Comparison of postoperative infection after emergency inguinal hernia surgery with enterectomy between mesh repair and non-mesh repair: a national database analysis.

PURPOSE: Synthetic non-absorbable mesh is used for elective inguinal hernia repair but is not commonly used for incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernia requiring enterectomy to reduce the risk of surgical-site infection. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of synthetic non-absorbable mesh repair in patients with incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernia requiring enterectomy versus non-mesh repair. METHODS: We analyzed patients with incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernia with enterectomy from April 2012 to March 2017 using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. We conducted overlap propensity score-weighted analyses to compare surgical-site infection (SSI), duration of anesthesia, antibiotic use at > 3 days after surgery, postoperative hospital stay, and 30 day readmission. Two sensitivity analyses were performed. First, we compared the proportions of patients requiring wound culture at ≥ 3 days after surgery. Second, we performed overlap propensity score-weighted logistic regression analyses for surgical-site infection. RESULTS: We identified 668 eligible patients, comprising 223 patients with mesh repair and 445 with non-mesh repair. Overlap propensity score-weighted analyses showed no significant differences between the mesh repair and non-mesh repair groups for SSI (2.5 vs. 2.8%, P = 0.79). Secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Proportion of wound culture at ≥ 3 days after surgery was similar in the two groups (11.1 vs. 14.6%, P = 0.18). Logistic regression analysis showed no significant association between mesh repair and SSI (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-2.57). CONCLUSION: Synthetic non-absorbable mesh use may be safe for incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernia requiring enterectomy.

Breast cancer surgery in patients with schizophrenia: short-term outcomes from a nationwide cohort.

BACKGROUND: Although patients with schizophrenia have a higher risk of developing breast cancer than the general population, studies that have investigated postoperative complications after breast cancer surgery in patients with schizophrenia are scarce. This study examined associations between schizophrenia and short-term outcomes following breast cancer surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for stage 0-III breast cancer between July 2010 and March 2017 were identified from a Japanese nationwide inpatient database. Multivariable analyses were conducted to compare postoperative complications and hospitalization costs between patients with schizophrenia and those without any psychiatric disorder. Three sensitivity analyses were performed: a 1 : 4 matched-pair cohort analysis with matching for age, institution, and fiscal year at admission; analyses excluding patients with schizophrenia who were not taking antipsychotic medication; and analyses excluding patients with schizophrenia who were admitted to hospital involuntarily. RESULTS: The study included 3660 patients with schizophrenia and 350 860 without any psychiatric disorder. Patients with schizophrenia had a higher in-hospital morbidity (odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95 per cent c.i. 1.21 to 1.55), with more postoperative bleeding (OR 1.34, 1.05 to 1.71) surgical-site infections (OR 1.22, 1.04 to 1.43), and sepsis (OR 1.20, 1.03 to 1.41). The total cost of hospitalization (coefficient €743, 95 per cent c.i. 680 to 806) was higher than that for patients without any psychiatric disorder. All sensitivity analyses showed similar results to the main analyses. CONCLUSION: Although causal inferences remain premature, multivariable regression analyses showed that schizophrenia was associated with greater in-hospital morbidity and higher total cost of hospitalization after breast cancer surgery than in the general population.

Stent as a bridge to surgery or immediate colectomy for malignant right colonic obstruction: propensity-scored, national database study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes of urgent colectomy and placement of a self-expanding metallic stent followed by colectomy for patients with malignant right colonic obstruction. Right-sided malignant obstruction is less common than left-sided. Stenting for malignant left colonic obstruction has been reported to reduce postoperative complications. However, the impact of stenting for malignant right colonic obstruction remains undefined. METHODS: The study included patients with right-sided malignant obstruction or stenosis undergoing colectomy between April 2012 and March 2017 identified from a nationwide database. Propensity score matching analysis was used to compare mortality and morbidity rates, proportion receiving a stoma and postoperative stay between urgent colectomy and stent groups. RESULTS: From 9572 patients, 1500 pairs were generated by propensity score matching. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the urgent colostomy and stent groups (1·6 versus 0·9 per cent respectively; P = 0·069). Complications were more common after urgent colectomy than stenting (22·1 versus 19·1 per cent; P = 0·042). Surgical-site infection was more likely with urgent colectomy (7·1 versus 4·4 per cent; P = 0·001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in anastomotic leakage (3·8 versus 2·6 per cent; P = 0·062). The proportion of patients needing a stoma was higher with urgent colectomy than primary treatment with stents (5·1 versus 1·7 per cent; P < 0·001). Postoperative stay was longer after urgent colectomy (15 versus 13 days; P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Stenting followed by colectomy in patients with malignant right colonic obstruction may provide more favourable perioperative outcomes than urgent colectomy.

ANTECEDENTES: El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar los resultados perioperatorios entre la colectomía urgente y la colocación de una endoprótesis (stent) metálica autoexpandible seguida de colectomía en pacientes con obstrucción maligna del colon derecho. La obstrucción maligna del colon derecho es menos frecuente que la del colon izquierdo. Se ha demostrado que la colocación de una endoprótesis en la obstrucción maligna del colon izquierdo reduce las complicaciones postoperatorias. Sin embargo, el impacto de la colocación de una endoprótesis en la obstrucción maligna del colon derecho no está definido. MÉTODOS: Los pacientes con obstrucción o estenosis maligna del colon derecho sometidos a colectomía desde abril de 2012 hasta marzo de 2017 se analizaron a partir de una base de datos nacional. Se realizó un análisis mediante emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión para comparar la mortalidad, la morbilidad, el porcentaje de pacientes en los que se realizó un estoma y la estancia postoperatoria entre los grupos de colectomía urgente y endoprótesis. RESULTADOS: A partir de 9.572 pacientes, se generaron 1.500 parejas mediante emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión. No hubo diferencias significativas en la mortalidad hospitalaria entre los dos grupos (1,6% versus 0,9%, P = 0,07). Las complicaciones fueron más frecuentes después de la colectomía urgente en comparación con las endoprótesis (22,1% versus 19,1%, P = 0,04). La infección del sitio quirúrgico ocurrió con mayor frecuencia en el grupo de la colectomía urgente en comparación con el grupo de endoprótesis (7,1% versus 4,4%, P = 0,001). No se observaron diferencias significativas en la fuga anastomótica entre los dos grupos (3,8% versus 2,6%, P = 0,06). La proporción de pacientes que precisaron estomas fue mayor con la colectomía urgente en comparación con aquellos tratados inicialmente con endoprótesis (5,1% versus 1,7%, P < 0,001). La estancia postoperatoria fue más larga después de la colectomía urgente que tras la colocación de una endoprótesis (15 días versus 13 días, P < 0,001) CONCLUSIÓN: En pacientes con obstrucción maligna del colon derecho, la colocación de una endoprótesis seguida de colectomía puede proporcionar resultados perioperatorios más favorables en comparación con la colectomía urgente.