Associations of abdominal discomfort and length of clinical signs with surgical procedure in 181 cases of canine small intestinal foreign body obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal foreign bodies are a common indication for abdominal exploratory surgery. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship of pre-operative abdominal discomfort and duration of clinical signs with surgical resolution of canine small intestinal foreign body obstructions (SIFBO). METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 181 canine abdominal exploratory surgeries for confirmed SIFBO at two referral hospitals. Animals were categorized into five surgical groups (gastrotomy after manipulation into the stomach, enterotomy, resection-and-anastomosis [R&A], manipulated into colon, already in colon) and further grouped by whether entry into the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) was required. RESULTS: Abdominal discomfort was noted in 107/181 cases (59.1%), but no significant differences in abdominal discomfort rates were present among the surgical groups or between GIT entry and no entry groups. Clinical sign duration was associated with surgical procedure; median durations were R&A = 3 days (range, 1-9), enterotomy = 2 days (range, 1-14), gastrotomy = 2 days (range, 1-6), already in colon = 1.5 days (range, 1-2), and manipulated into colon = 1 day (range, 1-7). In a pairwise comparison, differences in the duration of clinical signs were found for obstructions manipulated into the colon versus R&A, gastrotomy versus R&A, and in colon versus R&A. When patients were grouped according to GIT entry, cases with entry had a longer duration of clinical signs (median = 2 days [range, 1-14] versus 1 day [range, 1-7], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal discomfort was not associated with surgical complexity; however, the duration of clinical signs was associated with surgical complexity, with longer duration being associated with entry into the GIT and R&A. Despite statistical significance, the maximum difference of 2 days between surgical groups is unlikely to be clinically relevant.

Effect of empirical versus definitive antimicrobial selection on postoperative complications in dogs and cats undergoing total ear canal ablation with lateral bulla osteotomy: 120 cases (2009-2019).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate dogs and cats undergoing total ear canal ablation with lateral bulla osteotomy (TECA-LBO), document antimicrobial choices, and determine relationships associated with infection-related and neurologic postoperative complications. ANIMALS: 107 client-owned dogs and 13 client-owned cats that underwent TECA-LBO. PROCEDURES: A retrospective analysis of medicals records of dogs and cats with TECA-LBO from 2 veterinary hospitals with postoperative data for at least 6 months was performed. All information associated with the TECA-LBO surgery including follow-up was recorded. Logistic regression analyses were performed and corrected using a false discovery rate to identify significance between antimicrobial administration and other perioperative variables and the outcomes of short- and long-term neurologic and infection-related complications, need for revision surgery, and euthanasia due to recurrence of infection-related signs. RESULTS: Intraoperative cultures were performed in 111 animals, and 95 (85.5%) had bacterial growth, with Staphylococcus spp most commonly isolated. Revision surgeries due to infection-related signs occurred in 13 of 120 (10.8%) patients. If intraoperative bacterial cultures were positive and antimicrobials were administered within 1 month of surgery, patients were 85.8% less likely to exhibit infection-related complications, whereas patients not administered antimicrobials were 10.3 times as likely to require a revision surgery. Longer durations of postoperative antimicrobial administration were associated with revision surgery and euthanasia due to infection-related signs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Administration of systemic antimicrobials within the first postoperative month may be necessary to prevent complications when intraoperative cultures exhibit bacterial growth and plays a role in the successful outcome of TECA-LBO.

Colonic torsion in 4 Great Danes.

OBJECTIVE: To describe 4 Great Danes with colonic torsions and describe the risk of torsion recurrence in this breed, which has not previously been reported. This study also describes pneumocolon as a rapid and noninvasive diagnostic for confirmation of colonic torsion. SERIES SUMMARY: Four Great Danes were presented with nonspecific gastrointestinal (GI) clinical signs. Colonic torsion was diagnosed in each case with either plain radiography identifying pneumocolon or contrast radiography (barium enema). Bloodwork in each case revealed nonspecific changes. Each case had a previous gastropexy, 3 of which were prophylactic and 1 as a surgical emergency for gastric dilatation-volvulus. Three cases had favorable outcomes with emergency surgical intervention and returned to normal activity levels with resolution of clinical signs. Two cases of colonic torsion recurred, 1 of which occurred subsequent to a prior left-sided colopexy. One case of recurrence had persistent clinical signs following surgical revision and was euthanized. NEW OR UNIQUE INFORMATION PROVIDED: This is the first report describing pneumocolon to identify a colonic torsion, providing a rapid and low-morbidity diagnostic aid and to describe the recurrence of colonic torsion in 2 dogs. Support to a previous hypothesis for an association between colonic torsion and altered GI motility is provided. Prior publications reporting colonic torsion and entrapment in German Shepherd Dogs associated with disruption of the duodenocolic ligament reported no recurrence following correction without colopexy. The recurrence in these 2 dogs suggests colonic torsion in Great Danes may represent a different or more severe form of this condition.