%; 33.1-52.9%). At least one hematological abnormality was retrieved in 71.7% (59.9-83.4%) of patients. Most patients had vitamin B12 deficiency: vitamin B12 <150 pmol/L (70.7%; 60.7-80.8%), homocysteine >15 µmol/L (90.3%; 79.3-100%), and methylmalonic acid >0.4 µmol/L (93.8%; 80.4-100%). Consistently, 85% of patients exhibited a possibly or probably deficient vitamin B12 status according to the cB12 scoring system. N2O can produce severe outcomes, with neurological or hematological disorders in almost all published cases. More than half of them are reported in the setting of recreational use. The N2O-related burden is dominated by vitamin B12 deficiency. This highlights the need to evaluate whether correcting B12 deficiency would prevent N2O-related toxicity, particularly in countries with a high prevalence of B12 deficiency.

Erythrocytes morphology in pregnancy.

Morphologic anomalies of the red blood cells (RBCs) during pregnancy are poorly known. Peripheral blood films from 69 healthy pregnant women were investigated for shape, color and content anomalies of the RBCs. A range of minor alterations was observed, without clinical significance. Only a slight increase of polychromatophilic RBCs was regularly observed. However, we would like to stress that spherocytes or schistocytes can occasionally be found, even in the absence of hemolysis.

Integrated routine workflow using next-generation sequencing and a fully-automated platform for the detection of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded samples with poor DNA quality in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: KRAS and NRAS mutations are identified resistance mutations to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. BRAF status is also routinely assessed for its poor prognosis value. In our institute, next-generation sequencing (NGS) is routinely used for gene-panel mutations detection including KRAS, NRAS and BRAF, but DNA quality is sometimes not sufficient for sequencing. In our routine practice, Idylla platform is used for the analysis of samples that don't reach sufficient quality criteria for NGS assay. METHODS: In this study, data from mCRC samples analyzed from May 2017 to 2018 were retrospectively collected. All samples with a poor DNA quality for sequencing have been assessed using Idylla platform. First, KRAS Idylla assay cartridge has been used for the determination of KRAS mutational status. All KRAS wild-type samples have then been analyzed using NRAS-BRAF assay. Among 669 samples, 67 samples failed the DNA quality control and have been assessed on Idylla KRAS mutation test. RESULTS: Among 67 samples, 50 (75%) samples had a valid result with Idylla KRAS mutation test including 22 carrying a KRAS mutation. For 28 samples, NRAS and BRAF mutational statuses have been assessed using Idylla NRAS-BRAF mutation test. Among 28 samples, 27 (96%) had a valid result including 2 samples bearing a NRAS mutation and 3 samples bearing a BRAF mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that an integrated workflow using NGS and Idylla platform allows the determination of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutational statuses of 651/669 (97.3%) samples and retrieve 49/67 (73.1%)samples that don't reach DNA quality requirements for NGS.

Technical considerations for circulating tumor DNA detection in oncology.

INTRODUCTION: Blood draw or collection of other body fluids, known as 'liquid biopsies' are generally less invasive procedures than tumor biopsies. Cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) is widely evaluated in cancer for early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, therapy monitoring or determination of minimal residual disease. In body fluid samples, ctDNA can represent a small fraction of total cell-free DNA (cfDNA), requiring highly sensitive assays. Areas covered: The first part of this review is dedicated to critical preanalytical points necessary to obtain suitable samples for cfDNA analysis. The second part describes the available techniques for ctDNA analysis. Expert commentary: Detection of ctDNA is emerging as a powerful adjunct in the management of patients with cancer. For reliable ctDNA detection, preanalytical steps from sampling to DNA extraction are crucial. Various techniques are available for cfDNA detection, but one needs to consider the appropriate application for the patient's clinical trajectory, whether it is for diagnosis or disease monitoring. Broad screening assays like Next-Generation Sequencing should be used for early cancer detection or for tumor molecular characterization to guide therapy options in a molecular board context. Techniques designed for unique hotspot or well-identified mutations are the most sensitive and should be used for monitoring purposes.

Clinical Interest of Circulating Tumor DNA in Oncology.

Genetic alterations in tumors, as predictor of response to targeted-therapies or as prognostic markers, are clinically relevant to determine adequate therapeutic management. Tumor biopsy is currently the golden standard for somatic alterations assessment, but this approach is invasive and does not consider tumor heterogeneity. In various body fluids like plasma, somatic mutations have been identified. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) holds promises in tumor burden monitoring or malignancies early detection. Since allele frequencies of circulating somatic mutations are low, highly sensitive novel assays have been developed to allow the investigation of the tumor genome, leading to the emergence of the "liquid biopsy" concept. Despite these technological advances, other assays for identifying intratumor and intermetastases heterogeneity need to be developed. Before being applied to clinic, ctDNA analyses need to be harmonized and validated with well-powered, well-designed studies. One of the primary prerequisite to incorporation of ctDNA analysis in the follow-up strategy of malignancies is the checking of the concordance with golden standard detection methods, imaging, circulating proteins and biopsy. This review focuses on the clinical interest of ctDNA in solid tumors and hematological malignancies.

Comparison of Five Different Assays for the Detection of BRAF Mutations in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Tissues of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic or unresectable melanoma is a serious and deadly disease. Anti-BRAF and immunotherapy improved overall survival in patients with metastatic disease. Thus, BRAF genotyping is important to choose the right therapy. METHODS: In our study, we assessed and compared BRAF mutations in 59 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor samples of patients with metastatic melanoma with next-generation sequencing (NGS), Cobas® 4800 BRAF V600 mutation test CE-IVD commercial kit, high-resolution melting PCR (HRM), multiplex real-time allele specific amplification (multiplexed RT-ASA) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: Thirty-one samples were found bearing a BRAF mutation with NGS (52.5%), 28 with Cobas® test (47.5%), 28 with HRM (47.5%), 29 with multiplexed RT-ASA (49.2%) and 27 with IHC (45.8%). Based on NGS data, 26 (81.2%) were c.1799 T>A (p.Val600Glu), 3 (9.4%) were c. 1798-1799 GT>AA (p.Val600Lys), 1 was c.1789_1790 CT>TC (p.Leu597Ser) and 2 were complex mutations. Sensitivity was 90.3% for Cobas® test, 93.1% for multiplexed RT-ASA and 87.1% for IHC and HRM. Specificity was 100% for Cobas® test, IHC and multiplexed RT-ASA and 96.4% for HRM. The reference assay was NGS. Rare mutations were detected with NGS and HRM: c.1789_1790 CT>TC (p.Leu597Ser) mutation and the complex mutation c.1796 A>T; c.1797_1798 insACT (p.Thr599Thr; p.Thr599_Val600insThr). Our data suggest that multiplexed RT-ASA is the most sensitive assay but specific primers for each mutation are needed. HRM can detect all exon 15 mutations but has a lower sensitivity. Because of its specificity for Val600Glu mutation, IHC may be considered only as a screening tool and testing should be completed by a method able to detect other V600 mutations. BRAF Cobas® assay is Val600Glu-specific and has poor sensitivity for the other V600 mutations; thus, it looks important to use multiplex assays able to detect all V600 mutations because a false-negative result will deprive the patient of an important treatment option.

Detection of BRAF Mutations Using a Fully Automated Platform and Comparison with High Resolution Melting, Real-Time Allele Specific Amplification, Immunohistochemistry and Next Generation Sequencing Assays, for Patients with Metastatic Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic melanoma is a severe disease with one of the highest mortality rate in skin diseases. Overall survival has significantly improved with immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Kinase inhibitors targeting BRAF V600 showed promising results. BRAF genotyping is mandatory for the prescription of anti-BRAF therapies. METHODS: Fifty-nine formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded melanoma samples were assessed using High-Resolution-Melting (HRM) PCR, Real-time allele-specific amplification (RT-ASA) PCR, Next generation sequencing (NGS), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the fully-automated molecular diagnostics platform IdyllaTM. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated using NGS as the reference standard to compare the different assays. RESULTS: BRAF mutations were found in 28(47.5%), 29(49.2%), 31(52.5%), 29(49.2%) and 27(45.8%) samples with HRM, RT-ASA, NGS, IdyllaTM and IHC respectively. Twenty-six (81.2%) samples were found bearing a c.1799T>A (p.Val600Glu) mutation, three (9.4%) with a c.1798_1799delinsAA (p.Val600Lys) mutation and one with c.1789_1790delinsTC (p.Leu597Ser) mutation. Two samples were found bearing complex mutations. CONCLUSIONS: HRM appears the less sensitive assay for the detection of BRAF V600 mutations. The RT-ASA, IdyllaTM and IHC assays are suitable for routine molecular diagnostics aiming at the prescription of anti-BRAF therapies. IdyllaTM assay is fully-automated and requires less than 2 minutes for samples preparation and is the fastest of the tested assays.