Retrospective analysis of effectiveness of fingolimod in real life setting in Turkey (REFINE).

BACKGROUND: During multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment different modes of action such as lateral (interferon beta to glatiramer acetate or glatiramer acetate to interferon beta) or vertical (interferon beta/glatiramer acetate to fingolimod) drug switch can be performed. This study aims to investigate the clinical effectiveness of switching from the first-line injectable disease modifying treatments (iDMTs) to fingolimod (FNG) compared to switching between first-line iDMTs. METHODS: This is a multicenter, observational and retrospective study of patients with relapsing-remitting MS who had lateral and vertical switch. The observation period included three key assessment time points (before the switch, at switch, and after the switch). Data were collected from the MS patients' database by neurologists between January 2018 and June 2019. The longest follow-up period of the patients was determined as 24 months after the switch. RESULTS: In 462 MS patients that were included in the study, both treatments significantly decreased the number of relapses during the postswitch 12 months versus preswitch one year while patients in the FNG group experienced significantly fewer relapses compared to iDMT cohort in the postswitch 12 months period. FNG cohort experienced fewer relapses than in the iDMT cohort within the postswitch 2 year. The mean time to first relapse after the switch was significantly longer in the FNG group. DISCUSSION: The present study revealed superior effectiveness of vertical switch over lateral switch regarding the improvement in relapse outcomes. Patients in the FNG cohort experienced sustainably fewer relapses during the follow-up period after the switch compared the iDMT cohort. Importantly, switching to FNG was more effective in delaying time to first relapse when compared with iDMTs.

Factors associated with fingolimod rebound: A single center real-life experience.

Background It is still controversial whether the relapse experienced after discontinuation of fingolimod treatment is a rebound. Increasing cases of rebound have been reported in the literature. The rate of fingolimod rebound in patients after fingolimod cessation is reported between 5% and 52%. The present study aims to determine the rate of rebound after discontinuation of fingolimod treatment and the factors affecting the rebound. Methods This retrospective cohort study consists of adult MS patients who have been admitted to the Hacettepe University Hospital Neurology MS Center outpatient clinic between 2012 and 2020. Results During the study period, 642 patients received fingolimod and 23.1% discontinued the fingolimod treatment. Thirteen of 126 patients had a rebound (10.3%) after fingolimod discontinuation. The patients in the rebound group were significantly younger and washout period were significantly longer than those in the non-rebound group. After discontinuation of fingolimod treatment, the EDSS score of the rebound group was significantly higher than the non-rebound group, while Annualized Relapse Rates were similar. Conclusion Younger age, longer washout time, and previous treatment preferences may increase the occurrence probability of rebound. It is recommended that patients should be closely monitored after fingolimod discontinuation and appropriate disease-modifying therapy should be initiated as soon as possible.

Effect of gastric acid suppression on Clostridioides difficile-induced diarrhea and appropriateness of gastric acid suppressors in hospitalized patients: A matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The effects of gastric acid suppressors (GASs) on Clostridioides difficile infection remain controversial. Moreover, studies have shown that GASs are overused. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of GAS use on the risk of C. difficile-induced diarrhea (CDID) development and to investigate the appropriate use of GASs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this observational case-control study, patients hospitalized between January 2010 and December 2016 who had diarrhea after 3 days of hospitalization were included. The study (n = 122) and control (n = 122) groups were matched according to the patients' hospitalization dates and departments. RESULTS: No significant difference in CDID development was observed between the study and control groups. However, GAS use was excessive in the study and control groups (usage rates were 90.2% and 91.8%, respectively) (p > 0.05). Most proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists were used without an appropriate indication. Surprisingly, the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for 7 days and longer showed a significant difference between the study and control groups (p < 0.05). Additionally, significant differences in enteral feeding, oral nutritional support products, carbapenem, penicillin, glycopeptide antibiotics, antifungals, hypoalbuminemia, and increased leukocyte levels were observed between the study and control groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A significant difference in CDID development was not detected. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for 7 days and longer was a risk factor for CDID development. Additionally, an excessive inappropriate use of GASs was observed. Clinicians should be cautious of all these factors, which may increase the risk of CDID development.