Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-up Study (NYC-SIGHT): a nested cross-sectional assessment of falls risk within a cluster randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the feasibility of using the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths and Injuries (STEADI) Falls Risk Tool Kit during community-based eye health screenings to assess falls risk of participants enrolled in the Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT). METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of data from a 5-year prospective, cluster-randomised clinical trial conducted in affordable housing developments in New York City in adults age 40 years and older. Prescreening questions determined whether participants were at risk of falling. STEADI tests classified participants at low, moderate or high risk of falling. Multivariate logistic regression determined odds of falls risk of all enrolled participants. RESULTS: 708 participants completed the eye health screening; 351 (49.6%) performed STEADI tests; mean age: 71.0 years (SD±11.3); 72.1% female; 53.6% Black, non-Hispanic, 37.6% Hispanic/Latino. Level of falls risk: 32 (9.1%) low, 188 (53.6%) moderate and 131 (37.3%) high. Individuals age >80 (OR 5.921, 95% CI (2.383 to 14.708), p=0.000), had blurry vision (OR 1.978, 95% CI (1.186 to 3.300), p=0.009), high blood pressure (OR 2.131, 95% CI (1.252 to 3.628), p=0.005), arthritis (OR 2.29876, 95% CI (1.362 to 3.875), p=0.002) or foot problems (OR 5.239, 95% CI (2.947 to 9.314), p=0.000) had significantly higher odds of falling, emergency department visits or hospitalisation due to falling. CONCLUSION: This study detected a significant amount of falls risk in an underserved population. The STEADI Falls Risk screening questions were easy for eye care providers to ask, were highly predictive of falls risk and may be adequate for referral to occupational health and/or physical therapy.

Natural History and Risk Factors for Glaucoma Progression in Chinese Patients With Normal-Tension Glaucoma.

Purpose: To characterize the natural history of normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) in Chinese patients. Methods: The prospective observational cohort study included patients with untreated NTG with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Functional progression was defined by visual field (VF) deterioration, while structural progression was characterized by thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) or ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL). Results: Among 84 participants (mean age, 60.5 years; mean deviation, -5.01 decibels [dB]) with newly diagnosed NTG followed for an average of 69.7 months, 63.1% progressed during the observation period. Specifically, 29.8% progressed by VF, and 48.8% progressed by either RNFL or GCIPL. In Cox proportional hazards analysis, disc hemorrhage (hazard ratio [HR], 2.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-5.35), female gender (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.08-3.62), and mean IOP during the follow-up period (HR, 1.14 per mm Hg; 95% CI, 1.00-1.31) were significant predictors of glaucomatous progression. Additionally, longer axial length (AL; HR, 0.57 per millimeter; 95% CI, 0.35-0.94) was protective against VF progression faster than -0.50 dB/y, and higher minimum diastolic blood pressure (DBP; HR, 0.96 per mm Hg; 95% CI, 0.92-1.00) was protective against structural progression. Conclusions: Nearly two-thirds of untreated Chinese patients with NTG progressed over an average follow-up of 70 months by VF, RNFL, or GCIPL. Disc hemorrhage, female gender, higher mean IOP, shorter AL, and lower minimum DBP were significant predictors for disease progression.

Visual Impairment and Real-World Home Physical Activity With Home Environment in an Older Population.

Importance: Physical activity levels are lower in visual impairment. However, additional factors, such as home environmental features, which can modify physical activity in this group, are unknown. Objective: To investigate the association between home environment features and home physical activity in patients with visual impairment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study of clinical patients included participants with glaucoma suspect and primary glaucoma who were 60 years or older with varying degrees of visual field damage. Study participants were recruited from the Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute Glaucoma Clinic, Baltimore, Maryland, from September 2013 through March 2015. Data were analyzed from December 19, 2022, through December 25, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Total in-home steps taken per day was the primary outcome measure; time in daily home physical activity and nonsedentary activity were secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 153 participants were included in analyses with mean age of 71 (SD, 7.8) years and 71 were female (46%). Sixty percent had more than 1 comorbid illness, about one-third took 5 or more prescription drugs, and median daily home steps were 1137. Median integrated visual field sensitivity was 28 dB. Better-eye median visual acuity in logMAR was 0.05 (20/22 Snellen equivalent). For every 0.1-log unit increment in average measured home lighting, participants took 5% more daily steps (rate ratio [RR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.10; P = .04) and had a 3% faster average daily peak cadence (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; P = .01). The average number of nonsedentary activity minutes (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.07; P = .06), average bout duration (ß = 0.03; 95% CI, 0.00-.07; P = .06), and activity fragmentation (ß = -0.06; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.00; P = .06) showed associations with home lighting. The number of hazards was not associated with any activity metric (steps: RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.96-1.34; P = .13; peak cadence: RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.93-1.08; P = .98; and nonsedentary time: RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.98-1.26; P = .11), nor was the frequency of hazards. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, results demonstrated that home environment features, particularly lighting, may influence home activity metrics in older adults with visual impairment. Further prospective studies would be needed to confirm if home modifications can improve at-home activity.

Long-Term Risk and Prediction of Progression in Primary Angle Closure Suspect.

Importance: Identifying primary angle closure suspect (PACS) eyes at risk of angle closure is crucial for its management. However, the risk of progression and its prediction are still understudied in long-term longitudinal studies about PACS. Objective: To explore baseline predictors and develop prediction models for the 14-year risk of progression from PACS to primary angle closure (PAC). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study involved participants from the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention trial who had untreated eyes with PACS. Baseline examinations included tonometry, ultrasound A-scan biometry, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) under both light and dark conditions. Primary angle closure was defined as peripheral anterior synechiae in 1 or more clock hours, intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than 24 mm Hg, or acute angle closure. Based on baseline covariates, logistic regression models were built to predict the risk of progression from PACS to PAC during 14 years of follow-up. Results: The analysis included 377 eyes from 377 patients (mean [SD] patient age at baseline, 58.28 [4.71] years; 317 females [84%]). By the 14-year follow-up visit, 93 eyes (25%) had progressed from PACS to PAC. In multivariable models, higher IOP (odds ratio [OR], 1.14 [95% CI, 1.04-1.25] per 1-mm Hg increase), shallower central anterior chamber depth (ACD; OR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.67-0.97] per 0.1-mm increase), and shallower limbal ACD (OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.99] per 0.01 increase in peripheral corneal thickness) at baseline were associated with an increased 14-year risk of progression from PACS to PAC. As for AS-OCT measurements, smaller light-room trabecular-iris space area (TISA) at 500 µm from the scleral spur (OR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.77-0.96] per 0.01-mm2 increase), smaller light-room angle recess area (ARA) at 750 µm from the scleral spur (OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.98] per 0.01-mm2 increase), and smaller dark-room TISA at 500 µm (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.80-0.98] per 0.01-mm2 increase) at baseline were identified as predictors for the 14-year risk of progression. The prediction models based on IOP and central and limbal ACDs showed moderate performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.63-0.75) in predicting progression from PACS to PAC, and inclusion of AS-OCT metrics did not improve the model's performance. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study suggests that higher IOP, shallower central and limbal ACDs, and smaller TISA at 500 µm and light-room ARA at 750 µm may serve as baseline predictors for progression to PAC in PACS eyes. Evaluating these factors can aid in customizing PACS management.

Comparison of Structural and Functional Features in Primary Angle Closure and Open Angle Glaucomas.

PRCIS: Using a large data set, we showed structural and functional differences between primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Primary angle closure glaucoma has relative structural preservation and worse functional loss inferiorly. PURPOSE: To identify structural and functional differences in PACG and POAG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this large cross-sectional study, differences in structural and functional damage were assessed among patients with POAG and PACG with optical coherence tomography and reliable visual field testing. RESULTS: In all, 283 patients with PACG and 4110 patients with POAG were included. Despite similar mean deviation on visual fields (mean [SD] -7.73 [7.92] vs. -7.53 [6.90] dB, P =0.72), patients with PACG had thicker global retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), smaller cup volume, smaller cup-to-disc ratio, and larger rim area than POAG (77 [20] vs. 71 [14] µm, 0.32 [0.28] vs. 0.40 [0.29] mm 3 , 0.6 [0.2] vs. 0.7 [0.1], 1.07 [0.40] vs. 0.89 [0.30] mm 2 , P <0.001 for all), while patients with POAG had more pronounced inferior RNFL thinning (82 [24] vs. 95 [35] µm, P <0.001). In a multivariable analysis, hyperopia [odds ratio (OR): 1.24, confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.37], smaller cup-to-disc ratio (OR: 0.69, CI: 0.61-0.78), thicker inferior RNFL (OR: 1.15, CI: 1.06-1.26) and worse mean deviation (OR: 0.95, CI: 0.92-0.98) were associated with PACG. Functionally, POAG was associated with superior paracentral loss and PACG with inferior field loss. After adjusting for average RNFL thickness, PACG was associated with more diffuse loss than POAG (total deviation differences 1.26-3.2 dB). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PACG had less structural damage than patients with POAG despite similar degrees of functional loss. Regional differences in patterns of functional and structural loss between POAG and PACG may improve disease monitoring for these glaucoma subtypes.

Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT): Subanalysis of Referral to Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: The Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-up Study aims to provide access to eye care for underserved populations, detect native rates of ocular pathology, and refer participants with eye disease to ophthalmology. This subanalysis describes the reasons for referral to ophthalmology and identifies risk factors associated with being referred. METHODS: Enrolled participants were aged ≥40 years, living independently in public housing developments and able to provide consent for eye health screenings. Those with habitual visual acuity 20/40 or worse, intraocular pressure (IOP) 23-29 mmHg, or an unreadable fundus image failed and were scheduled with the on-site optometrist. The optometric exam determined whether further referral to ophthalmology for a clinic exam was warranted. Those with an abnormal image or IOP ≥30 mmHg were referred directly to ophthalmology. Main outcome was factors associated with referral to ophthalmology. RESULTS: A total of 708 individuals completed the eye health screening over 15 months. A total of 468 participants were referred to ophthalmology (250 had an abnormal image and 218 were referred by the optometrist). Those referred were predominantly older adults (mean age 70.0 ± 11.4 years), female (66.7%), African American (55.1%) and Hispanic (39.5%). Seventy percent of participants had not had a recent eye exam. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that participants with pre-existing glaucoma (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.62 to 6.08, p = 0.001), an IOP ≥23 mmHg (OR 5.04, 95% 1.91 to 13.28, p = 0.001), or vision impairment (mild) (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.68 to 3.77, p = 0.001) had significantly higher odds of being referred to ophthalmology. CONCLUSION: This targeted community-based study in Upper Manhattan provided access to eye care and detected a significant amount of ocular pathology requiring referral to ophthalmology in this high-risk population.

MNREAD Reading Vision in Adults With Glaucoma Under Mesopic and Photopic Conditions.

Purpose: Despite good photopic visual acuity, glaucoma patients report difficulty performing daily activities under dim light such as reading. Here we investigated the impact of mesopic lighting conditions on reading vision of glaucoma patients. Methods: The study design included 39 patients with glaucoma and 40 healthy controls. Reading vision was assessed with MNREAD charts under mesopic (2 cd/m2) and photopic (220 cd/m2) conditions. Four reading indexes: maximum reading speed (MRS), critical print size (CPS), reading acuity (RA), and reading accessibility index (ACC) were obtained from the MNREAD test yielding a plot of reading speed versus print size. Results: Compared to photopic conditions, reading vision of both healthy controls and glaucoma patients significantly decreased under mesopic conditions (P < 0.05). For glaucoma patients (85% with mild or moderate glaucoma), MRS and ACC decreased by six words per minute and 0.1, respectively under mesopic conditions; CPS and RA increased by 0.25 and 0.18 logMAR, respectively. Moreover, under both photopic and mesopic conditions, reading vision of glaucoma patients was significantly worse than that of healthy controls, but the difference was greater under mesopic conditions (P < 0.05) even after controlling for age and visual acuity. Conclusions: Mesopic conditions make reading more challenging for both healthy controls and glaucoma patients. However, reading in dim light appears to be more burdensome for glaucoma patients. Mesopic reading tests mediated by both cone and rod photoreceptor systems likely provide a more sensitive and comprehensive assessment of a patient's reading impairment than testing under photopic conditions.

Short-term Detection of Fast Progressors in Glaucoma: The Fast Progression Assessment through Clustered Evaluation (Fast-PACE) Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of an intensive, clustered testing approach in identifying eyes with rapid glaucoma progression over 6 months in the Fast Progression Assessment through Clustered Evaluation (Fast-PACE) Study. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 125 eyes from 65 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects. METHODS: Subjects underwent 2 sets of 5 weekly visits (clusters) separated by an average of 6 months and then were followed with single visits every 6 months for an overall mean follow-up of 25 months (mean of 17 tests). Each visit consisted of testing with standard automated perimetry (SAP) 24-2 and 10-2, and spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT). Progression was assessed using trend analyses of SAP mean deviation (MD) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness. Generalized estimating equations were applied to adjust for correlations between eyes for confidence interval (CI) estimation and hypothesis testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic accuracy of the 6-month clustering period to identify progression detected during the overall follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 19 of 125 eyes (15%, CI, 9%-24%) progressed based on SAP 24-2 MD over the 6-month clustering period. A total of 14 eyes (11%, CI, 6%-20%) progressed on SAP 10-2 MD, and 16 eyes (13%, CI, 8%-21%) progressed by RNFL thickness, with 30 of 125 eyes (24%, CI, 16%-34%) progressing by function, structure, or both. Of the 35 eyes progressing during the overall follow-up, 25 had progressed during the 6-month clustering period, for a sensitivity of 71% (CI, 53%-85%). Of the 90 eyes that did not progress during the overall follow-up, 85 also did not progress during the 6-month period, for a specificity of 94% (CI, 88%-98%). Of the 14 eyes considered fast progressors by SAP 24-2, SAP 10-2, or SD-OCT during the overall follow-up, 13 were identified as progressing during the 6-month cluster period, for a sensitivity of 93% (CI, 66%-100%) for identifying fast progression with a specificity of 85% (CI, 77%-90%). CONCLUSIONS: Clustered testing in the Fast-PACE Study detected fast-progressing glaucoma eyes over 6 months. The methodology could be applied in clinical trials investigating interventions to slow glaucoma progression and may be of value for short-term assessment of high-risk subjects. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Glaucoma: now and beyond.

The glaucomas are a group of conditions leading to irreversible sight loss and characterised by progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells. Although not always elevated, intraocular pressure is the only modifiable risk factor demonstrated by large clinical trials. It remains the leading cause of irreversible blindness, but timely treatment to lower intraocular pressure is effective at slowing the rate of vision loss from glaucoma. Methods for lowering intraocular pressure include laser treatments, topical medications, and surgery. Although modern surgical innovations aim to be less invasive, many have been introduced with little supporting evidence from randomised controlled trials. Many cases remain undiagnosed until the advanced stages of disease due to the limitations of screening and poor access to opportunistic case finding. Future research aims to generate evidence for intraocular pressure-independent neuroprotective treatments, personalised treatment through genetic risk profiling, and exploration of potential advanced cellular and gene therapies.

Treatment Outcomes for Juvenile Open Angle Glaucoma in Thailand.

PRCIS: Juvenile open angle glaucoma (JOAG) patients with thick central corneas and negative family history were more likely to undergo surgery, mainly trabeculectomy with half requiring additional surgery within 10 years. PURPOSE: To assess the characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with JOAG in Thailand. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study included all patients diagnosed with JOAG over 12 years from 2 tertiary hospitals in Bangkok, Thailand. RESULTS: A total of 200 eyes from 104 patients were included in this study. The mean age of onset was 24.0±10.1 years (range: 5-40 y), with male predominance (60.5%). Over 90% of patients had bilateral JOAG and 25% had a positive family history. Negative family history (adjusted odds ratio=4.59, P =0.02) and thick central corneal thickness were surgical predictors (every 10 µm adjusted odds ratio=1.29, P =0.01). Over 70% of cases needed glaucoma surgery. Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin-C was performed on 131 eyes (65.5%) with a cumulative probability of complete success of 71.0%, 57.8%, 39.2%, and 26.9% and qualified success of 86.3%, 73.6%, 64.8%, and 45.7% at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The mean follow-up after surgery was 94.9 ± 69.8 months (range: 13-153 mo). There were no serious postoperative complications. Myopia and the number of baseline glaucoma medications were significantly associated with surgical failure. CONCLUSIONS: Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C was the most common primary surgery performed in Thai patients with JOAG, and successfully reduced intraocular pressure without significant complications. Patients with thicker corneas were more likely to undergo surgery. By 10 years, half of the patients required additional surgery and risk factors for failure included myopia and the number of medications.

Participant Experience Using Novel Perimetry Tests to Monitor Glaucoma Progression.

PRCIS: Participant surveys taken after using tablet-based and smart visual function analyzer (SVFA) perimetry tests suggest that patients may prefer novel perimetry tests over traditional visual field machines. PURPOSE: Compare patient experience using the IMOvifa SVFA and the tablet-based Melbourne Rapid Fields visual field (VF) tests to the Humphrey Field 24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm Standard. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study on adult participants with diagnoses of glaucoma suspect, ocular hypertension, or glaucoma. Participants attended 2 study visits ~3 months apart. During the first visit, participants were trained to use the 2 novel perimeters, took 1 test on both new devices and the Humphrey Field Analyzer, then were surveyed. Participants received tablets and performed weekly tablet VF tests at home between study visits. At the final study visit, participants re-took the VF tests and completed the same surveys. RESULTS: Eighty-one participants were surveyed twice. At the baseline survey, participants preferred the SVFA (71.7%) and tablet tests (69.2%) over the Humphrey VF. Most were willing to perform weekly monitoring at home on the SVFA (69.1%) and tablet (75.4%). Participants generally had a "very good" overall experience when testing on the SVFA (71.6%) and tablet (90.1%). At the final visit, fewer participants were willing to test on the tablet daily (23.5% to 9.9%; P = 0.02 for change) and more were willing to test monthly (18.5% to 33.3%; P = 0.03 for change). CONCLUSION: Users reported a preference for novel VF devices. Overall participant experience using these devices was positive, supporting the feasibility of home monitoring of VFs from an experience perspective.

Deep Ocular Phenotyping Across Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Genetic Burden.

Importance: Better understanding of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) genetics could enable timely screening and promote individualized disease risk prognostication. Objective: To evaluate phenotypic features across genetic burden for POAG. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional, population-based study conducted from 2006 to 2010. Included participants were individuals from the UK Biobank aged 40 to 69 years. Individuals with non-POAG forms of glaucoma were excluded from the analysis. Data were statistically analyzed from October 2022 to January 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: POAG prevalence based on structural coding, self-reports, and glaucoma-related traits. Results: Among 407 667 participants (mean [SD] age, 56.3 [8.1] years; 219 183 majority sex [53.8%]) were 14 171 POAG cases. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve for POAG detection was 0.748 in a model including polygenic risk score (PRS), age, sex, and ancestry. POAG prevalence in the highest decile of PRS was 7.4% (3005 of 40 644) vs 1.3% (544 of 40 795) in lowest decile (P < .001). A 1-SD increase in PRS was associated with 1.74 times higher odds of POAG (95% CI, 1.71-1.77), a 0.61-mm Hg increase in corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOP; 95% CI, 0.59-0.64), a -0.09-mm Hg decrease in corneal hysteresis (95% CI, -0.10 to -0.08), a 0.08-mm Hg increase in corneal resistance factor (95% CI, 0.06-0.09), and a -0.08-diopter decrease in spherical equivalent (95% CI, -0.11 to -0.07; P < .001 for all). A 1-SD increase in PRS was associated with a thinning of the macula-region retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL) of 0.14 µm and macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) of 0.26 µm (P < .001 for both). In the subset of individuals with fundus photographs, a 1-SD increase in PRS was associated with 1.42 times higher odds of suspicious optic disc features (95% CI, 1.19-1.69) and a 0.013 increase in cup-disc ratio (CDR; 95% CI, 0.012-0.014; P < .001 for both). A total of 22 of 5193 fundus photographs (0.4%) in decile 10 had disc hemorrhages, and 27 of 5257 (0.5%) had suspicious optic disc features compared with 9 of 5158 (0.2%) and 10 of 5219 (0.2%), respectively, in decile 1 (P < .001 for both). CDR in decile 10 was 0.46 compared with 0.41 in decile 1 (P < .001). Conclusion and Relevance: Results suggest that PRS identified a group of individuals at substantially higher risk for POAG. Higher genetic risk was associated with more advanced disease, namely higher CDR and corneal-compensated IOP, thinner mRNFL, and thinner GCC. Associations with POAG PRS and corneal hysteresis and greater prevalence of disc hemorrhages were identified. These results suggest that genetic risk is an increasingly important parameter for risk stratification to consider in clinical practice.

Role of Static and Dynamic Ocular Biometrics Measured in the Dark and Light as Risk Factors for Angle Closure Progression.

PURPOSE: To assess the role of static and dynamic ocular biometric parameters measured in the dark and light for predicting progression of primary angle closure suspect (PACS) to primary angle closure (PAC). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using prospective randomized controlled trial data from untreated, control eyes. METHODS: Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention Trial subjects underwent anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) imaging in the dark and light. Static biometric parameters were measured, consisting of angle, iris, lens, and anterior chamber parameters. Dynamic change parameters were calculated by subtracting light measurements from dark measurements. Cox proportional hazards regression models were developed to assess risk factors for PACD progression. RESULTS: A total of 861 eyes of 861 participants were analyzed (36 progressors). On univariable analysis, TISA500 measurements in the light and dark were associated with progression (P < .001), whereas dynamic change parameters were not (P ≥ .08). In the primary multivariable model, older age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.09 per year), higher intraocular pressure (IOP) (HR = 1.13 per mm Hg), and smaller TISA500 in the light (HR = 1.28 per 0.01 mm2) were significantly associated with greater risk of progression (P ≤ .04). Dark TISA500 had similar significance (HR = 1.28, P = .002) when replacing light TISA500. Risk of progression was more predictive among eyes in the lowest quartile of light TISA500 measurements (HR = 4.56, P < .001) compared to dark measurements (HR = 2.89, P = .003). CONCLUSION: Static parameters measured in the light are as predictive, and possibly more so, of angle closure progression as those measured in the dark. Ocular biometrics measured under light and dark conditions may provide additional information for risk-stratifying patients for angle closure progression.

Artifact-Tolerant Clustering-Guided Contrastive Embedding Learning for Ophthalmic Images in Glaucoma.

Ophthalmic images, along with their derivatives like retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness maps, play a crucial role in detecting and monitoring eye diseases such as glaucoma. For computer-aided diagnosis of eye diseases, the key technique is to automatically extract meaningful features from ophthalmic images that can reveal the biomarkers (e.g., RNFL thinning patterns) associated with functional vision loss. However, representation learning from ophthalmic images that links structural retinal damage with human vision loss is non-trivial mostly due to large anatomical variations between patients. This challenge is further amplified by the presence of image artifacts, commonly resulting from image acquisition and automated segmentation issues. In this paper, we present an artifact-tolerant unsupervised learning framework called EyeLearn for learning ophthalmic image representations in glaucoma cases. EyeLearn includes an artifact correction module to learn representations that optimally predict artifact-free images. In addition, EyeLearn adopts a clustering-guided contrastive learning strategy to explicitly capture the affinities within and between images. During training, images are dynamically organized into clusters to form contrastive samples, which encourage learning similar or dissimilar representations for images in the same or different clusters, respectively. To evaluate EyeLearn, we use the learned representations for visual field prediction and glaucoma detection with a real-world dataset of glaucoma patient ophthalmic images. Extensive experiments and comparisons with state-of-the-art methods confirm the effectiveness of EyeLearn in learning optimal feature representations from ophthalmic images.

Association of Optic Nerve Head and Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Measures With Glaucoma-Related Disability.

PRCIS: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) estimated retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness associated with glaucoma-related disability independent of the visual field (VF) damage and thus may provide additional patient-relevant disability information beyond what is captured by standard VF testing. PURPOSE: To examine whether OCT metrics [peripapillary RNFL thickness and macular ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness] are associated with quality of life (QoL) measures and additional disability metrics, and whether these associations are independent of VF damage. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 156 patients with glaucoma or suspected glaucoma received VF testing and OCT scans to measure RNFL and GCIPL thickness. QoL was assessed using the Glaucoma Quality-of-Life 15 and additional disability measures including fear of falling, reading speed, and steps per day were assessed. Multivariable regression models adjusting for relevant covariates tested whether RNFL or GCIPL thickness from the less-impaired eye were associated with disability measures and whether associations were independent of VF damage. RESULTS: Greater VF damage is associated with worse QoL (95% CI=0.4-1.4; P <0.001) and slower reading speed (CI=-0.06 to -0.02; P <0.001). Lower RNFL and GCIPL thicknesses were associated with lower QoL scores, but not with QoL scores or other disability metrics after correcting for VF damage. However, post hoc analyses in patients with better eye thicknesses between 55 and 75 µm demonstrated associations between lower RNFL thickness and worse QoL (CI=-2.2 to -0.1; P =0.04) and greater fear of falling (CI=-6.1 to -0.4; P =0.03) even after accounting for VF damage. No such associations were observed for GCIPL thickness. CONCLUSIONS: OCT RNFL, but not GCIPL, thickness is associated with multiple disability measures independent of VF damage severity.

Biometric Risk Factors for Angle Closure Progression After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy.

Importance: Laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) is the most common primary treatment for primary angle closure disease (PACD). However, there are sparse data guiding the longitudinal care of PAC suspect (PACS) eyes after LPI. Objective: To elucidate the anatomic effects of LPI that are associated with a protective outcome against progression from PACS to PAC and acute angle closure (AAC) and to identify biometric factors that predict progression after LPI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective analysis of data from the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention (ZAP) trial, a study of mainland Chinese people aged 50 to 70 years with bilateral PACS who received LPI in 1 randomly selected eye. Gonioscopy and anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) imaging were performed 2 weeks after LPI. Progression was defined as the development of PAC or an acute angle closure (AAC) attack. Cohort A included a random mix of treated and untreated eyes, and cohort B included only eyes treated with LPI. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were developed to assess biometric risk factors for progression in cohorts A and B. Data were analyzed from January 4 to December 22, 2022. Main Outcome and Measure: Six-year progression to PAC or AAC. Results: Cohort A included 878 eyes from 878 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.9 [5.0] years; 726 female [82.7%]) of whom 44 experienced progressive disease. In a multivariable analysis, treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.34-1.33; P = .25) was no longer associated with progression after adjusting for age and trabecular iris space area at 500 µm (TISA at 500 µm) at the 2-week visit. Cohort B included 869 treated eyes from 869 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.9 [5.0] years; 717 female [82.5%]) of whom 19 experienced progressive disease. In multivariable analysis, TISA at 500 µm (HR, 1.33 per 0.01 mm2 smaller; 95% CI, 1.12-1.56; P = .001) and cumulative gonioscopy score (HR, 1.25 per grade smaller; 95% CI, 1.03-1.52; P = .02) at the 2-week visit were associated with progression. Persistent angle narrowing on AS-OCT (TISA at 500 µm ≤0.05 mm2; HR, 9.41; 95% CI, 3.39-26.08; P <.001) or gonioscopy (cumulative score ≤6; HR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.13-6.93; P =.04) conferred higher risk of progression. Conclusions and Relevance: Study results suggest that persistent angle narrowing detected by AS-OCT or cumulative gonioscopy score was predictive of disease progression in PACS eyes after LPI. These findings suggest that AS-OCT and gonioscopy may be performed to identify patients at high risk of developing angle closure who may benefit from closer monitoring despite patent LPI.

Fourteen-Year Outcome of Angle-Closure Prevention with Laser Iridotomy in the Zhongshan Angle-Closure Prevention Study: Extended Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) prophylaxis for patients with primary angle-closure suspect (PACS) after 14 years and to identify risk factors for the conversion from PACS to primary angle closure (PAC). DESIGN: Extended follow-up of the Zhongshan Angle-Closure Prevention Study. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred eighty-nine Chinese patients 50 to 70 years of age with bilateral PACS. METHODS: Each patient received LPI in 1 randomly selected eye, with the fellow untreated eye serving as a control. Because the risk of glaucoma was low and acute angle closure (AAC) occurred only rarely, the follow-up was extended to 14 years despite substantial benefits of LPI reported after the 6-year visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of PAC, a composite end point including peripheral anterior synechiae, intraocular pressure (IOP) of > 24 mmHg, or AAC. RESULTS: During the 14 years, 390 LPI-treated eyes and 388 control eyes were lost to follow-up. A total of 33 LPI-treated eyes and 105 control eyes reached primary end points (P < 0.01). Within them, 1 LPI-treated eye and 5 control eyes progressed to AAC. Primary angle-closure glaucoma was found in 2 LPI-treated eyes and 4 control eyes. The hazard ratio for progression to PAC was 0.31 (95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.46) in LPI-treated eyes compared with control eyes. At the 14-year visit, LPI-treated eyes showed more severe nuclear cataract, higher IOP, and larger angle width and limbal anterior chamber depth (LACD) than control eyes. Higher IOP, shallower LACD, and greater central anterior chamber depth (CACD) were associated with an increased risk of end points developing in control eyes. In the treated group, eyes with higher IOP, shallower LACD, or less IOP elevation after the darkroom prone provocative test (DRPPT) were more likely to demonstrate PAC after LPI. CONCLUIONS: Despite a two-third decrease in PAC occurrence after LPI, the cumulative risk of progression was relatively low in the community-based PACS population over 14 years. Apart from IOP, IOP elevation after DRPPT, CACD, and LACD, more risk factors are needed to achieve precise prediction of PAC occurrence and to guide clinical practice. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Lens extraction versus laser peripheral iridotomy for acute primary angle closure.

BACKGROUND: Acute primary angle closure (APAC) is a potentially blinding condition. It is one of the few ophthalmic emergencies and carries high rates of visual morbidity in the absence of timely intervention. Laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) has been the standard of care thus far. However, LPI does not eliminate the long-term risk of chronic angle closure glaucoma and other associated sequelae. There has been increasing interest in lens extraction as the primary treatment for the spectrum of primary angle closure disease, and it is as yet unclear whether these results can be extrapolated to APAC, and whether lens extraction provides better long-term outcomes. We therefore sought to evaluate the effectiveness of lens extraction in APAC to help inform the decision-making process.  OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of lens extraction compared to LPI in the treatment of APAC. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2022, Issue 1), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE E-pub Ahead of Print, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily (January 1946 to 10 January 2022), Embase (January 1947 to 10 January 2022), PubMed (1946 to 10 January 2022), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (1982 to 10 January 2022), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search. We last searched the electronic databases on 10 January 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled clinical trials comparing lens extraction against LPI in adult participants ( ≥ 35 years) with APAC in one or both eyes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodology and assessed the certainty of the body of evidence for prespecified outcomes using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included two studies conducted in Hong Kong and Singapore, comprising 99 eyes (99 participants) of predominantly Chinese origin. The two studies compared LPI with phacoemulsification performed by experienced surgeons. We assessed that both studies were at high risk of bias. There were no studies evaluating other types of lens extraction procedures.  Phacoemulsification may result in an increased proportion of participants with intraocular pressure (IOP) control compared with LPI at 18 to 24 months (risk ratio (RR) 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28 to 2.15; 2 studies, n = 97; low certainty evidence) and may reduce the need for further IOP-lowering surgery within 24 months (RR 0.07, 96% CI 0.01 to 0.51; 2 studies, n = 99; very low certainty evidence). Phacoemulsification may result in a lower mean IOP at 12 months compared to LPI (mean difference (MD) -3.20, 95% CI -4.79 to -1.61; 1 study, n = 62; low certainty evidence) and a slightly lower mean number of IOP-lowering medications at 18 months (MD -0.87, 95% CI -1.28 to -0.46; 1 study, n = 60; low certainty evidence), but this may not be clinically significant. Phacoemulsification may have little to no effect on the proportion of participants with one or more recurrent APAC episodes in the same eye (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.30; 1 study, n = 37; very low certainty evidence). Phacoemulsification may result in a wider iridocorneal angle assessed by Shaffer grading at six months (MD 1.15, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.47; 1 study, n = 62; very low certainty evidence). Phacoemulsification may have little to no effect on logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at six months (MD -0.09, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.02; 2 studies, n = 94; very low certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a difference in the extent of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) (clock hours) between intervention arms at 6 months (MD -1.86, 95% CI -7.03 to 3.32; 2 studies, n = 94; very low certainty evidence), although the phacoemulsification group may have less PAS (degrees) at 12 months (MD -94.20, 95% CI -140.37 to -48.03; 1 study, n = 62) and 18 months (MD -127.30, 95% CI -168.91 to -85.69; 1 study, n = 60).  In one study, there were 26 adverse events in the phacoemulsification group: intraoperative corneal edema (n = 12), posterior capsular rupture (n = 1), intraoperative bleeding from iris root (n = 1), postoperative fibrinous anterior chamber reaction (n = 7), and visually significant posterior capsular opacification (n = 5), and no cases of suprachoroidal hemorrhage or endophthalmitis. There were four adverse events in the LPI group: closed iridotomy (n = 1) and small iridotomies that required supplementary laser (n = 3). In the other study, there was one adverse event in the phacoemulsification group (IOP > 30 mmHg on day 1 postoperatively (n = 1)), and no intraoperative complications. There were five adverse events in the LPI group: transient hemorrhage (n = 1), corneal burn (n = 1), and repeated LPI because of non-patency (n = 3).  Neither study reported health- or vision-related quality of life measures. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Low certainty evidence suggests that early lens extraction may produce more favorable outcomes compared to initial LPI in terms of IOP control. Evidence for other outcomes is less clear. Future high-quality and longer-term studies evaluating the effects of either intervention on the development of glaucomatous damage and visual field changes as well as health-related quality of life measures would be helpful.

Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer.

PURPOSE: The tablet-based Melbourne Rapid Fields (MRF) visual field (VF) test and the IMOvifa Smart Visual Function Analyzer (SVFA) are portable perimeters that may allow for at-home monitoring and more frequent testing. We compared tablet and SVFA results with outputs from the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm Standard program. DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Adult participants with a diagnosis of glaucoma, suspected glaucoma, or ocular hypertension seen in the Massachusetts Eye and Ear glaucoma clinic were enrolled. All participants were reliable and experienced HFA testers. METHODS: Participants were tested with the SVFA and HFA. The study staff also trained participants on the MRF tablet with instructions to take weekly tests at home for 3 months. Visual field results from the 3 devices were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), reliability parameters, and point sensitivity. RESULTS: Overall, 79 participants (133 eyes) with a mean age of 61 ± 13 years (range, 26-79 years) were included; 59% of the participants were female, and the mean HFA MD was -2.7 ± 3.9 dB. The global indices of MD and PSD did not significantly vary between HFA and the 2 novel devices, except that the tablet VF reported a 0.6 dB higher PSD compared with HFA. However, tablet and SVFA sensitivities significantly differed from those of the HFA at 36 and 39 locations, respectively, out of 52 locations. Relative to HFA, the tablet overestimated light sensitivity in the nasal field while underestimating the temporal field. The SVFA generally underestimated light sensitivity, but its results were more similar to HFA results compared with the tablet. CONCLUSIONS: Although average MD values from the 2 novel devices suggest that they provide similar results to the HFA, point-by-point comparisons highlight notable deviations. Differences in specific point sensitivity values were significant, especially between the tablet and the other 2 devices. These differences may in part be explained by differences in the devices' normative databases as well as how MD is calculated. However, the tablet had substantial differences based on location, indicating that the tablet design itself may be responsible for differences in local sensitivities. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Relationship between Claims-Based Frailty Index and Eye Care Utilization among Medicare Beneficiaries with Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To determine differences in eye care utilization by frailty levels among Medicare beneficiaries with glaucoma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries over 65 years of age with glaucoma, identified using International Classification of Diseases codes before July 1, 2014. METHODS: By using a validated claims-based frailty index (range, 0-1), beneficiaries were classified as nonfrail/prefrail (0-0.19), mildly frail (0.20-0.29), and moderate-to-severely frail (≥ 0.30). Negative binomial regression analyses were used to estimate incident rate ratios (IRRs) of eye care utilization by frailty levels between July 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Current Procedural Terminology codes for eye examinations and eye care-related office visits; eye care-related inpatient and emergency department (ED) encounters; eye care-related nursing facility and home-visit encounters; visual field (VF) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) OCT tests; and selective laser trabeculoplasties (SLTs) and glaucoma surgeries. RESULTS: Among 76 260 Medicare beneficiaries with glaucoma, the mean age was 78.9 years (standard deviation, 7.8), female beneficiaries constituted 60.5%, and 78.7% of beneficiaries self-identified as non-Hispanic White. According to a claims-based frailty index, 79.5% of beneficiaries were nonfrail/prefrail, 17.1% were mildly frail, and 3.4% were moderate-to-severely frail. Moderate-to-severely frail beneficiaries were less likely than nonfrail/prefrail beneficiaries to have outpatient encounters (IRR, 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.88); VF tests (IRR, 0.64, 95% CI, 0.60-0.67); RNFL OCT tests (IRR, 0.77, 95% CI, 0.73-0.81); SLT (IRR, 0.74, 95% CI, 0.60-0.92); and glaucoma surgery (IRR, 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.99), after adjusting for age, gender, glaucoma severity, race, and socioeconomic status. Compared with nonfrail/prefrail beneficiaries, moderate-to-severely frail beneficiaries had higher rates of inpatient/ED encounters (IRR, 5.03, 95% CI, 2.36-10.71) and nursing facility/home-visit encounters (IRR, 34.89, 95% CI, 14.82-82.13). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with nonfrail/prefrail Medicare beneficiaries with glaucoma, beneficiaries with moderate-to-severe frailty had lower rates of eye care utilization in the outpatient setting and higher rates of utilization in acute care settings. This suggests that frail patients may receive less disease monitoring and fewer interventions for their glaucoma management. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.