Ambulatory Robotic Colectomy: Factors Affecting and Affected by Postoperative Opioid Use.

BACKGROUND: The ongoing opioid crisis demands an investigation into the factors driving postoperative opioid use. Ambulatory robotic colectomies are an emerging concept in colorectal surgery, but concerns persist surrounding adequate pain control for these patients who are discharged very early. We sought to identify key factors affecting recovery room opioid use (ROU) and additional outpatient opioid prescriptions (AOP) after ambulatory robotic colectomies. METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective review of ambulatory robotic colon resections performed between 2019 and 2022. Patients were included if they discharged on the same day (SDD) or postoperative day 1 (POD1). Outcomes of interest included ROU [measured in parenteral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs)], AOP (written between PODs 2 to 7), postoperative emergency department presentations, and readmissions. RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen cases were examined, 48 of which underwent SDD. The mean ROU was 29.4 MME, and 8.7% of patients required AOP. Between SDD and POD1 patients, there were no differences in postoperative emergency department presentations, readmissions, recovery opioid use, or additional outpatient opioid scripts. Older age was associated with a lower ROU (-0.54 MME for each additional year). Older age, a higher body mass index, and right-sided colectomies were also more likely to use zero ROU. Readmissions were strongly associated with lower ROU. Among SDD patients, lower ROU was also associated with higher rates of AOP. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory robotic colectomies and SDD can be performed with low opioid use and readmission rates. Notably, we found an association between low ROU and more readmission, and, in some cases, higher AOP. This suggests that adequate pain control during the postoperative recovery phase is a crucial component of reducing these negative outcomes.

Surgical Training for a Disaster: Preparation of Surgical Trainees for Victims of Conflict.

INTRODUCTION: With increasing global unrest and military physician shortages potentially leading to a surgeon draft, we sought to evaluate the readiness of graduating general surgery residents to care for casualties of war. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the National Data Reports of Surgery Case Logs for general surgery residents from 2009 to 2018 to quantify experience with key procedures that provide critical skills required for wartime surgery. Reported cases from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education for graduating residents from civilian and military residency programs were analyzed for 28 individual procedures determined to be critical for the care of combat casualties. These included central and peripheral vascular procedures, as well as neck, thoracic, abdominal, and peripheral interventions. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2018, there has been a significant decrease in wartime-relevant cases by graduating residents. Notably, these include aorto-iliac/femoral bypasses (50% reduction; 7.1%/year; P < .001), femoral-popliteal bypasses (60% reduction; 6.9%/year; P < .001), femoral-femoral bypasses (30% reduction; 2.6%/year; P < .001), upper extremity amputations (50% reduction; 6.4%/year; P = .016), fasciotomies for trauma (50% reduction; 4.5%/year; P = .013), open repair of ruptured infrarenal aorto-iliac aneurysms (70% reduction; 5.8%/year; P < .001), repair of traumatic aorta or vena cava injuries (70% reduction; 7%/year; P = .007), carotid endarterectomies (40% reduction; 4%/year; P < .001), lung resections (40% reduction; 3.7%/year; P = .001), trauma splenectomies/splenorrhaphy (30% reduction; 2.9%/year; P < .001), and repair of traumatic liver lacerations (30% reduction; 2.5%/year; P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: Graduating general surgery residents has limited exposure to wartime critical skills due to a significant reduction in open vascular, head and neck, thoracic, and operative trauma cases. As the threat of global war persists and new graduates continue to deploy worldwide, residency training must be augmented to ensure adequate preparation in case a surgeon draft is required to fulfill demand for military surgeons.

Adenosine, lidocaine, and magnesium for attenuating ischemia reperfusion injury from resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in a porcine model.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) following noncompressible hemorrhage results in significant ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI). Adverse outcomes from IRI include organ dysfunction and can result in profound hemodynamic and molecular compromise. We hypothesized that adenosine, lidocaine, and magnesium (ALM) attenuates organ injury and inflammation responses following REBOA IRI in a porcine model of hemorrhage. METHODS: Animals underwent a 20% controlled hemorrhage followed by 45 minutes of supraceliac balloon occlusion. They were randomized into two groups: control (n = 9) and ALM intervention (n = 9) to include a posthemorrhage, pre-REBOA bolus (200 mL of 3% NaCl ALM) followed by a continuous drip (2 mL/kg per hour of 0.9% NaCl ALM) during the 4-hour resuscitative period. Primary outcomes included hemodynamic parameters, gene expression of inflammatory signaling molecules, and plasma concentrations of select cytokines and chemokines. RESULTS: The ALM cohort demonstrated a significant reduction in cardiac output and cardiac index. Plasma concentrations of interleukin 2 and interleukin 10 were significantly lower 3 hours post-REBOA in animals treated with ALM versus vehicle. Interleukin 4 levels in plasma were also lower with ALM at 3 and 4 hours post-REBOA (p < 0.05). Liver expression of IL1RN, MTOR, and LAMP3 messenger RNA was significantly lower with ALM as compared with the vehicle. No significant difference in large bowel gene expression was observed between treatments. CONCLUSION: In a porcine model of hemorrhage, ALM treatment mitigated inflammatory responses early during post-REBOA resuscitation. Our findings suggest that ALM use with trauma may reduce inflammatory injury and improve outcomes related to REBOA utilization.