Health-related quality of life in a randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy plus surgery in patients with oesophageal cancer (NeoRes trial).

BACKGROUND: There are few data comparing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (nCT) compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with oesophageal cancer. METHODS: In the NeoRes trial, patients were assigned randomly in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive either cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and an infusion of 750 mg per m2 5-fluorouracil over 24 h on days 1-5 in three 21-day cycles (nCT) or the same chemotherapy regimen, but with the addition of 40 Gy radiotherapy (nCRT). HRQoL data were collected at baseline, after neoadjuvant therapy and at 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire QLQ-C30 and disease-specific modules were used. RESULTS: Of 181 patients randomized, 165 were included in the analysis of HRQoL. In a direct comparison between the allocated treatments, odynophagia after completion of neoadjuvant therapy but before surgery (P = 0·047) and troublesome coughing at 3 years' follow-up (P = 0·011) were more pronounced in the nCRT arm. In the longitudinal analyses within each treatment arm, a large deterioration in HRQoL was noted at 1 year. Some recovery was seen in both arms over time but, after 3 and 5 years, patients in the nCRT arm reported more symptoms compared with baseline than patients in the nCT arm. CONCLUSION: HRQoL after multimodal treatment for cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction was impaired and more pronounced in patients who underwent nCRT, with only partial recovery over time.

ANTECEDENTES: Se dispone de poca información sobre la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (health-related quality of life, HRQOL) en pacientes con cáncer de esófago después de quimioterapia neoadyuvante sola en comparación con quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante. MÉTODOS: En el ensayo NeoRes, los pacientes fueron asignados de forma aleatoria 1:1 a tratamiento con cisplatino 100 mg/m2 en el día uno y 5-Fluorouracilo 750 mg/m2 /infusión de 24 horas en los días 1-5 en tres ciclos de 21 días (nCT) o al mismo régimen de quimioterapia, pero con la adición de radioterapia 40 Gy (nCRT). Los datos de HRQOL se recogieron al inicio, tras el tratamiento neoadyuvante y al cabo de 1, 3 y 5 años tras la cirugía. Se utilizaron los cuestionarios QLQ-C30 de la European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) y los módulos específicos para la enfermedad. RESULTADOS: De 181 pacientes aleatorizados, 165 fueron incluidos en el análisis de la HRQOL. En la comparación directa entre los tratamientos asignados, la odinofagia tras terminar nCRT pero antes de la cirugía (P = 0,047) y la tos molesta a los 3 años de seguimiento (P = 0,011), fueron más acentuadas en el brazo de nCRT. En el análisis longitudinal dentro de cada rama de tratamiento hubo un fuerte deterioro en la HRQOL al año. Se observó cierta recuperación en ambas ramas con el tiempo, pero a los 3 y 5 años de seguimiento, los pacientes de la rama de nCRT describieron más síntomas en comparación con la situación de inicio que los pacientes de la rama de nCT. CONCLUSIÓN: La HRQOL después del tratamiento multimodal del cáncer de esófago o de la unión gastroesofágica se ve afectada, siendo dicha afectación más pronunciada en pacientes que recibieron nCRT, recuperándose solo parcialmente con el tiempo.

Effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy alone on the relief of dysphagia in esophageal cancer patients: secondary endpoint analysis in a randomized trial.

Dysphagia is the most significant symptom in patients with esophageal cancer. There are different therapeutic interventions designed to relieve dysphagia, but few studies have addressed the effects of neoadjuvant therapy. The aim of this study is to compare the effects on dysphagia of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and further to study the association between dysphagia response and histological response. Patient reported swallowing function was a secondary endpoint in the NeoRes trial, in which patients were randomized between neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Patients completed dysphagia questionnaires before the start and after neoadjuvant therapy, using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) esophageal cancer modules QLQ-OES24/OG25. Chirieac tumor regression grade (TRG) was used to assess the histological response. Out of 181 patients were randomized, of whom 87% completed the dysphagia questionnaires before and 73% after neoadjuvant treatment. Patient characteristics were similar between the treatment arms. Among patients reporting dysphagia at baseline, neoadjuvant therapy improved dysphagia in both arms. The mean dysphagia score after neoadjuvant treatment was significantly lower after nCT compared to after nCRT (P = 0.022). The reported dysphagia did not differ between those with a complete histological response (TRG 1) and those without any response at all (TRG 4) (P = 0. 583).

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial.

NeoRes I is a randomized phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of resectable cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma, T1N1 or T2-3N0-1 and M0-M1a (AJCC 6th ed.), were randomized to receive three 3-weekly cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 and fluorouracil 750 mg/m2/24 hours, days 1-5 with or without the addition of concurrent radiotherapy 40 Gy, 2 Gy/fraction, 5 days a week, followed by esophageal resection with two-field lymphadenectomy. Primary endpoint was complete histopathological response rate in the primary tumor. Survival and recurrence patterns were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Between 2006 and 2013, 181 patients were enrolled in Sweden and Norway. All three chemotherapy cycles were delivered to 73% of the patients allocated to chemoradiotherapy and to 86% of the patients allocated to chemotherapy. 87% of those allocated to chemoradiotherapy received full dose radiotherapy. 87% in the chemoradiotherapy group and 86% in the chemotherapy group underwent tumor resection. Initial results showed that patients allocated to chemoradiotherapy more often responded with complete histopathological response in the primary tumor (28% vs. 9%). Treatment-related complications were similar between the groups although postoperative complications were more severe in the chemoradiotherapy group. This article reports the long-term results. Five-year progression-free survival was 38.9% (95% CI 28.9%-48.8%) in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 33.0% (95% CI 23.6%-42.7%) in the chemotherapy group, P = 0.82. Five-year overall survival was 42.2% (95% CI 31.9%-52.1%) versus 39.6% (95% CI 29.5%-49.4%), P = 0.60. There were no differences in recurrence patterns between the treatment groups. This is to our knowledge that the largest completed randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophageal resection in patients with cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Despite a higher tumor tissue response in those who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, no survival advantages were seen. Consequently, the results do not support unselected addition of radiotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a standard of care in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.

A randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy improves long-term survival after oesophagectomy, treating oesophageal cancer, but the evidence to date is insufficient to determine which of the two main neoadjuvant therapy types, chemotherapy (nCT) or chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), is more beneficial. We aimed to compare the effects of nCT with those of nCRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicentre trial, which was conducted in Sweden and Norway, recruited 181 patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus or the gastro-oesophageal junction who were candidates for curative-intended treatment. The primary end point was histological complete response after neoadjuvant treatment, which has been shown to be correlated with increased long-term survival. Study participants were randomized to nCT or nCRT, followed by surgery with two-field lymphadenectomy. Three cycles of platin/5-fluorouracil were administered in both arms, whereas 40 Gy of concomitant radiotherapy was added in the nCRT arm. RESULTS: The trial met the primary end point, histological complete response being achieved in 28% after nCRT versus 9% after nCT (P = 0.002). Lymph-node metastases were observed in 62% in the nCT group versus 35% in the nCRT group (P = 0.001). The R0 resection rate was 87% after nCRT and 74% after nCT (P = 0.04). There was no difference in overall survival between the treatment arms. CONCLUSION: The addition of radiotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy results in higher histological complete response rate, higher R0 resection rate, and a lower frequency of lymph-node metastases, without significantly affecting survival. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT01362127 (https://clinicaltrials.gov; The full study protocol was registered in the Clinical Trials Database).

Relief of dysphagia during neoadjuvant treatment for cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.

Dysphagia is the main symptom of cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction and causing nutritional problems and weight loss, often counteracted by insertion of self-expandable metal stents or nutrition via an enteral route. Clinical observations indicate that neoadjuvant therapy may effectively and promptly alleviate dysphagia, making such nutrition supportive interventions redundant before surgical resection. The objective of the current study was to carefully study the effects of induction neoadjuvant therapy on dysphagia and its subsequent course and thereby investigate the actual need for alimentary gateways for nutritional support. Thirty-five consecutive patients scheduled for neoadjuvant therapy were recruited and assessed regarding dysphagia and appetite at baseline, after the first cycle of preoperative treatment with either chemotherapy alone or with chemoradiotherapy and before surgery. Platinum-based therapy in combination with 5-fluorouracil was administered intravenously days 1-5 every 3 weeks and consisted of three treatments. Patients receiving combined chemoradiotherapy started radiotherapy on day one of second chemotherapy cycle. They received fractions of 2 Gy/day each up to a total dose of 40 Gy. Watson and Ogilvie dysphagia scores were used to assess dysphagia, while appetite was assessed by the Edmonton Assessment System Visual analogue scale-appetite questionnaire. Patients were evaluated at regular outpatient clinic visits or by telephone. The histological tumor response in the surgical specimen was assessed using the Chirieac scale. Ten patients scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 25 patients scheduled for chemoradiotherapy were included in the analysis. There was a significant improvement in dysphagia in both treatment groups, according to both scales, already from baseline to the completion of the first chemotherapy cycle which remained to the end of the neoadjuvant treatment (P < 0.001). Appetite also improved after the first chemotherapy cycle (P = 0.03). Body weight did not change during any type of neoadjuvant therapy. We were unable to demonstrate any association between relief of dysphagia and the degree of histological response to neoadjuvant therapy in the surgical specimen. The present study shows that a platin - 5FU-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with or without concomitant radiotherapy, effectively and promptly relieves dysphagia in patients presenting with cancers of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction already after the first cycle.

Morbidity and mortality after surgery for cancer of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction: A randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence and severity of postoperative complications after oesophagectomy for carcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) after randomized accrual to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy improves long-term survival after oesophagectomy. To date, evidence is insufficient to determine whether combined nCT, or nCRT alone, is the most beneficial. METHODS: Patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus or GOJ, resectable with a curative intention, were enrolled in this multicenter trial conducted at seven centres in Sweden and Norway. Study participants were randomized to nCT or nCRT followed by surgery with two-field lymphadenectomy. Three cycles of cisplatin/5-fluorouracil was administered in all patients, while 40 Gy of concomitant radiotherapy was administered in the nCRT group. RESULTS: Of the randomized 181 patients, 91 were assigned to nCT and 90 to nCRT. One-hundred-and-fifty-five patients, 78 nCT and 77 nCRT, underwent resection. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the incidence of surgical or nonsurgical complications (P-value = 0.69 and 0.13, respectively). There was no 30-day mortality, while the 90-day mortality was 3% (2/78) in the nCT group and 6% (5/77) in the nCRT group (P = 0.24). The median Clavien-Dindo complication severity grade was significantly higher in the nCRT group (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between patients randomized to nCT and nCRT. However, complications were significantly more severe after nCRT. REGISTRATION TRIAL DATABASE: The trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Database (registration number NCT01362127).

Combined stent insertion and single high-dose brachytherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer--results of a prospective safety study.

Previous randomized studies comparing the two commonly used palliative treatments for incurable esophageal cancer, i.e. stent insertion and intraluminal brachytherapy, have revealed the pros and cons of each therapy. While stent treatment offers a more prompt effect, brachytherapy results in more long-lasting relief of dysphagia and a better health-related quality of life (HRQL) in those living longer. This prospective pilot study aimed to explore the feasibility and safety of combining these two regimes and incorporating a single high dose of internal radiation. Patients with newly diagnosed, incurable cancer of the esophagus and dysphagia were eligible for inclusion, and stent insertion followed by a single dose (12 Gy) of brachytherapy was performed as a two-stage procedure. Clinical parameters including HRQL and adverse events were registered at inclusion, and 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months later. Twelve patients (nine males) with a median age of 73 years (range 54-85) were included. Stent insertion followed by a single dose of brachytherapy was successfully performed in all but one patient who was treated with stent only. Relief of dysphagia was achieved in the majority of cases (10/11, P < 0.05), but HRQL did not improve except for dysphagia-related items. Only minor adverse events, including chest pain, reflux, and restenosis, were reported. The median survival time after inclusion was 6.6 months. Our conclusion is that the combination of stent insertion and single high-dose brachytherapy seems to be a feasible and safe palliative regime in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Randomized trials comparing the efficacy of this strategy to stent insertion or brachytherapy alone are warranted.

How to improve loco-regional control in stages IIIa-b NSCLC? Results of a three-armed randomized trial from the Swedish Lung Cancer Study Group.

BACKGROUND: A combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is the treatment base for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, both loco-regional and distant failure is frequent. Attempts to improve the loco-regional control were made in three separate phase II studies in Swedish University Hospitals, where accelerated radiotherapy or concurrent daily or weekly chemotherapy with conventional radiotherapy were tested. Comparatively good results from these studies lead to this national randomized phase II study, the RAKET-study, where the different concepts were investigated on a wider basis for further phase III studies. METHODS: Inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients in good performance status (PS<2) were equally randomized to either of three arms in eight institutions. All arms started with two cycles of induction chemotherapy: paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC6. Arm A: a third identical cycle was given concomitant with start of accelerated radiotherapy, 1.7 Gy BID to 64.6 Gy in 4.5 weeks. Arm B consisted of daily concomitant paclitaxel 12 mg/m2 with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy: 2 Gy to 60 Gy in 6 weeks. Arm C: weekly concomitant paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 and identical radiotherapy to 60 Gy. Primary endpoint: TTP. Secondary: OS, toxicity, QL and relapse pattern. RESULTS: Between June 2002 and May 2005 152 patients were randomized and of them 151 were evaluable: 78 men and 73 women, median age 62 years (43-78), 55% had performance status 0 and 45% PS 1. Thirty-four percent had stage IIIa and 66% IIIb. HISTOLOGY: adenocarcinoma 48%, squamous cell carcinoma 32% and 20% non-small cell carcinoma. The three arms were well balanced. Toxicity was manageable with 12% grades 3-4 esophagitis, 1% grades 3-4 pneumonitis and there was no clear difference between the arms. The QL data did not differ either. Median time to progression was 9.8 (8.3-12.7) months (8.8, 10.3 and 9.3 months for arms A, B and C, respectively). Median survival was 17.8 (14.4-23.7) months (17.7, 17.7 and 20.6 months for A, B and C, respectively). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival was 63, 31 and 24%. Sixty-nine percent of the patients relapsed with distant metastases initially and 31% had loco-regional tumor progression, without significant differences between treatment arms. Thirty-four percent developed brain metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment results are quite equal by intensifying the loco-regional treatment either by accelerated fractionated radiotherapy or daily or weekly concomitant chemo-radiotherapy both in terms of survival, toxicity and quality of life. The optimal treatment schedule for patients with locally advanced NSCLC is still to be decided and investigated in future clinical studies. Relapse pattern with distant metastases and especially brain metastases is a great problem and need further research for better therapy options and higher cure rate for this patient group.

Phase II studies on docetaxel alone every third week, or weekly in combination with gemcitabine in patients with primary locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of these studies was to compare efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel alone with the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel for treatment of metastatic esophageal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: These studies enrolled patients with histopathologically verified squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or cardia. Between March 1997 and June 1999, 52 patients were enrolled in the initial Phase II study (Study 1). They were scheduled for treatment with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every third week as a 1-h infusion. The second Phase II study between September 2000 and March 2003 included 65 patients (Study II). They were given docetaxel 30 mg/m2, administered as a 30-min i.v. infusion weekly for four times, followed by 2 weeks of rest, and gemcitabine starting with a dose of 750 mg/m2 (if well-tolerated 1,000 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15, followed by 3 weeks of rest. A new cycle began on day 36. Patients were premedicated with betamethasone 8 mg p.o. on the evening before, and 8 mg i.v. 30-60 min before the docetaxel infusion. Response was confirmed by computed tomography and assessed at 12 and 24 weeks. Toxicity was assessed according to WHO scales. RESULTS: In study I, 38 out of the 52 enrolled patients were valuable. Two patients experienced complete remission (CR) (5%), 10 patients partial remission (PR) (26%), nine patients stable disease (SD) (24%), and 17 patients showed progressive disease (PD) (45%). Toxicity mainly involved leukopenia, which in some cases required hospitalization and treatment with antibiotics. In Study II, 46 out of the 65 enrolled patients (70%) were assessable. Out of these, three patients (7%) had CR, eight patients (17%) had PR, 10 patients (22%) had SD, and 25 (54%) PD. Overall response was 24% while an additional 22% showed stable disease. Toxicity mainly consisted of leucopenia and pain. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel as a single agent is active in esophageal cancer, both in treatment naive and in previously treated patients with recurrent disease. The overall response rate was 31%, with a good-safety profile. The addition of gemcitabine is well tolerated, but adds no efficacy. Weekly administration of docetaxel may be less effective. It demonstrates moderate efficacy and the doses used provide an acceptable safety profile.

Anemia and quality of life including anemia-related symptoms in patients with solid tumors in clinical practice.

The aim of this study was to explore in a clinical setting the association between hemoglobin (Hb) level and quality of life (QoL) including anemia-related symptoms in patients with cancer disease. The study was performed in the outpatient units at the Oncology Clinic, Karolinska University Hospital, during spring 2004. One hundred-sixty patients responded to the questionnaires and Hb levels were available in 133 of their medical files. Anemia was not a common problem as only 12 out of 133 patients had an Hb level below 110 g/L. The Hb level was not related to general QoL but to FACT-An Trial Outcome Index (rs = 0.186, p = 0.036), measuring anemia-related symptoms as well as functional and physical well-being. However, two patients with Hb < 110 g/L had minor anemia-related symptoms (FACT AnS > or = 40), while 22 patients with Hb > or = 110 g/L had more pronounced symptoms (FACT AnS < 40). There was no difference in anemia-related symptoms between patients with and without ongoing cancer treatment, but patients with ongoing cancer treatment had decreased physical (p = 0.025) and functional (p = 0.011) well-being as compared to those without ongoing treatment. Patients with lung cancer on cancer treatment had lower FACT-An Trial Outcome Index than patients with breast cancer on treatment (mean values 71.8 and 99.1 for patients with lung and breast cancer, respectively, p = 0.009), and also a tendency to lower Hb levels (mean values 119 and 127 for patients with lung and breast cancer, respectively, p = 0.052). Physical and functional aspects might be more important to consider than increasing the Hb level to reduce the fatigue.

Outcome of ipsilateral treatment for patients with metastases to neck nodes of unknown origin.

It is not uncommon for head and neck cancer patients to present with neck node metastases. Standard treatment for patients in whom no primary tumor is found include surgery and radiotherapy but there is still controversy about the type and extent of treatment. A retrospective review was carried out on 51 consecutive patients with cervical lymph node metastases of unknown origin, treated between 1980 and 1994 at Radiumhemmet, Karolinska Hospital. All patients received radiotherapy to the ipsilateral neck and the corresponding mucosa and surgery was performed in 55% of cases. The 5-year overall survival rate was 41%. A primary tumor was later found in 6 cases (12%). Two cases of cancer were detected after 5 years and classified as 'second primaries'. Results from this small retrospective material have to be interpreted with caution but indicate that limited, ipsilateral radiotherapy to mucosa and lymph nodes combined with surgery, when possible, may be justified.

Human papilloma virus (HPV) and p53 immunostaining in advanced tonsillar carcinoma--relation to radiotherapy response and survival.

BACKGROUND: Human papilloma virus (HPV), which is frequently present in tonsillar carcinoma seems to be a prognostically favourable factor for patient survival and also for low risk of relapse. Since HPV may abrogate the function of wild type p53 and hence influence radiosensitivity we attempted to analyse if HPV and p53 status in tonsillar carcinoma affected tumour response to radiotherapy (RT) and patient survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre-treatment primary tonsillar carcinoma specimens were obtained retrospectively from 40 patients, 21 complete responders (CR) and 19 non-complete responders (non-CR) of which 38/40 were stage III and IV tumours. The paraffin-embedded biopsies were analysed for presence of HPV DNA, by general and type specific PCR, and for p53 overexpression by immunohistochemical staining with the murine Mab DO-1. RESULTS: It was possible to analyse HPV in 34 and p53 in 39 patients. Presence of HPV DNA (HPV+) and p53 immunostaining (p53+) were not correlated with response to RT, since 8/18 CR patients and 6/16 non-CR patients were HPV+ and 11/21 CR patients and 8/18 non-CR patients were p53+. A tendency towards a survival benefit in patients with HPV+ tumours was observed and this tendency was significant for patients with stage IV HPV + tumours (p = .0431), and in particular HPV+/p53- cancers (p = .0195). A difference in survival between patients with p53+ cancer as compared to patients with p53- lesions was not demonstrated. In conclusion, although presence of HPV and p53 immunoreactivity in tonsillar carcinoma could not be related to RT response, determination of HPV and p53 status may still prove useful as predictive/prognostic markers.

GM-CSF at relatively high topic concentrations can significantly enhance the healing of surgically induced chronic wounds after radiotherapy.

Combinations of radiotherapy and surgery are often used in local cancer treatments. Preoperative radiotherapy may delay wound healing after surgery. Chronic wounds are debilitating conditions that require frequent medical attention. Two patients suffering from chronic and slowly healing wounds post-surgery and preoperative radiotherapy are described. A significant acceleration of the healing by local injections with GM-CSF was demonstrated.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in tonsillar cancer: clinical correlates, risk of relapse, and survival.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is more commonly found in tonsillar cancer than in other head and neck cancers. The importance of HPV status in tonsillar cancer for prognosis remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency of HPV in tonsillar cancer and to correlate the presence of HPV with tumor stage, nodal status, grade of differentiation, risk of relapse, and survival. HPV DNA and HPV type were determined, using PCR, in pre-treatment biopsies from 60 cases of primary tonsillar cancer. All patients had undergone full-dose radiotherapy, 45% as the only treatment modality, and 55% in combination with surgery. HPV 16 was detected in 43% (26/60) of the cancers including 1 double infection of both HPV 16 and HPV 33. Patients with HPV(+) tonsillar cancer showed less risk of relapse within 3 years after diagnosis, with a better odds ratio of 4.18 as compared with HPV(-) patients (p = 0. 025). Furthermore, cause specific survival was significantly (p = 0. 047) better in patients with HPV(+) tonsillar carcinomas. At 3 years after diagnosis the survival rate was 65.3% in the HPV(+) group and 31.5% in the HPV(-) group, and at 5 years the survival rate was 53. 5% and 31.5%, respectively. The better outcome for patients with HPV(+) tonsillar cancer was independent of TNM stage, nodal status, gender and age. These results indicate that HPV status is a significantly favorable prognostic factor in tonsillar cancer and may be used as a marker in order to optimize the treatment of patients with this type of cancer.

Prognostic impact of complete remission after preoperative irradiation of tonsillar carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of the radiumhemmet data, 1980-1995.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study was done to determine the outcome of patients with tonsillar carcinoma treated at Radiumhemmet, Karolinska Hospital, between January 1980 and December 1995 with radiotherapy alone or in combination with surgery. In addition the importance of tumor remission for patient survival was analyzed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The analysis is based on 167 previously untreated patients with biopsy-proven, invasive tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsillar region. All patients were consecutively admitted to the Department of General Oncology, Radiumhemmet, and treated with curative intent. The median follow-up time was 20 months. The median target dose was 64 Gy, delivered in fractions of 2 Gy 5 times weekly. Twenty-eight percent of the patients underwent surgery of the primary site and/or neck dissection after radiotherapy (RT). RESULTS: The overall local control rate for the whole patient group after radiotherapy was 79%. Probability of survival after 5 years for patients responding with complete remission (CR) was 43% and for patients with incomplete response (non-CR) 9%, (p<0.0001). The survival in the non-CR group treated with combination therapy was 20 months longer than in patients receiving radiotherapy alone (p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in prediction of long-term survival when the patient population was stratified according to tumor differentiation grade, age, sex, nodal status, or treatment time. CONCLUSION: The strongest clinical predictor of survival was the degree of tumor remission after RT. For the non-CR group receiving combination treatment including surgery there was a survival benefit as compared to patients treated with RT alone (p<0.0001) although there were few long-term survivors in this patient group.