Presbylarynx: Is it Possible to Predict Glottal Gap by Cut-Off Points in Auto-Assessment Questionnaires?

PURPOSE: To determine cut-off points in auto-assessment questionnaires to predict the presence and extent of presbylarynx signs. METHOD: This case control, prospective, observational, and cross-sectional study was carried out on consecutive subjects observed by Otorhinolaryngology, in a tertiary center, in 2020. Each subject underwent fiberoptic videolaryngoscopy with stroboscopy, and presbylarynx was considered when it was identified two or more of the following endoscopic findings: vocal fold bowing, prominence of vocal processes in abduction, and a spindle-shaped glottal gap. Each subject completed three questionnaires: the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), with 30 and 10 questions, and the "Screening for voice disorders in older adults questionnaire" (RAVI). RESULTS: The studied population included 174 Caucasian subjects (60 males; 114 females), with a mean age of 73.99 years (standard deviation = 6.37; range 65-95 years). Presbylarynx was identified in 71 patients (41%). Among patients with presbylarynx, a glottal gap was identified in 22 patients (31%). The mean score of VHI-30 between "no presbylarynx" and "presbylarynx" groups was statistically different (P < 0.001), with a higher score for subjects with signs of presbylarynx. The presence of glottal gap was associated to a higher mean score of VHI-30 (41.64 ± 11.87) (P < 0.001). The mean score of VHI-10 between "no presbylarynx" and "presbylarynx" groups was statistically different (P < 0.001), with a higher score for subjects with signs of presbylarynx. Among patients with presbylarynx, the presence of glottal gap was associated to higher mean score of VHI-10 (14.04 ± 3.91) (P < 0.001). There was a strong positive correlation between VHI-30 and VHI-10 (rs = 0.969; P < 0.001). The mean score of RAVI between "no presbylarynx" and "presbylarynx" groups was statistically different (P < 0.001), with a higher score for subjects with signs of presbylarynx. Among patients with presbylarynx, the presence of glottal gap was associated to a higher mean score of RAVI (11.68 ± 1.61) (P < 0.001). There was a strong positive correlation not only between RAVI and VHI-30 (rs = 0.922; P < 0.001), but also between RAVI and VHI-10 (rs = 0.906; P < 0.001). The optimal cut-off points to discriminate "no presbylarynx" from "presbylarynx", obtained by the Youden' index, were 3.5 for RAVI, 4.5 for VHI-30 and 1.5 for VHI-10. RAVI had the highest sensitivity and specificity. The optimal cut-off points to predict glottal gap, obtained by the Youden' index, were 9.5 for RAVI, 21 for VHI-30 and 7.5 for VHI-10. CONCLUSION: The optimal cut-off points do discriminate "no presbylarynx" from "presbylarynx" were 3.5 for RAVI, 4.5 for VHI-30 and 1.5 for VHI-10. RAVI had the highest sensitivity and specificity, probably because it was designed specifically for vocal complaints of the elderly. Among patients with presbylarynx, cut-off points of 9.5 for RAVI, 21 for VHI-30 and 7.5 for VHI-10 were determined to predict patients with and without glottal gap. It was found a strong positive correlation between RAVI, VHI-30 and VHI-10. Thus, VHI-10 can be preferred to VHI-30 to assess voice impairment in clinical practice, because for elderly patients it is easier to answer. However, to predict endoscopic signs of presbylarynx, RAVI should be preferred.

Pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI): Validation in European Portuguese Children.

OBJECTIVES: To determine reliability and validity of the European Portuguese pVHI version (pVHI-EP). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. METHODS: The pVHI-EP and the talkative and global voice assessment scales were administered to the caregivers of children aged from 3 to 16 years old with and without dysphonia. Reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) was analyzed. The validity analyses performed were: (1) content validity by analyzing the percentage of missing data; (2) construct validity with intraclass correlation coefficients among pVHI-EP domains and overall score; (3) concurrent validity was conducted between pVHI-EP, the caregivers' judgment of the child's voice severity on a visual analog scale and the Speech-Language Pathologist perceptual voice assessment; (4) known-groups validity between children with and without dysphonia, and (5) predictive validity by calculating receiver operating characteristics, sensitivity and specificity and determining cut-off points. RESULTS: A total of 283 children (61.5% boys, mean age 8.3 years) participated in the study. The pVHI-EP showed an excellent internal consistency for the pVHI-EP total data. Strong to moderate test-retest reliability confirms pVHI-EP reproducibility. Excellent to good intraclass correlation coefficients between the pVHI-EP overall and the domains confirms its construct validity. Weak to moderate concurrent validity with visual analog scale and Speech-Language Pathologist perceptual voice assessment was confirmed. The pVHI-EP significantly distinguished two groups of different voice conditions. A cut-off point of 10.5 with 95.9% sensitivity and 92.5% specificity was determined for the overall score of the pVHI-EP. CONCLUSIONS: The pVHI-EP is a reliable and valid caregiver voice outcome tool for EP children with dysphonia.

Presbylarynx: Is It a Sign of the Health Status of the Elderly?

PURPOSE: Only a full understanding of how different diseases affect the same or different anatomical/functional entities, may provide a clue on how comorbidity should be taken into consideration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the chronic medical illnesses of an elderly population, in order to analyze potential correlation of specific comorbidities with presbylarynx. METHODS: This case-control, prospective, observational, and cross-sectional study was carried out on consecutive subjects observed by otorhinolaryngology, in a tertiary center, from January to September 2020. The inclusion criteria were ability to report an accurate medical history and ≥65 years of age. The exclusion criteria were neurologic diagnoses, autoimmune disease, history of thoracic or head and neck surgery, cancer, radiotherapy, thyroid pathology, vocal fold mass lesions, acute laryngitis, or vocal fold paralysis. Based on videostroboscopy of the larynx, the patients were subdivided into two main groups: presbylarynx versus no presbylarynx. Health status was assessed by evaluation of chronic medical illnesses (individual diagnoses of chronic conditions plus Charlson comorbidity index [CCI]), functional status (Katz index of independence in activities of daily living and functional Ambulation ambulation classification), and emotional status (Geriatric Depression Scale). RESULTS: A total of 174 subjects (60 males; 114 females) were included (mean age = 73.99 years; range 65-95 years). Presbylarynx was identified in 71 patients (41%). A statistically significant difference was found concerning diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM); P< 0.001), asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; P< 0.001), and psychiatric disorder (P< 0.001). The mean score of CCI between "presbylarynx" and "no presbylarynx" groups was statistically different (P= 0.021). Results showed an association between some functional dependence (P< 0.001), and mild or severe depression (P< 0.001) and the presence of presbylarynx. CONCLUSIONS: Presbylarynx may be considered a sign of the health status of the elderly. Based on CCI, It was found that patients with higher probability of 10-year mortality exhibit more endoscopic signs of presbylarynx. It was also found that patients with better scores in functionality scales exhibited less endoscopic findings compatible with presbylarynx. Among chronic medical illnesses, T2DM, asthma, or COPD may be considered risk factors for noticeable endoscopic signs of presbylarynx.

Geriatric otorhinolaryngology: reasons for outpatient referrals from generalists to ENT specialists.

PURPOSE: To determine the main symptoms leading to referral of geriatric patients from primary care to otorhinolaryngology. METHODS:  Retrospective, observational study performed on patients aged 65 and older, referred from Primary Care to the Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery department of a tertiary centre during 2019 and 2020. Symptoms leading to otorhinolaryngological referral were categorized as "Oto-neurological symptoms", "Nasal symptoms", "Pharyngolaryngeal symptoms", "Other Head and Neck symptoms" and "Other Reasons". Data regarding age, gender and whether patients maintain follow-up or have been discharged was also collected. RESULTS:  The study population included a total of 1304 patients (697 female; 607 male). Oto-neurological symptoms were found to be the most prevalent symptoms, with 65% of patients reporting oto-neurological symptoms as at least one of the reasons for referral. Hearing loss was the most commonly reported symptom, with an association found between this symptom and age (p < 0.001). Results also showed an association between the female gender and vertigo/dizziness (p < 0.001) and tinnitus (p = 0.007). An association between the male gender and nasal symptoms was also found (p = 0.018), particularly nasal obstruction (p = 0.003) and epistaxis (p = 0.028). No statistically significant associations were found among the pharyngolaryngeal group. CONCLUSIONS:  This retrospective observational study allowed for a better understanding of the type of otorhinolaryngological symptoms affecting elderly patients and driving otorhinolaryngology evaluation, cementing hearing loss as one of the major complaints among older adults and allowing for a better preparation by otorhinolaryngologists for the changing needs of this subset of the population.

Presbylarynx: validation of a classification based on morphological characteristics.

PURPOSE: Validation of a classification to stratify presbylarynx into three types. METHODS: Evaluate the reproducibility of this classification. 30 video recordings of rigid laryngostroboscopies were presented to 20 otorhinolaryngologists from five tertiary hospitals: 10 residents and 10 specialists. Specialists with different differentiations were included. RESULTS: Among 1200 evaluations performed (30 video recordings × 20 raters, twice), average intra-rater agreement rate was 0.847 (p < 0.001). The average inter-rater reliability was 0.67 ± 0.179 on the first evaluation, and 0.691 ± 0.131 on the second evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: This study presented the validation of a classification that allows stratifying laryngeal endoscopic signs in elderly patients with presbyphonia. We believe that this classification will enrich the diagnostic protocol of the aging voice and will improve the documentation of treatment outcomes.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the European Portuguese Dysphagia Handicap Index.

The Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI) is a valid Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) 25-item questionnaire assessing the physical, functional, and emotional aspects of patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD), of heterogeneous etiologies. The purpose of this study is to translate and validate the European Portuguese-DHI (EP-DHI). This is a prospective study that was carried out at Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUPorto). The generated EP-DHI was administered to 132 patients with OD and 112 healthy control subjects. 132 patients undergoing fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (FEES). 15 patients were contacted by phone, 2 or 3 weeks later after the first interview to repeat the questionnaire. The validity of concurrent criteria was evaluated by comparing the results of the EP-DHI score with the score attributed to the pathological findings found in FEES and, consequently, Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). The internal consistency of EP-DHI was successful: Cronbach's alpha coefficient for total EP-DHI was 0.874. The test-retest reliability for the total and the three EP-DHI subscales obtained a Pearson's correlation coefficient ranged from 0.990 to 0.712. This study demonstrates that EP-DHI is a valid tool for self-assessment of the handicapping effect of dysphagia on physical, functional, and emotional aspects of patient's quality of life, among an European Portuguese sample.

Stratifying Presbylarynx: Characterization of its Three Types.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical characteristics of each type of glottal configuration proposed in a classification that allows stratifying presbylarynx into three types: Type 0: there is no significant morphological alteration in glottal configuration. Type 1: two or more of the following endoscopic signs are present: atrophic vocal folds, vocal fold bowing, prominence of vocal processes, supraglottal hyperactivity, decreased amplitude (vocal fold edge stiffness without evidence of vocal post-traumatic scar), and tremor of laryngeal structures. Type 2: elderly patients with type 1 plus glottal insufficiency. METHODS: Prospective, observational, and cross-sectional study. Data regarding age, gender, type of glottal configuration, self-assessment regarding vocal complaints, as well as acoustic and audio-perceptive examination were collected. RESULTS: The study population included 306 subjects (180 females), and the mean age was 73.85. Type 0 was the most frequent (61%). A statistically significant association was found between type 0 and female subjects, as well as type 2 and male subjects. The mean age of the patients with type 0 was statistically lower than the mean age of the patients with type 1 or type 2. The mean score of self-assessment questionnaires of patients with type 2 was statistically higher than the mean score registered for patients with type 0 and type 1. The mean score of Jitter, Shimmer, and HNR in type 2 were statistically higher than in type 0 or type 1 (P < 0.05). The mean score of Maximum Phonation Time in type 2 was statistically lower than in type 0 or 1 (P < 0.001). Based on vocal complaints, 115 subjects (38%) had presbyphonia (46 males; 69 females), and the mean age was 75.97 years (SD = 6.98; range 65 - 97). Among subjects without presbyphonia (n = 191), type 0 was the most frequent (84%), followed by type 1 (15%) and type 2 (1%). Among subjects with presbyphonia (n = 115), type 1 was the most frequent (58%), followed by type 0 (23%) and type 2 (19%). CONCLUSIONS: This study presented the clinical characterization of a classification that allows stratifying endoscopic laryngeal signs in elderly patients with presbyphonia. We believe this classification will enrich the diagnostic protocol of the aging voice and will improve the documentation of treatment outcomes.

Presbylarynx: How Easy Is It To Recognize The Aging Signs? A Prospective Study With Inter- And Intra-Rater Reliability In Laryngoscopic Evaluation.

PURPOSE: To determine if recognition of presbylarynx is easy and straightforward. METHOD: First, a systematic review regarding the structural features of the geriatric larynx through laryngostroboscopy was performed, and its results were presented to the raters in an educational session. Then, video recordings of rigid laryngostroboscopies were randomly selected and presented to a panel of otorhinolaryngologists. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were determined. RESULTS: Based on the main findings of the systematic review, raters were invited to consider the diagnosis of presbylarynx when one or more of the following endoscopic signs were present: atrophic vocal folds (VF), VF bowing, prominence of vocal processes, or spindle-shaped glottal gap. Twenty otorhinolaryngologists from five tertiary hospitals participated in this study (residents and specialists). Among 300 evaluations performed (15 video recordings x 20 raters), the intra-rater agreement was 93.0%. The Cohen´s Kappa for intra-rater reliability was higher than 0.600 for all the raters except for two residents. Cohen´s Kappa was higher among specialists (0.893) than among residents (0.826). The highest Cohen´s Kappa was registered for evaluations performed by specialists with differentiation in laryngology (0.933). Presbylarynx was identified mostly in laryngostroboscopic recordings of subjects older than 65 years. CONCLUSION: we consider the answer to "Presbylarynx: How easy is it to recognize the aging signs" to be "After education on signs of presbylarynx, it is easy." This answer is supported by the high rate of intra- and inter-rater agreement, in a blinded and randomized presentation of laryngostroboscopic recordings, and by the fact that the diagnosis of presbylarynx was mostly attributed to videos regarding subjects aged 65 years and older. It proves that is not difficult to recognize aging signs in the larynx. Thus, in the future, more education regarding presbylarynx and further studies to improve criteria for its diagnosis may improve the management of the aging voice.

Swallowing and Communication Management of Tracheostomy and Laryngectomy in the Context of COVID-19: A Review.

IMPORTANCE: The care of patients with a surgically modified airway, such as tracheostomy or laryngectomy, represents a challenge for speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The objective was to review available publications and practice guidelines on management of tracheostomy and laryngectomy in the context of COVID-19. This study performed a review and synthesis of information available in the PubMed database and from national SLP organizations across 6 countries. OBSERVATIONS: From the search, 22 publications on tracheostomy and 3 referring to laryngectomy were identified. After analysis of titles and abstracts followed by full-text review, 4 publications were identified as presenting guidelines for specific approaches to tracheostomy and were selected; all 3 publications on laryngectomy were selected. The main guidelines on tracheostomy described considerations during management (eg, cuff manipulation, suctioning, valve placement) owing to the increased risk of aerosol generation and transmission during swallowing and communication interventions in this population. Regarding laryngectomy, the guidelines focused on the care and protection of both the professional and the patient, offering recommendations on the management of adverse events and leakage of the tracheoesophageal prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Frequent guideline updates for SLPs are necessary to inform best practice and ensure patient and health care worker protection and safety while providing high-quality care and rehabilitation.

Assessment, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Dysphagia in Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2: A Review of the Literature and International Guidelines.

Purpose Speech-language pathologists are playing a crucial role in the assessment and management of patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Our goal was to synthesize peer-reviewed literature and association guidelines from around the world regarding dysphagia assessment and management for this specific population. Method A review of publications available in the PubMed database and official guidelines of international groups was performed on May 23, 2020. The information was synthesized and categorized into three content areas for swallowing: clinical evaluation, instrumental assessment, and rehabilitation. Results Five publications were identified in the PubMed database. Following title, abstract, and full-text review, only three publications met inclusion criteria: two reviews and one narrative report. Additionally, 19 international guidelines were reviewed. To assess swallowing, a modified clinical evaluation was recommended and only following a risk assessment. Instrumental assessments were often considered aerosol generating, especially transnasal procedures such as endoscopy and manometry. For this reason, many associations recommended that these examinations be performed only when essential and with appropriate personal protective equipment. Guidelines recommended that intervention should focus on compensatory strategies, including bolus modification, maneuvers/postural changes, and therapeutic exercises that can be conducted with physical distancing. Respiratory training devices were not recommended during rehabilitation. Conclusions International associations have provided extensive guidance regarding the level of risk related to the management of dysphagia in this population. To date, there are no scientific papers offering disease and/or recovery profiling for patients with dysphagia and coronavirus disease 2019. As a result, research in this area is urgently needed.

Is there an improvement on acoustic voice parameters in patients with bilateral vocal fold nodules after voice therapy? a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to estimate the effect of voice therapy intervention in adults with vocal fold nodules, on three acoustic voice parameters (fundamental frequency, jitter and shimmer). The purpose of this meta-analysis is to present evidence based on literature regarding objective acoustic voice parameters changes, after voice therapy, in patients with bilateral VFNs. A pooled statistical analysis comparing pre- and post-therapy measurements of three acoustic voice parameters (average F0, % jitter and % shimmer) were performed. METHODS: A literature review was performed by searching studies in adults, with bilateral vocal fold nodules who received voice therapy, and where voice quality was evaluated quantitatively using acoustic analysis, before and after treatment. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model. PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL and Web of Science were searched for retrospective and prospective cohort, cross-sectional and case-control with comparative studies in adults published between January/1995 and March/2019 and English written. Search terms used were: intervention, therapy, vocal, voice, nodules, bilateral, multidimensional assessment, acoustic and analysis. RESULTS: Overall 1950 articles were identified. After removing repeated articles and conducting screening stages using inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of four studies were selected with 147 participants for the meta-analysis. The pooled results analysis showed a statistically significant effect in two acoustic parameters after voice therapy: (1) F0 [increased mean difference post-therapy was 33.00 Hz (95% CI 20.26-45.74, p < 0.001)] and (2) jitter (%) [decreased mean difference post-therapy was 0.59% (95% CI 0.23-0.94%, p = 0.001)]. In addition, a non-statistically significant effect in shimmer (%) [decreased mean difference post-therapy was 2.98% (95% CI - 0.03-6.00, p = 0.052)]. CONCLUSION: Acoustic analysis has a clinical role in patients with vocal fold nodules, by objectively assessing and providing data on the effect of voice therapy in voice acoustic parameters. This meta-analysis has shown that patients with vocal fold nodules improved their acoustic voice parameters after receiving voice therapy.

Self-evaluation of communication experiences after laryngectomy (SECEL): translation and psychometric properties in European Portuguese.

Introduction: The patients' perception of how communication dysfunction may cause a disadvantage is important information for the clinical decision-making process.Objectives: This study aimed to translate the self-evaluation of communication experiences after laryngectomy (SECEL) to the European Portuguese (EP) and to assess its feasibility, acceptability, reliability, and validity.Material and methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out, and a cluster sample of seven ENT outpatient clinics was drawn. The EP-SECEL was filled in by 129 people with laryngectomy, aged 29-81 years and 25 of those completed it in the second time. Patients have also filled in the European Organization for Research Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORCT), the core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the 35-item Head and Neck module (H&N35).Results: The EP-SECEL has the same conceptual meaning, semantics, idiomatic, format and score equivalence as the original one. Psychometric analyses revealed that it is feasible (missing <1%, to fill out took about 15 minutes for most patients), acceptable (floor and ceiling effects inferior to 15%), reliable (excellent internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha = 0.90, and moderate test-retest, Spearman's rhô = 0.64), well-constructed (66% of the total variance is explained by exploratory factor analysis), significantly convergent (correlates with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and H&N35) and validly discriminates people with total and partial laryngectomy as well as people with different primary means-of-communication.Conclusions: This study supports that the EP-SECEL has sufficient psychometric qualities to be considered an adequate tool to be recommended for assessing health-related quality of life among laryngectomy patients.