Radiotherapy Quality Assurance in the PORTEC-3 (TROG 08.04) Trial.

AIMS: Quality assurance in radiotherapy (QART) is essential to ensure the scientific integrity of a clinical trial. This paper reports the findings of the retrospective QART assessment for all centres that participated in PORTEC-3; a randomised controlled trial that compared pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy to the pelvis followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The trial showed an overall survival benefit for the addition of the chemotherapy in the management of women with high-risk endometrial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinicians were invited to upload a randomly selected case/s treated at each of the participating sites. Panel reviewers analysed the contours to certify that the target volumes and organ at risk structures were contoured according to guidelines. The results were categorised into acceptable, minor variation, major variation or unevaluable. The radiotherapy plans were dosimetrically evaluated using the well-established Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) protocol. RESULTS: Between August 2010 and January 2018, data from 146 patients of 686 consecutively treated patients were retrospectively reviewed. All 16 Australia and New Zealand and 71 of 77 international centres uploaded data for evaluation. In total, 3514 dosimetric and contour variables were reviewed. Of these, 3136 variables were deemed acceptable (89.2%), with 335 minor (9.6%) and 43 major variations (1.2%). Major contour variations included the clinical target volume vaginal vault, clinical target volume parametria and differential planning target volume vault expansion. CONCLUSION: The results of the QART assessment confirmed high uniformity and low rates of both minor and major deviations in contouring and dosimetry in all sites. This supports the safe introduction of the PORTEC-3 treatment protocol into routine clinical practice.

Personalizing post-treatment cancer care: a cross-sectional survey of the needs and preferences of well survivors of breast cancer.

Background: Improved treatments resulting in a rising number of survivors of breast cancer (bca) calls for optimization of current specialist-based follow-up care. In the present study, we evaluated well survivors of bca with respect to their supportive care needs and attitudes toward follow-up with various care providers, in varying settings, or mediated by technology (for example, videoconference or e-mail). Methods: A cross-sectional paper survey of well survivors of early-stage pT1-2N0 bca undergoing posttreatment follow-up was completed. Descriptive and univariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine associations between survivor characteristics, supportive care needs, and perceived satisfaction with follow-up options. Qualitative responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: The 190 well survivors of bca who participated (79% response rate) had an average age of 63 ± 10 years. Median time since first follow-up was 21 months. Most had high perceived satisfaction with in-person specialist care (96%, 177 of 185). The second most accepted model was shared care involving specialist and primary care provider follow-up (54%, 102 of 190). Other models received less than 50% perceived satisfaction. Factors associated with higher perceived satisfaction with non-specialist care or virtual follow-up by a specialist included less formal education (p < 0.01) and more met supportive care needs (p < 0.05). Concerns with virtual follow-up included the perceived impersonal nature of virtual care, potential for inadequate care, and confidentiality. Conclusions: Well survivors of bca want specialists involved in their follow-up care. Compared with virtual follow-up, in-person follow-up is perceived as more reassuring. Certain survivor characteristics (for example, met supportive care needs) might signal survivor readiness for virtual or non-specialist follow-up. Future work should examine multi-stakeholder perspectives about barriers to and facilitators of shared multimodal follow-up care.

Outcomes in Patients Treated with Post-mastectomy Chest Wall Radiotherapy without the Routine Use of Bolus.

AIMS: The use of bolus in post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) varies significantly between institutions. We report on chest wall recurrence and acute toxicity rates for PMRT patients treated with selective use of bolus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed PMRT patients who received adjuvant chest wall radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer between 2004 and 2009. Patient, tumour and cancer outcomes were collected from a prospective database, with additional radiotherapy and acute toxicity details supplemented retrospectively. Chest wall bolus was reserved for patients considered at high risk of local recurrence. RESULTS: There were 314 patients suitable for analysis: 52 received bolus, 262 did not. The mean age was 53.2 years. The median follow-up was 4.2 years. The most common T stage was T2 (37%), followed by T3/T4 (33%). There were 229 patients (73%) who had N+ disease; 213 (68%) patients had grade 3 cancer. Oestrogen receptor was positive in 176 (56%) cases, progesterone receptor was positive in 134 (43%) and HER2 receptor was positive in 24 (8%). Lymphovascular space invasion was present in 146 patients (46%), dermal invasion in 30 patients (10%) and positive margin in 14 patients (4%). The 4 year chest wall recurrence rate was 14% (95% confidence interval 5.4-26.8%) in the bolus group and only 3.5% (95% confidence interval 1.6-6.4%) in the non-bolus group. On univariate analysis, use of bolus was associated with a significant difference in chest wall recurrence (hazard ratio 3.09; 1.15-8.33; P = 0.025). However, when taking into account margin status, this significance was lost (hazard ratio = 2.45; 95% confidence interval 0.80-7.50, P = 0.12). There was a higher rate of acute grade 2 skin toxicity in patients receiving bolus compared with those without, 40% versus 21% (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The selective use of bolus resulted in a small risk of chest wall recurrence rates for low-risk patients. This suggests that the routine use of bolus in PMRT patients may be unnecessary.

Prognostic Significance of Human Papilloma Virus and p16 Expression in Patients with Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma who Received Radiotherapy.

AIMS: Human papilloma virus (HPV) has been identified as an aetiological agent in a subset of patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). The prognostic role of HPV status in VSCC patients treated with radiotherapy has not yet been determined. We investigated the associations between HPV, p16 and clinical outcome in these women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing potentially curative radiation treatment for VSCC at a single institution from 2000 to 2009 were retrospectively identified. Those who received definitive or peri-operative radiotherapy as part of treatment, and who had available pathological specimens, were included for analysis. HPV infection was detected using Roche Linear array hybridisation and p16 by immunohistochemistry. The locoregional relapse (LRR) rate was estimated using a cumulative incidence function to account for competing risks. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median follow-up was 4.9 years. RESULTS: Forty patients were suitable for analysis, with a median age of 69.5 years. HPV was detected in 14/40 (35%) patients, HPV16 being the most common serotype (79%). Patients with HPV-positive tumours had lower 5 year LRR compared with those with HPV-negative tumours (14.3% versus 79.3%, Gray test P = 0.003). Tumour p16 positivity was also associated with lower 5 year LRR (15.4% versus 81.2%, Gray test P = 0.002). Patients with p16-positive tumours had higher 5 year DFS compared with those with p16-negative tumours (62% versus 7%, Log-rank test P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a favourable prognostic group in VSCC, with p16-positive patients showing improved outcomes. p16 has the potential to be a predictive marker allowing the identification of women more likely to have a favourable response to radiotherapy.

Clinical consequences of upfront pathology review in the randomised PORTEC-3 trial for high-risk endometrial cancer.

Background: In the PORTEC-3 trial, women with high-risk endometrial cancer (HR-EC) were randomised to receive pelvic radiotherapy (RT) with or without concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy (two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m2 in weeks 1 and 4 of RT, followed by four cycles of carboplatin AUC5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2). Pathology review was required before patient enrolment. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the role of central pathology review before randomisation. Patients and methods: A total of 1295 cases underwent pathology review to confirm HR-EC in the Netherlands (n = 395) and the UK (n = 900), and for 1226/1295 (95%) matching review and original reports were available. In total, 329 of these patients were enrolled in the PORTEC-3 trial: 145 in the Netherlands and 184 in the UK, comprising 48% of the total PORTEC-3 cohort of 686 participants. Areas of discrepancies were evaluated, and inter-observer agreement between original and review opinion was evaluated by calculating the kappa value (κ). Results: In the 1226 pathology reviews, 6356 selected items were evaluable for both original and review pathology. In 43% of cases at least one pathology item changed after review. For 102 patients (8%), this discrepancy led to ineligibility for the PORTEC-3 trial, most frequently due to differences in the assessment of histological type (34%), endocervical stromal involvement (27%) and histological grade (19%). Lowest inter-observer agreement was found for histological type (κ = 0.72), lymph-vascular space invasion (κ = 0.72) and histological grade (κ = 0.70). Conclusion: Central pathology review by expert gynaeco-pathologists changed histological type, grade or other items in 43% of women with HR-EC, leading to ineligibility for the PORTEC-3 trial in 8%. Upfront pathology review is essential to ensure enrolment of the target trial-population, and to avoid over- or undertreatment, especially when treatment modalities with substantial toxicity are involved. This study is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN14387080, www.controlled-trials.com) and with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00411138).

A multi-institutional analysis of intraoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer: Does age matter?

BACKGROUND: Single-session intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) minimizes treatment demands associated with traditional whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) but outcomes on local disease control and morbidity among the elderly is limited. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective registry was established from 19 centers utilizing IORT from 2007 to 2013. Patient, tumor, and treatment variables were analyzed for ages <70 and ≥70. RESULTS: We evaluated 686 patients (<70 = 424; ≥70 = 262) who were margin and lymph node negative. Patients <70 were more likely to have longer operative time, oncoplastic closure, higher rates of IORT used as planned boost, and receive chemotherapy and post-operative WBRT. Wound complication rates were low and not significantly different between age groups. Median follow-up was 1.06 (range 0.51-1.9) years for < 70 and 1.01 (range 0.5-1.68) years for ≥ 70. There were 5 (0.73%) breast recurrences (4 in <70 and 1 ≥ 70, p = 0.65) and no axillary recurrences during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: IORT was associated with a low rate of wound complication and local recurrence on short-term follow-up in this cohort.

Building a New Model of Care for Rapid Breast Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation of the Advanced Practice Radiation Therapist in Cavity Delineation.

AIMS: Breast radiotherapy treatment is commonly managed by a multidisciplinary team to ensure optimal delivery of care. We sought a new model of care whereby a clinical specialist radiation therapist (CSRT) delineates the cavity target for whole breast radiotherapy treatment planning and the radiation oncologist validates the contour during final plan review. This study evaluated the radiation oncologist's acceptance of these contours and identified characteristics of cavities suitable for CSRT-directed contouring. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following specialised breast oncology education and training by the radiation oncologist, the CSRT prospectively delineated cavities in 30 tangential breast radiotherapy cases and consulted the radiation oncologist in 'complex' cases but directed 'non-complex' cases for treatment planning. Changes to CSRT contours were evaluated using the conformity index. Breast density, time since surgery and cavity location, size and visualisation score [CVS: range 1 (no visible cavity) to 5 (homogenous cavity)] were captured. RESULTS: Of the 30 CSRT delineated cavities contours, the CSRT directed 20 (66.7%) cases for planning without radiation oncology review; 19 were accepted (without changes) by the radiation oncologist upon final plan review and one was changed by the radiation oncologist (conformity index = 0.93) for boost treatment and did not affect the tangential treatment plan. Ten (33.3%) cases, all CVS ≤ 3, were reviewed with the radiation oncologist before planning (conformity index = 0.88 ± 0.12). CVS was inversely correlated with breast density and cavity size (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The CSRT delineated cavities appropriate for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning in women with well-visualised cavities, whereas 'complex' cases with dense breast parenchyma, CVS ≤ 3, and/or cases needing boost radiotherapy treatment required review with the radiation oncologist before planning.

Omission of Breast Radiotherapy in Low-risk Luminal A Breast Cancer: Impact on Health Care Costs.

AIMS: The economic burden of cancer care is substantial, including steep increases in costs for breast cancer management. There is mounting evidence that women age ≥ 60 years with grade I/II T1N0 luminal A (ER/PR+, HER2- and Ki67 ≤ 13%) breast cancer have such low local recurrence rates that adjuvant breast radiotherapy might offer limited value. We aimed to determine the total savings to a publicly funded health care system should omission of radiotherapy become standard of care for these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The number of women aged ≥ 60 years who received adjuvant radiotherapy for T1N0 ER+ HER2- breast cancer in Ontario was obtained from the provincial cancer agency. The cost of adjuvant breast radiotherapy was estimated through activity-based costing from a public payer perspective. The total saving was calculated by multiplying the estimated number of luminal A cases that received radiotherapy by the cost of radiotherapy minus Ki-67 testing. RESULTS: In 2010, 748 women age ≥ 60 years underwent surgery for pT1N0 ER+ HER2- breast cancer; 539 (72%) underwent adjuvant radiotherapy, of whom 329 were estimated to be grade I/II luminal A subtype. The cost of adjuvant breast radiotherapy per case was estimated at $6135.85; the cost of Ki-67 at $114.71. This translated into an annual saving of about $2.0million if radiotherapy was omitted for all low-risk luminal A breast cancer patients in Ontario and $5.1million across Canada. CONCLUSION: There will be significant savings to the health care system should omission of radiotherapy become standard practice for women with low-risk luminal A breast cancer.

Follow-up for cervical cancer: a Program in Evidence-Based Care systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Program in Evidence-based Care (pebc) of Cancer Care Ontario published a guideline on the follow-up of cervical cancer. In 2014, the pebc undertook an update of the systematic review and clinical practice guideline for women in this target population. METHODS: The literature from 2007 to August 2014 was searched using medline and embase [extended to 2000 for studies of human papillomavirus (hpv) dna testing]. Outcomes of interest were measures of survival, diagnostic accuracy, and quality of life. A working group evaluated the need for changes to the earlier guidelines and incorporated comments and feedback from internal and external reviewers. RESULTS: One systematic review and six individual studies were included. The working group concluded that the new evidence did not warrant changes to the 2009 recommendations, although hpv dna testing was added as a potentially more sensitive method of detecting recurrence in patients treated with radiotherapy. Comments from internal and external reviewers were incorporated. RECOMMENDATIONS SUMMARY: Follow-up care after primary treatment should be conducted and coordinated by a physician experienced in the surveillance of cancer patients. A reasonable follow-up strategy involves visits every 3-4 months within the first 2 years, and every 6-12 months during years 3-5. Visits should include a patient history and complete physical examination, with elicitation of relevant symptoms. Vaginal vault cytology examination should not be performed more frequently than annually. Combined positron-emission tomography and computed tomography, other imaging, and biomarker evaluation are not advocated; hpv dna testing could be useful as a method of detection of recurrence after radiotherapy. General recommendations for follow-up after 5 years are also provided.

The role of elective para-aortic lymph node irradiation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

AIMS: Pelvic lymph node positivity in cervical cancer is known to be an adverse prognostic factor and is associated with an elevated risk of clinically occult para-aortic lymph node metastases. The purpose of this study was to examine the benefit of elective para-aortic lymph node radiotherapy (PART) in patients with no clinical or radiographic evidence of para-aortic lymph node metastases receiving concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin for cervical cancer from 1999 to 2009 were identified in two prospective databases. All patients received external beam pelvic radiotherapy (PRT) to a median dose of 50 Gy concurrently with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m(2). This was followed by pulse dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy to a median dose of 40 Gy. Patients at high risk of occult para-aortic metastases also received PART to a median dose of 40 Gy. RESULTS: There were 228 patients suitable for analysis; the median follow-up was 4.6 years. The addition of PART to PRT was not associated with a significant difference in disease-free survival (hazard ratio 1.1, confidence interval 0.7-1.8, P = 0.75) or overall survival (hazard ratio 1.6, confidence interval 0.9-2.7, P = 0.11) on multivariate analysis. There was no significant difference in the rate of para-aortic relapse with PART versus PRT (hazard ratio 2.01, confidence interval 0.79-5.12, P = 0.14). The 3 year grade 3-4 late toxicities were 11% for the PART group versus 8% for PRT (hazard ratio 1.39, confidence interval 0.58-3.37, P = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that cervical cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin do not benefit from elective PART.

Tumor factors predictive of response to hypofractionated radiotherapy in a randomized trial following breast conserving therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine whether tumor grade, molecular subtype and hypoxia predict response to hypofractionated versus standard radiotherapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for node-negative breast cancer in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor blocks were available on 989 of 1234 patients enrolled in the Hypofractionation Whole Breast Irradiation (HWBI) Trial. A central pathology review and assessment of tumor grade using the Nottingham grading system was carried out. Tumors were classified by molecular subtype as luminal A, luminal B, HER2 enriched, basal-like or unclassified using a six-biomarker panel; ER, PR, HER-2, Ki67, CK5/6 and EGFR. Tumors were also classified as hypoxic based on the expression of HIF1α, CAIX or GLUT-1. The primary end point was local recurrence (LR). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 12 years. In the multivariable Cox model, molecular subtype was the only factor predictive of LR, the 10-year cumulative incidence was 4.5% for luminal A and basal-like, 7.9% for luminal B and 16.9% for HER-2 enriched tumors (P < 0.01). Tumor grade, molecular subtype or hypoxia did not predict response to hypofractionation. CONCLUSIONS: In women enrolled in the HWBI trial following BCS tumor molecular subtype predicted LR. However tumor grade, molecular subtype and hypoxia did not predict response to hypofractionation suggesting that patients with node-negative breast tumors of all grades and molecular subtypes may be safely treated with hypofractionated RT regimens.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of gynaecological cancers.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a newer method of radiotherapy that uses intensity-modulated beams that can provide multiple intensity levels for any single beam direction and any single source position allowing concave dose distributions and dose gradients with narrower margins than those possible using conventional methods. IMRT is ideal for treating complex treatment volumes and avoiding close proximity organs at risk that may be dose limiting and provides increased tumour control through an escalated dose and reduces normal tissue complications through organ at risk sparing. Given the potential advantages of IMRT and the availability of IMRT-enabled treatment planning systems and linear accelerators, IMRT has been introduced in a number of disease sites. This systematic review examined the evidence for IMRT in the treatment of gynaecological cancers to quantify the potential benefits of this new technology and to make recommendations for radiation treatment programmes considering adopting this technique. Findings were based on a review of four cohort studies, one of which was prospective, including a total of 619 patients. If reducing acute and chronic toxicity are the main outcomes of interest, then IMRT may be considered over three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for women with gynaecological cancers; if disease-related outcomes are the main outcomes of interest, there are insufficient data to recommend IMRT over three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Future research should focus on prospective multicentre studies reporting on both acute and chronic toxicity as well as survival and recurrence. Dose escalation studies should be carried out to investigate the effect of higher doses on disease.

A hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen (0-7-21) for advanced gynaecological cancer patients.

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of a palliative three fraction radiation regimen delivered on days 0, 7 and 21 (0-7-21 regimen) for advanced stage gynaecological cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients with advanced gynaecological cancer who were treated with the 0-7-21 regimen between 1998 and 2008 were identified. The median follow-up period was 1.4 months (range 0.2-33.4). Treatment completion data, symptomatic response, toxicity and survival were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients received at least two of the three planned fractions. Complete and partial responses of vaginal bleeding were seen in 92% of 26 evaluable patients. Complete and partial responses of pain were seen in 76% of 25 evaluable patients. Eighteen of the 33 evaluable patients experienced grade 1/2 acute toxicity. No patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicity. Grade 1/2 and grade 3 late toxicity occurred in four and one of 12 evaluable patients, respectively. Grade 5 toxicity was assigned in two patients. It was uncertain whether these deaths were radiation related or due to tumour progression. Eleven patients survived longer than 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The 0-7-21 regimen provided effective and rapid symptomatic relief with acceptable toxicity, and offered the advantage of convenience for most patients. It offers an alternate treatment option for carefully selected patients with incurable gynaecological malignancies.

Follow-up for women after treatment for cervical cancer.

QUESTION: What is the most appropriate follow-up strategy for patients with cervical cancer who are clinically disease-free after receiving primary treatment? PERSPECTIVES: For women with cervical cancer who have been treated with curative intent, follow-up includes identification of complications related to treatment and intervention in the event of recurrent disease. Most women who recur with cervical cancer are not curable; however, early identification of recurrence can alter disease management or treatment-planning options, and for those with a central pelvic recurrence and no evidence of distant disease, there is a potential for cure with additional therapy. Follow-up protocols in this population are variable, using a number of tests at a variety of intervals with questionable outcomes. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest included recurrence, survival, and quality of life. METHODOLOGY: The Gynecology Cancer Disease Site Group (DSG) conducted a systematic review of the literature and a narrative review of emerging clinical issues to inform the most appropriate follow-up strategy for patients with cervical cancer. The evidence was insufficient to specify a clinically useful recommended follow-up schedule, and therefore, the expert consensus opinion of the Gynecology Cancer DSG was used to develop recommendations on patient surveillance. The resulting recommendations were reviewed and approved by the Gynecology Cancer DSG and by the Program in Evidence-Based Care Report Approval Panel. An external review by Ontario practitioners completed the final phase of the review process. Feedback from all parties was incorporated to create the final practice guideline. RESULTS: The systematic review of the literature identified seventeen retrospective studies. The Gynecology Cancer DSG used a consensus process to develop recommendations based on the available evidence from the systematic review, the narrative review, and the collective clinical experience and judgment of the DSG members. PRACTICE GUIDELINE: The recommendations in this practice guideline are based on the expert consensus opinion of the Gynecology Cancer DSG, informed by evidence from retrospective studies. These are some general features of an appropriate follow-up strategy: 1. At a minimum, follow-up visits with a complete physical examination, including a pelvic-rectal exam and a patient history, should be conducted by a physician experienced in the surveillance of cancer patients. 2. There is little evidence to suggest that vaginal vault cytology adds significantly to the clinical exam in detecting early disease recurrence. 3. Routine use of various other radiologic or biologic follow-up investigations in asymptomatic patients is not advocated, because the role of those investigations has yet to be evaluated in a definitive manner. 4. A reasonable follow-up schedule involves follow-up visits every 3-4 months in the first 2 years and every 6-12 months in years 3-5. Patients should return to annual population-based general physical and pelvic examinations after 5 years of recurrence-free follow-up.

Molecular targeted agents combined with chemo-radiation in the treatment of locally advanced cervix cancer.

Despite improvements in survival after the introduction of chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) in the treatment of patients with cervical cancer, loco-regional control of this disease continues to be a major problem. The present article reviews current and emerging therapeutic strategies combining CRT with novel molecular agents that specifically target the abnormal tumor microenvironment, with the aim of improving local control and survival in patients with locally advanced cervix cancer. The evidence supporting the biological rational to combine novel non-cytotoxic agents with CRT is strong, and drugs targeting different molecular pathways are currently under clinical development (EGFR inhibitors, COX-2 inhibitors, hypoxia targeted agents, etc). Early pre-clinical and clinical strategies also favor the use of vascular-targeted agents with the aim to normalize the abnormal tumor vasculature, increase tumor oxygenation, and reduce interstitial fluid pressure (IFP). The integration of these novel targeted therapies with CRT in clinical trials is discussed, as well as new and promising biomarkers to test drug activity.

Uterine papillary serous carcinoma: evaluation of multimodality treatment with abdominopelvic radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

The aim of this study was to compare overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and relapse patterns between different modalities of treatment for uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC). A retrospective review of 124 patients with pathologically confirmed UPSC was performed, of whom, 97 patients were eligible for study. Postoperative treatment groups included adjuvant radiotherapy consisting of whole abdomen and a pelvic boost (abdominopelvic radiotherapy [APRT]) (55 patients), paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy (CT) for six cycles followed by APRT (18 patients), CT only (5 patients), and 19 patients were observed without postoperative adjuvant therapy. Three-year OS was 81% and 63% for the CT followed by APRT and APRT alone, respectively (P= 0.11). After controlling for stage, the group treated with APRT alone had significantly decreased OS and PFS compared to the CT/APRT group (HR 3.6; 1.3-9.8; P= 0.01) and (HR 2.9; 95% CI 1.1-7.3; P= 0.03), respectively. Within the limitations of a retrospective study, the results of this study indicate that multimodality postoperative treatment with paclitaxel and a platinum-based CT followed by APRT may increase the survival of patients with UPSC. However, further prospective studies using these combined modalities are needed to confirm these findings.

The psychosocial impact of cervical cancer among affected women and their partners.

This study aimed to assess the range and intensity of psychosocial concerns experienced by women with cervical cancer and their male partners. A cross-sectional survey assessed 26 couples where the woman had invasive cervical cancer stage I-IV, up to 2 years posttreatment, using a concerns questionnaire and widely used psychosocial questionnaires. Respondents indicated their concerns about the impact of the disease and treatment as well as general psychosocial impact. Women with cervical cancer and their male partners expressed equal intensities of concern regarding the illness and its treatment, rating sexuality, prognosis, and communication with the treatment team most highly in terms of current concerns. Couples where the patient had a more advanced stage of cancer expressed higher concerns than those with earlier stage disease. Although women with cervical cancer reported more fatigue and illness intrusiveness than their male partners, both experienced disruptions in relationships, intimacy, and instrumental life domains. With increased time posttreatment, concerns differed subtly between affected women and their male partners. Effective psychosocial support for cervical cancer must be provided for both the affected woman and her male partner. Support and information should address the most salient concerns of patients and partners as these evolve over significant clinical milestones.

The activity of letrozole in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and correlation with biological markers--a study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

A multicenter phase II trial was conducted to define the activity of letrozole in postmenopausal women with recurrent or advanced endometrial carcinoma, who had no more than one prior line of progestins and never had chemotherapy (except adjuvant). Archival paraffin-embedded tumor samples were retrieved to determine the expression level of estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR), p53, HER-2, bcl-2 and PTEN protein, and phosphorylation status of protein kinase B (PKB/Akt). Thirty-two eligible patients were treated with letrozole at 2.5 mg daily continuously, of whom 10 (31%) had prior progestins. Of the 28 patients evaluated for response, one complete and two partial responses were noted; overall response was 9.4% (95% confidence interval 2-25%). Eleven patients had stable disease for a median duration of 6.7 months (range 3.7-19.3 months). Amongst 22 patients who had tumor blocks available, the proportion showing positive expression of the following markers includes: PgR (86%), ER (86%), PTEN (82%), phosphorylated PKB/Akt (59%), bcl-2 (45%), p53 (32%), and HER-2 (0%). None of these markers correlated with response to letrozole or disease progression. In conclusion, letrozole is well tolerated but has little overall activity in this cohort of women with endometrial cancer.

Concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for cervical cancer--a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of concurrent cisplatin plus radiotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer. METHODS: A systematic review of randomized trials of cisplatin administered concurrently with external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy without cisplatin for cervical cancer was combined with a meta-analysis of results abstracted from published reports of the trials. RESULTS: Pooled survival rates from eight randomized trials that evaluated the role of cisplatin, alone or in combination with other chemotherapy agents, administered concurrently with external beam radiotherapy to patients with cervical cancer demonstrated a statistically significant effect in favour of cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy without cisplatin (relative risk [RR] of death, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.86). The pooled RR of death among the six trials that enrolled only women with locally advanced cervical cancer was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.90). The pooled relative risk for the two trials in high-risk early-stage disease also demonstrated a statistically significant benefit for the addition of cisplatin-based chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RR=0.56; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.77). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirms that treatment with concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy improves overall survival over various controls in women with locally advanced cervical cancer, large stage IB tumours (prior to surgery) and high-risk early-stage disease (following surgery). The variation in control treatments and the quality of their delivery among the randomized trials makes interpretation difficult. Nonetheless, the meta-analysis supports the use of concurrent cisplatin with radical radiotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer.

Familial and hormonal risk factors for papillary serous uterine cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To identify genetic and non-genetic risk factors for papillary serous uterine cancer. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted. Case women with papillary serous uterine cancer were compared with two control groups: 1) women with endometrioid uterine cancer and 2) healthy women with no past history of cancer. Cases and controls were matched for age (within two years) and ethnic group. All study subjects completed a questionnaire addressing family history. The cases and healthy controls were assessed for factors associated with estrogen exposure. RESULTS: The risks of breast cancer (RR 1.84, CI 1.03-3.31) and of prostate cancer (RR 2.21, CI 0.77-6.37) were higher among the relatives of patients with papillary serous uterine cancer, than among relatives of those with endometrioid uterine cancer. Other significant risk factors included weight at 18 years (p = 0.04) and the use of estrogen replacement therapy (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Relatives of women with papillary serous cancer of the uterus had an increased risk of breast and prostate cancer. Hormonal exposure also increases the risk for this cancer. These findings suggest that predisposing genetic factors, possibly related to hormone metabolism, may be common to the three forms of cancer.