Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Curr Psychol ; : 1-11, 2022 Nov 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36468169

RESUMO

The present study aimed to analyze the association between motivation (self-determined and non-self-determined motivation), positive and negative affect, life satisfaction and state-anxiety in a sample of gym exercisers, during the 2nd COVID-19 lockdown in Portugal. Also, we aimed to analyze the possible mediating role of positive and negative affect and life satisfaction in the relationship between motivation and levels of state-anxiety. A total of 201 gym participants (30.42 ± 11.22) were enrolled in the present study, of which 116 (57.7%) were women and 85 (42.3%) were men. The survey included sociodemographic data as well as the subsequently validated instruments: the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, and the Satisfaction with Life Scale. The results revealed a positive association between state-anxiety and negative affect (r = .69), controlled motivation (r = .33), and autonomous motivation (r = .25). Still, state-anxiety was negatively associated with positive affect (r = -.40) and with satisfaction with life (r = -.43),. In addition, the results of mediation analysis, revealed inconsistent mediation of positive affect and life satisfaction in the relationship between autonomous motivation and state-anxiety. However, a total mediation was observed through negative affect and life satisfaction in the relationship between controlled motivation and anxiety since the indirect effect (ß = .27) is higher than the direct effect (ß = .06). Overall, the results reinforce that positive affect and satisfaction with life could act as a possible buffer against state-anxiety in gym exercisers and, thus, should be considered in future interventions and studies.

3.
Inform Health Soc Care ; 45(3): 327-341, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32237933

RESUMO

To ensure that adolescents adhere to programmes promoting healthy behaviors, these programmes must be appealing and interesting. This study aims to characterize and assess the devices, operating system and type of mobile apps frequently used by adolescents; understand the features that mHealth apps should have to be appealing; comprehend the facilitators and barriers for adolescents to use mHealth apps. The sample comprised 165 adolescents (12-18 years) from the main population, recruited in 2018. Most participants used smartphones and the Android system. Food and physical activity suggestions were considered the most important features for an mHealth app. 62.6% had never tried an mHealth app. For those who had tried one, 26.0% stated it was to improve health status/lifestyle. Their favorite feature was physical exercise tips/plans (41.8%). Adolescents pointed out that the reasons that made them keep using the app were utility and interest (35.7%). Regarding possible barriers, 48.4% reported a lack of a senseof need/practical utility, and 18.8% considered notifications as their least favorite feature. Lack of interest was pointed out for 38.2% as the main reason for stopping use. Results provide practical information for the planning, design, and implementation of future mHealth apps for the promotion of healthy behaviors - an important implication for future research in this area.


Assuntos
Comportamento do Adolescente/psicologia , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Aplicativos Móveis , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Obesidade/psicologia , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Comportamento do Consumidor , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Aplicativos Móveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Portugal , Smartphone/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Telemedicina/métodos
4.
Chirurg ; 90(2): 137-145, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29947920

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new tool in the treatment of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. The aerosol containing chemotherapeutic drugs is administered laparoscopically into the abdominal cavity to achieve a local treatment effect. This can be carried out in combination with systemic chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Within the framework of a register study, we prospectively documented and evaluated the data of our first 111 PIPAC procedures. The analysis focused on perioperative patient safety and safety at the workplace. Perioperative clinical patient data were analyzed and the platinum concentration in the operating room was checked by wipe samples. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were scheduled for PIPAC and 121 operations were carried out. In 9 procedures a secure access to the abdomen could not be found and 54 patients received 111 PIPAC treatments. One patient died as a result of intestinal perforation, six bowel lesions were treated immediately and healed without further complications. A further patient developed a postoperative renal failure. Otherwise, there was no major complications and no cases of toxicity. CONCLUSION: The PIPAC procedure can be used as a supplement to systemic drug treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis. An exact selection of suitable patients is important. The PIPAC is a low-risk procedure when performed under strict inclusion criteria and under standardized conditions, for the patients and also the surgical staff.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias Peritoneais , Aerossóis , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Neoplasias Peritoneais/tratamento farmacológico
5.
Schmerz ; 30(3): 257-65, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26846929

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Although well-established guidelines give advice on how to use analgesics, measure pain, and organize pain treatment, many patients still suffer from avoidable severe pain. We assume one reason for this is that pain is inadequately addressed in routine patient contacts. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the extent to which pain was addressed during patient contacts in routine orthopedic care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective observational study in an orthopedic unit of a university hospital, we invited physicians and nurses during their routine patient contacts to be observed by independent, trained monitors. The monitors systematically assessed all pain-related aspects, which were analyzed descriptively afterwards. RESULTS: The monitors documented 572 physician-patient contacts with 7 physicians and 108 patients and 578 nurse-patient contacts with 12 nurses and 102 patients. Physicians and nurses asked their patients about pain in 20 and 16 % of the patient contacts, respectively. While in physician-patient contacts, patients most frequently addressed their current pain situation (in 35 % of contacts), in nurse-patient contacts, patients most frequently addressed their need for analgesics (52 %). Patients rated their pain intensity in 16 % of physician-patient contacts vs. 17 % of nurse-patient contacts. CONCLUSIONS: Using a comprehensive external monitoring procedure, we found that systematic pain assessment was not optimally standardized and implemented for systematic, individualized pain therapy by physicians or nurses in our routine care setting.


Assuntos
Ortopedia , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Medição da Dor/métodos , Dor/classificação , Dor/diagnóstico , Idoso , Lista de Checagem , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde
6.
Klin Padiatr ; 225(5): 277-82, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23946090

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anticonvulsants require special consideration particularly at the interface from hospital to ambulatory care. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Observational study for 6 months with prospectively enrolled consecutive patients in a neuropediatric ward of a university hospital (age 0-<18 years) with long-term therapy of at least one anticonvulsant. Assessment of outpatient prescriptions after discharge. Parent interviews for emergency treatment for acute seizures and safety precautions. RESULTS: We identified changes of the brand in 19/82 (23%) patients caused by hospital's discharge letters (4/82; 5%) or in ambulatory care (15/82; 18%). In 37/76 (49%) of patients who were deemed to require rescue medication, no recommendation for such a medication was included in the discharge letters. 17/76 (22%) of the respective parents stated that they had no immediate access to rescue medication. Safety precautions were applicable in 44 epilepsy patients. We identified knowledge deficits in 27/44 (61%) of parents. CONCLUSION: Switching of brands after discharge was frequent. In the discharge letters, rescue medications were insufficiently recommended. Additionally, parents frequently displayed knowledge deficits in risk management.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Alta do Paciente , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Substituição de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Assistência de Longa Duração , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Pais/educação , Estudos Prospectivos , Gestão de Riscos
7.
Zentralbl Chir ; 137(2): 173-9, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21766274

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Medication errors and subsequent drug-related problems (DRPs) result from lack of sufficient information during the prescribing step. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the contribution of having a pharmacist participate in clinical routine on a surgical unit by studying DRPs, and the classification of DRPs in the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pharmacotherapy of all patients of a visceral surgical ward was evaluated by a pharmacist in a prospective study design over a six-month period. The identified DRPs were classified using the PCNE system. RESULTS: In 29 131 prescription lines, 697 DRPs were registered. This corresponds to a mean intervention rate of 2.4 %. All DRPs were classified into the modified PCNE system with 910 causes and 1 148 interventions. The most frequent DRPs were "lack of home medication" (35.6 %), drug dosing problems (18.6 %), the inappropriate duplication of drugs of the same therapeutic group (6.7 %) and drug interactions (6.5 %). 78.6 % vs. 3.7 % of all registered DRPs were completely vs. near completely resolved by pharmacist. CONCLUSIONS: We consider the PCNE system with the four-level of classification to be a practical and easy-to-use tool in the daily hospital setting. Although we did not notice clinically relevant impairments of patient safety, a pharmacist may support the drug therapy and improve patient safety in clinics supporting the free choice of the drug therapy by the physician.


Assuntos
Comportamento Cooperativo , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Farmacêuticos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar , Estudos de Coortes , Interações Medicamentosas , Substituição de Medicamentos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Alemanha , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Sistemas de Medicação no Hospital , Segurança do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Vísceras/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA