Preoperative weekly cisplatin, epirubicin, and paclitaxel (PET) improves prognosis in locally advanced breast cancer patients: an update of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG) randomised trial 9908.

BACKGROUND: The present article reports the updated survival outcome of the 200 patients enrolled in the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group 9908 trial, which compared 12 weekly cycles of cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel (PET) with 4 triweekly (once every 3 weeks) cycles of epirubicin-paclitaxel (ET) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). METHODS: The effects of treatment, pathologically documented response (pathological response), pre- and post-treatment biomarkers on relapse-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) are analysed. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 74 (range 48-105 months) months, the 5-year RFS, DMFS, and OS were 64 % versus 53% (P = 0.11), 73% versus 55% (P = 0.04), and 82% versus 69% (P = 0.07) in PET and ET, respectively. At multivariate analysis, after adjusting treatment effect for pretreatment biomarkers, PET independently predicted better DMFS (P = 0.018) and OS (P = 0.03), whereas the impact on RFS was of borderline significance (0.057). PET treatment was significantly better than ET treatment only in high-grade or highly proliferating tumours. The better outcome in PET arm was the results of both the higher rate of patients with optimal pathological response and the lower rate of patients with biologically aggressive residual tumour. CONCLUSIONS: The PET weekly regimen significantly improves both DMFS and OS in LABC patients, compared with the triweekly ET combination. The therapeutic advantage is limited to patients with highly aggressive tumours.

Preoperative weekly cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel with G-CSF support in triple-negative large operable breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Findings from our previously published phase II study showed a high pathologic complete remission (pCR) rate in patients with triple-negative large operable breast cancer after the administration of eight cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel (PET) weekly cycles. The safety and efficacy data of the initial population were updated, with inclusion of additional experience with the same therapy. METHODS: Patients with triple-negative large operable breast cancer (T2-T3 N0-1; T > 3 cm) received eight preoperative weekly cycles of cisplatin 30 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2, paclitaxel (Taxol) 120 mg/m2, with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (5 microg/kg days 3-5) support. RESULTS: Overall 74 consecutive patients (T2/T3 = 35/39; N0/N+ = 26/48) were treated, from May 1999 to May 2008. At pathological assessment, 46 women (62%; 95% confidence interval 50-73) showed pCR in both breast and axilla. At a 41-month median follow-up (range 3-119), 13 events (nine distant metastases) had occurred, 5-year projected disease-free survival (DFS) and distant disease-free survival being 76% and 84%, respectively. Five-year DFS was 90% and 56% in pCRs and non-pCRs, respectively. Severe neutropenia and anemia occurred in 23 (31%) and eight (10.8%) patients, respectively. Severe non-hematological toxicity was recorded in <20% of patients. Peripheral neuropathy was quite frequent but never severe. CONCLUSIONS: Eight weekly PET cycles are a highly effective primary treatment in women with triple-negative large operable breast cancer. This approach results in a very promising long-term DFS in this poor prognosis population. This triplet regimen is worthy of evaluation in phase III trials.

Outcome analysis of breast cancer patients receiving breast-conserving surgery in Southern Italy.

The purpose of the current analysis was to evaluate the outcome of patients enrolled at the National Cancer Institute of Naples between 1997 and 2000, who underwent breast-conserving surgery. Between January 1997 and December 2000, 946 patients had been diagnosed with T1 or T2 (<3 cm) breast carcinoma. At the time of the present analysis (31-12-2005), all patients had been followed for >5 years. A Cox proportional hazards model was performed. Overall, 7-year Locoregional Relapse-free survival (LRFS) and Distant Relapse-free Survival (DRFS) rates were 95.9% and 88.4%, respectively. Seven-year DRFS was 91.2% and 79.3% in T1 and T2 stage, respectively (p<0.0001). Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that number of positive lymph-nodes and hormone receptor status were significantly associated with prognosis. Our findings confirm that early diagnosed breast cancer, treated with breast-conserving surgery, is associated with a very good prognosis in patients referred to an Institution which may be considered as representative of similar Cancer Institutes of Southern Italy. The risk of local relapse was found to be very low (4%), although a longer follow-up is needed to draw definitive conclusions.

Efficacy of the combination of cisplatin with either gemcitabine and vinorelbine or gemcitabine and paclitaxel in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised trial of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG 0101).

BACKGROUND: Triplet regimens were occasionally reported to produce a higher response rate (RR) than doublets in locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This trial was conducted to assess (i) whether the addition of cisplatin (CDDP) to either gemcitabine (GEM) and vinorelbine (VNR) or GEM and paclitaxel (PTX) significantly prolongs overall survival (OS) and (ii) to compare the toxicity of PTX-containing and VNR-containing combinations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage III or IV NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to (i) GEM 1000 mg/m(2) and VNR 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (GV arm); (ii) GEM 1000 mg/m(2) and PTX 125 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (GT arm); (iii) GV plus CDDP 50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (PGV arm); and (iv) GT plus CDDP 50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (PGT arm). Treatments were repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: A total of 433 (stage III, 160; stage IV, 273) patients were randomly allocated to the study. RR was 48% [95% confidence interval (CI), 42% to 54%] for triplets and 35% (95% CI, 32% to 38%) for doublets (P = 0.004). Median progression-free survival (6.1 versus 5.5 months, P = 0.706) and median OS (10.7 versus 10.5 months, P = 0.379) were similar. CDDP significantly increased the occurrence of severe neutropenia (35% versus 13%), thrombocytopenia (14% versus 4%), anaemia (9% versus 3%), vomiting (6% versus 0.5%), and diarrhoea (6% versus 2%). Conversely, frequency of severe neutropenia (30% versus 17%) and thrombocytopenia (11% versus 6%) was significantly higher with VNR-containing regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Adding CDDP to GV or GT significantly increased RR, but did not prolong the OS of patients. Among doublets, the GT regimen should be preferred in view of its better safety profile.

Weekly cisplatin, epirubicin, and paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support vs triweekly epirubicin and paclitaxel in locally advanced breast cancer: final analysis of a sicog phase III study.

The present study aimed at evaluating whether a weekly cisplatin, epirubicin, and paclitaxel (PET) regimen could increase the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in comparison with a tri-weekly epirubicin and paclitaxel administration in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients. Patients with stage IIIB disease were randomised to receive either 12 weekly cycles of cisplatin 30 mg m(-2), epirubicin 50 mg m(-2), and paclitaxel 120 mg m(-2) (PET) plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support, or four cycles of epirubicin 90 mg m(-2)+paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2) (ET) every 3 weeks. Overall, 200 patients (PET/ET=100/100) were included in this study. A pCR in both breast and axilla occurred in 16 (16%) PET patients and in six (6%) ET patients (P=0.02). The higher activity of PET was evident only in ER negative (27.5 vs 5.4%; P=0.026), and in HER/neu positive (31 vs 5%; P=0.037) tumours. The two arms yielded similar pCR rate in ER positive (PET/ET=7.5/7.1%) and HER/neu negative (PET/ET=10/6%) patients. At a 39 months median follow-up, 70 patients showed a progression or relapses (PET, 32 vs ET, 38). Anaemia, mucositis, peripheral neuropathy, and gastrointestinal toxicity were substantially more frequent in the PET arm. The PET weekly regimen is superior to ET in terms of pCR rate in LABC patients with ER negative and/or HER2 positive tumours Mature data in terms of disease-free and overall survival are needed to ascertain whether this approach could improve the prognosis of these subsets of LABC patients.

A 2-month cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel (PET) weekly combination as primary systemic therapy for large operable breast cancer: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to define the antitumor activity of eight cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel (PET) weekly cycles with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in patients with large operable breast cancer. METHODS: Operable breast cancer (T2-3 N0-1; T >3 cm) patients received eight preoperative weekly cycles of cisplatin 30 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 120 mg/m2, with G-CSF (5 microg/kg, days 3-5) support. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (T2/T3=30/33; N0/N+=8/55) were enrolled. Thirty-one clinical complete (49%) and 30 partial (48%) responses were recorded, giving a 97% response rate (95% confidence interval 89% to 100%). Breast-sparing surgery was performed in 32/63 (51%) patients. At pathological assessment, 28 patients (45%) showed absence of invasive residual disease in breast and 34 (55%) had negative axilla. In 20 women (32%) both breast and axilla were found to be disease-free. At a 23-month median follow-up (range 4-63), only eight relapses and two deaths had occurred, with the 4-year projected relapse-free and overall survival being 59% and 95%, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and anemia occurred in 24% and 5% of patients, respectively. Emesis, diarrhea and mucositis were the main non-hematological toxicities; however, only nine (14%) patients experienced one or more episodes of severe non-hematological toxicity. Peripheral neuropathy was frequent, but never severe. CONCLUSIONS: A 2-month weekly treatment with PET represents a well tolerated and highly effective approach in large operable breast cancer patients. In spite of the short duration of chemotherapy, one-third of patients achieved a complete eradication of the tumor in both breast and axilla.

Gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine vs paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone for elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

The aim of this study was to assess whether a combination of gemcitabine (GEM) with either paclitaxel (PTX) or vinorelbine (VNR) could be more effective than GEM or PTX alone in elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A total of 264 NSCLC patients aged >70 years with ECOG performance status (PS)< or =2, or younger with PS=2, were randomly treated with: GEM 1200 mg m(-2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days; PTX 100 mg m(-2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days; GEM 1000 mg m(-2) plus PTX 80 mg m(-2) (GT) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days; GEM 1000 mg m(-2) plus VNR 25 mg m(-2) (GV) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. In all arms, an intra-patients dose escalation was applied over the first three courses, provided that no toxicity of WHO grade > or =2 had previously occurred. At present time, 217 (82%) patients had died. The median (months) and 1-year survival probability were 5.1 and 29% for GEM, 6.4 and 25% for PTX, 9.2 and 44% for GT, and 9.7 and 32% for GV. Multivariate analysis showed that PS< or =1 (hazard ratio (HR)=0.67; 95% CI 0.51-0.90), and doublet treatments (HR=0.76; 95% CI 0.59-0.99) were significantly associated with longer survival. Doublets produced no more toxicity than single agents. GT should be considered a reference regimen for elderly NSCLC patients with PS< or =1.

Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine yields better survival outcome than vinorelbine alone in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG) phase III trial.

OBJECTIVE: This phase III study was aimed at evaluating whether the addition of gemcitabine (G) to vinorelbine (V) could improve the survival and quality of life (QoL) of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC, aged >or=70 years, were randomly allocated to receive V 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks or G 1200 mg/m(2) plus V 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Survival was the main end point of the study. The estimated sample size was 120 patients per arm, but an interim analysis of survival was planned on the first 60 patients per arm. RESULTS: In May 1999, an interim analysis was performed with the survival data of the first 120 eligible patients (V(arm)=60, G+V(arm)=60). Forty-nine patients had stage IIIB disease and 71 patients stage IV disease, median potential follow-up of 14 months (range; 3-22), 93 patients had died (G+V(arm)=41, V(arm)=52). Median survival time (MST) was 29 weeks and projected 1-year survival was 30% in the G+V(arm); these values were 18 weeks and 13% in the V(arm). At multivariate Cox analysis, the risk of death in the G+V(arm) compared with V(arm) was 0.48 (95% C1=0.29-0.79; P<0.01). Combination therapy was also associated with a clear delay in symptom and QoL deterioration. The ORR was 22 and 15% in the G+V and V(arms), respectively. Toxicity was not irrelevant in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: G+V treatment is associated with a significantly better survival than V alone in elderly NSCLC patients. The magnitude of the difference justifies the early closure of the study. The G+V regimen is now the SICOG reference regimen in this type of patients.

Gemcitabine/cyclophosphamide/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid triplet combination in anthracycline- and taxane-refractory breast cancer patients: a Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group phase I/II study.

We sought to define the recommended dose of cyclophosphamide (CTX) for subsequent phase II assessment when combined with fixed doses of gemcitabine (Gemzar; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) and 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid in metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Patients age 70 or less, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, were enrolled. Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2), 5-fluorouracil 425 mg/m(2), folinic acid 100 mg/m(2), and escalating doses of CTX (in 100-mg/m(2) increments), starting at 500 mg/m(2), on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Since March 1999, 46 patients, with a median age of 51 years (range, 38 to 74 years), entered the trial in seven cohorts. Cyclophosphamide dose escalation was stopped at 600 mg/m(2) when three of six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (one each with grade 3 thrombocytopenia, grade 3 neutropenia, and persistent grade 2 neutropenia), and then continued with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. The CTX dose of 800 mg/m(2) was proven safe and was chosen for phase II study. Two complete and 15 partial responses provided an overall response rate of 37% (95% confidence interval, 23% to 51%). Gemcitabine/CTX/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid is well tolerated by metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines/taxanes, up to a CTX dose of 800 mg/m(2). The phase II study is ongoing. Semin Oncol 28 (suppl 10):50-56.

A weekly regimen of cisplatin, paclitaxel and topotecan with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support for patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

The present study was aimed at defining the antitumour activity of the cisplatin-paclitaxel-topotecan (CPT) weekly administration with G-CSF support in chemo-naive SCLC patients with extensive disease (ED-SCLC). Chemonaive ED-SCLC patients received cisplatin 40 mg/m(2), paclitaxel 85 mg/m(2), and topotecan 2.25 mg/m(2)weekly, with G-CSF (5 microg/kg days 3-5) support, for a maximum of 12 weeks. 37 patients were treated, for a total of 348 cycles delivered. 8 complete responses (22%) and 22 partial responses (59%) were recorded, giving an 81% [95% CI = 65-92%] ORR. At a 13-month (range, 4-26) median follow-up, median progression-free and overall survival were 8 months and 12.5 months, with 1-year and 2-year projected survivals of 55% and 21%, respectively. No toxic deaths occurred. Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 6 and 3 patients, respectively. Only one case of neutropenic sepsis was recorded, while haemorrhagic thrombocytopenia was never observed. Diarrhoea, paraesthesias and fatigue were the main nonhaematologic toxicities being severe in 6, 2 and 10 patients, respectively. The weekly CPT combination with G-CSF support represents a well tolerated therapeutic approach in chemo-naive ED-SCLC patients. The activity rate seems at least similar to that achievable with the standard front-line approaches.

Cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel weekly administration with G-CSF support in advanced breast cancer. A Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG) phase II study.

PURPOSE: It has been shown in vitro that both cisplatin and epirubicin increase the antitumor activity of paclitaxel. Weekly administration could give a substantial improvement in the therapeutic index of cisplatin and paclitaxel. This study was aimed at defining the antitumor activity of a weekly cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel (PET) administration in locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight breast cancer patients with advanced disease, who had not received prior chemotherapy (except adjuvant), received weekly cisplatin 30 mg/sqm, paclitaxel 120 mg/sqm and epirubicin 50 mg/sqm plus G-CSF (day 3-5), for a maximum of 12 cycles. Thirty-five patients had stage IIIB and 33 stage IV disease (14 with visceral metastases). RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for response on an intent to treat basis. Overall, 21 complete and 38 partial responses have been recorded for an 87% ORR (95% CI = 76-94%). Fourteen CRs and 19 PRs have been registered in the 35 patients with locally advanced disease for a 94% ORR (95% CI = 81-99%) while 7 CRs and 19 PRs were observed in the 33 patients with metastatic disease for a 79% ORR (95% CI-61-91%). Surgery was performed in 33/35 women with locally advanced disease. Four of these patients (11%) showed no invasive cancer on pathologic examination, and in an additional 8 patients tumor < 1 cm was found in the breast. Only 4/33 patients who underwent surgery relapsed. The projected one-year RFS was greater than 80%. At an 11-month median follow-up (range, 3-19), 11 patients had progressed and 5 had died among the 33 patients with metastatic disease, the median progression-free survival in this group being 14 months. Severe hematologic toxicity was uncommon, grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurring in 32% and 4% of patients, respectively. Only 2 episodes of neutropenic sepsis were registered. Packed red blood cell transfusions were required in 7 patients. Vomiting, diarrhoea, mucositis and skin toxicity were severe in 6%, 9%, 10%, and 9% of patients, respectively. Peripheral neuropathy was observed in 47% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The weekly PET administration is a well tolerated and very effective approach in advanced breast cancer patients. It can produce a 40% clinical complete response rate, with a more than 10% pCR rate in patients with T4 disease, and an about 80% ORR in those with distant metastases. A phase III trial comparing PET with a standard every 3 weeks epirubicin-taxol administration is underway.

Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine alone in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the addition of gemcitabine (G) to vinorelbine (V) improves survival and quality of life (QoL) among elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with NSCLC aged >/= 70 years with advanced disease were randomly allocated to receive V 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks or G 1,200 mg/m(2) + V 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The estimated sample size was 120 patients per arm, but an interim analysis of survival was planned based on the first 60 patients per arm. RESULTS: In May 1999, the survival data were analyzed of 120 eligible patients (V group = 60; G + V group = 60) who had been randomized from June 1997 to February 1999. Forty-nine patients had stage IIIB disease, and 71 had stage IV. At a median potential follow-up of 14 months (range, 3 to 22 months), 93 patients had died (G + V group = 41; V group = 52). In the G + V group, median survival time was 29 weeks and projected 1-year survival was 30%; these values were 18 weeks and 13% in the V group. According to multivariate Cox analysis, the risk of death in the G + V arm compared with the V arm was 0.48 (95% confidence interval, 0. 29 to 0.79; P <.01). Combination therapy was also associated with a clear delay in symptom and QoL deterioration. The overall response rates were 22% and 15% in the G + V and V groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with NSCLC, G + V treatment is associated with significantly better survival than is V alone.

Weekly docetaxel plus gemcitabine or vinorelbine in refractory advanced breast cancer patients: a parallel dose-finding study. Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG).

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the docetaxel MTD when combined with gemcitabine or vinorelbine in advanced breast cancer patients who had received previous anthracycline-based chemotherapy for advanced disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Advanced breast cancer patients aged between 18 and 70 with ECOG PS 0-2 who had not responded to, or had relapsed after, first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy, were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 or vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 in combination with escalating doses of docetaxel (starting from 30 mg/m2), all on days 1 and 8 every three weeks. Escalation was stopped if > 33% of patients treated at a given dose level showed DLT at the first cycle. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients with locally advanced (8) or metastatic disease (26) were treated, for a total of 94 cycles delivered. Nineteen patients received docetaxel in combination with gemcitabine and 15 with vinorelbine. All patients had been pretreated with anthracyclines, and 24 of 34 had also received weekly dose-dense paclitaxel. A docetaxel dose of 40/m2 proved to be safe when combined on days 1 and 8 with gemcitabine, while a dose of 35 mg/m2 was tolerated in combination with vinorelbine. Overall, nine episodes of DLT, all of them neutropenia, occurred at the first cycle. Considering all 94 cycles, grades 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 15 (44%), and 7 (20%) patients. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild, except for three cases of grade 2 peripheral neuropathy. All patients were assessed for response on an 'intent-to-treat' basis. Overall, five partial responses were recorded (docetaxel + gemcitabine = 3 and docetaxel + vinorelbine = 2), for a 15% (95% CI: 5%-31%) overall response rate. Only 1 of 24 (4%) patients who had received weekly dose-dense paclitaxel responded to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The weekly docetaxel administration in combination with either gemcitabine or vinorelbine is a well-tolerated treatment for heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer patients. This approach, although sometimes capable of achieving a major response, does not seem advisable in advanced breast cancer patients refractory to both anthracyclines and paclitaxel.

Randomized trial comparing cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine with either cisplatin and gemcitabine or cisplatin and vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: interim analysis of a phase III trial of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: In our previous phase II study, the cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine (PGV) regimen produced a median survival time (MST) of approximately 1 year in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The present study was aimed at comparing the MST of patients treated with this triplet regimen with the MSTs of patients receiving cisplatin and vinorelbine (PV) or cisplatin and gemcitabine (PG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 1997, patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, an age of < or = 70 years, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < or = 1 were randomized to receive one of the following regimens: cisplatin 50 mg/m(2), gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2), and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (arm A); cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (arm B); or cisplatin 120 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 29 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2)/wk (arm C). According to the two-stage design for phase III trials, an interim analysis was planned when the first 60 patients per arm were assessable for survival. RESULTS: The survival data of 180 NSCLC patients (stage IIIB, 76 patients; stage IV, 104 patients) were analyzed in April 1999. Overall, 128 patients had died (PGV, n = 33; PG, n = 42; and PV, n = 53). The MST of patients in the PGV, PG, and PV arms was 51, 42, and 35 weeks, respectively, and the corresponding 1-year projected survival rates were 45%, 40%, and 34%, respectively. When only patients with stage IV disease were considered, an even stronger difference was seen between PGV (MST = 47 weeks) and both PG (34 weeks) and PV (27 weeks). At multivariate Cox analysis, the estimate hazard of death for patients receiving PGV compared with those receiving PV was 0.35 (95% confidence interval, 0.16 to 0.77; P <.01). The response rates were 47% in the PGV arm, 30% in the PG arm, 25% in the PV arm. Both hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were not substantially worse in patients who received the PGV regimen. CONCLUSION: The PGV regimen is associated with a substantial survival gain (MST > 3 months longer) when compared with the PV combination. Because this difference in survival met one of the early stopping rules, the accrual in the PV arm has been stopped (null hypothesis rejected). Enrollment still continues in the PGV and PG arm to ascertain whether the PGV regimen can also produce a significantly longer survival than that obtained with the PG regimen.

Ambamustine in the second-line treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer: a phase II Fonicap study.

Despite a high probability of response to first-line chemotherapy, most patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) will eventually have progression of their disease because of the development of resistant disease. Second-line testing of new drugs is an accepted research strategy in SCLC. In this context, the Italian Lung Cancer Task Force (FONICAP) has tested a new synthetic bifunctional alkylating agent, Ambamustine, with preliminary evidence of activity in other solid tumors. Patients with measurable SCLC, progressive after one first-line chemotherapy regimen (either "sensitive" or "refractory"), were eligible for the study. Ambamustine was administered at the dose of 2 mg/kg as a 1-hour intravenous infusion on day 1 every 21 days. The dose was to be increased to 3 mg/kg if no grade IV toxicity and complete hematologic recovery had occurred by day 22. Sample size was calculated according to a two-stage optimal Simon's design. Seventeen patients were entered into the study. Twelve patients were refractory to prior chemotherapy; 12 had extensive disease; the median age was 64 years (range: 46-75 years) and the median performance status was 1. Among 13 patients who received more than one cycle, 9 patients could increase Ambamustine dose from 2 to 3 mg/kg. No objective response was observed: one patient obtained a 50% regression of the primary tumor with contemporary disease progression in the liver and was qualified as having progressive disease. The treatment was well tolerated: grade IV leukopenia occurred in only 1 patient; grade III anemia occurred in 17.6%, grade III leukopenia in 11.8%, and grade III thrombocytopenia in 23.5%. Nonhematologic toxicity was minimal. Ambamustine, at the dose and schedule used in this study, is well tolerated in pretreated patients with SCLC but has no significant antitumor activity in this unfavorable group of patients.

Phase I/II study of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of gemcitabine when combined with a fixed dose of vinorelbine in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to evaluate in a phase II trial the activity of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were treated with vinorelbine at fixed dose of 30 mg/m(2) intravenously and gemcitabine at increasing dose levels from 800 to 1,500 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: In phase I, dose-limiting toxicity occurred at the dosage of 1,500 mg/m(2) gemcitabine, with three of five patients developing grade 4 thrombocytopenia. In phase II, with gemcitabine at 1,200 mg/m(2), 19 (36%) of 52 assessable patients responded. Objective response was observed in 11 (39%) of 28 patients with stage IIIB disease and in eight (33%) of 24 patients with stage IV. The median time to progression was 29 weeks (range, 2 to 41 weeks; 35 weeks and 16 weeks for stages IIIB and IV, respectively), and median survival was 54 weeks (range, 2 to 84+ weeks; 63 weeks and 42 weeks for stages IIIB and IV, respectively). One-year survival was 64% for patients with stage IIIB disease and 29% for those with stage IV. Clinical benefit response was observed in 29 (59%) of 49 assessable patients. Grade 4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were uncommon (6% and 8% of cases, respectively); however, grade 3/4 leukothrombocytopenia occurred more frequently in patients aged more than 70 years (52% and 24%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The combination of vinorelbine and gemcitabine is effective and tolerable in the treatment of NSCLC, thus deserving randomized trials with cisplatin combination regimens.

Interim analysis of a phase III trial comparing cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine vs. either cisplatin and gemcitabine or cisplatin and vinorelbine in advanced non small-cell lung cancer. A Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group Study.

In a previous phase II randomized study, a cisplatin/gemcitabine/vinorelbine (PGV) regimen produced a 50-week median survival time (MST) in advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The present trial was planned to randomly compare the outcome of patients treated with this new triplet regimen with those of patients receiving either cisplatin plus vinorelbine (PV) or cisplatin plus gemcitabine (PG) doublet combinations. One hundred eighty patients with stage IIIB (76) or IV (104) disease, aged

Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel in locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I-II study. Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Because both cisplatin-paclitaxel and cisplatin-gemcitabine combinations are generally considered to be among the most active regimens in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, this study aimed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel when combined with fixed doses of cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced NSCLC patients and aimed to define the therapeutic activity of this new regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1996 to September 1998, 75 patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC, who were either chemotherapy-naive (65 patients) or who had been pretreated (10 patients), received fixed doses of cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)) and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) and escalating doses of paclitaxel in a 1-hour infusion, all on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Five different paclitaxel doses were tested, for a total of 275 cycles delivered. The escalation was stopped at the paclitaxel dose of 75 mg/m(2) in pretreated patients, whereas it continued to 150 mg/m(2) in chemotherapy-naive patients. A total of 65 chemotherapy-naive patients were treated. A paclitaxel dose of 125 mg/m(2) was recommended for phase II, and a total of 39 patients were treated at this level, for a total of 158 cycles delivered. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Five patients were hospitalized because of sepsis, and packed RBC transfusion was required in 13 patients. Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 23 (31%) and eight (11%) patients, respectively. Overall, 74 of the 75 patients were assessable for response. Four complete (CR) and 38 partial (PR) responses were recorded, for an overall response rate (ORR) of 57%. Three of the ten pretreated patients achieved a PR, compared with four CRs and 35 PRs in the 64 chemotherapy-naive patients (ORR, 61%). Thirty-eight of 39 patients included in phase II were assessable for response and quality of life (QOL) (one patient's disease was not measurable). Two CRs and 24 PRs were recorded in this group, for an ORR of 68% (95% confidence interval, 51% to 82%). The QOL score improved in 27 of 38 (71%) patients. The median survival time was 15 months in the 65 chemotherapy-naive patients, but it had not yet been reached in the 39 patients included in phase II, for whom the 1-year projected survival was 70%. CONCLUSION: The cisplatin-gemcitabine-paclitaxel combination is a feasible and well-tolerated approach in advanced NSCLC patients. Both a major response and a QOL improvement can be obtained in a high proportion of patients, with a median survival time exceeding 1 year. A phase III trial comparing this combination with other effective regimens is under way.

Is there any impact of new drugs on the outcome of advanced NSCLC? An overview of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group trials.

Lung cancer represents the major cause of cancer-related death in Europe and North America, accounting for 28% of all cancer deaths. Seventy to 80% of all lung cancers are non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), and approximately 75 % of these patients present with locally advanced or disseminated disease. Even though chemotherapy is now recommended in the majority of cases of unresectable NSCLC, it still fails to substantially modify the fate of these patients. In recent years, several active cytotoxic drugs (paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and irinotecan) have been developed, showing an overall response rate (ORR) <20% in NSCLC. Phase II/III trials testing these new agents in combination with cisplatin have been carried out in recent years with inconsistent results. Large randomized trials testing cisplatin-paclitaxel, carboplatin-paclitaxel, and cisplatin-gemcitabine regimens have been reported showing no substantial superiority of these combinations over standard treatments. The ORR remained well below 50%, and the median survival times were quite far from one year. These data could suggest that the addition of a single new agent to a platinum compound could be insufficient to substantially improve the prognosis of advanced NSCLC patients. In view of these disappointing data, the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group has tried to improve the fate of patients with advanced NSCLC by testing new triplet combinations, which combined cisplatin with two rather than one of the newest chemotherapy agents. To avoid an unacceptable increase in toxicity and/or a marked decrease in dose intensity, the standard schedules of administration of the three agents used in these studies were changed, and the schedule changes were evaluated in phase I trials aimed at determining the maximum tolerated dosages of the drugs. Subsequently, phase II and III trials were conducted. The present paper summarizes the results of the clinical trials either completed or under way and aims to evaluate whether this strategy will result in a substantial prognostic improvement.

Cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel weekly administration in advanced breast cancer: a phase I study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Both cisplatin and epirubicin have been shown to enhance the antitumor activity of paclitaxel in vitro. Weekly administration could result in a substantial improvement in the therapeutic index of cisplatin and paclitaxel. This study was aimed at determining the MTDs of epirubicin and paclitaxel given weekly with a fixed dose of cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-three breast cancer patients with advanced disease (24 locally advanced and 39 metastatic), who had not received prior chemotherapy (except adjuvant), received weekly cisplatin (CDDP) doses of 30 mg/m2 together with escalating doses of paclitaxel (PTX) and epirubicin (EPI) for a minimum of six cycles. The dose escalation was stopped if DLT occurred during the first six treatment cycles in > 33% of patients of a given cohort. RESULTS: Nine different dose levels were tested, for a total of 506 weekly cycles delivered. G-CSF support on days 3-5 of each week was also given in the last four cohorts (24 patients). An overall 11 patients showed DLT in the first six cycles. EPI and PTX doses up to 40 and 85 mg/m2/week, respectively, were safely delivered without G-CSF support. However, the actually delivered mean dose intensity was only 64% in this cohort. Therefore, the dose escalation continued with the addition of filgrastim from day 3 to day 5 each week. Doses of EPI and PTX up to 50 and 120 mg/m2/week were administered without observing DLT in the first six cycles in more than one third of the patients enrolled. No toxic deaths were observed. Only two patients had to be hospitalized because of sepsis. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 25, 9, and 16 patients, respectively. Alopecia was almost universal. Other nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild, being of grade 3-4 in only eight patients (fatigue and loss of appetite in two cases, diarrhoea in four cases, peripheral neuropathy and mucositis in one case). Fifteen complete and 37 partial responses have been registered for an 82% (95% CI = 71-91) overall clinical response rate (ORR). Eight complete and 14 partial responses occurred in the 24 patients with locally advanced disease, for a 92% (95% CI = 73-99) ORR, as compared to seven complete and 23 partial responses in the 39 women with metastatic disease, 77% (95% CI = 61-89). A clear dose-response relationship was not observed, since an overall response rate of at least 70% was achieved at all dose levels. However, the ORR increased to 92% in the last four cohorts which included patients who received higher doses of EPI and PTX with G-CSF support. All of the 24 patients with locally advanced disease underwent modified radical mastectomy with axillary dissection. Three of them showed no invasive cancer on pathologic examination, and in another five patients a tumor smaller than 1 cm was found in the surgical specimen of the breast. At a nine-month median follow-up (range 2-14), 11 patients have progressed and three have died. Twenty-three out of 24 patients who underwent surgery are still free from progression. The one-year projected progression-free survival is 77% for the whole population. CONCLUSIONS: The CDDP/EPI/PTX weekly administration is a well tolerated and very effective approach in advanced breast cancer patients. Full doses of all the three drugs can be delivered even in absence of G-CSF support. A very impressive increment of the dose-intensity can be obtained, however, by adding filgrastim. A phase II study is under way to better define the therapeutic efficacy of this regimen in patients with advanced breast cancer.