Cancer awareness and its related factors among junior high and high school teachers in Japan: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: The early detection and prevention of many cancers is possible. Therefore, public awareness about cancer risk factors and warning signs must be increased to ensure early diagnosis. Although Japan has implemented mandatory cancer education in junior high and high schools, few studies have evaluated teachers' cancer awareness. This study aimed to determine Japanese junior high and high school teachers' awareness of cancer and related factors. METHODS: This cross-sectional study obtained data through an online questionnaire survey using questions from the Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM) developed by Cancer Research UK. Thirty items were selected from three CAM modules: cancer risk factors, cancer warning signs, and barriers to seeking help. Descriptive statistics were used for socio-demografic data and CAM module questions. The χ2 test was performed on the relationship between cancer awareness and socio-demographic data. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing cancer awareness. RESULTS: Respondents included 316 junior high school and 463 high school teachers (541 men; 238 women; average age = 48.2 years; average teaching experience = 23.5 years). An average of 5.41 out of 11 cancer risk factors were recognized. More than 70% of teachers recognized smoking, exposure to another person's cigarette smoke, and having a close relative with cancer as risk factors. On average, 4.52 out of 9 cancer warning signs were recognized. More than 50% of teachers recognized the warning signs of unexplained lump or swelling, unexplained weight loss, and unexplained bleeding. Barriers to seeking help had a low average score of 4.51 out of 20. However, the most commonly recognized "barriers to seeking help" were "too busy to make time," "difficult to make an appointment," "worried about what the doctor might find," and "too scared." Moreover, the common factors that affected awareness of cancer risk factors and cancer warning signs were gender and cancer experience of relatives. Factors that affected awareness of "barriers to seeking help" were "participation in cancer-related workshops," age, gender, and cancer experience of relatives. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer awareness education should consider interventions that can improve knowledge of the symptoms and signs related to cancer without increasing the awareness of barriers to seeking help.

Long-term follow-up and exploratory analysis of lenvatinib in patients with metastatic or recurrent thymic carcinoma: Results from the multicenter, phase 2 REMORA trial.

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this report was to detail the long-term follow-up data from the REMORA study, which investigated the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib in patients with thymic carcinoma. In addition, an exploratory analysis of the association between relative dose intensity (RDI) and the efficacy of lenvatinib is presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The single-arm, open-label, phase 2 REMORA study was conducted at eight Japanese institutions. Forty-two patients received oral lenvatinib 24 mg once daily in 4-week cycles until the occurrence of intolerable adverse events or disease progression. The REMORA long-term follow-up data were evaluated, including overall survival (OS). RDI was calculated by dividing the actual dose administered to the patient by the standard recommended dose. This trial is registered on JMACCT (JMA-IIA00285) and on UMIN-CTR (UMIN000026777). RESULTS: The updated median OS was 28.3 months (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 17.1-34.0 months), and the OS rate at 36 months was 35.7 % (95 % CI: 21.7 %-49.9 %). When grouped by RDI of lenvatinib, the median OS was 38.5 months (95 % CI: 31.2-not estimable) in patients with ≥ 75 % RDI and 17.3 months (95 % CI: 13.4-26.2 months) in patients with < 75 % RDI (hazard ratio 0.46 [95 % CI: 0.22-0.98]; P = 0.0406) at 8 weeks. Patients who maintained their lenvatinib dose over 8 weeks had a higher objective response rate than patients whose doses were reduced (75.0 % vs 29.4 %; P = 0.0379). No new safety concerns or treatment-related deaths were reported, and lenvatinib had a tolerable safety profile. CONCLUSION: This follow-up report updated OS in patients with metastatic or recurrent thymic carcinoma. A higher RDI of lenvatinib at 8 weeks could be associated with improved outcomes.

Severe Drug-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease After Administration of Osimertinib as Adjuvant Treatment for Resected EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: A Case Report.

Osimertinib administration has been approved as an adjuvant treatment after complete surgical resection in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This article presents the first report of life-threatening postoperative osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease. An 83-year-old male patient underwent right upper lobectomy (pathologic stage IIA) and osimertinib (80 mg/d) was initiated on postoperative day 75. On day 44 of osimertinib administration, chest computed tomography revealed diffuse ground-glass opacities; accordingly, osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease was diagnosed. Steroid pulse therapy was initiated using a high-flow nasal cannula to treat dyspnea and hypoxemia, rapidly improving the respiratory status and imaging findings; moreover, the patient's clinical course was excellent. This case report suggests that the postoperative occurrence of severe osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease is a crucial factor that must be considered in patient decision-making regarding perioperative treatment.

The cytotoxicity of gefitinib on patient­derived induced pluripotent stem cells reflects gefitinib­induced liver injury in the clinical setting.

Gefitinib is a key drug used in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations. Gefitinib therapy is superior to conventional chemotherapy for the progression-free survival rate of patients with EGFR mutations. However, 10-26% of patients develop grade 3 or higher hepatotoxicity during gefitinib treatment; therefore, the development of preclinical tests for hepatotoxicity prior to clinical use is desirable. The present study evaluated the use of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and iPSC-derived hepatocytes (iPSC-heps), as a platform for preclinical test development. Patient-derived iPSCs were generated by reprogramming peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from two groups of gefitinib-treated patients with severe hepatotoxicity [toxicity group (T group)] or mild hepatotoxicity [no clinical toxicity group (N group)]. To examine the hepatotoxicity, the iPSCs from both T and N groups were differentiated into hepatocytes to obtain iPSC-heps. Differentiation was confirmed by measuring the expression levels of hepatocyte markers, such as albumin or α-fetoprotein, via western blotting and quantitative PCR analyses. Cytotoxicity in iPSCs and iPSC-heps after gefitinib treatment was evaluated using a lactate dehydrogenase release assay. The gefitinib-induced cytotoxicity in iPSCs from the T group was significantly higher than that from the N group, whereas there were no significant differences between the groups of iPSC-heps. These results suggested that using iPSCs in preclinical assessment may be a good indicator for the prediction of gefitinib-induced cytotoxicity in clinical use.

Tumor Microenvironment Landscape of NSCLC Reveals Resistance Mechanisms for Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Blockade After Chemoradiotherapy: A Multicenter Prospective Biomarker Study (WJOG11518L:SUBMARINE).

INTRODUCTION: The PACIFIC regimen of consolidation therapy with the programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitor durvalumab after definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy has become a standard of care for individuals with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Nevertheless, approximately half of the treated patients experience disease progression within 1 year, with the mechanisms of treatment resistance being poorly understood. We here performed a nationwide prospective biomarker study to explore the resistance mechanisms (WJOG11518L:SUBMARINE). METHODS: A total of 135 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received the PACIFIC regimen were included for comprehensive profiling of the tumor microenvironment by immunohistochemistry, transcriptome analysis, and genomic sequencing of pretreatment tumor tissue and flow cytometric analysis of circulating immune cells. Progression-free survival was compared on the basis of these biomarkers. RESULTS: The importance of preexisting effective adaptive immunity in tumors was revealed for treatment benefit regardless of genomic features. We also identified CD73 expression by cancer cells as a mechanism of resistance to the PACIFIC regimen. Multivariable analysis of immunohistochemistry data with key clinical factors as covariables indicated that low CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density and the high CD73+ cancer cells were independently associated with poor durvalumab outcome (hazard ratios = 4.05 [95% confidence interval: 1.17-14.04] for CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; 4.79 [95% confidence interval: 1.12-20.58] for CD73). In addition, whole-exome sequencing of paired tumor samples suggested that cancer cells eventually escaped immune pressure as a result of neoantigen plasticity. CONCLUSIONS: Our study emphasizes the importance of functional adaptive immunity in stage III NSCLC and implicates CD73 as a promising treatment target, thus providing insight forming a basis for development of a new treatment approach in NSCLC.

Overall survival analysis of patients enrolled in a randomized phase III trial comparing gefitinib and erlotinib for previously treated advanced lung adenocarcinoma (WJOG5108LFS).

BACKGROUND: Since the overall survival (OS) of patients enrolled in the first clinical phase III trial (WJOG5108L) was not recorded owing to time constraints, the present study (WJOG5108LFS) with a longer follow-up (66.6 months) aimed to compare OS of those treated with erlotinib (ER) and gefitinib (GE) for lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. METHODS: Among 536 enrolled patients, 362 (67.5%) were EGFR mutation-positive, including 182 in the ER arm and 180 in the GE arm. Median survival time (MST) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. OS and PFS were determined for patients with EGFR mutation. RESULTS: MSTs of ER (n = 182) and GE arms (n = 180) were 31.97 and 27.98 months, respectively (P = 0.3573, hazard ratio = 1.116). MSTs of exon 19 mutation patients in ER (n = 99) and GE arms (n = 89) were 37.49 and 28.91 months, respectively (P = 0.3791). MSTs of L858 mutation patients in ER (n = 82) and GE arms (n = 89) were 22.98 and 27.79 months, respectively (P = 0.7836). In patients with brain metastasis harboring mutation, response rates were 32.8% and 22.2% (P = 0.160), MSTs were 23.46 and 23.89 months (P = 0.7410), and PFS were 9.49 and 6.98 months (P = 0.1481) in the ER (n = 67) and GE arms (n = 72), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in OS were observed between the ER and GE arms in all patients with EGFR mutation and those with brain metastasis harboring EGFR mutation.

Details of Cancer Education Programs for Adolescents and Young Adults and Their Effectiveness: A Scoping Review.

The purpose of this review was to establish what cancer education programs have been carried out aimed at adolescents and young adults (AYAs) and what outcomes they achieved. The databases used were MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science, and the search period was set as 2011-2020. The extracted literature was evaluated for quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools. The subjects of the analysis were 29 studies: 10 randomized controlled trials and 19 quasi-experimental designs. Regarding the varieties of cancers found in the data, in descending order, 10 documents looked at cervical cancer, 9 looked at cancer in general, and 4 looked at breast cancer. Most studies focused on AYAs exclusively, with just three studies involving their parents simultaneously. Many studies used lecture-based intervention, with information technology-based interventions using websites and cell phones. Topics included in the program were cancer epidemiology, cancer risk factors, cancer warning signs and symptoms, prevention methods, and screening methods. After the intervention, all studies showed statistically significant improvements in at least one outcome measure, which included knowledge and awareness of cancer, health beliefs, and intent to take preventive action, demonstrating a basis for educational intervention. Educating AYAs about cancer at a time when their ways of life are becoming more concrete can be expected to have a positive impact on cancer preventing behaviors in adulthood, increase their parents' awareness of cancer, and have a positive impact on behavior around screening.

Comparison Between Second- and Third-generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors as First-line Treatment in Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: For epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), administration of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is mandatory to prolong survival. To date, a comparison of second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs has not been reported as far as we are aware. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the survival time of patients diagnosed with EGFR-mutated advanced or recurrent NSCLC who had received afatinib, a second-generation EGFR-TKI, or osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI, as the first-line treatment. RESULTS: Among the 49 patients included in the study, 15 received afatinib and 34 received osimertinib. No significant differences in overall survival were observed between the two groups [afatinib vs. osimertinib=36 vs. 33 months (hazard ratio=2.917, 95% confidence interval=0.780-10.905; p=0.112)]. T790M mutation was detected in three of the patients in the afatinib group, and all three subsequently received osimertinib. The median overall survival of these three patients and of the 12 without the mutation were 63 and 36 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no apparent difference in the effect on survival between second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs, whereas the sequential administration of second- followed by third-generation EGFR-TKIs appeared to confer a better long-term prognosis.

Cardiovascular Complications Associated with Contemporary Lung Cancer Treatments.

OPINION STATEMENT: Lung cancer is the most common form of cancer in humans and the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Traditionally, lung cancer has been diagnosed as either small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, recent developments in molecular pathology have revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of the disease, thus improving patient prognosis and increasing the number of survivors. In advanced NSCLC cases, molecularly targeted drugs for patients with positive driver gene mutation/rearrangement, and immune checkpoint inhibitors for those with a positive biomarker, have changed the standard of care. SCLC is a highly malignant entity. In addition to the chemotherapy and radiotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently provided some hope for extended-stage SCLC. Smoking cessation is related to decreased morbidity. However, early metastasis remains a significant challenge. Recently, cancer therapy-related cardiovascular disease (CTRCD) has emerged as diverse pathophysiology, including fulminant myocarditis, fatal arrhythmia, pericarditis, hypertension, and thrombosis, that emerged with modern lung cancer therapies. Cardio-oncology is a new interdisciplinary collaboration to develop methodologies to manage cardiovascular risk factors and CTRCDs with the common goal of minimizing unnecessary interruption of cancer treatment and maximizing outcomes of lung cancer survivors.

Phase I/II Study of Cisplatin plus Nab-Paclitaxel with Concurrent Thoracic Radiotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

LESSONS LEARNED: The combination of cisplatin plus nab-paclitaxel with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer is a promising therapeutic strategy. Further investigation is warranted. BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase I/II trial of cisplatin plus nab-paclitaxel with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine the recommended dose (RD) of nab-paclitaxel and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this regimen. METHODS: In the phase I study, escalating doses of weekly nab-paclitaxel were administered together with cisplatin at 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and concurrent radiotherapy. In the phase II study, nab-paclitaxel was administered at the RD. RESULTS: In the phase I study, whereas no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed with nab-paclitaxel at 50 or 60 mg/m2 , one of six patients experienced DLT (esophagitis of grade 3) at 70 mg/m2 , determined as the RD. Twenty-four patients at RD were evaluable for safety and efficacy in phase II. Common toxicities included esophagitis (87.5%) and leukopenia (79.2%). Pneumonitis and treatment-related deaths were not observed, but 20 patients (83.3%) experienced radiation pneumonitis, with one case of grade 3 and four of grade 2, after completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 73.9% and 56.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.3%-74.7%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemoradiation with nab-paclitaxel at 70 mg/m2 and cisplatin at 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks showed encouraging feasibility and activity for locally advanced NSCLC.

Lenvatinib in patients with advanced or metastatic thymic carcinoma (REMORA): a multicentre, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Thymic carcinoma is a rare malignant disease and standard treatment for advanced or metastatic thymic carcinoma previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy has not been established. Lenvatinib is a novel multi-targeted inhibitor of VEGFR, FGFR, RET, c-Kit, and other kinases. The aim of this trial was to assess the activity and safety of lenvatinib as a second-line treatment in thymic carcinoma. METHODS: This single-arm, phase 2 trial done in eight institutions in Japan (five cancer centres, two medical university hospitals, and one public hospital) enrolled patients with pathologically confirmed unresectable advanced or metastatic thymic carcinoma that progressed following at least one platinum-based chemotherapy. Key inclusion criteria were age 20 years or older, at least one measurable lesion as defined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients received 24 mg of lenvatinib orally once daily in 4-week cycles until disease progression or occurrence of unacceptable adverse events. The primary endpoint was objective response rate evaluated at the data cutoff date (Feb 22, 2019), by independent central review in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered on JMACCT, JMA-IIA00285, and on UMIN-CTR, UMIN000026777. FINDINGS: Between April 21, 2017, and Feb 22, 2018, 42 patients were enrolled and all patients were included in the activity and safety analysis. The median follow-up period was 15·5 months (IQR 13·1-17·5). The objective response rate was 38% (90% CI 25·6-52·0, p<0·0001). 16 (38%) of 42 patients had a partial response and 24 (57%) had stable disease. The most frequent grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (27 [64%]) and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (three [7%]). No patient died from adverse events. INTERPRETATION: The activity and safety of lenvatinib in patients with advanced or metastatic thymic carcinoma was confirmed. These results suggest that lenvatinib could become a standard treatment option for patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic thymic carcinoma. FUNDING: Center for Clinical Trials, Japan Medical Association.

Exacerbation of autoimmune myocarditis by an immune checkpoint inhibitor is dependent on its time of administration in mice.

BACKGROUND: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have made an immense breakthrough in cancer therapeutics, they can exert unique, immune-related adverse events. Among them, myocarditis is less frequent, but it is serious and often follows a lethal course. METHODS: To examine the changes in cardiac autoimmunity after ICI administration, we developed a mouse experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) model via intraperitoneal administration of murine α-cardiac myosin heavy chain (MyHC-α) fragment. Thereafter, the mouse anti-PD-1 antibody (mPD1ab) was administered at two time points, subsequent to and concurrent with MyHC-α fragment administration. RESULTS: Severe EAM developed in 3 weeks; wide inflammatory lesions were observed in the cardiac sections. Furthermore, inflammatory/fibrotic genes, such as interleukin 1ß, interleukin 6, and collagen 1, were upregulated, although the cardiac function was not significantly affected. The subsequent administration of mPD1ab at 2 weeks post administration of the first MyHC-α fragment exacerbated EAM, whereas the administration of mPD1ab concurrent with MyHC-α fragment administration did not exacerbate EAM. The subsequent administration of mPD1ab significantly increased the infiltration of cluster of differentiation (CD)4- and F4/80-positive cells, whereas the concurrent administration of mPD1ab significantly decreased the infiltration of CD4-positive cells, indicating that the concurrent and subsequent administration of mPD1ab had opposite effects on immune/inflammatory cell infiltration. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the appearance of ICI-induced autoimmune myocarditis might be related to autoimmune system activity before ICI administration. Although ICIs do not adversely affect patients with normal immune systems, we propose that ICI administration should be avoided in patients with autoimmune disorders.

Exploration of germline variants responsible for adverse events of crizotinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer by target-gene panel sequencing.

OBJECTIVES: Crizotinib is a standard treatment for advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- or ROS1-fusion-gene-positive non-small cell lung cancer; however, serious adverse events (AEs), including elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and interstitial lung disease (ILD), develop occasionally. Here, we evaluated relationships between clinically significant crizotinib-associated AEs and germline variations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNA obtained from 75 patients allowed selection of 147 genes according to function, exon identification and sequencing, and determination of germline single nucleotide variants (SNVs). Correlations between clinically significant AEs and presence of germline variants were estimated by Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: We defined clinically significant AEs as grade 4 hematological toxicity, grade ≥3 non-hematological toxicity, and any grade of ILD. These AEs were observed in 26 patients (35%), with elevated AST/ALT (15%) the most common, followed by neutropenia (5%), ILD (4%), and thromboembolic events (4%). Nonsynonymous SNVs in epoxide hydrolase 1 (EPHX1) [odds ratio (OR): 3.86; p = 0.0009) and transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) (OR: 2.51; p = 0.025) were associated with the presence of clinically significant AEs. CONCLUSION: Nonsynonymous EPHX1 and TCF7L2 SNVs might be associated with clinically significant crizotinib-associated AEs. These data indicated that target-gene sequencing could be feasible for predicting anticancer-agent toxicity, and that germline multi-gene information might be useful for predicting patient-specific AEs to promote precision medicine.

An early clinical trial of Salirasib, an oral RAS inhibitor, in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Patients with RAS-positive tumors respond poorly to chemotherapies and have a few treatment options. Salirasib is an oral RAS inhibitor that competitively blocks the membrane association of RAS proteins. The aim of this phase I multiple-ascending-dose clinical trial was to investigate the safety and pharmacokinetics of Salirasib in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors and to explore its efficacy. METHODS: Salirasib was started at a dose of 100-mg twice-daily and escalated to a maximum of 1000-mg twice-daily from days 1 to 21 of a 28-day regimen. The pharmacokinetics was evaluated on days 1 and 21. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the trial. Patients with stable disease or better repeated the dosing regimen. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients received Salirasib. Among 14 patients tested, 4 had KRAS mutations. Cmax and AUCinf were maximal at 800 mg. No maximum tolerable dose was discerned, as no DLT was observed in any dosing group. The most frequently observed AEs were gastrointestinal disturbances, including diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea. No AEs led to discontinuation. All patients completed the first regimen and 11 patients repeated the regimen (median: 2 cycles; range: 1-13). Patients with KRAS mutations showed median progression-free survival of 227 days (range: 79-373). CONCLUSION: Salirasib was safe and well tolerated in Japanese patients, and 800-mg twice-daily is recommended for phase II trials. Although the number of participants with KRAS mutations was limited, the remarkably long progression-free period warrants further investigation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: JAPIC Clinical Trials Information; JapicCTI-121751.

Phase 3 study of ceritinib vs chemotherapy in ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients previously treated with chemotherapy and crizotinib (ASCEND-5): Japanese subset.

BACKGROUND: In the global, Phase 3, ASCEND-5 study, ceritinib improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs chemotherapy in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had previously progressed on crizotinib and platinum-based chemotherapy. Here, we report efficacy and safety in a subset of Japanese patients from the ASCEND-5 study. METHODS: Patients with advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC received oral ceritinib 750 mg/day or chemotherapy (intravenous pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 [investigator's choice], every 21 days). RESULTS: Among the 231 patients, 29 were Japanese, of which, 11 were treated with ceritinib and 18 were treated with chemotherapy (5 with pemetrexed and 13 with docetaxel). All the patients received prior crizotinib and one or two lines of prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. Median follow-up time was 16.6 months for ceritinib arm and 16.4 months for chemotherapy arm in the overall population. The median PFS by blinded independent review committee was 9.8 months (95% CI, 4.3-14.0) in ceritinib arm vs 1.6 months (95% CI, 1.4-3.0) in chemotherapy arm. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events, suspected to be study drug related, were reported in 36.4% of ceritinib arm and 72.2% of chemotherapy arm, respectively. No Grade 3 or 4 events of diarrhea, nausea and vomiting were reported in both the treatment arms. Adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation were reported in one patient in each arm: Grade 3 central-nervous system metastases in ceritinib-treated patient and Grade 3 febrile neutropenia in chemotherapy-treated patient. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with overall population, ceritinib demonstrated better efficacy compared with the standard second-line chemotherapy in Japanese patients with crizotinib-resistant ALK+ NSCLC. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01828112.

Small-cell Lung Cancer in a Young Adult Nonsmoking Patient with Ectopic Adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) Production.

Cushing's syndrome due to young small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is recognized as being extremely rare. We herein present the case of a 35-year-old nonsmoking man who presented with thirst and polyuria. Laboratory examinations showed hyperglycemia, hypokalemia and liver enzyme elevation. Imaging examinations revealed the presence of multiple liver tumors and lymph node swelling. The levels of serum neuroendocrine tumor markers were elevated. The patient was diagnosed with SCLC based on the pathological examination of a biopsy specimen from the right supraclavicular lymph node. The physical findings, including proximal myopathy, truncal obesity and pigmentation suggested high levels of glucocorticoids. An immunohistochemical examination of the tumor showed that it was positive for adrenocorticotropin (ACTH). An endocrinological investigation allowed for the definitive diagnosis of SCLC with ectopic ACTH production.

A phase I/Ib study of trametinib (GSK1120212) alone and in combination with gemcitabine in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Trametinib is an inhibitor of MEK1/MEK2 activation and kinase activity. In order to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of single-agent trametinib (part 1) and trametinib in combination with gemcitabine (part 2), we undertook the first clinical study of this combination in Japanese patients with cancer and herein report our results. METHODS: In part 1, 13 patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled into 3 dose cohorts, receiving trametinib once daily at a dose of 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 mg. In part 2, 5 patients with pancreatic cancer received trametinib (2.0 mg once daily) in combination with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: In part 1, a dose-limiting toxicity was observed in a patient in the 2.0-mg dose cohort, but the maximum tolerated dose was not reached at doses up to 3.0 mg daily. The best overall response was a PR in 1 patient, and 6 patients had SD. In part 2, the combination of trametinib and gemcitabine was tolerated for a short period of time. However, serious interstitial lung disease (ILD) was observed in 3 of 5 patients 4 weeks or more after the start of the treatment, including 1 fatal case. Three patients achieved a PR, and 2 patients had SD. The most common adverse event was rash (85 % in part 1 and 100 % in part 2). CONCLUSIONS: Trametinib monotherapy was tolerable in Japanese patients with cancer. However, the combination of trametinib plus gemcitabine carried a higher risk as compared with monotherapy, during which no ILD was observed. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01324258.).

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung with cancer-associated retinopathy.

We report a rare case of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung with cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR). To our knowledge, only two cases of LCNEC with CAR have been reported, one in 1995 and another in 2013. CAR, typically associated with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), is one of the paraneoplastic syndromes with deterioration of visual acuity, visual field constriction, and photophobia. CAR is caused by an autoimmune system reaction against the same antigen in the tumor and retinal photoreceptor cells. To diagnose CAR, genetic retinal dystrophies or any other medical causes of retinopathy should be excluded, but there are no standard diagnostic criteria. Anti-retinal antibodies are known to be positive in CAR patients, and anti-recoverin antibodies are thought to be sensitive and specific to CAR. In our case, anti-recoverin antibodies were not detected by serum tests, but CAR could be diagnosed on the basis of ophthalmological findings including clinical symptoms, electroretinographic findings, and visual field tests. CAR with clinical features of rapid visual disorder should be considered in LCNEC patients as well as in SCLC patients.

Phase I study of amatuximab, a novel monoclonal antibody to mesothelin, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

Amatuximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that targets mesothelin, which is expressed in virtually all mesotheliomas and pancreatic adenocarcinomas. The objective of this study was to determine the dose-limiting toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose. Patients with mesothelioma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma or other mesothelin-positive solid tumors were eligible for this study. Amatuximab was administered weekly as an intravenous infusion in 4-week cycles at progressively increasing doses ranging from 50 to 200 mg/m(2). Seventeen patients received amatuximab. Two dose-limiting toxicities were observed: one at 50 mg/m(2) and one at 200 mg/m(2); the maximum tolerated dose of this study was determined to be 200 mg/m(2). Of the 17 patients, 13 patients (76.5%) experienced treatment-related adverse events. The most common adverse events were grade 1 fatigue (29.4%) and pyrexia (23.5%). The maximum serum concentration and area under the concentration curve values increased in an almost dose-proportional manner. Three patients had stable disease. Amatuximab was generally well tolerated at doses up to 200 mg/m(2). The pharmacokinetic profile of amatuximab in the Japanese population was similar to that seen in the United States population (Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01018784).