Clinical utility of ctDNA by amplicon based next generation sequencing in first line non small cell lung cancer patients.

The assessment of ctDNA has emerged as a minimally invasive avenue for molecular diagnosis and real-time tracking of tumor progression in NSCLC. However, the evaluation of ctDNA by amplicon-based NGS has been not endorsed by all the healthcare systems and remains to be fully integrated into clinical routine practice. To compare tissue single-gene with plasma multiplexed testing, we retrospectively evaluated 120 plasma samples from 12 consecutive patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who were part of a prospective study enrolling treatment-naïve patients and in which tissue samples were evaluated using a single-gene testing approach. While the plasma ctDNA detection of EGFR and BRAF mutations had an acceptable level of concordance with the archival tissue (85%), discordance was seen in all the patients in whom ALK alterations were only detected in tissue samples. Among six responders and six non-responders, early ctDNA mutant allelic frequency (MAF) reduction seemed to predict radiologic responses and longer survival, whereas increasing MAF values with the emergence of co-mutations like BRAFV600E, KRASG12V or TP53M237I seemed to be an early indicator of molecular and radiologic progression. This report using an amplicon-based NGS assay on ctDNA underscores the real-life need for plasma and tissue genotyping as complementary tools in the diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making process.

The role of bone modifying agents for secondary osteoporosis prevention and pain control in post-menopausal osteopenic breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant aromatase inhibitors.

Introduction: Hormonal therapy (HT) blocks the hormone-mediated growth signal dramatically reducing estrogenic levels with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) becoming a crucial component of the treatment mainstay in patients with early breast cancer (BC). Postmenopausal BC patients receiving HT present with a significant risk of secondary osteoporosis with AIs further reducing estrogen levels and ultimately leading to an accelerated rate of bone resorption and thus decreased bone mineral density (BMD). This was an observational retrospective clinical study that consecutively enrolled early BC patients with osteopenia to compare the impact of alendronate versus denosumab on secondary osteoporosis prevention and pain control. Methods: We identified two groups of patients treated with denosumab 60 mg by subcutaneous injection once every six months or alendronate 70 mg orally once a week. All the patients underwent a baseline physiatric evaluation (T0) and underwent a follow-up visit after 18 months (T1) together with femoral and vertebral Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) exam evaluating T-Score marks. From September 2015 to December 2019 a total of 50 early (stage I-III) BC patients were considered eligible and consecutively enrolled in our study if they met pre-specified inclusion criteria. Results: In the entire observed population, the addition of treatment with alendronate or denosumab led to a significant T-score improvement at the lumbar spine level (-1.92 vs -1.52, p=0.03), with a comparable contribution from alendronate (-1.60 vs -1.45, p=0.07) and denosumab (-2.26 vs -1.58, p=0.07). Regarding the femoral region, neither alendronate (-0.98 vs -1.07, p=0.23) nor denosumab (-1.39 vs -1.34, p=0.81) were able to produce any statistically relevant effect. However, concerning pain control, BMAs had a significant impact on reducing NRS scoresin the general population (T1 3.94 vs. baseline 4.32, p=0.007), with a likelyspecific contribution from alendronate (T1 3.52 vs. baseline 3.88, p=0.004) compared to denosumab (T1 4.36 vs baseline 4.76, p=0.12), without any differences in analgesic therapy assumption over time (p=0.93). Discussion: Both alendronate and denosumab significantly contributed to preventing secondary osteoporosis in early BC patients with low BMD undergoing AIs, mostly at the lumbar spine level. Moreover, alendronate seemed to significantly impact pain control in such patients further supporting alendronate as a cost-effective option in this frail setting, although BMAs particularities should be carefully considered on an individual basis according to specific clinical contexts.

Navigating the liquid biopsy Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in non-small cell lung cancer: Making the invisible visible.

Liquid biopsy has gained increasing interest in the growing era of precision medicine as minimally invasive technique. Recent findings demonstrated that detecting minimal or molecular residual disease (MRD) in NSCLC is a challenging matter of debate that need multidisciplinary competencies, avoiding the overtreatment risk along with achieving a significant survival improvement. This review aims to provide practical consideration for solving data interpretation questions about MRD in NSCLC thanks to the close cooperation between biologists and oncology clinicians. We discussed with a translational approach the critical point of view from benchside, bedside and bunchside to facilitate the future applicability of liquid biopsy in this setting. Herein, we defined the clinical significance of MRD, focusing on relevant practical consideration about advantages and disadvantages, speculating on future clinical trial design and standardization of MRD technology.

Moving the Target on the Optimal Adjuvant Strategy for Resected Pancreatic Cancers: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Combination regimens have shown superiority over single agents in the adjuvant treatment of resected pancreatic cancer (PC), but there are no data supporting definition of the best regimen. This work aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of mFOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine+capecitabine, and gemcitabine+nab/paclitaxel in PC patients. A meta-analysis was performed for direct comparison between trials comparing combination regimens and gemcitabine monotherapy. Subsequently, an indirect comparison was made between trials investigating the efficacy and safety of mFOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine+capecitabine, and gemcitabine+nab/paclitaxel because of the same control arm (gemcitabine). A total of three studies met the selection criteria and were included in our indirect comparison. Indirect comparisons for efficacy outcomes showed a benefit in terms of DFS (disease-free survival)/EFS (event-free survival)/RFS (relapse-free survival) for both mFOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine+capecitabine (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52-0.91) and versus gemcitabine+nab/paclitaxel (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.90). No significant advantage was registered for OS (overall survival). Indirect comparisons for safety showed an increase in terms of G3-5 AEs (with the exception of neutropenia) for mFOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine+capecitabine (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03-1.50), while no significant differences were observed versus gemcitabine+nab/paclitaxel. According to our results, mFOLFIRINOX is feasible and manageable and could represent a first option for fit PC resected patients.

Detection of RAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA: a new weapon in an old war against colorectal cancer. A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tissue evaluation for RAS (KRAS or NRAS) gene status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients represent the standard of care to establish the optimal therapeutic strategy. Unfortunately, tissue biopsy is hampered by several critical limitations due to its invasiveness, difficulty to access to disease site, patient's compliance and, more recently, neoplastic tissue spatial and temporal heterogeneity. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic literature review to identify available trials with paired matched tissue and ctDNA RAS gene status evaluation. The authors searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane, www.ClinicalTrials.gov, and abstracts from international meetings. In total, 19 trials comparing standard tissue RAS mutational status matched paired ctDNA evaluated through polymerase chain reaction (PCR), next generation sequencing (NGS) or beads, emulsions, amplification and magnetics (BEAMing) were identified. RESULTS: The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80-0.85) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89-0.93) respectively. The pooled positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the ctDNA were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81-0.92) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.92), respectively. Positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 8.20 (95% CI: 5.16-13.02) and the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.22 (95% CI: 0.16-0.30). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 50.86 (95% CI: 26.15-98.76), and the area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operational characteristics (sROC) curve was 0.94. CONCLUSION: The authors' meta-analysis produced a complete and updated overview of ctDNA diagnostic accuracy to test RAS mutation in mCRC. Results provide a strong rationale to include the RAS ctDNA test into randomized clinical trials to validate it prospectively.

Can the plasma PD-1 levels predict the presence and efficiency of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with metastatic melanoma?

BACKGROUND: The immune response in melanoma patients is locally affected by presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), generally divided into brisk, nonbrisk, and absent. Several studies have shown that a greater presence of TILs, especially brisk, in primary melanoma is associated with a better prognosis and higher survival rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) the correlation between PD-1 levels in plasma and the presence/absence of TILs in 28 patients with metastatic melanoma. RESULTS: Low plasma PD-1 levels were correlated with brisk TILs in primary melanoma, whereas intermediate values correlated with the nonbrisk TILs, and high PD-1 levels with absent TILs. Although the low number of samples did not allow us to obtain a statistically significant correlation between the plasma PD-1 levels and the patients' overall survival depending on the absence/presence of TILs, the median survival of patients having brisk type TILs was 5 months higher than that of patients with absent and nonbrisk TILs. CONCLUSIONS: This work highlights the ability of measuring the plasma PD-1 levels in order to predict the prognosis of patients with untreated metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation at the time of diagnosis.

Publisher Correction: The diagnostic accuracy of circulating tumor DNA for the detection of EGFR-T790M mutation in NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has been fixed in the paper.

The diagnostic accuracy of circulating tumor DNA for the detection of EGFR-T790M mutation in NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This pooled analysis aims at evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of circulating tumor (ct) DNA for the detection of EGFR-T790M mutation in NSCLC patients who progressed after EGFR-TKIs. Data from all published studies, reporting both sensitivity and specificity of plasma-based EGFR-T790M mutation testing by ctDNA were collected by searching in PubMed, Cochrane Library, American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society of Medical Oncology and World Conference of Lung Cancer meeting proceedings. A total of twenty-one studies, with 1639 patients, were eligible. The pooled sensitivity of ctDNA analysis was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.64-0.70) and the pooled specificity was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.77-0.83). The pooled positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.87) and the pooled negative predictive value (NPV) was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.56-0.63). The positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were 2.67 (95% CI: 1.86-3.82) and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.38-0.54), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 7.27 (4.39-12.05) and the area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) curve was 0.77. The ctDNA analysis represents a promising, non-invasive approach to detect and monitor the T790M mutation status in NSCLC patients. Development of standardized methodologies and clinical validation are recommended.

Clinical Impact of Cystatin C/Cathepsin L and Follistatin/Activin A Systems in Breast Cancer Progression: A Preliminary Report.

This study was directed to assess the clinical impact of the circulating cathepsin L, cystatin C, activin A, and follistatin in breast cancer patients. The serum concentrations of these molecules were determined by immunoenzymatic assays, and their association with some clinico-pathological parameters of breast cancer progression was evaluated. Our results identified cystatin C and activin A as predictive markers for the presence of breast cancer and bone metastasis, respectively. Therefore, these proteins may have a clinical role as circulating biomarkers in the diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of breast cancer patients.

Lenograstim in preventing chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Neutropenia and its complications represent one of the principal dose-limiting toxicity issues in chemotherapeutic regimens for soft tissue sarcoma. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). The correct timing of G-CSF administration should be considered in order to optimize the prophylactic treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (≥18 years old) affected by soft tissue sarcoma and treated with epirubicin and ifosfamide, underwent prophylactic treatment with G-CSF (lenograstim at 263 µg) from day 5 to day 9. The proportion of patients experiencing FN and G4 neutropenia was considered. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients receiving three cycles of chemotherapy with epirubicin plus ifosfamide were treated. None developed FN; G4 neutropenia was reported in 17% of patients. No treatment delay or dose reduction was required, no antibiotic therapy was administered and no hospitalization occurred. CONCLUSION: Five-day lenograstim treatment is efficient as prophylaxis of FN for soft tissue sarcoma chemotherapy regimens and allows maintenance of chemotherapy dose intensity.

Meaningful cut-off pain intensity for breakthrough pain changes in advanced cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the level of pain intensity at which patients feel the impetus to ask for a breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) medication, and level of pain intensity at which patients consider they have achieved acceptable pain control after receiving a BTcP medication. METHODS: A consecutive sample of patients who were receiving oral morphine equivalents equal to or more than 60 mg daily, and were prescribed rapid onset opioids for the management of episodes of BTcP, were included in the study. Focused educational activities regarding BTcP and numerical scales were established during hospital admission. At discharge patients were interviewed to find out what was the pain intensity level which gave the impetus to take the BTcP medication, what was the pain intensity for acceptable pain control after a BTcP medication had been given, and which factors prevented the patient calling for BTcP medication. A brief COPE (coping orientation to problems experienced) questionnaire was also administered. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were recruited for this study. The meaningful pain intensity for asking for a BTcP medication was 7.1; 77% of patients had a pain intensity of 7-8 on a numerical scale of 0-10. The meaningful pain intensity for adequate analgesia after a BTcP medication was 3.5. Similarly, 77% of patients had a pain intensity of 3-4. There was no relationship with the variables examined. Concerns by patients about the use of BTcP medications were minimal. CONCLUSION: The meaningful BTcP intensity and pain intensity expected after BTcP medication can be useful in selecting patients in studies of BTcP. The principal limitation of this study was the specific setting of an acute unit with specific features and the relatively low number of patients. This observation should be followed up by further surveys with a larger number of patients and different settings.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: guidelines of the Italian Society for Haemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET)(1).

BACKGROUND: Prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients remains controversial in most clinical settings. PURPOSE: The Italian Society for Haemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET) commissioned a project to develop clinical practice guidelines for the prevention of VTE in patients with malignancy. METHODS: Key questions concerning the prevention of VTE in patients with malignancy were formulated by a multidisciplinary working group consisting of experts in clinical medicine and research. After a systematic review and discussion of the literature, recommendations were formulated and graded according to the supporting evidence. For those questions for which the literature search did not find any definitive answers (due to absence of evidence, low quality evidence and/or contradictory evidence), a formal consensus method was used instead to issue clinical recommendations. RESULTS: The search for "VTE prevention" resulted in 1021 citations; 69 articles were selected and 24 were used for drafting clinical recommendations. Four areas were graded A to C: 1) Need of prevention (pharmacological and/or mechanical) in cancer patients undergoing major abdominal or pelvic surgery and in 2) those with an acute medical disease requiring hospitalization and who are bedridden. Avoid prevention in 3) cancer patients with a central venous catheter and 4) those on chemotherapy, radiotherapy or hormonal therapy, except patients with multiple myeloma treated with thalidomide/lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone, and those with gastrointestinal or lung cancer. Six areas were considered to be clinically important, but lacked evidence from the literature and thus required a formal consensus (grade D): 1) need of prevention during chemo- radiotherapy or hormonal therapy in patients with previous VTE; 2) optimal duration of pharmacological prevention in patients who are hospitalized/bedridden for acute medical illness; 3) optimal duration of pharmacological prevention in patients undergoing major surgery other than abdominal and pelvic; 4) optimal duration of pharmacological prevention in myeloma patients receiving thalidomide plus dexamethasone; 5) presence of cerebral metastasis as a contraindication to pharmacological prevention; 6) prevention in cancer patients undergoing surgery by laparoscopic procedures lasting>30min. CONCLUSION: Results of the systematic literature review and an explicit approach to consensus techniques have led to recommendations for the most clinically important issues in the prevention of VTE in cancer patients.

Prognostic vs predictive molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer: is KRAS and BRAF wild type status required for anti-EGFR therapy?

An important molecular target for metastatic CRC treatment is the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Many potential biomarkers predictive of response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab) have been retrospectively evaluated, including EGFR activation markers and EGFR ligands activation markers. With regard to the "negative predictive factors" responsible for primary or intrinsic resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies a lot of data are now available. Among these, KRAS mutations have emerged as a major predictor of resistance to panitumumab or cetuximab in the clinical setting and several studies of patients receiving first and subsequent lines of treatment have shown that those with tumors carrying KRAS mutations do not respond to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies or show any survival benefit from such treatments. The role of B-RAF mutations, mutually exclusive with KRAS mutations, in predicting resistance to anti-EGFR mAbs is not yet consolidated. It therefore appears that BRAF mutations may play a strong negative prognostic role and only a slight role in resistance to anti-EGFR Abs.

Morphine versus oxycodone in pancreatic cancer pain: a randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: According to experimental findings, oxycodone (OX) could have some advantages over morphine (MO) in clinical models of visceral pain. It was hypothesized that OX could have some advantages over MO in terms of efficacy and dose escalation in pancreatic cancer pain. METHODS: Sixty patients with pancreatic cancer with a pain intensity rating of 4/10 who required opioids were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive 30 mg/d of sustained release oral MO or sustained release oral OX (20 mg/d). Opioid doses were increased according to the clinical needs. Daily doses of opioids, pain and symptom intensity were recorded at admission (T0) and at weekly intervals for the subsequent 4 weeks (T1, T2, T3, and T4), with an extension at 8 weeks (T8). Opioid escalation index (OEI) as percentage (OEI %) and in mg (OEI mg) was calculated. RESULTS: Nineteen and 20 patients in groups OX and MO, respectively, were followed for the entire period of study (T4). No differences between groups were found in age (P=0.400), Karnofsky (P=0.667), or escalation indexes at T4 and T8 (OEImg, P=0.945 and OEI %, P=0.295). No statistical differences in pain and symptoms intensity between the groups were observed. CONCLUSION: OX and MO provided similar analgesia and adverse effects with similar escalating doses in patients with pancreatic cancer pain, resembling observations reported in the general cancer pain population. The experimental hypothesis that OX would be superior to MO in the clinical model of pancreatic cancer pain was not confirmed.

Serum follistatin in patients with prostate cancer metastatic to the bone.

The clinical significance of circulating follistatin (FLST), an inhibitor of the multifunctional cytokine activin A (Act A), was investigated in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). The serum concentrations of this molecule were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in PCa patients with (M+) or without (M0) bone metastases, in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and in healthy subjects (HS). The effectiveness of FLST in detecting PCa patients with skeletal metastases was determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Serum FLST was significantly higher in PCa patients than in BPH patients (P = 0.001) or HS (P = 0.011). Conversely, in BPH patients, FLST levels resulted lower than in HS (P = 0.025). In cancer patients the serum concentrations of FLST significantly correlated with the presence of bone metastases (P = 0.0005) or increased PSA levels (P = 0.04). Interestingly, significant differences in the ratio between FLST and Act A serum concentrations (FLST/Act A) were observed between HS and BPH patients (P = 0.001) or PCa patients (P = 0.0005). Finally, ROC curve analysis, highlighted a sound diagnostic performance of FLST in detecting M+ patients (P = 0.0001). However, the diagnostic effectiveness of FLST did not result significantly superior to that of Act A or PSA. These findings suggest that FLST may be regarded as a potential, molecular target in the treatment of metastatic bone disease while its clinical role as soluble marker in the clinical management of PCa patients with bone metastases needs to be better defined.

Bortezomib: a new pro-apoptotic agent in cancer treatment.

Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor. It targets the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway with subsequent inhibition of the degradation of proteins involved in cell cycle regulation and cancer cell survival. The best known molecular mechanism concerns the inhibition of IkappaB breakdown and the related stabilization of NFkappaB, thus preventing its translocation to the nucleus for the activation of downstream pathways. Bortezomib is the only drug in this class which has been approved for clinical use. It has shown an efficient antitumor effect in a phase III clinical trial (APEX) involving relapsed multiple myeloma patients. Response rate, time to progression and overall survival have been improved in patients treated with bortezomib and dexamethasone compared to dexamethasone alone. These results have induced several researchers to suggest preclinical and clinical studies for the application of bortezomib in solid tumors. Preclinical data have proved useful in the identification of several of the biological processes implicated, including cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase, upregulation of p21, apoptosis regulation, microvessel density reduction, overcoming chemotherapy resistance. The clinical results obtained so far with the use of bortezomib in patients with solid malignancies are still not sufficient for the introduction of the drug into clinical practice. Furthermore, the results obtained with the use of bortezomib combined with cytotoxic drugs have not proved any more satisfactory than those obtained with bortezomib used as a single agent. Other preclinical studies are required in order to reach a clearer understanding of the relevance of bortezomib in the therapy of solid tumors.

Minor hepatic resection using heat coagulative necrosis.

Intra- and postoperative bleeding represents an extremely serious and frequent complication of hepatic surgery. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of a radiofrequency (RF) device using heat to cause coagulative necrosis of the hepatic parenchyma to control hemostasis in minor hepatic resection. Between December 2005 and November 2007, a study was conducted of 21 patients undergoing 22 hepatic resections with the RF-assisted technique. Sixteen of these were affected by hepatocellular carcinoma and five had liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Intraoperative blood loss, the need for blood transfusion, the complication rates, operating times, and the duration of postoperative hospitalization were evaluated. Four segmentectomies and 18 tumor-ectomies were performed. The average blood loss was of 15.7 mL (range, 0-40 mL); the average operating time was 25.7 minutes (range, 12-43 minutes); the mean postoperative hospital stay was 8.2 days (range, 3-49 days) with a median of 6.0 days. The authors concluded that the RF-assisted technique can be a useful method not only for reducing blood loss and avoiding blood transfusions, but also for reducing operating time and postoperative hospitalization for minor liver resections.

Treatment strategies for cancer patients with breakthrough pain.

BACKGROUND: Breakthrough pain (BTP) is a transitory flare of pain superimposed on an otherwise stable pain pattern in patients treated with opioids. It is normally severe in intensity, has a rapid onset, has a variable duration (on average 30 min) and is considered a negative prognostic factor. OBJECTIVE: To verify the data in the literature about therapy strategies for BTP in cancer patients. METHODS: To find clinical trials investigating drug therapy for BTP. CONCLUSION: The treatment of BTP in cancer patients receiving opioids is principally based on the use of opioids, preferentially with a short onset. Fentanyl delivered by recently developed systems seems to be the best option to cover the temporal pattern of BTP, although the treatment should be highly personalized to provide the best in individuals, balancing patients' preferences and clinical needs. The doses to be administered is still a matter of controversy in the literature; additional studies with specific designs should be conducted to settle the question.

Gemcitabine-based doublets versus single-agent therapy for elderly patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: a Literature-based Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: : Although platinum-based combinations are considered the best option of care for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), single-agent therapy is the preferred treatment for older patients. Since the late 1990s, various combinations of third-generation agents (gemcitabine [G], vinorelbine, docetaxel, and paclitaxel) have been tested, yielding contradictory results. The authors of this report performed a literature-based meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and tolerability of G-based doublets compared with single-agent chemotherapy for elderly patients with NSCLC. METHODS: : Data from all published, randomized, phase 3 trials that compared a G-based doublet with a third-generation single agent in elderly patients were collected from electronic databases (Medline and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), relevant reference lists, and abstract books. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for the 1-year survival rate, the overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3 and 4 toxicities. RESULTS: : Four eligible trials (1436 patients) were selected from 442 studies that initially were identified. A significant difference in ORR favoring G-based doublets over single agents was observed (OR, 0.65; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.51-0.82 [P < .001]), whereas the trend toward an improved 1-year survival rate was not significant (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57-1.06 [P = .169]). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities did not differ significantly except for thrombocytopenia (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.12-2.76 [P = .014]). CONCLUSIONS: : G-based doublets appeared to be effective and feasible compared with single agents in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC who were not suitable for full-dose, platinum-based chemotherapy. Further prospective, elderly specific, phase 3 trials will be necessary. Cancer 2009. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.