Men at risk of being a mutation carrier for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer: an exploration of attitudes and psychological functioning during genetic testing.

Males with a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation are not at greatly increased risk for cancer, whereas their (grand)daughters, and other female relatives who carry the mutation, are. Males from BRCA1/BRCA2 families may opt for genetic testing to confirm whether or not they may have transmitted the mutation to their children and, if so, to inform them at an appropriate age about the genetic risk and its implications. The psychological implications of genetic testing for men at risk of being a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carrier have received little attention. We report on 28 men requesting BRCA1 or BRCA2 testing, and their partners. Men were at 25% (n =4) or 50% risk (n =24) of being a mutation carrier, the majority with daughters and half of them with daughters aged over 20 years. Levels of psychological distress were assessed several weeks before and after disclosure of the test result. In addition, we investigated the level of intrusive thoughts and feelings about breast and ovarian cancer and the tendency to avoid these. By means of interviews and questionnaires, participants could report on (expected) emotional implications of genetic testing for themselves and their children, on experiences with cancer in the family and on personality trait optimism. Distress levels prior to the result in tested men and their partners were low. Many men and partners expected the test result to affect their children's, but not their own level of problems. Men without daughters and those with an optimistic personality had especially low distress prior to disclosure. Most men reported that they did not actively avoid the issue. Only four of the 28 men were identified as mutation carriers. High distress after disclosure of the result was reported by one mutation carrier and by three non-mutation carriers. Verbatim transcripts from interviews showed a large variation of psychological reactions in male mutation carriers (eg regarding guilt feelings). Low pre-test distress in males does not necessarily indicate avoidance of the issue. Future studies may indicate which psychological reactions occur in male mutation carriers when the problem becomes more acute, eg when a daughter is found to carry the mutation and/or is diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer.

Psychological impact of receiving a BRCA1/BRCA2 test result.

Mutation analysis for autosomal dominant hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genes (BRCA1/BRCA2) became an important technique for women at risk of carrying these mutations. Healthy female mutation carriers have a high lifetime risk for breast and/or ovarian cancer and may opt for frequent breast and ovary surveillance or prophylactic surgery (mastectomy and/or oophorectomy). Psychological distress was assessed in 78 healthy women at risk of having inherited a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation opting for genetic testing and 56 partners several weeks prior to ("pre-test") and after ("post-test") learning about their DNA test result. Twenty-five women were found to be mutation carriers, and 53 were non-mutation carriers. One goal of the study was to identify individuals at risk for high distress in the weeks following disclosure of the test result. Interview transcripts were used to give a fuller picture of pre- and post-test distress. High post-test anxiety was reported by 20% of the mutation carrier women and by 35% of their partners. Eleven percent of women without the mutation and 13% of their partners reported high post-test anxiety levels. High post-test anxiety in women was significantly related to 1) a high level of pre-test anxiety and 2) being a mutation carrier. Women without a mutation who had a sister identified as a mutation carrier recently had higher post-test levels of depression than the other non-mutation carriers. It is suggested to consider seriously the need for psychological support in mutation carriers who had been anxious at pre-test already. For most non-mutation carriers, psychological follow-up might be of lesser importance, but those having a sister receiving an unfavorable test result should be informed about the possibility that they might not feel relief.

Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS): emotional reactions of parents and adult patients to the clinical diagnosis of AIS and its confirmation by androgen receptor gene mutation analysis.

The emotional reactions of parents and adult patients on disclosure of the clinical diagnosis of androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) and its later confirmation by gene mutation analysis were assessed. A semistructured interview and three questionnaires were used. Parents came from 18 different families with a total of 20 children (15 complete AIS, 5 partial AIS), 19 raised as girls, 1 as a boy. Ten adult women with complete AIS came from six families. The short-term reaction upon the clinical diagnosis was in the majority of both parents and adult patients associated with shock, grief, anger, and shame and in the mothers and adult patients with guilt. Emotional reactions were more long-lasting in mothers and adult patients than in fathers. The confirmation by DNA analysis did not alter the actual feelings of both parents. Adolescents with AIS should be informed completely - but in a step-by-step way - about their condition, since adult patients indicated that they had suffered from being not at all or misinformed about AIS in their adolescence.

Presymptomatic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: how distressing are the pre-test weeks? Rotterdam/Leiden Genetics Working Group.

Presymptomatic DNA testing for autosomal dominant hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) became an option after the identification of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 1994-1995. Healthy female mutation carriers have a high lifetime risk for breast cancer (56-87%) or ovarian cancer (10-60%) and may opt for intensive breast and ovary surveillance or prophylactic surgery (mastectomy/oophorectomy). We studied general and cancer related distress in 85 healthy women with a 25% or 50% risk of being carrier of a BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutation and 66 partners in the six to eight week period between genetic counselling/blood sampling and disclosure of the test result. Questionnaire and interview data are analysed. Associations are explored between levels of distress and (1) expected consequences of being identified as a mutation carrier, (2) personality traits, (3) sociodemographic variables, and (4) experiences related to HBOC. Mean pre-test anxiety and depression levels in women at risk of being a carrier and partners were similar to those of a normal Dutch population. In about 25% of those at risk of being a carrier and 10% of the partners, increased to high levels of general and cancer related distress were found. Increased levels of distress were reported by women who (1) anticipated an increase in problems after an unfavourable test outcome, (2) considered prophylactic mastectomy if found to be mutation carrier, (3) had an unoptimistic personality, (4) tended to suppress their emotions, (5) were younger than 40 years, and (6) were more familiar with the serious consequences of HBOC. Recently obtained awareness of the genetic nature of cancer in the family was not predictive of distress.The majority of the women and their partners experienced a relatively calm period before the disclosure of the test result and seemed to postpone distressing thoughts until the week of disclosure of the result. The low distress levels may partly be explained by the use of strategies to minimise the emotional impact of a possibly unfavourable test outcome. However, a minority reported feeling very distressed. Several factors were found to be predictive for increased distress levels.

BRCA1 in the family: a case description of the psychological implications.

Our experience with the first family in the Netherlands for whom predictive DNA-testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) became an option is described. This serves to illustrate the complex emotional impact on a family as a whole, and upon the members separately, of becoming aware that breast and ovarian cancer is hereditary, and the implications of undergoing predictive testing. All family members received genetic counseling and were offered pre- and post-test psychological follow-up. We observed two important roles within the family. One member became "the messenger of the news" informing the relatives of the hereditary character of cancer in the family. Another was "the first utilizer" of the new options; namely, the predictive DNA-test and preventive surgery. This first utilizer became the example to the rest of the family. Decisions made about preventive treatment (prophylactic ovariectomy and/or mastectomy) were based on the experiences within the family, whether one identified with an affected family member with breast or with ovarian cancer. The actions and reactions perceived were illustrative of what kind of support provisions should be provided in addition to the genetic and oncological counseling for HBOC. Moreover HBOC should be considered both as an individual and a family problem and be treated as such in genetic counseling.

Diagnostic delay in neurofibromatosis type 1.

UNLABELLED: Since 1985 a multidisciplinary team in the Sophia Children's University Hospital in Rotterdam provides diagnostic follow up and genetic counseling services for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients and their families. Parents of 68 affected children as well as 24 affected parents were interviewed. Of the affected children, 50% and 33% of the affected adults were treated for symptoms related to NF1 before a specific diagnosis was made. Although the disease is fully penetrant by the age of 5 years, 35% of the affected children had not been diagnosed by this age. Parents stated a preference for early diagnosis of NF1. Diagnosis of NF1 did not seem to be a reason to refrain from having children. The general attitude towards prenatal diagnosis was positive; however few parents would actually terminate an affected pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Overall delay in diagnosis of NF1 is significant. Knowledge of symptoms should make an early diagnosis possible with beneficial effects for the patient and family members.

Psychological distress in applicants for predictive DNA testing for autosomal dominant, heritable, late onset disorders. The Rotterdam/Leiden Genetics Workgroup.

In a comparative study on the effects of predictive DNA testing for late onset disorders, pre-test psychological distress was assessed in people at risk for Huntington's disease (HD, n = 41), cerebral haemorrhage (HCHWA-D, n = 9), breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC, n = 24), and polyposis coli (FAP, n = 45). Partners, if available, also participated in the study. Distress was measured with the subscales Intrusion and Avoidance of the Impact of Event Scale. People at risk for the neurodegenerative disorders reported more avoidance than those at risk for the cancer syndromes. People at risk for FAP and partners of those at risk for HBOC reported less intrusion than the others at risk and the other partners. Subjects who were more distressed reported more experiences with the disease in close relatives, the disease having a great impact on their lives, having considerations against predictive testing, expecting that being identified as a gene carrier would have adverse effects, and expecting relief after being identified as a non-carrier. Test candidates who expected an increase of personal problems showed higher avoidance, whereas those who could better anticipate future life as a carrier had higher intrusion levels. Generally, subjects with high distress levels are of more concern to the healthcare professional than those with low distress levels. However, high distress may reflect worrying as a mental preparation for the test result, whereas low distress may indicate denial-avoidance behaviour and poor anticipation of the test outcome. In pre-test counselling sessions, this should be acknowledged and addressed.

Factors influencing whether or not couples seek genetic counselling: an explorative study in a paediatric surgical unit.

To investigate the factors influencing whether or not couples seek genetic counselling, the parents of 37 children with a major congenital anomaly were interviewed at home. All the children had been admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the Department of Paediatric Surgery. After physical examination of the child, the consultant clinical geneticist stated that genetic counselling was indicated for the parents. Whether they sought genetic counselling was left to the parents to decide. Eighteen of the 37 parents had sought genetic counselling. Assessment of the joint influence of a number of factors revealed that two factors were separately paramount in distinguishing between couples who did seek genetic counselling and those who did not: whether parents considered genetic counselling useful in their case shortly after the birth of their affected child, and whether the couple was clearly and correctly informed about the indication for genetic counselling. The intention to have a subsequent pregnancy was not associated with whether or not couples sought genetic counselling. Loss of information was observed: 1/3 of the referrals for genetic counselling mentioned on the written consultation forms were not stated in the discharge letters. This loss of information could have been reduced by a) routinely including the indication for genetic counselling in the discharge letter and b) appointing a coordinating physician to ensure that the parents were informed clearly about the availability of genetic counselling. Resistance to genetic counselling needs to be respected by the physician. Exploring its background might help to reduce this resistance.

Presymptomatic DNA testing for Huntington disease: identifying the need for psychological intervention.

UNLABELLED: In the Dutch presymptomatic DNA-testing program for Huntington disease (HD), 29 individuals with increased risk and 44 with decreased risk were followed-up 6 months after test results. A prognostic model was built aimed at identifying individuals at risk for psychological maladjustment, as measured by the Impact of Event Scale, the Beck Hopelessness Scale, the General Health Questionnaire, and the Social Support Questionnaire. RESULTS: 1) The more that applicants suffered from intrusive feelings about HD and tried to avoid HD-related situations, prior to the test, the greater the chance that they will experience this 6 months after the test if they proved to be at increased risk; 2) the more that both individuals with increased risk and those with decreased risk who suffered from the threat of having HD tried to avoid HD-related situations prior to the test and the less satisfied they were with available support, the greater the probability that they will show avoidance behavior after the test; 3) the more pessimistic that individuals with increased risk as well as those with decreased risk were about their future prior to the test, the more they avoided HD-related situations and the more dissatisfied they were about their available support (pretest), the greater the probability that they will become depressive and suicidal. Psychological adjustment was also studied as a function of a) intrusion/denial-avoidance pattern over time and b) healthy mental functioning/future expectancies. Most individuals with increased risk (86%) seem to cope well thus far, although this was based largely on strong psychological defenses and dependent on satisfactory relationships.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Reliability and validity of the Perinatal Grief Scale for women who experienced late pregnancy loss.

The psychometric qualities of the Perinatal Grief Scale (PGS) were evaluated in a sample of 46 Dutch women in late pregnancy (> or = 24 weeks), who had been informed of the diagnosis 'lethal or severe fetal malformation'. The validity was assessed by comparing it to the Impact of Event Scale and to a clinical diagnosis of psychological instability. The PGS appeared to be internally consistent and particularly strongly related to psychological instability. It can therefore be considered as a valid assessment instrument, also for women who experience late pregnancy loss.

On attitudes and appreciation 6 months after predictive DNA testing for Huntington disease in the Dutch program.

We have studied the 6-month follow-up attitudes of 63 individuals, after predictive testing for Huntington disease (HD). Reducing uncertainty (81%) and family planning (60%) were the major reasons for taking the test. Twenty-four individuals were diagnosed as having an increased risk (+/- 98%), and 39 a decreased risk (+/- 2%). Among those with an increased risk, denial or minimization of the ultimate impact of the increased risk result was observed. Most of them (84%) rated their current life situation, at the very least, as being good. Twenty-one percent of individuals with an increased risk who originally planned to have a family, decided to refrain from having children. Sixty percent of those with increased risk who still wished to have children, would choose to have prenatal testing. In most individuals with increased risk, the test result did not increase the previously expected control over their own future. Half of the partners of persons with increased risk acknowledged the burden of the future disease. Half had no one in whom they could confide. They showed loyalty to the denial and avoidance reactions of their spouses. Half of the individuals with decreased risk denied the impact of the result, as reflected by absence of relief, and emotional numbness. A third of persons with decreased risk experienced involvement with problems of affected relatives. We found that 20% of all participants were discontented with the support given by their general practitioner, who is normally regarded as being the most significant professional for aftercare. Our findings suggest that the perpetuation

Emotional reactions in women in late pregnancy (24 weeks or longer) following the ultrasound diagnosis of a severe or lethal fetal malformation.

We studied the emotional reactions of 41 women in late pregnancy shortly after they had been informed of the diagnosis of 'severe or lethal fetal malformations' and 3 months after delivery. In addition, situational variables were explored as determinants of grieving. While grief did not diminish during the study period, psychological instability was less pronounced at 3 months after delivery. More grief reactions were evoked by self-reported easily versus self-reported not easily initiated pregnancy, gestational age between 24 and 34 weeks versus beyond 34 weeks, multiparity versus primiparity, and viewing versus not viewing the baby.

Presymptomatic DNA-testing for Huntington disease: pretest attitudes and expectations of applicants and their partners in the Dutch program.

We studied the baseline attitudes, prior to testing, of 70 applicants at risk for Huntington disease (HD) and their partners in the Dutch presymptomatic DNA-testing program. Two thirds of the applicants were female; 36% already had children. The main reason (60%) for undertaking the test was for family planning. Other reasons were either to reduce uncertainty (43%) or to obtain certainty (38%). Partners of applicants stated that planning for the future was for them the most important reason (76%). Significantly more at-risk females (42%) than males (16%) anticipated an unfavorable test outcome. Quite remarkably, most applicants and partners denied that a positive result might have adverse effects on either personal mood, quality of life, or marriage. Only a few did not expect that a favorable result would induce relief. The eventual outcome of the test was expected to enable applicants to gain control over their future, whatever the results. Hence, we propose that the applicants form a self-selected group, based on their expectation that they will not be emotionally affected by either result.

DNA-testing for Huntington's disease in The Netherlands: a retrospective study on psychosocial effects.

Presymptomatic DNA-testing for Huntington's disease has made it possible to predict whether or not at-risk individuals are gene-carriers with a reliability of about 98%. In our retrospective study of 18 tested individuals, most of the newly identified carriers function apparently well. They use avoidance and repression of affect as psychological defense strategies. However, 8 out of 9 non-carriers do not experience the expected relief about their test results. They experience survivor guilt and emotional numbness and find it difficult to cope with the effects of the test results on the family system. The partners of gene-carriers are at risk of becoming emotionally isolated by putting aside their own feelings for fear of seeming self-centered. Appreciation of these effects on tested individuals is important and professional support is needed to prevent post-traumatic stress disorders. Whatever the test result may be, the working through process may take years rather than months. These findings have important implications for patient care and necessitate an extended period of observation after presymptomatic testing.