In Patients We Trust: Reliability of Self-Reported Weight and Height in Nuclear Medicine Patients.

The aim of the study was to assess the reliability of the self-reported weight and height of nuclear medicine patients in view of recommendations for weight-dependent tracer application for imaging and therapy. Methods: In total, 824 patients (334 men and 490 women) were asked to report their weight and height before imaging or therapy and their level of confidence. Subsequently, the weight and height of each patient were measured, and body mass index, body surface area, and lean body mass were calculated. Differences between reported and true values were compared for statistically significant differences. Results: The average patient age was 60 ± 14 y (range, 17-91 y). An over- or underestimation of weight by at least 10% was observed in 2% of patients, and height was overestimated by 1% by the patients. The BMI calculation was affected by incorrect self-reported values. Conclusion: Most self-reported weights and heights of nuclear medicine patients are accurate. However, since over- and underestimation of weight and height lead to incorrect body mass index, body surface area, and lean body mass values, patient weights should be measured at least for patients receiving a weight-adapted therapy or if quantification in PET/CT is needed.

Effects of rosiglitazone on radioiodine negative and progressive differentiated thyroid carcinoma as assessed by ¹²4I PET/CT imaging.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the redifferentiative and antiproliferative effects of rosiglitazone in patients with progressive differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) without or with negligible overall radioiodine uptake. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 9 patients with progressive DTC with either no or only negligible radioiodine accumulation were enrolled in this study. Oral rosiglitazone treatment was applied for 6 months (4 mg per day for 2 weeks followed by 8 mg per day). The compatibility of the medication was initially checked twice weekly and then weekly by laboratory tests and clinical evaluation of side effects. The assessments of alterations in the doses absorbed by the tumor and in lesion sizes over the course of rosiglitazone treatment were performed using serial ¹²4I positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging. The assessment time points were before enrollment and 3 and 6 months posttreatment initiation. RESULTS: Lesion dosimetry indicated that 5 of 9 patients had an improved lesion absorbed dose per administered activity (LDpA), yielding in radioiodine therapy treatment in 4 patients. One third of the patients (3/9) were unchanged with regard to LDpA, and 1 of 9 had deteriorated LDpA. Volumetric analyses revealed that lesion sizes were regredient in 3 of 9 patients, stable in 4 of 9, and was progressive in 1 of 9. The medication was well-tolerated, and no patient developed clinically important toxicity associated with rosiglitazone treatment. In 2 of 9 of the patients, the medication was terminated after 3 months as a precaution due to progressive heart disease in one patient and bone fracture within a known osteolytic bone lesion in another patient. It is not clear that these complications were caused by rosiglitazone. CONCLUSION: Rosiglitazone appears to be suitable as off-label therapy in radioiodine-negative and progressive DTC that lacks therapy alternatives. In Europe, rosiglitazone was removed for label use because of reported side effects during diabetes treatment. Further investigations of other available glitazone compounds are necessary.

Lesion dose in differentiated thyroid carcinoma metastases after rhTSH or thyroid hormone withdrawal: 124I PET/CT dosimetric comparisons.

PURPOSE: Renal radioiodine excretion is ~50% faster during euthyroidism versus hypothyroidism. We therefore sought to assess lesion dose/GBq of administered 131I activity (LDpA) in iodine-avid metastases (IAM) of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) in athyreotic patients after recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH) versus after thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW). METHODS: We retrospectively compared mean LDpA between groups of consecutive patients (N=63) receiving 124I positron emission tomography/computed tomography (124I PET/CT) aided by rhTSH (n=27) or THW (n=36); we prospectively compared LDpA after these stimulation methods within another individual. Data derived from serial PET scans and one CT scan performed 2-96 h post-124I ingestion. A mixed model analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) calculated the treatment groups' mean LDpAs adjusting for statistically significant baseline intergroup differences: non-IAM were more prevalent, median IAM count/patient lower in cervical lymph nodes and higher in distant sites, median stimulated thyroglobulin higher, mean cumulative radioiodine activity greater and prior diagnostic scintigraphy more frequent in the rhTSH patients. RESULTS: Mean LDpAs were: rhTSH group (n=71 IAM), 30.6 Gy/GBq; THW group (n=66 IAM), 51.8 Gy/GBq. The difference in group means (rhTSH less THW), -21.2 Gy/GBq, was statistically non-significant (p=0.1667). However, the 95% confidence interval of that difference (-51.4 to +9 Gy/GBq) suggested a trend favouring THW. The within-patient comparison found 2.9- to 10-fold higher LDpAs under THW. CONCLUSION: We found some suggestions, but no statistically significant evidence, that rhTSH administration results in a lower radiation dose to DTC metastases than does THW. A large, well-controlled, prospective within-patient study should resolve this issue.