Medical resource use and costs related to central precocious puberty: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic burden of central precocious puberty (CPP) by examining direct health care resource utilization and costs. METHODS: Administrative claims from the Medstat MarketScan Commercial Claims database were analyzed, and 2 cohorts of children ≤ 12 years of age were identified. The CPP cohort included patients newly diagnosed with precocious sexual development and puberty (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 259.1x) between January 1, 2004, and June 30, 2006 (date of the initial diagnosis of CPP was designated as the "index date") who used gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists during the 12 months after diagnosis. Each patient with CPP was matched with 4 control patients without CPP on the basis of age, sex, geographic region, and type of health insurance plan. Resource utilization and costs during the 12 months before and the 12 months after the index date were examined. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients with CPP and 688 control patients were identified after matching. Approximately 62% of patients were 7 to 9 years of age, and 87% were female. The patients with CPP had higher annual health care costs than did the control patients during the 12-month pre-index ($10,968 versus $783; P<.001) and the 12-month post-index ($21,071 versus $849; P<.001) periods, primarily attributable to outpatient and pharmacy costs. For the patients with CPP, annual health care costs increased by $10,103 after diagnosis. On average, annual CPP-related costs were $10,605. Monthly total health care costs for the patients with CPP increased sharply during the first month after diagnosis and remained high throughout the post-index period. CONCLUSION: In this study, health care resource use and costs among patients with CPP were substantial before and after the initial diagnosis of CPP.

Outcomes of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia.

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical and economic outcomes among patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) treated with United States Food and Drug Administration-approved fixed dosing regimens of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA). METHODS: Data were employed from the Dosing and Outcomes Study of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Therapies (DOSE) registry to evaluate CIA patients who were initiated on either epoetin alfa (EPO) 40,000 Units (U) or darbepoetin alfa (DARB) 500 micrograms (mcg) between January 1, 2006 and May 8, 2009. Study measurements included ESA treatment dose and dose ratio, changes in hemoglobin (Hb) levels from baseline, and cumulative ESA costs. RESULTS: Five hundred forty patients treated in 44 clinical centers were evaluated, of which 420 were initiated on EPO 40,000 U and 120 were initiated on DARB 500 mcg. Both cohorts had similar baseline characteristics, although EPO patients were less likely than DARB patients to have received iron supplementation before ESA initiation (11.4% EPO vs. 20.0% DARB, p = 0.015). The EPO-to-DARB dose ratio based on cumulative ESA dose was 169:1 (U EPO: mcg DARB). EPO patients showed statistically greater Hb improvement compared to DARB patients, and compared to EPO patients, a greater proportion of DARB patients required a blood transfusion (13.9% EPO vs. 22.5% DARB, p = 0.026). Mean cumulative ESA cost was significantly lower for EPO patients than DARB patients ($4,261 EPO vs. $8,643 DARB, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings reported that patients with CIA achieved more favorable clinical and economic outcomes if initiated with EPO 40,000 U vs. DARB 500 mcg.

Medication adherence and healthcare costs among fibromyalgia patients treated with duloxetine.

OBJECTIVE: The study aims to examine predictors associated with duloxetine adherence and its association with healthcare costs among fibromyalgia patients. METHODS: Administrative claims from both commercially and Medicare supplemental-insured fibromyalgia patents aged 18+ who initiated duloxetine in 2006 were analyzed. Initiation was defined as a 90-day clean period without duloxetine. The dispense date of the first duloxetine prescription was denoted as the index date. Two cohorts were constructed based on duloxetine adherence over the 12-month postindex period (high adherence as medication possession ratio ≥0.8). Predictors of high adherence were examined via logistic regression. Generalized linear regressions were performed to estimate the association between duloxetine adherence and healthcare costs. RESULTS: A total of 4,869 commercially and 566 Medicare supplemental-insured fibromyalgia patients were identified. Two-thirds of patients had low adherence. Higher duloxetine average daily dose (ADD) was associated with increased adherence (reference group=30mg; Commercial: Odds ratio [OR]=3.03, 2.40, and 3.73 for 31 to 59mg, 60mg, and >60mg, respectively, all P<0.05; Medicare supplemental: OR=3.11, 2.33, and 4.76 for 31 to 59mg, 60mg, and >60mg, respectively, all P<0.05). Commercially insured patients with high adherence had significantly lower total healthcare costs than low-adherence patients (-$1,164, P<0.05), primarily because of lower inpatient (-$2,222, P<0.05) and outpatient (-$1,075, P<0.05) costs. Medicare supplemental-insured patients with high adherence had similar overall and inpatient costs, but significantly lower outpatient costs (-$2,025, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Fibromyalgia patients with higher duloxetine ADD were more likely to adhere to the therapy. High duloxetine adherence was associated with lower (Commercial) or similar (Medicare supplemental) healthcare costs.

Opioid utilization and health-care costs among patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain treated with duloxetine vs. other therapies.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective cohort study assessed subsequent opioid utilization and health-care costs among patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) who initiated duloxetine vs. other standard of care (SOC) treatments. METHODS: Medical and pharmacy claims were analyzed for commercially-insured individuals aged 18-64. Two study cohorts were constructed from DPNP patients who initiated duloxetine or SOC medications (tricyclic antidepressants, venlafaxine, gabapentin, pregabalin) between March 1, 2005 and December 31, 2005. Initiation was defined as a prior 90-day period without access of the medication. The dispense date of the first initiation was denoted as the index date. Patients with opioids dispensed in the prior 90 days were excluded. Opioid utilization including total days, number of prescriptions filled, and morphine equivalent dosage was assessed for overall, long-acting, and short-acting opioids. Health-care costs and opioid use in the 12-month post-index period were examined via multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Four hundred and ninety-nine DPNP patients (272 duloxetine, 227 SOC) were identified. SOC patients had higher prevalence of comorbidities and pre-index health-care costs than duloxetine patients. Controlling for cross-cohort differences, duloxetine patients were significantly less likely to use any opioids than SOC patients. Also, duloxetine patients had 20 fewer adjusted opioid supply days (largely due to the use of short-acting opioids, P < 0.05) and significantly lower adjusted total costs ($8,088, P < 0.05) and diabetes-related costs ($3,092, P < 0.05) in the 12-month post-index period, with most of the cost differences from lower outpatient costs. CONCLUSIONS: DPNP patients who initiated duloxetine therapy were less likely to have subsequent opioid use and had lower health-care costs than SOC patients.

The relationship between average daily dose, medication adherence, and health-care costs among diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain patients initiated on duloxetine therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between average daily dose (ADD) of duloxetine, adherence to therapy, and health-care costs among patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of commercially insured DPNP patients was conducted among those aged 18 to 64 years who initiated duloxetine therapy between Ocotober 1, 2004 and December 31, 2006. The dispense date of the first duloxetine prescription was defined as the index date. All duloxetine prescriptions over the 12-month post-index period were used to assess ADD and adherence. Four study cohorts were constructed based on ADD: 30 mg, 31 to 59 mg, 60 mg; and >60 mg. High adherence was defined as having a medication possession ratio for duloxetine of ≥0.8. Health-care costs over 12-month post-index period were estimated. Multiple regression models were used to examine the association between ADD, adherence, and health-care costs. RESULTS: The study sample included 1,351 DPNP patients (mean age: 55 years; male: 41%). Twelve percent of patients had a duloxetine ADD of 30 mg, 17% of 31 to 59 mg, 56% of 60 mg, and 15% of >60 mg. Patients with ADD of 30 mg (>60 mg) were significantly less (more) likely to adhere to duloxetine therapy compared with those in the 60 mg cohort. Controlling for cross-cohort demographic and clinical differences, patients with ADD of 30 mg, 31 to 59 mg, or >60 mg had significantly higher total health-care costs than those with ADD of 60 mg (adjusted differences: $6,090, $6,320, $6,466 for 30 mg, 31 to 59 mg, >60 mg, respectively, all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that having an ADD of 60 mg for duloxetine among commercially insured DPNP patients is associated with improved medication adherence and lower health-care costs.