Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, other antidepressant medication, and risk of cataract: a case-control study based on Swiss claims data.

PURPOSE: Three previous studies reported controversial results regarding selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) exposure and cataract development. We therefore aimed to assess risk of cataract associated with previous exposure to SSRI using data from a large health insurance in Switzerland. METHODS: In a case-control study, we analyzed individuals insured by the Helsana Group, a large Swiss health insurance provider. We matched patients aged 40 years or older with cataract extraction (i.e., a proxy for a cataract diagnosis) in 2014 or 2015 to four control patients, on age, sex, date of cataract extraction, and area of residence. Exposure of interest was the number of SSRI claims prior to cataract extraction. We conducted conditional logistic regression analyses to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We adjusted our analyses for the presence of hypertension, diabetes, glaucoma, systemic steroid use, and use of other antidepressant drugs. RESULTS: We identified 13,773 cataract cases and 51,625 matched controls. Compared with non-use, long-term use of SSRI (≥ 20 claims) was not associated with an altered risk of cataract (adjusted OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84-1.04). The analysis of the individual drug substances also yielded no statistically significant association between drug exposure and the risk of cataract. CONCLUSIONS: According to our study, use of SSRI does not change the risk of cataract in the overall population.

Physician drug dispensing in Switzerland: association on health care expenditures and utilization.

BACKGROUND: Several countries recently reassessed the roles of drug prescribing and dispensing, either by enlarging pharmacists' rights to prescribe (e.g. the US and the United Kingdom) or by limiting physicians' rights to dispense (e.g. Taiwan and South Korea). While integrating the two roles might increase supply and be convenient for patients, concern is that drug mark-ups incite providers to prescribe unnecessary drugs. We aimed to assess the association of physician dispensing (PD) in Switzerland on various outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study, using health care claims data for patients in the year 2013. The analysis of the association of PD was perfomed using a large patient level dataset and several target variables, including the number of different chemical agents, share of generic drugs, number of visits to physicians and expenditures. Different multivariate econometric models were applied in order to capture the association PD on the target variables. RESULTS: A total of 101'784 patients were enrolled in 2013, whereas 54 % were PD patients. We find that PD is associated with lower pharmaceutical expenditure per patient, which can be explained by an increased use of generic drugs. The decrease is compensated by higher use of physician services. We find no significant impact of physician dispensing on total health care expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: Our study offers insights for policy makers who are (re-)considering the separation between drug prescribing and dispensing, either by allowing physicians to dispense or pharmacists to prescribe certain drugs. In terms of total health care expenditures, we find no difference between the two systems, so we are doubtful that changing dispensing rights are a good measure to contain cost, at least in Switzerland.