Survival and Swallowing Function after Primary Radiotherapy versus Transoral Robotic Surgery for Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of primary transoral robotic surgery (TORS) versus radiotherapy (RT) on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and 1-year swallowing function for patients with early-stage HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). METHODS: Patients with stage I-II (AJCC 8th Ed.) HPV-associated OPSCC treated with TORS followed by risk-adapted adjuvant therapy or (chemo)radiotherapy between 2014 and 2019 were identified. PFS, OS, and swallowing outcomes including gastrostomy tube (GT) use/dependence, and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) change over 1 year were compared. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-seven patients were analyzed: 116 treated with TORS with or without adjuvant RT and 51 treated with RT (50 chemoRT). The RT group had more advanced tumor/nodal stage, higher comorbidity, and higher rates of concurrent chemotherapy. There were no differences in 3-year PFS (88% TORS vs. 75% RT) or OS (90% vs. 81%) between groups, which persisted after adjusting for stage, age, and comorbidity. GT use/dependence rates were higher in the RT group. Mean (SD) FOIS scores in the TORS group were 6.9 (0.4) at baseline and 6.4 (1.0) at 1 year, compared with 6.7 (0.6) and 5.6 (1.7) for the RT group. Only clinical nodal stage was found to be significantly associated with FOIS change from baseline to 1 year. CONCLUSION: There were no differences in PFS or OS between patients treated with primary TORS or RT for early-stage HPV-associated OPSCC. Clinical N2 status is associated with FOIS change at 1 year and may be the major factor affecting long-term swallowing function, irrespective of primary treatment modality.

Quad-shot-immunotherapy: quad-shot radiotherapy with pembrolizumab for advanced/recurrent head and neck cancer.

Effective treatments for advanced/recurrent head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma are limited. For cases not curable by conventional local therapies, the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab shows modest response rates. Quad-shot, a hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy regimen (14.8 Gy in four twice-daily fractions), can provide symptomatic relief, contributes to local control and may potentiate the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this study, 15 patients with advanced/recurrent head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma will be treated with pembrolizumab combined with up to three administrations of quad-shot before cycles four, eight and 13. Outcomes include disease response, survival and treatment toxicity. Correlative multiomics analysis of blood and saliva will identify molecular biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor and the immune-related impact of quad-shot. Clinical trial registration: This study (WFBCCC 60320) is registered on NCT04454489 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Advanced and recurrent head and neck cancers are difficult to treat. Most patients receive systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy or immunotherapy, with modest rates of cancer control. We aim to test the effectiveness of an immunotherapy drug called pembrolizumab in combination with a type of low-dose radiation therapy called quad-shot. Patients will receive pembrolizumab every 3 weeks and will be treated with one to three low-dose radiation therapy courses targeted at their cancer in the head and neck approximately every 12 weeks. We plan to measure how well the cancer responds to treatment, how long this response lasts, how long patients survive and treatment side effects.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy with planned Gamma Knife radiosurgery boost for head and neck cancer with extensive disease in proximity to critical structures.

BACKGROUND: To describe intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) boost for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) with disease near dose-limiting structures. METHODS: Patients with HNC treated with IMRT/GKRS as part of a combined modality approach between 2011 and 2021 were reviewed. Local control, overall survival and disease-specific survival were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included. Nineteen patients had T3-4 tumors. Median follow-up was 26.3 months. GKRS site control was 95%. Two patients progressed at the treated primary site, one patient failed at the edge of the GKRS treatment volume, with no perineural or intracranial failure. 2-year OS was 94.7% (95% CI: 85.2%-100%). Concurrent chemotherapy was given in nine patients (45%). One patient (5%) received induction/concurrent chemotherapy. Brain radionecrosis occurred in three patients, one of which was biopsy-proven. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT plus GKRS boost results in excellent disease control near critical structures with minimal toxicity.

Timing of radiotherapy and chemotherapy start for patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: The ideal timing for the initiation of chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT) in the use of definitive chemoradiation (CRT) for patients with head and neck cancer is not well established. We sought to evaluate the impact of the timing of initiating these two modalities on clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who were treated using definitive chemoradiation from 2012 to 2018 were identified. Patients undergoing re-irradiation, post-op CRT, had recurrent or second primaries, or ECOG 3-4 were excluded. Outcomes including locoregional control (LRC), distant control (DC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated and compared between subgroups of the cohort based on the timing in which chemotherapy or RT were initiated: chemotherapy first, same day start, within 24 h, or start on Monday/Tuesday/Wednesday. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were included for analysis consisting of oropharynx (64%), larynx (22.9%), nasopharynx (6.9%), hypopharynx (3.1%), oral cavity (1.5%), and unknown primary (1.5%). Chemotherapy was administered as bolus cisplatin every 3 weeks in 40% of patients and weekly cisplatin in 60% with a median cumulative dose of 240 mg/m2. In the multivariable analysis (MVA), starting chemotherapy before RT was associated with improved LRC (HR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11-0.99). Three-year LRC for patients starting chemotherapy first was 90.9% compared to 78.2% in those starting RT first. In the MVA, cisplatin regimen and cumulative cisplatin dose were associated with improved OS, while no factors were significantly associated with DC or PFS. CONCLUSION: Starting chemotherapy prior to radiation therapy improves LRC, but did not impact DC, PFS, or OS. Clinical outcomes were not different when stratifying by the other differences in the timing of initiating chemotherapy or RT.

Initial Referring Physician and Radiologist Experience with Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) is a radiology reporting system developed for head and neck cancer surveillance imaging, using standardized terminology, numeric levels of suspicion, and linked management recommendations. Through a multidisciplinary, interdepartmental quality improvement initiative, we implemented NI-RADS for the reporting of head and neck cancer surveillance CT. Our objective is to summarize our initial experience from the standpoints of head and neck cancer providers and radiologists. STUDY DESIGN: Quality improvement study. METHODS: Before and 3 months post-implementation, surveys were offered to referring physicians (n = 21 pre-adoption; 22 post-adoption) and radiologists (n = 17 pre- and post-adoption). NI-RADS utilization was assessed over time. RESULTS: Survey response rates were 62% (13/21) and 73% (16/22) for referring physicians pre- and post-adoption, respectively, and 94% (16/17) for radiologists pre- and post-adoption. Among post-adoption provider respondents, 100% (16/16) strongly agreed or agreed with "I want our radiologists to continue using NI-RADS," "The NI-RADS numerical rating of radiologic suspicion is helpful," and "The language and style of NI-RADS neck CT reports are clear and understandable." Among radiologist respondents, 88% (14/16) strongly agreed or agreed with "NI-RADS improves consistency among our radiologists in the reporting of surveillance neck CTs." Radiologist NI-RADS utilization increased over time (46% month 1; 72% month 3). CONCLUSIONS: Most referring physicians and radiologists preferred NI-RADS. Head and neck cancer providers indicated that NI-RADS reports are clear, understandable, direct, and helpful in guiding clinical management. Radiologists indicated that NI-RADS improves radiologist consistency in the reporting of surveillance neck CT, and radiologists increasingly used NI-RADS over time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:349-355, 2022.

Chemoradiotherapy with high-dose cisplatin compared with weekly cisplatin for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using high-dose cisplatin (HDC) is standard for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); weekly cisplatin (WC) is an alternative. We aim to compare retrospectively the survival and disease control outcomes between these regimens in our institutional experience. METHODS: Patients with stage III-IV HNSCC treated with definitive or postoperative CRT between 2012 and 2018 were identified. Patients were stratified by intent-to-treat CRT. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were generated and multivariable Cox models were performed. RESULTS: 193 patients were treated with concurrent HDC (n = 69), WC at 40 mg/m2 (WC40, n = 88) or WC at <40 mg/m2 (WC<40, n = 36). Treatment intent was definitive in 74% and adjuvant in 26%. Baseline differences included age, performance status and HPV status. Cumulative cisplatin dose ≥200 mg/m2 was achieved in 89% (HDC), 86% (WC40) and 25% (WC<40, P < 0.0001). For HDC, WC40 and WC<40, 2-year OS rates were 87%, 77%, 60% and 2-year DFS rates were 75%, 68% and 52%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed gender, performance status, primary site, T/N stage and chemotherapy as predictive of OS. Primary site, T/N stage and chemotherapy regimen were associated with DFS. Compared with HDC, no differences in locoregional control (LRC) or distant metastasis were observed between groups. CONCLUSION: Concurrent HDC is associated with increased total cisplatin intensity, OS and DFS compared with weekly cisplatin regimens. LRC was not associated with chemotherapy regimen. HDC remains the standard of care; WC40 is a reasonable alternative that does not appear to sacrifice LRC.

Perineural Invasion As the Sole Pathologic Risk Factor After Surgical Resection for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Introduction Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is routinely recommended for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) based on pathologic risk factors (pRFs) such as perineural invasion (PNI). Patients with PNI as the sole pRF after resection of HNSCC are uncommon and their prognosis is less clear. The aim of this study is to assess the role of PNI as a sole risk factor in patients with otherwise pathologically low-risk HNSCC. Methods Patients with HNSCC of the oral cavity, pharynx, or larynx treated with primary surgical resection from 2013 to 2018 were identified from an institutional cancer registry. Those with pRFs (pathologic T3-4 disease, lymphovascular space invasion [LVSI], multiple positive lymph nodes, close [within 2 mm] or positive margins, extranodal extension [ENE], or recurrent disease) were excluded, yielding an otherwise pathologically low-risk cohort with or without incidental, pathologic PNI. Locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were estimated and compared between PNI groups and by adjuvant therapy. Results A total of 1,058 patients were identified as having undergone surgical resection. Exclusion of patients with other pRFs, those with unknown PNI, and oral cavity patients with depth of invasion > 10 mm yielded a study cohort of 85 patients. Eight patients (10% of study group, <1% of all patients) had PNI as the sole pRF, none of which had clinical signs or symptoms of perineural tumor spread. The remaining 77 were negative for PNI and thus pathologically low risk. Patients with PNI were more likely to have oral cavity cancer, to be younger, and to have received PORT than those without PNI; no patient received concurrent chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 46.4 months, two- and five-year LRC rates were 81.4% and 78.5%, respectively. No differences were noted between PNI-positive and PNI-negative groups (p=0.73) or PORT v. no-PORT groups (p=0.39). While the utility of PORT is not possible to assess given limited sample size, four patients with PNI who did not receive PORT did not experience locoregional failure. Seventeen patients overall experienced locoregional failure and 14 were ultimately salvaged. Five-year OS and DSS were 77.4% and 90.8%, respectively. Conclusion Patients with pathologically low-risk HNSCC after surgical resection experience high rates of LRC. In this large institutional cohort, PNI as the sole pRF was exceedingly rare, and the benefit of adjuvant therapies is difficult to assess. Within this limitation, PORT remains the standard of care for patients with PNI to reduce the risk of locoregional failure. Further collaborative studies are required to adequately assess the prognostic impact of PNI alone in resected HNSCC.

Comparing Outcomes for Patients with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Type 16 versus Other High-Risk HPV Types in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is related to improved treatment outcomes. What remains unclear is whether all HPV DNA genotypes carry similar prognostic relevance. We aimed to evaluate disease control and survival outcomes by HPV DNA genotype. Patients with primary OPSCC without distant metastases treated with curative intent were retrospectively identified from an IRB-approved institutional database. Patients that underwent HPV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing with available genotype were included and dichotomized by the presence of HPV type 16 (HPV-16) or other high-risk HPV genotype (HPV-non16). Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional control (LRC) and distant control (DC) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. In our cohort of 193 patients treated from 2012 to 2018 with HPV DNA PCR, 10% were detected as HPV-non16 high-risk types. Patients with HPV-16 were significantly younger than those with HPV-non16, but no other baseline factors were associated with HPV-non16. With a median follow-up of 42.9 months, there were no significant differences in outcomes between the HPV-16 and HPV-non16 groups for 3-year OS (87.7% v. 73.6%), DFS (82.9% v. 68.7%), LRC (92.8% v. 88.5%) or DC (91% v. 89.2%). There is no statistically significant difference in outcomes between OPSCC with HPV-16 and HPV-non16 high-risk genotypes in our cohort, though trends of overall worse survival and disease-free survival in HPV-non 16 OPSCC were seen. Further studies with larger cohorts of patients with HPV-non 16-associated OPSCC are required to make definitive conclusions regarding the prognostic and clinical significance of HPV type.

Human papillomavirus-associated squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx or hypopharynx: Clinical outcomes and implications for laryngeal preservation.

OBJECTIVES: Human papillomavirus (HPV) can be detected in approximately 25% of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the larynx and hypopharynx. Though HPV is associated with improved survival and disease control in patients with oropharyngeal SCC, the role of HPV as a marker of favorable treatment outcomes in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal SCC were reviewed. HPV status detected by p16 and/or HPV DNA PCR were abstracted from the medical record. A subset of samples (stage III-IV treated with primary radiotherapy) was retrospectively tested for p16 and HPV DNA. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional control (LRC) were determined and compared between HPV-positive (p16+, PCR+ or both) and HPV-negative (p16- or PCR-) patients. RESULTS: In total, 279 patients were identified, 94 of which were tested for HPV. Eighty-two (87%) were negative and 12 (13%) were positive for HPV. At 3 years, there were no significant differences in OS (72% v. 83%), DFS (60% v. 71%) and LRC (80% v. 89%). Performance status, smoking history and stage predicted for OS, while performance status and stage predicted for DFS. Analysis of patients treated with primary radiotherapy revealed non-significantly higher rates of laryngeal preservation at 3 years (75% v. 100%). CONCLUSION: HPV was detected in 13% of tested laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancers. HPV does not appear to significantly impact survival or disease control in patients with SCC of the larynx or hypopharynx. Non-significant improvements in laryngeal preservation were observed in HPV-positive patients.

Omitting Elective Irradiation of the Contralateral Retropharyngeal Nodes in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in head and neck cancers has allowed for selective sparing of low-risk or uninvolved lymph nodes. In oropharyngeal cancers, the benefits and risks of omitting contralateral retropharyngeal lymph nodes (RPLN) remain uncertain. This study examines the outcomes of elective coverage of contralateral RPLN in oropharyngeal cancer treated with definitive IMRT. METHODS: We analyzed 54 patients with newly diagnosed unilateral tonsil or base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma with at most unilateral neck involvement (cN0-N2b) and no RPLN involvement. These patients had no prior head and neck irradiation and were treated with definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy between 2012 and 2017. Cumulative incidences of local/regional/distant failure were estimated using competing risks methodology, and overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: All patients received elective nodal coverage to the ipsilateral RPLN, and 38 (62%) patients did not receive elective treatment of the contralateral RPLN. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. There were no contralateral RPLN failures observed. When comparing patients who received contralateral RP treatment with those who did not, there were no significant differences in two-year local failure (23% vs. 9%, p = 0.09), regional failure (18% vs. 4%, p = 0.12), or distant failure (15% vs. 9%, p = 0.62). Two-year OS was 89%. Mean parotid dose was not significantly lower after sparing vs. treating the contralateral RPLN (median 25.6 vs. 32.7 Gy, p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: The omission of contralateral RPLN irradiation in tonsil or tongue base carcinomas with unilateral neck involvement is safe without compromising disease control.