Teaching Chest Tube Insertion by Blended Learning: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Emerging technologies are being incorporated in surgical education. The use of such technology should be supported by evidence that the technology neither distracts nor overloads the learner and is easy to use. To teach chest tube insertion, we developed an e-learning module, as part of a blended learning program delivered prior to in-person hands-on simulation. This pilot study was aimed to assess learning effectiveness of this blended learning, and cognitive load and the usability of e-learning. METHODS: The interactive e-learning module with multimedia content was created following learning design principles. In advance of the standard simulation, 13 first-year surgical residents were randomized into two groups: 7 received the e-learning module and online reading materials (e-learning group); 6 received only the online reading materials (controls). Knowledge was evaluated by pre-and post-tests; technical performance was assessed using a Global Rating Scale by blinded assessors. Cognitive load and usability were evaluated using rating scales. RESULTS: The e-learning group showed significant improvement from baseline in knowledge (P = .047), while controls did not (P = .500). For technical skill, 100% of residents in the e-learning group reached a predetermined proficiency level vs 60% of controls (P = .06). The addition of e-learning was associated with lower extrinsic and greater germane cognitive load (P = .04, .03, respectively). Usability was evaluated highly by all participants in e-learning group. CONCLUSION: Interactive e-learning added to hands-on simulation led to improved learning and desired cognitive load and usability. This approach should be evaluated in teaching of other procedural skills.

Identifying Royal College-accredited simulation centre research priorities across Canada.

To advance the field of health sciences simulation, research must be of high quality and would benefit from multi-institutional collaboration where centres can leverage and share expertise as well as work together to overcome limits to the generalizability of research findings from single-institution studies. A needs assessment in emergency medicine simulation has illustrated the importance of identifying research priorities in Canada. The main purpose of this study was to identify simulation research priority directions for Canadian simulation centres. The current survey study drew on 16 research priorities developed through a two-round internal Delphi study at McGill University that 15 of 17 simulation centre advisory board members participated in. The final 16 research priorities were then rated by a total of 18 of 24 simulation centre directors and/or delegates contacted from 15 of 19 Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada-accredited simulation centres in Canada. Results revealed nine common research priorities that reached 70% or higher agreement for all respondents. We anticipate that our findings can contribute to building a shared vision of priorities, community, and collaboration to enhance health care simulation research quality amongst Canadian simulation centres.

Pour faire progresser le domaine de la simulation en sciences de la santé, il faut tendre vers une recherche de haute qualité, qui serait favorisée par une collaboration multi-institutionnelle permettant aux programmes de tirer parti de leur expertise, de la partager et de surmonter les limites de la généralisabilité des résultats de recherche provenant d'études menées dans un seul établissement. Une évaluation des besoins en matière de simulation en médecine d'urgence a illustré l'importance de définir des priorités de recherche à l'échelle du Canada. Le principal objectif de cette étude était de dresser les orientations prioritaires des programmes de simulation canadiens pour la recherche en simulation. Elle est basée sur 16 priorités de recherche dégagées d'une étude Delphi à deux tours réalisée à l'Université [masqué], à laquelle 15 des 17 membres du comité consultatif de son centre de simulation ont participé. Les 16 priorités de recherche finales ont ensuite été évaluées par 18 des 24 directeurs ou délégués de centres de simulation contactés, provenant de 15 des 19 programmes de simulation agréés par le Collège royal des médecins et chirurgiens du Canada. Les résultats font état de neuf priorités de recherche communes ayant obtenu un taux d'accord de 70 % ou plus parmi l'ensemble des répondants. Nous pensons que nos résultats peuvent contribuer à l'élaboration d'une vision commune des priorités parmi les programmes de simulation canadiens, à la création d'une communauté de pratique et à une collaboration pour améliorer la qualité de la recherche en simulation dans le domaine des soins de santé.

Nursing Students Reported More Positive Emotions about Training during COVID-19 After Using a Virtual Simulation Paired with an In-person Simulation.

Background: Virtual simulations (VS) are educational tools that can help overcome the limitations of in-person learning highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Research has illustrated that VS can support learning, but little is known about the usability of VS as a distance learning tool. Research on students' emotions about VS is also scarce, despite the influence of emotions on learning. Methods: A quantitative longitudinal study was conducted with undergraduate nursing students. 18 students participated in a hybrid learning experience involving a virtual simulation (VS) followed by an in-person simulation. Students completed questionnaires about their emotions, perceived success, and usability and received a performance score from the VS. Results: Nursing students reported statistically significant improvements in their emotions about completing their program after completing both VS and in-person simulations compared to their emotions before the pair of simulations. Emotions directed toward the VS were weak-to-moderate in strength, but predominantly positive. Positive emotions were positively associated with nursing students' performance. Findings replicated "okay" approaching "good" usability ratings from a recent study with key methodological differences that used the same software. Conclusions: VS can be an emotionally positive, effective, efficient, and satisfying distance learning supplement to traditional simulations.

Measurement and Management of Cognitive Load in Surgical Education: A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive load should be considered in designing optimal educational programs in health care. Despite the highly demanding nature of surgery and surgical education, a consensus on how to manage cognitive load has not been established. The objective of this review is to map out how recent surgical education research incorporates cognitive load. METHODS: A literature search was performed using keywords related to cognitive load and digital education up to December 2021. Studies published in English relevant to assessment and management of cognitive load in surgical education were included. Terminology, assessment tools, association with different surgical procedures and training modalities, and programs considering cognitive load were reported. RESULTS: We identified several terms to describe cognitive load. Cognitive load was measured by subjective, self-reported questionnaires and by objective measurements, such as physiological parameters or estimated by reaction time to secondary tasks. Subjective measurements reported cognitive load in one or multiple dimensions. Correlations between subjective and objective measurements were shown in multiple studies. Overall, higher cognitive load was observed in training for more complex tasks and high-fidelity modalities, and among less experienced trainees. Cognitive load theory has been lately incorporated into designing teaching programs. CONCLUSIONS: A broad range of terms and assessment tools were identified for cognitive load. To maximize the learning outcome, management of cognitive load is necessary in surgical education. This review summarizes the current knowledge in assessment and management of cognitive load in surgical education and provides suggestions for future studies.

Digital Education in General Thoracic Surgery: A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Since advanced technologies were introduced into surgical education, a variety of new programs have been developed. However, a comprehensive review of digital education in general thoracic surgery has not been performed. This narrative review was conducted was to identify the current applications of digital education in general thoracic surgery. METHODS: A literature search was performed using keywords related to general thoracic surgery and digital education, including e-learning and virtual simulation, up to September 2021. Studies published in English investigating the effect of digital education in general thoracic surgery were included. RESULTS: Thirteen studies met the criteria. The settings were in undergraduate (n = 6) and postgraduate education (residency) (n = 5) and mixed audience with other disciplines (n = 2). Theoretical knowledge (n = 5), technical skills (n = 4), and both knowledge and technical skills (n = 4) were the stated educational objectives for the studies. The didactic materials were transferred to hardware, software, or online platforms and delivered with multimedia materials. Technical skills training for bronchoscopy and chest tube insertion (n = 5) were offered using virtual reality and computer-based simulations. Subjective evaluation was done in 10 studies. Although after the digital education training there was observed improvement in knowledge or skills in 8 studies, studies were not designed to test for superiority compared with controls through randomized controlled studies. CONCLUSIONS: This review summarizes the current applications of digital education in general thoracic surgery and helps establish the needs for future studies in this field.

Rethinking how health care professionals cope with stress: A process model for COVID-19 and beyond.

ISSUE: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was evidence of challenges surrounding the psychological well-being of health care professionals (HCPs). HCPs already frayed psychological ability to cope risks being further compromised by COVID-19-related stresses. CRITICAL THEORETICAL ANALYSIS: Most research on stress, psychological distress, and coping among HCPs is done in a piecemeal manner without a theoretical model connecting these different but related phenomena. This critical advancement article aims to apply and extend Wheaton and Montazer's model of stressors, stress, and distress to the literature on HCPs, generally, and COVID-19, specifically, to summarize past and guide future research on HCPs' mental health, resilience, and coping. Our model describes how different sources of support buffer the effect of stressors on stress and how coping strategies moderate the effect of stress on psychological distress. ADVANCE: We extended the model by (a) distinguishing context from the support in HCPs' environment; (b) distinguishing adaptive from maladaptive coping strategies and their relationships with antecedents and outcomes; (c) describing the adverse impacts that psychological distress has on patients, HCPs, and health services; and (d) describing how such outcomes can become stressors, in turn, further contributing to HCPs' stress in a vicious cycle. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Our model provides a broader perspective of HCPs' work-related mental health and helps guide the creation, implementation, and evaluation of different sources of support and promote adaptive coping strategies. This model helps HCPs, researchers, and health services managers better understand and respond to the well-being crisis HCPs are facing, especially during the pandemic.

Feasibility of Prospectively Comparing Opioid Analgesia With Opioid-Free Analgesia After Outpatient General Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The overprescription of opioids to surgical patients is recognized as an important factor contributing to the opioid crisis. However, the value of prescribing opioid analgesia (OA) vs opioid-free analgesia (OFA) after postoperative discharge remains uncertain. Objective: To investigate the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomized clinical trial (RCT) to assess the comparative effectiveness of OA vs OFA after outpatient general surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This parallel, 2-group, assessor-blind, pragmatic pilot RCT was conducted from January 29 to September 3, 2020 (last follow-up on October 2, 2020). at 2 university-affiliated hospitals in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Participants were adult patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing outpatient abdominal (ie, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, or hernia repair) or breast (ie, partial or total mastectomy) general surgical procedures. Exclusion criteria were contraindications to drugs used in the trial, preoperative opioid use, conditions that could affect assessment of outcomes, and intraoperative or early complications requiring hospitalization. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive OA (around-the-clock nonopioids and opioids for breakthrough pain) or OFA (around-the-clock nonopioids with increasing doses and/or addition of nonopioid medications for breakthrough pain) after postoperative discharge. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were a priori RCT feasibility criteria (ie, rates of surgeon agreement, patient eligibility, patient consent, treatment adherence, loss to follow-up, and missing follow-up data). Secondary outcomes included pain intensity and interference, analgesic intake, 30-day unplanned health care use, and adverse events. Between-group comparison of outcomes followed the intention-to-treat principle. Results: A total of 15 surgeons were approached; all (100%; 95% CI, 78%-100%) agreed to have patients recruited and adhered to the study procedures. Rates of patient eligibility and consent were 73% (95% CI, 66%-78%) and 57% (95% CI, 49%-65%), respectively. Seventy-six patients were randomized (39 [51%] to OA and 37 [49%] to OFA) and included in the intention-to-treat analysis (mean [SD] age, 55.5 [14.5] years; 50 [66%] female); 40 (53%) underwent abdominal surgery, and 36 (47%) underwent breast surgery. Seventy-five patients (99%; 95% CI, 93%-100%) adhered to the allocated treatment; 1 patient randomly assigned to OFA received an opioid prescription. Seventeen patients (44%) randomly assigned to OA consumed opioids after discharge. Seventy-three patients (96%; 95% CI, 89%-99%) completed the 30-day follow-up. The rate of missing questionnaires was 37 of 3724 (1%; 95% CI, 0.7%-1.4%). All the a priori RCT feasibility criteria were fulfilled. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this pilot RCT support the feasibility of conducting a robust, full-scale RCT to inform evidence-based prescribing of analgesia after outpatient general surgery. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04254679.

Establishing validity evidence for device-assisted advanced laparoscopic suturing tasks using simulation.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic suturing (LS) is an essential technique required for a wide range of procedures, and it is one of the most challenging for surgical trainees to master. We designed and collected validity evidence for advanced LS tasks using an automated suturing device and evaluated the perceived educational value of the tasks. METHODS: This project was a multicentre prospective study involving McGill University, University of Toronto (UofT), and Louisiana State University (LSU) Health New Orleans. Novice (NS) and experienced (ES) surgeons performed suturing under tension (UT) and continuous suturing (CS) tasks. ES performed the tasks twice to establish proficiency benchmarks, and they were interviewed to develop formative feedback tools (FFT). Participants were assessed on completion time, error, Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS), and FFT. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods. RESULTS: Twenty-seven participants (13 ES, 14 NS, median age 34 years; 85% male) completed the study. Eight were attending surgeons, 7 fellows, 4 PGY5, 5 PGY4, and 3 PGY3 (18 from McGill, 5 UofT, and 4 LSU). Comparing ES and NS, for UT task, ES had significantly greater task scores (570 [563-648] vs 323 [130-464], p value 0.00036) and GOALS scores (14 [13-16] vs 10 [8-12], p value 0.0038). Similarly, for CS, ES had significantly greater task scores (976 [959-1010] vs 785 [626-856], p value 0.00009) and GOALS scores (16 [12-17] vs 12.5 [8.25-15], p value 0.028). After FFTs were developed, comparing ES and NS, for both UT and CS tasks, ES had significantly greater FFT scores (UT 25 [24-26] vs 17 [14-20], p value 0.0016 and CS 30 [27-32] vs 22[17.2-25.8], p value 0.00061). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, preliminary validity evidence was provided for the tasks. Once further validity evidence is established, incorporating the tasks into the training curricula could improve trainee skills and help to meet the need for better advanced suturing models.

Reciprocal peer coaching for practice improvement in surgery: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Peer coaching has been associated with much higher rates of practice changes and new skill implementation compared to common used modalities but bilateral peer coaching structures where seniority is not a requirement to coach have not been studied. The purpose of this study was to implement and evaluate a reciprocal peer coaching pilot program for practicing surgeons to inform future coaching program design. METHODS: A multicenter reciprocal peer surgical coaching program was designed according to the framework developed from previous studies by our group. The coach-coachee matching process was voluntary and autonomous. All participants received basic coaching skills training. Pairs were instructed to complete two coaching sessions, alternating between the coach or coachee role for each session. Data were collected through questionnaires and structured interviews. RESULTS: Twenty-two participants enrolled in the pilot study and completed the coach training (88% enrollment rate). During the first wave of COVID-19, 12 participants withdrew. Of the five pairs that completed the program, three pairs were composed of general surgeons, one of orthopedic surgeons, and one ophthalmologic surgeon. Three sessions were conducted live in the OR, five virtually, and one involved an in-person discussion. Overall satisfaction with the program was high and all participants expectations were met. Participants were significantly more likely to predict "routinely" asking for feedback from their partner after study completion (6, 66%) compared to pre-intervention (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: This pilot study supports the feasibility of a peer coaching model for surgeons in practice that emphasized reciprocity and participant autonomy. These key elements should be considered when designing future coaching programs.

Development of a simulation curriculum to teach and assess advanced laparoscopic suturing skills using telesimulation: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Telesimulation helps overcome limitations in time and local expertise by eliminating the need for the learner and educator to be physically co-located, especially important during COVID-19. We investigated whether teaching advanced laparoscopic suturing (ALS) through telesimulation is feasible, effective, and leads to improved suturing in the operating room (OR). METHODS: In this prospective feasibility study, three previously developed 3D-printed ALS tasks were used: needle handling (NH), suturing under tension (UT), and continuous suturing (CS). General surgery residents (PGY4-5) underwent 1-month of telesimulation training, during which an expert educator at one site remotely trained residents at the other site over 2-3 teaching sessions. Trainees were assessed in the three tasks and in the OR at three time points: baseline(A1), control period(A2), and post-intervention(A3) and completed questionnaires regarding educational value and usability of telesimulation. Paired t-test was used to compare scores between the three assessment points. RESULTS: Six residents were included. Scores for UT improved significantly post-intervention A3(568 ± 60) when compared to baseline A1(416 ± 133) (p < 0.019). Similarly, scores for CS improved significantly post-intervention A3(756 ± 113) vs. baseline A1(539 ± 211) (p < 0.02). For intraoperative assessments, scores improved significantly post-intervention A3(21 ± 3) when compared to both A1(17 ± 4) (p < 0.018) and A2(18 ± 4) (p < 0.0008). All residents agreed that tasks were relevant to practice, helped improve technical competence, and adequately measured suturing skill. All residents found telesimulation easy to use, had strong educational value, and want the system to be incorporated into their training. CONCLUSION: The use of telesimulation for remotely training residents using ALS tasks was feasible and effective. Residents found value in training using the tasks and telesimulation system, and improved ALS skills in the OR. As the pandemic has caused a major structural shift in resident education, telesimulation can be an effective alternative to on-site simulation programs. Future research should focus on how telesimulation can be effectively incorporated into training programs.

Nurses' and Physicians' Distress, Burnout, and Coping Strategies During COVID-19: Stress and Impact on Perceived Performance and Intentions to Quit.

INTRODUCTION: Health care providers (HCPs) have experienced more stress and burnout during COVID-19 than before. We compared sources and levels of stress, distress, and approaches to coping between nurses and physicians, and examined whether coping strategies helped mitigate the negative impact of stress and intentions to quit. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional study design, burnout was measured with the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Psychological distress was measured using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale. A self-reported survey was used to evaluate stressors, impact on perceived performance, and intentions to quit. The data were analyzed using t-tests and linear regression models. RESULTS: Responses of 119 HCPs were analyzed. Findings suggest that (1) compared to physicians, nurses experienced a higher level of distress and burnout, and used more maladaptive coping strategies. (2) Both nurses and physicians experienced more distress and burnout during COVID-19 than before. (3) Adaptive coping strategies moderated the negative impact of stress on work performance (4) Adaptive coping strategies moderated the negative effect of stress on burnout, which in turn reduced intentions to quit. Stress negatively impacted work performance and burnout only for those with low, but not high, levels of adaptive coping strategies. DISCUSSION: The current findings of HCPs' challenges, risks, and protective factors provide valuable information (1) on COVID-19's impact on HCPs, (2) to guide the distribution of institutional supportive efforts and recommend adaptive coping strategies, and (3) to inform medical education, such as resilience training, focusing on adaptive coping approaches.

High incidence of potentially preventable emergency department visits after major elective colorectal surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) visits after surgery represent a significant cost burden on the healthcare system. Furthermore, many ED visits are related to issues of healthcare delivery services and may be avoidable. Few studies have assessed the reasons for ED visits after colorectal surgery. The main objectives of this study were to: (1) identify the reasons why patients presented to the ED within 30 postoperative days and (2) determine if these visits were potentially preventable. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on elective major colorectal surgery cases performed in a single center between 01/2017 and 07/2019. Data collected included demographics, medical history, intraoperative details, postoperative complications, ED visits within 30 postoperative days, and readmissions. Each ED visit was assessed by two reviewers and graded on a scale adapted from the New York University ED algorithm. The gradings were: (1) non-emergent, (2) emergent but treatable in an ambulatory setting, (3) emergent/ED-care required but preventable if timely outpatient care was available, and (4) emergent/ED-care required and non-preventable. Grades 1-3 were deemed potentially preventable. Logistic regression identified independent predictors of potentially preventable visits. RESULTS: Six hundred and twenty five patients were included in the final analysis. 110 (17.6%) patients presented to the ED within 30 days. The most common cause of ED visit were ileus/small bowel obstruction (SBO) (16.4%), superficial wound infection (15.5%), genitourinary issues (10.9%), and non-infectious gastrointestinal issues (nausea, malnutrition, diarrhea, high output stomas) (10.9%). After review, 51.8% of visits were considered potentially preventable (Grade 1-3). The most common causes of preventable ED visits were superficial wound infection (24.6%), non-infectious gastrointestinal issues (19.3%), and minor bleeding (14.0%). Creation of a new stoma was the only independent risk factor for potentially preventable ED visits (OR 2.14, 95%CI 1.03-4.47). CONCLUSION: Approximately half of ED visits within 30 days of discharge were potentially preventable. These findings indicate a need to improve access to outpatient care to reduce preventable ED visits after elective colorectal surgery.

Considerations for designing and implementing a surgical peer coaching program: an international survey.

BACKGROUND: Surgical peer coaching has been associated with high rates of practice change but remains largely unutilized. The purpose of this study was to survey surgeons internationally to investigate attitudes regarding peer coaching and to identify any international differences to inform the design of future coaching programs. METHODS: Practicing surgeons in general surgery or related subspecialties were eligible to participate. Invitations to complete the survey were distributed through 13 surgical associations, social media, and personal e-mail invitations. Responses were obtained between June 1st and August 31st, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 521 surveys were collected. The majority of participants practiced in North America (263; 50%) with remaining respondents from Asia (81; 16%), Europe (34;7%), South America (21; 4%), Africa (17; 3%), and Oceania (6; 1%). Duration of practice was equally distributed across 4 intervals (0-5 years; 6-15 years; 16-25 years; > 25 years). Respondents most frequently identified as general surgeons (290; 67%) and 325 (75%) were male. Awareness of peer coaching was reported by 275 (53%) respondents, with 197 (44%) never seeking formal feedback from peers. The majority of respondents (372; 84%) would be willing to participate in a peer coaching program, with monthly interactions the most desirable frequency reported (193; 51%). Coaching in the operating room was preferred by most participants (360; 86%). Few respondents (67; 14%) would accept coaching from someone unknown to them. Participants identified key coaching program elements as: feedback kept private and confidential (267; 63%); opportunity to provide feedback to the coach (247; 59%); personalized goal setting (244; 58%); and the option to choose one's own coach (205; 49%). The most commonly cited potential barrier to participation was logistical constraints (334; 79%). CONCLUSION: This international survey of practicing surgeons demonstrated that peer feedback is rarely used in practice, but there is high interest and acceptance of the peer coaching model for continuous professional development. Findings regarding preferred program structure may be useful to inform the design of future peer coaching programs.

Evaluations of Healthcare Providers' Perceived Support From Personal, Hospital, and System Resources: Implications for Well-Being and Management in Healthcare in Montreal, Quebec, During COVID-19.

Increased stressful experiences are pervasive among healthcare providers (HCPs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identifying resources that help mitigate stress is critical to maintaining HCPs' well-being. However, to our knowledge, no instrument has systematically examined how different levels of resources help HCPs cope with stress during COVID-19. This cross-sectional study involved 119 HCPs (64 nurses and 55 physicians) and evaluated the perceived availability, utilization, and helpfulness of a list of personal, hospital, and healthcare system resources. Participants also reported on their level of burnout, psychological distress, and intentions to quit. Results revealed that HCPs perceived the most useful personal resource to be family support; the most useful hospital resources were a safe environment, personal protective equipment, and support from colleagues; the most useful system resources were job protection, and clear communication and information about COVID. Moreover, HCPs who perceived having more available hospital resources also reported lower levels of psychological distress symptoms, burnout, and intentions to quit. Finally, although training and counseling services were perceived as useful to reduce stress, training was not perceived as widely available, and counseling services, though reported as being available, were underutilized. This instrument helps identify resources that support HCPs, providing implications for healthcare management.

Identifying optimal program structure, motivations for and barriers to peer coaching participation for surgeons in practice: a qualitative synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Continuous advancement of surgical skills is of utmost importance to surgeons in practice, but traditional learning activities without personalized feedback often do not translate into practice changes in the operating room. Peer coaching has been shown to lead to very high rates of practice changes and utilization of new skills. The purpose of this study was to explore the opinions of practicing surgeons regarding the characteristics of peer coaching programs, in order to better inform future peer coaching program design. METHODS: Using a convenience sample, practicing general surgeons were invited to participate in focus group interviews. Allocation into groups was according to years in practice. The interviews were conducted using open-ended questions by trained facilitators. Audio recordings were transcribed and coded into themes by two independent reviewers using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Of 52 invitations, 27 surgeons participated: 74% male; years in practice: < 5 years: 33%; 5-15 years: 26%; > 15 years: 41%. Three main themes emerged during coding: ideal program structure, motivations for participation, and barriers to implementation. For the ideal structure of a peer coaching program all groups agreed coaching programs should be voluntary, involve bidirectional learning, and provide CME credits. Live, in situ coaching was preferred. Motivations for coaching participation included: desire to learn new techniques (48%), remaining up to date with the evolution of surgical practice (30%) and improvement of patient outcomes (18%). Barriers to program implementation were categorized as: surgical culture (42%), perceived lack of need (26%), logistical constraints (23%) and issues of coach-coachee dynamics (9%). CONCLUSION: Peer coaching to refine or acquire new skills addresses many shortcomings of traditional, didactic learning modalities. This study revealed key aspects of optimal program structure, motivations and barriers to coaching which can be used to inform the design of successful peer coaching programs in the future.

Patients' preferences for sphincter preservation versus abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for low rectal cancer can be associated with severe bowel dysfunction and impaired quality of life. It is important to determine how patients value the trade-off between anorectal dysfunction versus abdominoperineal resection. Therefore, the objective was to determine patients' preferences for treatment for low rectal cancer. METHODS: Ambulatory patients without colorectal cancer at a single high-volume academic colorectal referral center from September 2019 to March 2020 were included. Patients with prior stoma or malignancy were excluded. Participants were presented with a hypothetic scenario describing a low rectal cancer. A threshold task identified preferences for functional and oncologic outcomes for sphincter preservation versus abdominoperineal resection. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were recruited. Patients preferred abdominoperineal resection over sphincter preservation if there were more than a mean of 6.7 (standard deviation 4.0) daily bowel movements, 1.9 (standard deviation 2.6) daily episodes of stool incontinence, and 6.5 (standard deviation 3.2) gas incontinence. Abdominoperineal resection was preferred over sphincter preservation in 38% if daily activities were altered owing to fecal urgency. Patients were willing to accept a 10% (interquartile range, 5-25) absolute increase in risk of margin involvement with sphincter preservation to avoid abdominoperineal resection. Abdominoperineal resection was the preferred option overall for 18% of patients. CONCLUSION: An important proportion of patients would prefer abdominoperineal resection over sphincter preservation owing to the impairments in anorectal function associated with sphincter preservation. The decision to perform sphincter preservation or abdominoperineal resection should consider how the patients' value functional outcomes with a low anastomosis.

S116: Impact of incisional negative pressure wound therapy on surgical site infection after complex incisional hernia repair: a retrospective matched cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) may reduce surgical site infections (SSI), which can have devastating consequences after incisional hernia repair. Few comparative studies investigate the effectiveness of this wound management strategy in this population. The objective of this study is to determine the effect of iNPWT on the incidence of SSI after complex incisional hernia repair. METHODS: All adult patients undergoing open incisional hernia repair at a single center from 2016 to 2019 were reviewed. A commercial iNPWT dressing was used at the discretion of the surgeon. Patients were grouped by type of dressing; iNPWT and standard sterile dressings (SSD). Coarsened exact matching was used to create balanced cohorts for comparison using age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, wound classification, and surgical urgency. The primary outcome was the composite incidence of superficial and deep SSI within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included non-infectious surgical site occurrences (SSO), overall complications, length of stay (LOS), emergency department visits, and readmission at 30 days. RESULTS: 134 patients underwent complex hernia repair, with 114 patients included after matching (34 iNPWT, 51 SSD). Composite incidence of superficial and deep SSI was 19.3% (11.8% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.107), with significantly lower rates of deep SSI in patients receiving iNPWT (2.9% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.045). After accounting for residual differences between groups, iNPWT was associated with decreased incidence of composite SSI (RR 0.36, 95% CI [0.16, 0.87]). Median LOS was longer in patients with iNPWT (7 vs. 5 days, p = 0.001). There were no differences in SSO, overall complications, readmission, or emergency department visits. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing incisional hernia repair, the use of iNPWT was associated with a lower incidence of SSI at 30 days. Future studies should focus on cost effectiveness of iNPWT, its impact on long-term hernia recurrences, and the identification of patient selection criteria in this population.

Defining the key skills required to perform advanced laparoscopic procedures: a qualitative descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: Simulation is widely used to teach and assess fundamental laparoscopic skills; however, program directors have reported that current simulation programs do not meet the needs for trainees and surgeons learning advanced laparoscopic procedures (ALP). The purpose of our study was to identify the key skills required to perform ALP, to serve as the basis to establish an advanced laparoscopic skills training program. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with attending surgeons, fellows, and senior residents in general surgery, gynaecology, and urology. The questions were developed through an iterative process using relevant literature, expert opinions, and in consultation with a qualitative researcher. Interviews were conducted in person, over the phone, or by videoconference, and inductive thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: 25 interviews were conducted with 16 attending surgeons and 9 fellows/residents from 9 institutions in Canada and USA. Twenty-one skills were identified to be important when performing ALP. The skills most commonly described by faculty were the following : (a) suturing, (b) dissection, (c) procedural expertise, (d) retraction and exposure, and (e) familiarity with relevant anatomy as viewed through the laparoscope. The skills most commonly described by trainees were the following: (a) suturing, (b) dissection, (c) procedural expertise, (d) trocar positioning, and (e) patient factors. There was a large difference between the importance the faculty attributed to the 'Retraction and Exposure' skill compared to the trainees. CONCLUSION: This study identified key skills that are important when performing ALP. In order to address the current needs of trainees/surgeons learning ALP, this work provides the building blocks for the development of an advanced laparoscopic surgery simulation program.

Development and validation of an endoscopic submucosal dissection video assessment tool.

BACKGROUND: Despite a need for assessment of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) skills in order to track progress and determine competence, there is no structured measure of assessing competency in ESD performance. The present study aims to develop and examine validity evidence for an assessment tool to evaluate the recorded performance of ESD for gastric neoplasms. METHODS: The ESD video assessment tool (EVAT) was systematically developed by ESD experienced endoscopists. The EVAT consists of a 25-item global rating scale and 3-item checklist to assess competencies required to perform ESD. Five unedited videos were each evaluated by 2-blinded experienced ESD endoscopists to assess inter-rater reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Seventeen unedited videos in total were rated by 3 blinded experienced ESD endoscopists. Validity evidence for relationship to other variables was examined by comparing scores of inexperienced (fellows) and experienced endoscopists (attending staff), and by evaluating the relationship between the EVAT scores and ESD case experience. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability for the total score was high at 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.99). The total score [median, interquartile range (IQR)] was significantly different between the inexperienced (71, 63-77) and experienced group (95, 91-97) (P = 0.005). The total scores demonstrated high correlation with the number of ESD cases (Spearman's ρ = 0.79, P < 0.01). The internal consistency was 0.97. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary validity evidence for the assessment of video-recorded ESD performances for gastric neoplasms using EVAT.