Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arthroscopy ; 21(2): 243-7, 2005 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15689877

RESUMO

Primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is considered a successful surgical procedure, but the results reported for revision ACL surgery are less satisfactory. The most common cause of technical failure in primary reconstruction is tunnel misplacement, particularly on the femoral side, although an anterior placement of the tibial tunnel may lead to graft impingement and failure. Several technical problems are encountered during revision procedures. We describe a technique for revision ACL surgery using a special jig for preparing the tibial tunnel that references the apex and roof of the intercondylar notch and an over-the-top routing for proximal femoral placement. This combination avoids graft impingement at the tibial tunnel exit and circumvents the problems associated with further femoral tunnel preparation.


Assuntos
Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Humanos , Instabilidade Articular/cirurgia , Recidiva , Reoperação/métodos , Tendões/transplante
2.
Knee ; 10(4): 335-40, 2003 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14629936

RESUMO

Twenty-nine patients who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision were evaluated retrospectively between 1992 and 2000. A similar surgical technique was used in all cases. Twenty-six patients underwent revision following failed primary and revision surgery with the ABC scaffold ligament. There were 2 failed primary semitendinosus/gracilis (STG) autografts and one failed bone patella tendon bone (BPTB) autograft. Autologous hamstring tendons (STG) were used in 26 knees, quadriceps tendon in 2 and BPTB autograft in 1 knee. The Mark I Soffix soft tissue fixation device was used in 16 patients and 13 patients underwent reconstruction with the Mark II BH (Button Hole ) Soffix. Follow up evaluation included clinical examination, KT 2000 arthrometric side to side difference (SSD) assessment, Lysholm, Tegner and IKDC scoring. The average follow up time was 50+/-22 months. The overall SSD was 1.66+/-1.5 mm, a mean Lysholm score of 87.2+/-12.5 was obtained and 22 patients had an IKDC score of nearly normal (B). In the Mark II (BH Soffix) group knees were significantly tighter than in the Mark I Soffix group (P<0.05) with a mean SSD of 1.23+/-1.3 and 2.0+/-1.6 mm, respectively. However there were no significant differences in the other measured parameters between the two fixation devices. Multiply re-operated knees tended to have lower IKDC and Lysholm scores (not statistically significant). We concluded that the technique reported in this study can restore stability to the knee following failed primary or revision ACL reconstruction and the results in the non-multiply operated knees are comparable to primary reconstruction.


Assuntos
Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Poliésteres/uso terapêutico , Próteses e Implantes , Tendões/transplante , Adulto , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Artroscopia/métodos , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Instabilidade Articular/cirurgia , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Reoperação/instrumentação , Reoperação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Técnicas de Sutura , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Knee ; 10(1): 87-91, 2003 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12649033

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate tibial bone tunnel enlargement following four-strand hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, using a new method of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment. Correlation with clinical outcome was also examined. In a prospective study following ACL reconstruction, 24 patients underwent MRI and clinical assessment, at a mean follow-up of 6.5 months. A four-strand semitendinosus and gracilis (STG) tendon graft with the polyester Soffix (Surgicraft Ltd) fixation device was placed via an instrument guided tibial tunnel and an over-the-top femoral route. Cross-sectional area (CSA) perpendicular to the long axis of the tibial tunnel was calculated digitally at three levels, using MRI. Clinical assessment included physical examination, Lysholm subjective self-evaluation score and KT 2000 arthrometric measurement. A mean CSA tibial tunnel enlargement of 33% was found. The mean side-to-side KT-2000 arthrometric difference was 1.66 mm and the mean Lysholm score was 92. We concluded that this previously unused MRI evaluation using digital direct CSA measurements provides a highly accurate method of tunnel assessment. We found no correlation between tibial tunnel enlargement, knee stability, joint function and patient satisfaction scores in the short term.


Assuntos
Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Traumatismos do Joelho/cirurgia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Transferência Tendinosa/métodos , Tíbia/patologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Traumatismos do Joelho/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Músculo Esquelético , Período Pós-Operatório , Probabilidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Estudos de Amostragem , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Transplante Autólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA