Complexity assessment and technical aspect of coronary angiogram and percutaneous coronary intervention following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Performing selective coronary angiogram (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) post transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may be challenging with various success rates of coronary ostia engagement. METHODS: Among all patients who underwent CA and/or PCI after TAVI from our single center TAVI registry, ostia cannulation success was reported according to the quality of ostia engagement and artery opacification, and was classified as either selective, partially selective or non-selective but sufficient for diagnosis. RESULTS: Among the 424 consecutive TAVI procedures performed at the aforementioned institution, 20 (4.7%) CA were performed in 19 (4.5%) patients at a median time of 464 days post TAVI (25-75% IQ: 213-634 days). CA were performed in 7 CoreValve, 9 Evolut R, 1 Evolut PRO and 2 Edwards Sapien 3 devices. Transradial vascular approach was attempted in 9 procedures (45%, right n = 6 and left n = 3) and was successful in 8 (40%) patients. A total of 20 left main artery ostium cannulation were attempted leading to a diagnostic CA in all of them with selective engagement in 65%. Engagement of the right coronary artery in 2 out of 15 attempted cases failed due to a low ostium in conjunction with a high implantation of a CoreValve prosthesis. 11 PCI (55% of CA) including 2 left main lesions were performed. In 4 patients (36.4% of the PCI), an extension catheter was required to engage the left main. All planned PCI were successful. CONCLUSIONS: Post TAVI CA and PCI are challenging but feasible even after supra-annular self-expandable valve implantation.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in nonagenarians: effective and safe.

BACKGROUND: The number of nonagenarians is rising dramatically. These patients often develop severe aortic stenosis for which transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an attractive option. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of TAVI performed in a cohort of nonagenarian patients. METHODS: Between August 2008 and November 2012, 23 consecutive patients in their 90th year of age or older underwent TAVI in our institution after having been assessed by the local heart team. Data concerning baseline characteristics, procedural details and outcome were prospectively entered into a dedicated database. Transthoracic echocardiography and clinical follow-up were performed pre-procedure, at discharge, at 6 and 12 months and then annually post TAVI. RESULTS: Patients were male in 52% with a mean age of 90.3 ± 2.3 years. Mean logistic EuroSCORE and STS score were 26.6 ± 14.5% and 8.7 ± 2.9%, respectively. Transcatheter heart valve (THV) could be implanted in all but one patient. Mortality at 30 days was 8.7% overall and 4.8% for transfemoral approach. At 30 days the rate of stroke was 4.3%, paravalvular leak grade ≥ 2 was 8.7%, life-threatening bleeding was 13.0% and pacemaker implantation was 13%. Device success was 73.9%. The rate of all-cause mortality increased to 27.3% at one-year follow-up and 42.8% at a median follow-up of 417 days. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI is safe and effective even in a selected population of nonagenarians. Consequently, these patients should not be refused such a procedure based only on their age. Multi-disciplinary assessment is essential in order to properly select candidates.

Alcohol septal ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the perfect septal branch may originate from an atypical location.

Due to anatomical variability in the distribution and size of septal perforator arteries, not all patients are ideal candidates for alcohol septal ablation. Myocardial contrast echocardiography is essential in selecting the appropriate septal branch. We report a case where the target septal artery did not originate from the left anterior descending artery, but from the first diagonal branch.

Impact of bifurcation lesions on angiographic characteristics and procedural success in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Bifurcation lesions (BFLs) remain a challenging lesion subset, often associated with lower success rates than less complex lesions. There are few data regarding the impact of BFLs in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). AIMS: To assess the impact of BFLs on angiographic characteristics and procedural success in primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). METHODS: Out of 1070 primary PCIs performed between November 2006 and December 2008, 114 patients (10.7%) with a BFL (side branch ≥2.0mm) were identified and matched with 114 patients without a BFL, according to age, sex and infarct-related artery. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Using the Medina classification, true BFLs ([1,1,1]; [1,0,1]; [0,1,1]) were found in 46.5% of cases. Mean contrast volume (265±91 and 207±68mL), procedural time (51.0±26.6 vs 35.3±11.5min) and fluoroscopy time (16.2±11.2 vs 9.8±5.1min) were significantly higher in the BFL group than the non-BFL group (p<0.0001). However, time to reperfusion and angiographic success rates (residual stenosis ≤ 30% and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade 3 in main branch) were similar in BFL and non-BFL patients (13.7±7.9 vs 12.1±5.7min, respectively, p=0.087; 96.5 vs 99.1%, respectively, p=0.18), with no periprocedural events (in-hospital death, emergent coronary artery bypass graft or repeat PCI<24h). CONCLUSION: Despite being challenging lesions, BFLs in STEMI were associated with similar time to reperfusion and procedural success but led to significantly greater contrast use and prolonged procedural time compared with non-BFLs.

Measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by real time 3D echocardiography in patients with severe systolic dysfunction: comparison with radionuclide angiography.

AIM: Measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using real time 3D echocardiography (3DE) has been performed in subjects with preserved or modestly reduced systolic function. Our aim was to evaluate this technique in the subset of patients with severe systolic dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with LVEF less than 0.35 at two-dimensional echocardiography were included. LVEF obtained by 3DE was compared to the value measured by radionuclide angiography (RNA). Real time full-volume 3DE was performed, with offline semiautomated measurement of LVEF using dedicated software (Cardioview RT, Tomtec) by a single observer blinded to the results of RNA. A total of 50 patients were evaluated, of whom 38 (76%, 27 males, age 69 +/- 13 years) had a 3DE of sufficient quality for analysis. LVEF for this group was 0.21 +/- 0.07 using 3DE and 0.27 +/- 0.08 using RNA. The agreement between the two techniques was rather poor (r = 0.49; P < 0.001; 95% limits of agreements of -0.20 to 0.09). Truncation of the apex was observed in 6 of 38 (16%) patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with severe systolic dysfunction, 3DE shows poor agreement for measurement of LVEF as compared to RNA. There may be underestimation of up to 20% in absolute terms by 3DE. Accordingly, the two methods are not interchangeable for the follow-up of LV function. A limitation of 3DE may, at least in part, be related to the incomplete incorporation of the apical region into the pyramidal image sector in patients with dilated hearts.