RESUMO
Purpose: To assess the nationwide multicenter outcomes of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation with a central hole (EVO-ICL, STAAR Surgical) for patients with low myopia. Methods: This multicenter study comprised 172 eyes of 111 consecutive patients undergoing hole ICL implantation to correct low myopia and myopic astigmatism [manifest spherical equivalent (MSE);-3 diopters (D) or less] at seven nationwide major surgical facilities. We retrospectively determined safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, and adverse events at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and at the final visit. Results: The mean follow-up period was 1.4 ± 1.0 years. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuities at 1 year postoperatively were -0.17 ± 0.12 and -0.24 ± 0.07 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR), respectively. At 1 year postoperatively, 91% and 100% of eyes were within 0.5 and 1.0 D of the target correction, respectively. No significant manifest refraction changes of -0.07 ± 0.26 D occurred from 1 week to 1 year. No vision-threatening complications occurred at any time in this series. Conclusions: According to our experience, the EVO-ICL performed well without significant complications throughout the 1-year observation period, even for the correction of low myopia. It is suggested that current ICL implantation is one of the viable surgical options for correcting low myopia.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To assess the multicenter outcomes of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation with a central hole (EVO-ICL, STAAR Surgical) for patients undergoing previous laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: This case series enrolled 31 eyes of 21 consecutive patients undergoing EVO-ICL implantation to correct residual refractive errors after LASIK at 7 nationwide major surgical sites. We investigated safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, and adverse events at 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, and at the final visit. RESULTS: The mean observation period was 1.6 ± 1.8 years. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuities were - 0.14 ± 0.11 and - 0.22 ± 0.09 logMAR at 6 months postoperatively. At 6 months postoperatively, 81% and 100% of eyes were within ± 0.5 D and ± 1.0 D, respectively, of the targeted correction. We found neither significant manifest refraction changes of 0.05 ± 0.38 D from 1 week to 6 months nor apparent intraoperative or postoperative complications in any case. CONCLUSIONS: Our multicenter study confirmed that the EVO-ICL provided good outcomes in safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability, even in post-LASIK eyes. Therefore, EVO-ICL implantation may be a viable surgical option, even for correcting residual refractive errors after LASIK. Trial registration University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (000045295).
RESUMO
Current intraocular lens (IOL) explantation techniques are limited to cutting the optic and removing the pieces through a small incision or folding single-piece acrylic IOLs using a 2-handed technique. Poor execution of IOL explantation can result in injury to intraocular structures, including the corneal endothelium and iris. The minimally invasive cartridge pull-through technique uses a cartridge for IOL implantation and new forceps optimized for secure grasping of the IOL for removal. This method involved less manipulation in the anterior chamber, thereby reducing the risks for complications such as corneal and iris injuries. A dropped IOL lying on the retinal surface can be extracted directly without lifting it onto the iris first. The cartridge pull-through technique offers a more streamlined and potentially safer approach for IOL explantation.