Clinical Outcome following Management of Severe Osteomyelitis due to Pin Site Infection.

Aim: This study has investigated cases of pin site infection (PSI) which required surgery for persistent osteomyelitis (OM) despite pin removal. Materials and methods: Patients requiring surgery for OM after PSI between 2011 and 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Single-stage surgery was performed in accordance with a protocol at one institution. This involved deep sampling, debridement, implantation of local antibiotics, culture-specific systemic antibiotics and soft tissue closure. A successful outcome was defined as an infection-free interval of at least 24 months following surgery. Results: Twenty-seven patients were identified (the sites were 22 tibias, 2 humeri, 2 calcanei, 1 radius); about 85% of them were males with a median age of 53.9 years. The majority of infections (21/27) followed fracture treatment. Fifteen patients were classified as BACH uncomplicated and 12 were BACH complex. Staphylococci were the most common pathogens, polymicrobial infections were detected in five cases (19%). Seven patients required flap coverage which was performed in the same operation.After a median of 3.99 years (2.00-8.05) follow-up, all patients remained infection free at the site of the former OM. Wound leakage after local antibiotic treatment was seen in 3/27 (11.1%) cases but did not require further treatment. Conclusion: Osteomyelitis after PSI is uncommon but has major implications for the patient as 7 patients needed flap coverage. This reinforces the need for careful pin placement and pin site care to prevent deep infection. These infections were treated in accordance with a protocol and were not managed simply by curettage. All patients treated in this manner remained infection-free after a minimum follow-up of 2 years suggesting that this protocol is effective. Clinical significance: Pin site infection is a very common complication in external fixation. The sequela of a chronic pin site OM is rare but the implications to the patient are huge. In this series, more than a quarter of patients required flap coverage as part of the treatment of the deep infection. How to cite this article: Frank FA, Pomeroy E, Hotchen AJ, et al. Clinical Outcome following Management of Severe Osteomyelitis due to Pin Site Infection. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(1):21-25.

A practical definition of pin site infection.

Pin Site Infection (PSI) is the most common complication of external fixation treatment. Several classifications and diagnostic approaches have been used with reported incidences varying widely from 1 to 100 %. The quality of the existing literature is limited by the absence of a definition. This renders comparing literature and developing evidence-based algorithms for prevention, diagnostics, and treatment difficult to impossible. Similar problems were identified with prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and fracture-related infection (FRI) in recent years, resulting in new, validated definitions. PSI is complicated by the complexity of the issue. Numerous factors in PSI need consideration. Factors may be related to the patient, the surgical technique, the pin-bone interface, the pin-skin interface, the choice of external fixation device and/or the material used and its properties. Reliably diagnosing PSI is one of the most pressing issues. New definitions for FRI or PJI have diagnostic criteria which can be either confirmatory or suggestive. Any positive finding of a confirmatory criterion constitutes an infection. Although PSI resembles PJI and FRI, distinct differences are present. The skin is never closed, and bacterial colonization is inevitable along the treatment duration. The external fixator is only temporarily in place; thus, the goal of all measures is to continue the external fixator until the intended indication is reached. This paper proposes the principles of a definition of PSI. This definition is not designed to guide any treatment of PSI. Its purpose is to create common ground for clinical investigations and publishing further research.

[Septic arthritis]. / Die septische Arthritis.

Septic arthritis Abstract. A painful, red, and swollen joint may have different causes. Septic arthritis is one of the most serious conditions and should be diagnosed and treated right away. In the native joint, an infection can damage the cartilage within the first 24 hours with impacts on joint function including lingering joint problems leading to possible future joint destruction. An interdisciplinary approach is essential for achieving optimal results. Most infections are caused by bacteria from the patient's own microbiome. In general, the incidence of native joint infections is growing, whether it is due to more appropriate diagnostics, or an actual increase cannot be determined at this point. In case of an acute infection, the patients usually describe a relatively short and acute period of pain, redness, and swelling of the affected joint. For diagnostic purposes the common blood serum laboratory work-up serves as a basis, complemented by puncture of the affected joint. Cell count and cell differentiation in the synovial liquid, microbiological and histopathological workup serve as gold standard in detecting septic arthritis. Septic arthritis lacks a distinctive presentation and other inflammatory conditions, like CPPD and gout must be considered. Prior to antibiotic therapy, joint lavage is the most important method to reduce bacterial load, leading to an improved outcome. Prognosis is determined by a swift diagnosis and initiation of therapy. The patient's comorbidities are significant, especially immunocompromising factors such as rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes or immunomodulating therapy. In case of a second focus of infection, chronic kidney disease or older age, patients are at greater risk for an inferior outcome.

FGF-23 transmitted tumor - induced hypophosphatemic osteomalacia: A rare case of a young woman with recurrent fractures and review of the literature.

We present a case of tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) in a young woman of 22 years. The fibroblast growth factor 23 transmitting tumor in her left foot remained undetected for several years. She suffered several fractures including insufficiency fractures of both femoral necks requiring bilateral proximal femoral nailing. After phosphaturia was diagnosed any known genetic etiology was excluded. Even advanced imaging modalities were unable to detect the clinically silent tumor until an 68Ga-DOTA-TOC-PET/CT-scan revealed a mass with paraneoplastic activity in the left foot. Complete resection of the tumor proved to cure her condition after 9 years of uncertainty and suffering. Serum phosphate levels returned to normal within days. After presentation of the case report, the current literature on published cases of TIO between 1956 and 2021 is summarized to emphasize the importance of an accurate and early diagnosis. Our case report aims to illustrate that a long latency period of diagnosis may be avoided utilizing the latest imaging techniques to spare affected patients from long treatment of symptoms instead of finding the underlying cause.

Non-Adherence to Pain Medication Increases Risk of Postoperative Frozen Shoulder.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative frozen shoulder (FS) or adhesive capsulitis is a relatively frequent complication (5-20%), even after simple arthroscopic shoulder surgeries. The pathophysiology is still unclear, but psychological factors may play a pivotal role. From clinical experience, we hypothesized that patients, who are reluctant to take medications, particularly "pain-killers," have an increased incidence of postoperative FS. METHODS: We identified twenty patients who underwent limited arthroscopic operations of the shoulder and developed postoperative FS. Twenty patients with matching type of surgery, age, and gender served as control group (n = 20). All patients were at least one year postoperative and asymptomatic at the time of examination. Demographic data, the patient's adherence to self-medication (including self-medicating scale, SMS), development the Quality of life (QoL), and depression scale (PHQ-4-questionnaire) were assessed. RESULTS: Patients with FS had a 2-fold longer rehabilitation and 3-fold longer work inability compared to the patients without FS (P < 0.009 and P < 0.003, respectively). Subjective shoulder value SSV (P = 0.075) and post-operative improvement of QoL (P = 0.292) did not differ among the groups. There was a trend-but not significant-toward less coherence to self-medication in the FS-group (26.50 vs. 29.50; P = 0.094). Patients with postoperative FS significantly more often stated not to have "taken pain-killers as prescribed" (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Patients reporting unwillingness to take the prescribed pain medications had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative FS. It remains unclear whether the increased risk of developing FS is due to reduced postoperative analgesia or a critical attitude toward taking medication. However, patients who are reluctant to take painkillers should strongly be encouraged to take medications as prescribed.

Risk factors for secondary displacement in conservatively treated proximal humeral fractures.

AIMS: Conservative treatment of moderately displaced proximal humeral head fractures yields good clinical results, but secondary fragment displacement may occur. Identification of those fractures at risk of displacement may influence initial decision-making. METHODS: A total of 163 shoulders in 162 patients with conservatively treated isolated proximal humeral fractures were included. The fractures occurred between January 2015 and May 2018. The mean age of the patients was 69 years (26 to 100) and the mean follow-up was 144 days (42 to 779). The fractures were classified according to Neer. Scores for osteoporosis (Tingart, Deltoid Tuberosity Index (DTI)) and osteoarthritis (OA) of the glenohumeral joint were assessed. Translation of the head on follow-up radiographs of more than 10 mm was defined as displacement. Eccentric head index (EHI) describes the offset of the humeral head centre in relation to the diaphyseal axis. The ratio was estimated on anteroposterior (AP) and Neer views. Medial hinge was considered intact if the medial cortex proximal and distal to the fracture was in line on AP view. RESULTS: Secondary fracture displacement occurred in 41 patients (25.2%). Clinical risk factors were alcohol abuse (odds ratio (OR) 6.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 36; p = 0.025) and previously diagnosed osteoporosis (OR 4.6; 95% CI 0.6 to 34; p = 0.136). Age (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0 to 1.1; p = 0.003) and sex (OR 0.9; 95% CI 0.3 to 2.8; p = 0.867) were not independent factors. Radiological risk factors were OA grade 3 (OR 16.4; 95% CI 0.25 to 37.6; p = 0.107) and osteoporosis with the DTI (OR 10; 95% CI 0.8 to 250; p = 0.031) being more predictive than the Tingart score (OR 2.3; 95% CI 0.8 to 4.7; p = 0.041). A high EHI (AP/Neer > 0.4, OR 18.9; 95% CI 2.1 to 30.9/3.0; 95% CI 1.1 to 8.0; p = 0.002/p = 0.033) and a disrupted medial hinge (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.1 to 12.6; p = 0.039) increased the risk of secondary displacement significantly. Neer classification had no influence. CONCLUSION: During conservative treatment, a quarter of patients showed secondary fracture displacement of at least 10 mm. Patients with alcohol abuse, severe OA, and osteoporosis are at risk. Newly defined EHI and disrupted medial hinge are relevant predictors for secondary displacement. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):881-889.