Need for syndesmotic fixation and assessment of reduction during ankle fracture fixation, with and without contralateral fluoroscopic images, has poor interobserver reliability.

PURPOSE: To determine the interobserver reliability of syndesmosis assessment using intraoperative ankle mortise fluoroscopic images, with and without contralateral images. METHODS: A survey of 19 operative ankle fracture cases was administered to 17 orthopedic surgeons. Respondents were presented with fluoroscopic mortise and stress images of the ankle after fracture fixation and asked if they would fix the syndesmosis. Final fluoroscopic mortise images were then shown, and respondents were asked to assess the reduction of the syndesmosis. Six weeks later, the survey was administered again with the addition of contralateral fluoroscopic ankle mortise images. Responses were compared to a standard response agreed upon by fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability for syndesmosis fixation and reduction, with and without contralateral images, was considered weak (kappa 0.48 and 0.43; mean difference 0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.1) and minimal (kappa 0.25 and 0.22; mean difference 0.02, CI - 0.02 to 0.08). With the addition of contralateral mortise images, the number of surgeons who changed their response for syndesmosis fixation and reduction quality ranged from 0% to 41% and 0% to 88%; with the number of responses matching the standard increasing for both fixation (proportional difference (PD) 7%, CI 1% to 14%) and reduction (PD 14%, CI 7% to 21%); CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver reliability of syndesmosis fixation and reduction remained weak to minimal between surgeons, with and without contralateral images. Future studies are necessary to understand the variability in surgeon responses in order to improve the intraoperative assessment and fixation of syndesmotic injuries.

Size and location of posterior wall fragment on CT can predict hip instability in a cadaveric model.

PURPOSE: Previous research has been unable to elucidate the exact factors that contribute to hip instability in the setting of posterior wall acetabular fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of posterior wall fracture fragment size and fracture angle on the stability of the hip joint in a cadaveric model. METHODS: Six fresh human cadavers (12 hips) were used. Specimens underwent pre-procedure CT evaluation and were then randomized to one of three groups: posterior wall fragment size (FS) of 15%, 20% and 25%. Osteotomies were performed starting at a fracture angle (FA) of 40°. The specimens underwent an exam under anesthesia (EUA). If the hip remained stable, the fracture angle was increased in 20° increments and re-tested until it became unstable. RESULTS: In the group with a FS of 15%, all hips were stable with a FA of 40°. Increasing the FA to 60° caused all hips to be unstable (subluxation or dislocation). In the group with a FS of 20% and 25%, all hips were unstable with a FA of 40°. CONCLUSION: In all specimens, a FS of 15% and FA of 40° were stable on EUA. Varying combinations of increasing FS size and increasing FA were all unstable. This study provides data for a CT-based measurement to predict hip instability in the setting of posterior wall acetabular fractures based on FS and FA. More research is required to validate this data in a clinical setting.

Comparison of iliac crest versus supraacetabular external fixator in hemodynamically unstable patients with a pelvic ring injury.

PURPOSE: External fixation has been widely implemented as a resuscitation strategy in combination with pelvic packing for high energy, hemodynamically unstable, pelvic ring injuries. The primary aim of this study is to compare urgent iliac crest (IC) versus supraacetabular (SA) external fixation in the setting of haemodynamic instability. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a prospectively gathered registry at an urban level one trauma centre comparing placement of pelvic external fixator by SA or IC technique. Outcomes assessed were accuracy of pin placement, duration of procedure, and the effect on true pelvic circumference depending on type of fracture by Young and Burgess Classification system. RESULTS: Ninety-three haemodynamically unstable patients with a pelvic fracture included. Pin malpositioning was more common with IC than SA groups (proportional difference, - 40%; 95% CI, - 57 to - 20%; p < 0.0001). For APC injuries, there was a larger median reduction in pelvic circumference in the SA group than the IC group (median difference [MD], - 12.85 cm; 95% CI, - 27 to 0.1; p = 0.0485). In LC injuries, the SA group had an overall increase in pelvic circumference compared to an overall decrease in IC group (MD, 6.5 cm; 95% CI, 1.5 to 16.8; p = 0.0221). There was no difference in the operating room (OR) time (mean difference, - 5.4 min; 95% CI, - 32 to 22; p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical setting, we recommend placement of SA external fixator (versus IC) with similar operative times, fewer pin malpositions, and improved stabilization of pelvic circumference in APC and LC injuries.

Mobilization versus displacement on lateral stress radiographs for determining operative fixation of minimally displaced lateral compression type I (LC1) pelvic ring injuries.

PURPOSE: Operative fixation of minimally displaced lateral compression type I (LC1) pelvic ring injuries is considered by some if the patient is unable to mobilize or displacement is seen on stress radiographs. The purpose of this study was to compare these methods of determining operative fixation. METHODS: A retrospective study of a prospectively gathered registry of LC1 injuries was performed before and after the adoption of a mobilization protocol. Fixation was considered if the patient was unable to mobilize 15 feet on the second day of admission. Prior to this protocol, all patients with displacement of ≥ 10 mm on stress radiographs were offered fixation. All patients received lateral stress radiographs (LSR), an anteroposterior pelvis radiograph in the lateral decubitus positions without sedation, to assess stability. RESULTS: There were 21 and 18 patients treated under the stress radiograph and mobilization protocols. Displacement ≥ 10 mm was present in 12 (57%) and six (33%) patients in the LSR and mobilization groups. Under the mobilization protocol, patients with ≥ 10 mm of displacement on LSR all had incomplete sacral fractures and were less likely to mobilize (2 (33%) vs. 11 (92%); 95% confidence interval of the difference (CID) - 86 to - 9%). The mobilization protocol did not identify all cases of occult instability and resulted in an increased time to surgery compared to the LSR protocol (5 vs. 2 days, 95% CID 1 to 5). CONCLUSION: Under the mobilization protocol, unstable LC1 injuries were less likely to mobilize and the time to surgery was increased.

An international survey of pelvic trauma surgeons on the management of pelvic ring injuries.

INTRODUCTION: There exists substantial variability in the management of pelvic ring injuries among pelvic trauma surgeons. The objective of this study was to perform a comprehensive survey on the management of pelvic ring injuries among an international group of pelvic trauma surgeons to determine areas of agreement and disagreement. METHODS: A 45-item questionnaire was developed using an online survey platform and distributed to 30 international pelvic trauma surgeons. The survey consisted of general questions on the acute management of pelvic ring injuries and questions regarding 5 cases: Lateral compression (LC) type 1 injury, LC-3, Anterior-posterior compression (APC) type 3 injury, a combined vertical shear (VS) injury through the sacrum, and VS injury through sacroiliac joint. Respondents were shown blinded anteroposterior pelvis radiographs and axial computed tomography (CT) images for each case and asked if the injury needed fixation, the type of fixation, the order of fixation, and postoperative weight-bearing status. The Kappa statistic was calculated to assess agreement between respondents for each question. RESULTS: Nineteen out of 30 pelvic trauma surgeons completed the survey. Respondents practiced in Brazil (n = 1), Germany (n = 1), India (n = 1), Italy (n = 1) United Kingdom (n = 1), and the United States (n = 14). Of the 45 questions in this survey, 38 (84%) had minimal to no agreement among the respondents. There was moderate agreement, for performing lumbopelvic fixation when indicated, for anterior and posterior fixation of the LC-3 injury, and on forgoing EUA or stress X-rays for the APC-3 injury. There was strong agreement for open reduction and internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring in the APC-3 injury and the VS injury through the SI joint. In contrast, LC-1 injury and combined VS pelvic ring injury through the sacrum had no areas of moderate to strong agreement. DISCUSSION: This study identified specific areas of pelvic ring injury management with minimal to no agreement among pelvic trauma surgeons. Future research should target these areas with a lack of agreement to decrease practice variability and improve patient outcomes.

Psychological outcomes affect functional outcomes in patients with severe pelvic ring fractures.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between post-traumatic functional and psychological outcomes in patients with severe pelvic ring injuries. METHODS: Forty-four patients who sustained a completely unstable pelvic ring injury (Tile C, AO/OTA 61C) treated in our institution from 2012 to 2017 were included. A telephone interview was performed in 16 of 44 patients to evaluate pelvic functionality, using the Majeed pelvic score, and psychological evaluation, using Hamilton anxiety and depression rating scales. RESULTS: The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 27 ± 12, and mean GCS at presentation was 13 ± 4. Average time from trauma to interview was 3 years (range, 1-5 years). Mean Majeed pelvic score was 67 ± 22. Majeed sub-scores were pain 19 ± 9, work 10 ± 7, sitting 8 ± 2, sexual intercourse 3 ± 2, walking aids 11 ± 2, gait unaided 9 ± 2, walking distance 8 ± 3. Mean depression and anxiety scores were 16 ± 12 and 17 ± 14, respectively. Significant correlations were observed between functional and psychological outcomes (P < 0.005). Majeed score was negatively correlated with depressive symptoms (r = -0.721, P = 0.002) and anxiety symptoms (r = -0.756, P = 0.001). Depression and anxiety scores were positively correlated (r = 0.945, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Lower functional outcomes in patients with Tile C pelvic injuries were correlated with more severe symptoms of depression and anxiety. We recommend that providers consider and treat patients' mental health condition during posttraumatic recovery.

Complications and Readmissions After Total Knee Replacement in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians.

INTRODUCTION: From 2000 to 2010, the cohort of patients aged 85 to 94 years had the fastest growth rate increasing in size by approximately 30%. The need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continues to increase with a larger percentage of patients older than 80 years requiring TKA. The purpose of our study was to examine the rate and risks of 30-day complications and unplanned readmission in patients older than 80 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database for the years 2008 to 2014 was queried for patients older than 80 years undergoing TKA. The risks of major complications, minor complications, bleeding occurrences, unplanned readmissions, and deaths over a 30-day period were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 12 026 patients were included for analysis. In all, 422 (3.5%) experienced a major complication, 2316 (19.3%) experienced a minor complication, 2074 (17.2%) had a bleeding occurrence requiring transfusion, and 566 (4.7%) experienced an unplanned readmission. Thirty-eight (0.3%) deaths were recorded. There were no significant risk factors for major complications. Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) >2 (odds ratio [OR]: 1.43 [1.239-1.651]), patients older than 84 years (OR: 1.240 [1.072-1.434]), and patients receiving general anesthesia (OR: 1.191 [1.035-1.370]) had increased risks of minor complications. Patients with a body mass index >30 (OR: 0.640 [0.532-0.770]) and men (OR: 0.815 [0.706-0.941]) had reduced rates of minor complications. Increased risk of unplanned readmission occurred in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 1.694 [1.007-2.850]) and congestive heart failure (OR: 3.030 [1.121-8.192]). Increased risk of death was seen in patients with an ASA >2 (OR: 8.9 [1.144-69.82]). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Elderly patients undergoing TKA have high complication and readmission rates. Surgeons should convey these increased risk factors and rates of complications in elective TKAs to their elderly patients and work with primary care physicians to mitigate these risks.