RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinicians' use of electronic health record (EHR) systems while multitasking may increase the risk of making errors, but silent EHR system use may lower patient satisfaction. Delaying EHR system use until after patient visits may increase clinicians' EHR workload, stress, and burnout. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the perspectives of clinicians, educators, administrators, and researchers about misses and near misses that they felt were related to clinician multitasking while using EHR systems. METHODS: This observational study was a thematic analysis of perspectives elicited from 63 continuing medical education (CME) participants during 2 workshops and 1 interactive lecture about challenges and strategies for relationship-centered communication during clinician EHR system use. The workshop elicited reflection about memorable times when multitasking EHR use was associated with "misses" (errors that were not caught at the time) or "near misses" (mistakes that were caught before leading to errors). We conducted qualitative analysis using an editing analysis style to identify codes and then select representative themes and quotes. RESULTS: All workshop participants shared stories of misses or near misses in EHR system ordering and documentation or patient-clinician communication, wondering about "misses we don't even know about." Risk factors included the computer's position, EHR system usability, note content and style, information overload, problematic workflows, systems issues, and provider and patient communication behaviors and expectations. Strategies to reduce multitasking EHR system misses included clinician transparency when needing silent EHR system use (eg, for prescribing), narrating EHR system use, patient activation during EHR system use, adapting visit organization and workflow, improving EHR system design, and improving team support and systems. CONCLUSIONS: CME participants shared numerous stories of errors and near misses in EHR tasks and communication that they felt related to EHR multitasking. However, they brainstormed diverse strategies for using EHR systems safely while preserving patient relationships.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Radiotherapy differed widely in east and south-east Asia because of technical, cultural, and socio-economic differences. With the purpose of standardizing radiotherapy for cervical cancer in the region, an international clinical study was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven institutions in eight Asian countries participated in the study. Between 1996 and 1998, 210 patients with stage IIIB cervical cancer were enrolled. Patients were treated with a combination of external beam radiotherapy (total dose, 50Gy) and either high-dose-rate (HDR) or low-dose-rate (LDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) according to the institutional practice. The planned point A dose was 20-28Gy/4 fractions for HDR-ICBT and 30-40Gy/1-2 fractions for LDR-ICBT. RESULTS: Hundred patients were treated with HDR-ICBT and 110 were treated with LDR-ICBT. The ICBT doses actually delivered to point A ranged widely: 12-32Gy in the HDR group and 26-52.7Gy in the LDR group. The 5-year follow-up rate among the countries differed greatly, from 29% to 100%. The 5-year major complication rates were 6% in the HDR group and 10% in the LDR group. The 5-year overall survival rates were 51.1% in the HDR group and 57.5% in the LDR group. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were several problems with treatment compliance and patients' follow-up, the study suggests that the protocols provided favorable outcomes with acceptable rates of late complications in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer in east and south-east Asia.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Sudeste Asiático , Braquiterapia/métodos , Ásia Oriental , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Taxa de Sobrevida , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidadeRESUMO
In the last 10 years, Ethiopian Jews have immigrated to Israel in large numbers. Up to 1990 they came directly from their remote villages in northern Ethiopia and no HIV infection was detected in the several thousands that came. In contrast, 1.74% of approximately 14,000 new immigrant Ethiopians who arrived in 1991-92, after spending more than a year in Addis Ababa, were HIV positive. Several infants born in Israel following the latter immigration were found to be infected, whereas more than 2500 children born in Ethiopia were negative. Sexual transmission during their stay in Addis Ababa is thought to be the only route of infection, and therefore this is a newly infected population. Immunological studies revealed very low CD4 count in HIV-infected people. HIV-negative Ethiopian immigrants to Israel also have a lower CD4 count than the general Israeli population. Further studies are currently under way to look at the natural history of this particular HIV-infected group.