Intraoperative Music to Promote Patient Outcome (IMPROMPTU): A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Perioperative music can have beneficial effects on postoperative pain, anxiety, opioid requirement, and the physiological stress response to surgery. The aim was to assess the effects of intraoperative music during general anesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for esophagogastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The IMPROMPTU study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized multicenter trial. Adult patients undergoing surgery for stage II-III esophagogastric cancer were eligible. Exclusion criteria were a hearing impairment, insufficient Dutch language knowledge, corticosteroids use, or objection to hearing unknown music. Patients wore active noise-cancelling headphones intraoperatively with preselected instrumental classical music (intervention) or no music (control). Computerized randomization with centralized allocation, stratified according to surgical procedure using variable block sizes, was employed. Primary endpoint was postoperative pain on the first postoperative day. Secondary endpoints were postoperative pain during the first postoperative week, postoperative opioid requirement, intraoperative medication requirement, the stress response to surgery, postoperative complication rate, length of stay, and mortality, with follow-up lasting 30 d. RESULTS: From November 2018 to September 2020, 145 patients were assessed and 83 randomized. Seventy patients (music n = 31, control n = 39) were analyzed. Median age was 70 [IQR 63-70], and 48 patients (69%) were male. Music did not reduce postoperative pain (numeric rating scale 1.8 (SD0.94) versus 2.0 (1.0), mean difference -0.28 [95% CI -0.76-0.19], P = 0.236). No statistically significant differences were seen in medication requirement, stress response, complication rate, or length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative, preselected, classical music during esophagogastric cancer surgery did not significantly improve postoperative outcome and recovery when compared to no music using noise-cancelling headphones.

Implementation of perioperative music in day care surgery.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative music can have beneficial effects on postoperative pain and perioperative opioid requirement. This study aims to assess the implementation feasibility of music in day care surgery through adherence to implementation, as well as its effects. METHODS: This implementation study employed a prospective single-center study design. Perioperative music was implemented as part of standard surgical care during day care surgery procedures. The music intervention consisted of preselected playlists. Primary outcome was adherence to implementation. Barriers and attitudes towards music of patients and perioperative care providers were evaluated. Furthermore, the effects of music were assessed through a matched cohort analysis. This study was registered with the Netherlands Trial Register (NL8213). RESULTS: From January to April 2020, a total of 109 patients received the music intervention and 97 were analyzed after matching to retrospective controls. Adherence rate to the music intervention was 92% preoperatively, 81% intraoperatively, and 86% postoperatively, with 83% of patients satisfied with the preselected music, and 93% finding music to be beneficial to surgical care. All health care providers believed perioperative music to be beneficial (63%) or were neutral (37%) towards its use. Postoperative pain was not significantly different (mean numeric rating scale 0.74; the music intervention group versus 0.68; control group, p = .363). Although not statistically significant, postoperative opioid requirement in the music group was lower (30% versus 40%, p = .132). CONCLUSION: Perioperative music implementation in day care surgery is feasible with high adherence rates, patient satisfaction levels, and positive attitudes of health care providers towards its use.

Effect of music on clinical outcome after hip fracture operations (MCHOPIN): study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing proximal femur fracture surgery are at high risk of postoperative complications, with postoperative delirium occurring in 25%-40% of patients. Delirium has profound effects on patient outcome and recovery, the patient's family, caregivers and medical costs. Perioperative music has a beneficial effect on eliciting modifiable risk factors of delirium. Therefore, the aim of this trial was to evaluate the effect of perioperative recorded music on postoperative delirium in patients with proximal femur fracture undergoing surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Music on Clinical Outcome after Hip Fracture Operations study is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised controlled, open-label, clinical trial. Five hundred and eight patients with proximal femur fracture meeting eligibility criteria will be randomised to the music intervention or control group with concealed allocation in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by hospital site. The perioperative music intervention consists of preselected lists totalling 30 hours of music, allowing participants to choose their preferred music from these lists (classical, jazz and blues, pop and Dutch). The primary outcome measure is postoperative delirium rate. Secondary outcome measures include pain, anxiety, medication requirement, postoperative complications, hospital length of stay and 30-day mortality. A 90-day follow-up will be performed in order to assess nursing home length of stay, readmission rate and functional ability to perform daily living activities. Furthermore, the cost and cost-effectiveness of the music intervention will be assessed. Data will be analysed according to an intention-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee Erasmus MC on 8 October 2018 (MEC-2018-110, NL64721.078.18). The trial will be carried out following the Declaration of Helsinki principles, Good Clinical Practice guidelines and Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act. Research data will be reported following Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines and study results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR7036.

Perception of auditory stimuli during general anesthesia and its effects on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Interest in implicit memory formation and unconscious auditory stimulus perception during general anesthesia has resurfaced as perioperative music has been reported to produce beneficial effects. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating explicit and implicit memory formation during general anesthesia and its effects on postoperative patient outcomes and recovery. SOURCE: We performed a systematic literature search of Embase, Ovid Medline, and Cochrane Central from inception date until 15 October 2020. Eligible for inclusion were RCTs investigating intraoperative auditory stimulation in adult surgical patients under general anesthesia in which patients, healthcare staff, and outcome assessors were all blinded. We used random effects models for meta-analyses. This study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020178087). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Fifty-three (4,200 patients) of 5,859 identified articles were included. There was evidence of implicit memory formation in seven out of 17 studies (41%) when assessed using perceptual priming tasks. Mixed results were observed on postoperative behavioural and motor response after intraoperative suggestions. Intraoperative music significantly reduced postoperative pain (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.1 to -0.57; P < 0.001; I2 = 0; n = 226) and opioid requirements (SMD, -0.29; 95% CI, -0.57 to -0.015; P = 0.039; I2 = 36; n = 336), while positive therapeutic suggestions did not. CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that intraoperative auditory stimuli can be perceived and processed during clinically adequate, general anesthesia irrespective of surgical procedure severity, leading to implicit memory formation without explicit awareness. Intraoperative music can exert significant beneficial effects on postoperative pain and opioid requirements. Whether the employed intraoperative anesthesia regimen is of influence is not yet clear.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'intérêt pour la création de mémoire implicite et la perception inconsciente de stimuli auditifs pendant l'anesthésie générale a refait surface depuis qu'il a été rapporté que l'audition de musique périopératoire produisait des effets bénéfiques. Nous avons mené une revue systématique et une méta-analyse des études randomisées contrôlées (ERC) évaluant la création de mémoire explicite et implicite pendant l'anesthésie générale et ses effets sur les devenirs postopératoires et le rétablissement des patients. SOURCES: Nous avons effectué une recherche documentaire systématique dans les bases de données Embase, Ovid Medline et Cochrane Central depuis leur date de création jusqu'au 15 octobre 2020. Étaient admissibles à l'inclusion les ERC évaluant la stimulation auditive peropératoire chez les patients chirurgicaux adultes sous anesthésie générale, dans lesquelles les patients, le personnel de soins de santé et les évaluateurs des devenirs étaient tous en aveugle. Nous avons utilisé des modèles à effets aléatoires pour les méta-analyses. Cette étude a respecté les lignes directrices PRISMA et a été enregistrée dans le registre PROSPERO (CRD42020178087). CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Cinquante-trois des 5859 articles identifiés (4200 patients) ont été inclus. Sept études sur 17 (41 %) comportaient des données probantes concernant la création de mémoire implicite lorsqu'elle était évaluée à l'aide de tâches d'amorçage perceptif. Des résultats mitigés ont été observés sur la réponse comportementale et motrice postopératoire après des suggestions peropératoires. La musique peropératoire a considérablement réduit la douleur postopératoire (différence moyenne standardisée [DMS], -0,84; intervalle de confiance [IC] de 95 %, -1,1 à -0,57; P < 0,001; I2 = 0; n = 226) et les besoins en opioïdes (DMS, -0,29; IC 95 %, -0,57 à -0,015; P = 0,039; I2 = 36; n = 336), mais pas les suggestions thérapeutiques positives. CONCLUSION: Les résultats de cette revue systématique et méta-analyse montrent que les stimuli auditifs peropératoires peuvent être perçus et traités pendant une anesthésie générale cliniquement adéquate, indépendamment de la gravité de l'intervention chirurgicale, menant à la création de mémoire implicite sans conscience explicite. La musique peropératoire peut avoir des effets bénéfiques significatifs sur la douleur postopératoire et les besoins en opioïdes. Il n'est pas encore possible de déterminer si le type d'anesthésie peropératoire utilisé a une influence.

The Perception and Attitude Toward Noise and Music in the Operating Room: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Environmental noise pollution is regarded as a general stressor. Noise levels frequently exceed recommended noise levels by the World Health Organization in hospitals, especially in the operation room. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effects of noise pollution on patient outcome and performance by operation room staff. In addition, the perception and attitude toward playing music in the operation room, which can increase noise levels, were assessed as well. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search of the databases Embase, Medline Ovid, and Cochrane from date of database inception until October 16th, 2020 using the exhaustive literature search method was performed. Prospective studies evaluating the effect of noise on the patient, surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and other operation room staff, or perception and attitude toward playing music in the operation room, were included. This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (ID: 208282). RESULTS: The literature search generated 4758 articles, and 22 prospective studies (3507 participants) were included. Three of the four studies that investigated the effect of noise on patient outcome reported a significant reduction of complication rate in surgical patients, when noise levels were lower. Six studies assessed the effect of noise in the operation room on the staff (1383 participants). Over half of the surveyed staff found noise levels to be a disturbing stressor and negatively impact performance. Although music increased decibel levels in the operation room, most surveyed staff was positively predisposed toward playing music during surgery, believing it to improve both individual and team performance. In general, music was not considered to be distracting or impairing communication. CONCLUSIONS: Higher noise levels seem to have a negative effect on patient outcome and adversely affect performance by members in the operation room. Further research is needed to assess whether this knowledge can benefit patient outcome and surgical performance. Notably, attitude of surgical team members toward music during surgery is generally regarded favorable.

The effect of preferred music on mental workload and laparoscopic surgical performance in a simulated setting (OPTIMISE): a randomized controlled crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, music is commonly played in the operation room. The effect of music on surgical performance reportedly has varying results, while its effect on mental workload and key surgical stressor domains has only sparingly been investigated. Therefore, the aim is to assess the effect of recorded preferred music versus operating room noise on laparoscopic task performance and mental workload in a simulated setting. METHODS: A four-sequence, four-period, two-treatment, randomized controlled crossover study design was used. Medical students, novices to laparoscopy, were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomly allocated to one of four sequences, which decided the exposure order to music and operation room noise during the four periods. Laparoscopic task performance was assessed through motion analysis with a laparoscopic box simulator. Each period consisted of ten alternating peg transfer tasks. To account for the learning curve, a preparation phase was employed. Mental workload was assessed using the Surgery Task Load Index. This study was registered with the Netherlands Trial Register (NL7961). RESULTS: From October 29, 2019 until March 12, 2020, 107 participants completed the study, with 97 included for analyzation. Laparoscopic task performance increased significantly during the preparation phase. No significant beneficial effect of music versus operating room noise was observed on time to task completion, path length, speed, or motion smoothness. Music significantly decreased mental workload, reflected by a lower score of the total weighted Surgery Task Load Index in all but one of the six workload dimensions. CONCLUSION: Music significantly reduced mental workload overall and of several previously identified key surgical stressor domains, and its use in the operating room is reportedly viewed favorably. Music did not significantly improve laparoscopic task performance of novice laparoscopists in a simulated setting. Although varying results have been reported previously, it seems that surgical experience and task demand are more determinative.

The Effects of Preferred Music on Laparoscopic Surgical Performance: A Randomized Crossover Study.

INTRODUCTION: Music can have a positive effect on stress and general task performance. This randomized crossover study assessed the effects of preferred music on laparoscopic surgical performance in a simulated setting. METHODS: Sixty medical students, inexperienced in laparoscopy, were included between June 2018 and November 2018. A randomized, 4-period, 4-sequence, 2-treatment crossover study design was used, with each participant acting as its own control. Participants performed four periods, consisting of five peg transfer tasks each period, on a laparoscopic box trainer: two periods while wearing active noise-cancelling headphones and two periods during music exposure. Participants were randomly allocated to a sequence determining the order of the four periods. The parameters time to task completion, path length and normalized jerk were assessed. Mental workload was assessed using the Surgical Task Load Index questionnaire. Also, heart rate and blood pressure were assessed. RESULTS: Participants performed the peg transfer task significantly faster [median difference: - 0.81 s (interquartile range, - 3.44-0.69) p = 0.037] and handled their instruments significantly more efficient as path length was reduced [median difference, - 52.24 mm (interquartile range, - 196.97-89.81) p = 0.019] when exposed to music. Also, mental workload was significantly reduced during music [median difference, - 2.41 (interquartile range, - 7.17-1.83) p = 0.021)]. No statistically significant effect was observed on heart rate and blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Listening to preferred music improves laparoscopic surgical performance and reduces mental workload in a simulated setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: NCT04111679.

The Effect of Perioperative Music on Medication Requirement and Hospital Length of Stay: A Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess and quantify the effect of perioperative music on medication requirement, length of stay and costs in adult surgical patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There is an increasing interest in nonpharmacological interventions to decrease opioid analgesics use, as they have significant adverse effects and opioid prescription rates have reached epidemic proportions. Previous studies have reported beneficial outcomes of perioperative music. METHODS: A systematic literature search of 8 databases was performed from inception date to January 7, 2019. Randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of perioperative music on medication requirement, length of stay or costs in adult surgical patients were eligible. Meta-analysis was performed using random effect models, pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018093140) and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 2414 articles, 55 studies (N = 4968 patients) were included. Perioperative music significantly reduced postoperative opioid requirement (pooled SMD -0.31 [95% CI -0.45 to -0.16], P < 0.001, I = 44.3, N = 1398). Perioperative music also significantly reduced intraoperative propofol (pooled SMD -0.72 [95% CI -1.01 to -0.43], P < 0.00001, I = 61.1, N = 554) and midazolam requirement (pooled SMD -1.07 [95% CI -1.70 to -0.44], P < 0.001, I = 73.1, N = 184), while achieving the same sedation level. No significant reduction in length of stay (pooled SMD -0.18 [95% CI -0.43 to 0.067], P = 0.15, I = 56.0, N = 600) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative music can reduce opioid and sedative medication requirement, potentially improving patient outcome and reducing medical costs as higher opioid dosage is associated with an increased risk of adverse events and chronic opioid abuse.

The Effect of Perioperative Music on the Stress Response to Surgery: A Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Current perioperative patient care aims to maintain homeostasis by attenuation of the stress response to surgery, as a more vigorous stress response can have detrimental effects on postoperative recovery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the effect of perioperative music on the physiological stress response to surgery. METHODS: The Embase, Medline Ovid, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception date until February 5, 2019, using a systematic literature search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines for randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of music before, during, and/or after surgery in adult surgical patients on the stress response to surgery. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model and pooled standardized mean differences were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. This study was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42018097060). RESULTS: The literature search identified 1076 articles. Eighteen studies (1301 patients) were included in the systematic review, of which eight were included in the meta-analysis. Perioperative music attenuated the neuroendocrine cortisol stress response to surgery (pooled standardized mean difference -0.30, [95% confidence interval -0.53 to -0.07], P = 0.01, I2 = 0). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative music can attenuate the neuroendocrine stress response to surgery.

Retreatment of vestibular schwannoma with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: clinical outcome, tumor control, and review of literature.

OBJECTIVE Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has become an accepted treatment for vestibular schwannoma, with a high rate of tumor control and good clinical outcome. In a small number of cases, additional treatment is needed. This retrospective study examines the clinical outcome, reproducibility of volumetric response patterns, and tumor control rate after administering a second GKRS to treat vestibular schwannomas. METHODS A total of 38 patients were included: 28 patients underwent a radiosurgical procedure as the initial treatment (Group 1), and 10 patients underwent microsurgical resection with adjuvant radiosurgery on the tumor remnant as the initial treatment (Group 2). The indication for a second GKRS treatment was growth observed on follow-up imaging. The median margin dose was 11.0 Gy for the first procedure and 11.5 Gy for the second procedure. Tumor control after retreatment was assessed through volumetric analysis. Clinical outcome was assessed through medical chart review. RESULTS Median tumor volume at retreatment was 3.6 cm3, with a median treatment interval of 49 months. All patients showed tumor control in a median follow-up period of 75 months after the second radiosurgical procedure. Volumetric tumor response after the second procedure did not correspond to response after the first procedure. After retreatment, persisting House-Brackmann Grade II facial nerve dysfunction was observed in 3 patients (7.9%), facial spasms in 5 patients (13%), and trigeminal nerve hypesthesia in 3 patients (7.9%). Hearing preservation was not evaluated because of the small number of patients with serviceable hearing at the second procedure. CONCLUSIONS Repeat GKRS after a failed first treatment appears to be an effective strategy in terms of tumor control. The volumetric response after a repeat procedure could not be predicted by the volumetric response observed after first treatment. This justifies considering repeat GKRS even for tumors that do not show any volumetric response and show continuous growth after first treatment. An increased risk of mild facial and trigeminal nerve dysfunction was observed after the second treatment compared with the first treatment.