Implementation of the combined use of non-invasive fetal electrocardiography and electrohysterography during labor: A prospective clinical study.

INTRODUCTION: Fetal electrocardiography (NI-fECG) and electrohysterography (EHG) have been proven more accurate and reliable than conventional non-invasive methods (doppler ultrasound and tocodynamometry) and are less affected by maternal obesity. It is still unknown whether NI-fECG and EHG will eliminate the need for invasive methods, such as the intrauterine pressure catheter and fetal scalp electrode. We studied whether NI-fECG and EHG can be successfully used during labor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective clinical pilot study was performed in a tertiary care teaching hospital. A total of 50 women were included with a singleton pregnancy with a gestational age between 36+0 and 42+0 weeks and had an indication for continuous intrapartum monitoring. The primary study outcome was the percentage of women with NI-fECG and EHG monitoring throughout the whole delivery. Secondary study outcomes were reason and timing of a switch to conventional monitoring methods (i.e., tocodynamometry and fetal scalp electrode or doppler ultrasound), repositioning of the abdominal electrode patch, success rates (i.e., the percentage of time with signal output), and obstetric and neonatal outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register (NL8024). RESULTS: In 45 women (90%), NI-fECG and EHG monitoring was used throughout the whole delivery. In the other five women (10%), there was a switch to conventional methods: in two women because of insufficient registration quality of uterine contractions and in three women because of insufficient registration quality of the fetal heart rate. In three out of five cases, the switch was after full dilation was reached. Repositioning of the abdominal electrode patch occurred in two women. The overall success rate was 94.5%. In 16% (n = 8) of women, a cesarean delivery was performed due to non-progressing dilation (n = 7) and due to suspicion of fetal distress (n = 1). Neonatal metabolic acidosis did not occur. Two neonates (4%) were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit for complications not related to intrapartum monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: NI-fECG and EHG can be successfully used during labor in 90% of women. Future research is needed to conclude whether implementation of electrophysiological monitoring can improve obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth: the results from A 20-year cohort.

Cerclages can be used to prevent preterm birth, although their effectiveness and safety is disputed. We aimed to describe obstetric outcomes after cerclage procedures. We included 156 singleton pregnancies and six multiple pregnancies. In singleton pregnancies with history-indicated, short cervix-indicated and emergency cerclages, respectively 84.6, 76.5 and 43.8% resulted in late preterm or term deliveries. In singletons, the following complications were reported: excessive bleeding in one emergency cerclage procedure and three re-cerclage procedures in the history-indicated cerclage group. No perioperative rupture of membranes occurred in singletons. When comparing results of experienced and less-experienced gynaecologists, a remarkably smaller take home child rate was observed for singletons treated by less-experienced gynaecologists: 90.7% and 94.4% for the two experienced gynaecologist as compared to 85.0% for the group of less-experienced gynaecologists. In conclusion, cerclages in singletons result in few cerclage-associated complications and a high take home child rate, when performed by experienced gynaecologists. Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Prematurity is the leading cause of perinatal and neonatal mortality and morbidity worldwide. Cervical cerclages can be used to prevent preterm birth, although their effectiveness and safety is disputed.What the results of this study add? In our cohort study, singleton pregnancies with cerclages seem to have satisfactory obstetric outcomes. We found a very low prevalence of cerclage-associated complications in singleton pregnancies, for both history-indicated, short cervix-indicated and emergency cerclages. Additionally, take home child rates in singleton pregnancies were remarkably higher when cerclage procedures were performed by experienced gynaecologists, compared to less experienced gynaecologists.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Based on the observed difference in take home child rates, we advise all cerclage procedures to be performed by experienced gynaecologists only. This may mean that women with an indication for cerclage will be referred to a more experienced colleague, either in the same, or in another hospital. To ensure treatment by an experienced gynaecologist, simulation-based training could also provide a solution.

Clinical evaluation of electrohysterography as method of monitoring uterine contractions during labor: A propensity score matched study.

OBJECTIVE: Electrohysterography is a non-invasive technique to monitor uterine activity and has a significantly higher sensitivity compared to conventional external tocodynamometry. Whether this technique could lead to improved obstetrical outcomes is still unknown. In this propensity score matched study, clinical results of the first pilot implementing electrohysterography during labor were evaluated. The hypothesis tested is that electrohysterography will help to optimize uterine activity and thereby lead to fewer obstetric interventions. Secondary outcomes were Apgar score, arterial umbilical pH values, first stage labor duration, episiotomy rate and postpartum vaginal blood loss. STUDY DESIGN: From November 2017 until October 2018, electrohysterography was introduced as a standard alternative for monitoring uterine activity in high-risk deliveries. It could be applied in case of induced labor, previous cesarean delivery, body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 or an inadequate external tocodynamometry monitoring. Outcomes were compared to a matched group of women in which external tocodynamometry was applied for uterine activity monitoring during labor. These women were identified using propensity scores. RESULTS: A total of 348 women received electrohysterography as standard method of uterine monitoring during labor. A match (1:1 ratio) was found for 317 women, resulting in a total population of 634 women. No significant differences were seen in obstetric interventions (i.e. cesarean deliveries and assisted vaginal deliveries) between the electrohysterography and tocodynamometry group (P = 0.80). No statistically significant differences were seen regarding the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This first pilot study implementing electrohysterography as monitoring method during labor in a high-risk population did not result in statistically significant differences regarding obstetric interventions, low Apgar scores or low umbilical artery pH values. Therefore, we suggest that electrohysterography causes no harm and we recommend further implementation and evaluation in clinical practice.

Simulation-based training of vaginal twin delivery for experienced gynaecologists: Useful or not?

OBJECTIVE: It is important to train clinicians to maintain and optimise maternal and neonatal outcomes after vaginal twin delivery. Simulation-based training provides opportunities for training in a realistic way without harming patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of simulation-based training concerning twin vaginal delivery on knowledge and comfort of obstetrician-gynaecologists. STUDY DESIGN: Obstetrician-gynaecologists participated in a twin vaginal delivery simulation between March 2018 and May 2019. Simulation-based training consisted of standardized patient interviews, didactic sessions and three different simulation-based scenarios: internal podalic version and breech extraction, assisted vaginal delivery and vaginal breech delivery with problems of aftercoming head. Pre- and posttraining, participants were asked to fill out questionnaires exploring knowledge concerning vertex-vertex twin deliveries and vertex-nonvertex twin deliveries, level of comfort performing various obstetric manoeuvres and counselling on mode of delivery for women pregnant with twins. Our primary outcome of interest was a change in knowledge or comfort surrounding vaginal twin delivery after completion of the simulation-based training. RESULTS: The estimated median number of vaginal twin deliveries performed by the participating thirty-four obstetrician-gynaecologists was 50 (IQR 20-100). Significant improvements were seen in knowledge regarding twin deliveries with vertex-nonvertex presentation (p < 0.01). In two of three questions regarding twin delivery with vertex-vertex presentation significant improvements were seen as well (p < 0.01). Before training, 40.6% of participants felt comfortable to perform internal podalic version compared to 91.2% afterwards (p < 0.01). Comfort with breech extraction increased from 69.7% to 97.1% pre- and posttraining, respectively (p < 0.01). Before training only 55.9% would strongly counsel patients towards vaginal twin delivery as opposed to 73.5% after training (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-based training results in beneficial effects on knowledge and comfort concerning vaginal twin deliveries for obstetrician-gynaecologists. This training suggested a potential impact on provider practice with a more favourable attitude towards twin vaginal birth.