Good interobserver agreement was attainable on outcome adjudication in patients with stable coronary heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: In clinical trials, agreement on outcomes is of utmost importance for valid estimation of intervention effects. As there is limited knowledge about adjudicator agreement in cardiology, we examined the level of agreement among three cardiology specialists adjudicating all possible events in a randomized controlled clinical trial of patients with stable coronary heart disease. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: All information (hospital records, death certificates, etc.) was forwarded to two randomly selected blinded adjudicators. If they disagreed, the third arbiter had to choose the more likely of the two alternatives. Files of 5,475 nonfatal and 362 fatal events were evaluated. RESULTS: For nonfatal outcomes, pairwise kappa values ranged from 0.75 to 0.80. The three adjudicators had 4.3%, 9.5%, and 6.1% of their nonfatal outcome classifications overruled by their arbiter. If stable angina pectoris, unstable angina pectoris, and acute myocardial infarction were treated as one, agreement increased minimally. For fatal outcomes, the pairwise kappa values ranged from 0.65 to 0.90. The three adjudicators had 12%, 9%, and 10% of their death classifications overruled. CONCLUSION: Specialists in cardiology can attain a reasonably high agreement on outcomes in patients with stable coronary heart disease.

Application of basic and composite thrombelastography parameters in monitoring of the antithrombotic effect of the low molecular weight heparin dalteparin: an in vivo study.

BACKGROUND: Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is in vast usage for treatment of thromboembolic diseases such as deep venous thrombosis and acute coronary syndromes. There are certain clinical situations where a quick point of care testing of the effect of LMWH would be useful. At this point there are no point of care devices available in the market for monitoring the effect of LMWH. Thrombelastography (TEG) evaluates the viscoelastic properties of blood during coagulation. The clinical application of TEG in monitoring LMWH treatment is not yet well defined. The purpose of this in vivo study was to systematically evaluate the most suitable TEG parameters for evaluation of the antithrombotic effect of LMWH. We furthermore evaluated for the first time the usefulness of the composite TEG parameter the Thrombodynamic Ratio (TDR) in monitoring LMWH treatment. METHODS: Healthy male volunteers (n = 7) were injected subcutaneously with the LMWH dalteparin 120 IU/kg. TEG parameters and antifactor Xa levels were measures at baseline, 2, 4, 5 and 24 hours after the injection. Correlation between TEG parameters and antiXa were calculated. The sensitivity and specificity of the TEG parameters for plasma levels of antiXa in the therapeutic range of 0.5 - 1.0 U/ml were calculated. RESULTS: All basic TEG parameters correlated significantly with antiXa levels. Among the basic parameters, the TEG reaction time R had the best correlation with antiXa levels with the most favorable combination of sensitivity and specificity for the therapeutic range of antiXa levels (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001, sensitivity 68%, specificity 100%). The composite TEG parameter TDR demonstrated the best correlation with antiXa levels, and an even more favorable combination of sensitivity and specificity compared to any of the basic parameters (r = - 0.87, p < 0.0001, sensitivity 95%, specificity 79%). CONCLUSION: The TEG reaction time R and TDR are the most suitable TEG parameters for evaluation of the antithrombotic effect of dalteparin with a highly significant correlation with antiXa levels in healthy male volunteers. Measures for uniform clinical use of these parameters are proposed. Larger clinical trials are needed to correlate R and TDR with clinical outcomes.