Mucormycosis in a Severe Trauma Patient Treated with a Combination of Systemic Posaconazole and Topical Amphotericin B-Case Report.

Mucormycosis is an opportunistic infection affecting mainly immunocompromised hosts. Infection in immunocompetent patients is rare, but may occur typically in trauma or burn victims. We report on a previously healthy young man suffering devastating trauma from an agricultural accident with the subsequent development of a multifocal mucormycosis. Diagnosis was achieved by cultures obtained from non-healing wounds, some of them even covered by a macroscopic mold formation. Specific treatment was initiated soon after the preliminary results indicated mucormycosis. Aggressive surgical therapy, with concomitant use of systemic posaconazole and topical amphotericin B in a combination treatment, led to the elimination of the fungal infection. The remaining deep tissue defects were consequently reconstructed by a muscle flap and skin graft autotransplantation with a good overall outcome, which would not have been possible without the complete remission of mucormycosis. This case study presents the successful use of a combination treatment with systemic posaconazole and topical amphotericin B and underlines the importance of timely and aggressive surgical therapy.

Effects of goal-directed fluid management guided by a non-invasive device on the incidence of postoperative complications in neurosurgery: a pilot and feasibility randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The positive effects of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) on patient-orientated outcomes have been demonstrated in various clinical scenarios; however, the effects of fluid management in neurosurgery remain unclear. Therefore, this study was aimed at assessing the safety and feasibility of GDHT using non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring in elective neurosurgery. The incidence of postoperative complications was compared between GDHT and control groups. METHODS: We conducted a single-center randomized pilot study with an enrollment target of 34 adult patients scheduled for elective neurosurgery. We randomly assigned the patients equally into control and GDHT groups. The control group received standard therapy during surgery and postoperatively, whereas the GDHT group received therapy guided by an algorithm based on non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring. In the GDHT group, we aimed to achieve and sustain an optimal cardiac index by using non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring and bolus administration of colloids and vasoactive drugs. The number of patients with adverse events, feasibility criteria, perioperative parameters, and incidence of postoperative complications was compared between groups. RESULTS: We successfully achieved all feasibility criteria. The GDHT protocol was safe, because no patients in either group had unsatisfactory brain tissue relaxation after surgery or brain edema requiring therapy during surgery or 24 h after surgery. Major complications occurred in two (11.8%) patients in the GDHT group and six (35.3%) patients in the control group (p = 0.105). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that a large randomized trial evaluating the effects of GDHT on the incidence of postoperative complications in elective neurosurgery should be safe and feasible. The rate of postoperative complications was comparable between groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration: ClininalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT04754295, date of registration: February 15, 2021.

Anesthesia and Perioperative Management for Surgical Correction of Neuromuscular Scoliosis in Children: A Narrative Review.

Scoliosis is the most frequent spinal deformity in children. It is defined as a spine deviation of more than 10° in the frontal plane. Neuromuscular scoliosis is associated with a heterogeneous spectrum of muscular or neurological symptoms. Anesthesia and surgery for neuromuscular scoliosis have a higher risk of perioperative complications than for idiopathic scoliosis. However, patients and their relatives report improved quality of life after the surgery. The challenges for the anesthetic team result from the specifics of the anesthesia, the scoliosis surgery itself, or factors associated with neuromuscular disorders. This article includes details of preanesthetic evaluation, intraoperative management, and postoperative care in the intensive care unit from an anesthetic view. In summary, adequate care for patients who have neuromuscular scoliosis requires interdisciplinary cooperation. This comprehensive review covers information about the perioperative management of neuromuscular scoliosis for all healthcare providers who take care of these patients during the perioperative period, with an emphasis on anesthesia management.

Effect of Prophylactic Fibrinogen Concentrate In Scoliosis Surgery (EFISS): a study protocol of two-arm, randomised trial.

INTRODUCTION: Fibrinogen is one of the essential coagulation factors. Preoperative lower plasma fibrinogen level has been associated with higher blood loss. Scoliosis surgery presents a challenge for the anaesthetic team, one of the reasons being blood loss and transfusion management. Recently, the prophylactic fibrinogen administration has been a debated topic in various indications. It has been described for example, in urological or cardiovascular surgery, as well as in paediatrics. This pilot study is focused on verifying the feasibility of potential large randomised trial and verifying the safety of prophylactic fibrinogen administration in paediatric scoliosis surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A total of 32 paediatric patients indicated for scoliosis surgery will be recruited. Participants will be randomised into study groups in a 1:1 allocation ratio. Patients in the intervention group will receive prophylactic single dose of fibrinogen, in addition to standard of care. Patients in the control group will receive standard of care without study medication prior to skin incision. The primary aim is to assess the safety of prophylactic fibrinogen administration during scoliosis surgery in children, the incidence of any adverse events (AEs) and reactions will be monitored during participation in the study. The secondary objective is to investigate the additional safety information, feasibility and efficacy of a prophylactic fibrinogen administration. The incidence of AEs and reactions according to selected adverse events of special interest will be monitored. All collected data will be subjected to statistical analysis according to a separate statistical analysis plan. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial follows the applicable legislation and requirements for good clinical practice according to the International Conference on Harmonisation E6(R2). All essential trial documents were approved by the relevant ethics committee and national regulatory authority (State Institute for Drug Control) and their potential amendments will be submitted for approval. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05391412.

Incidence of muscle wasting in the critically ill: a prospective observational cohort study.

Loss of muscle mass occurs rapidly during critical illness and negatively affects quality of life. The incidence of clinically significant muscle wasting in critically ill patients is unclear. This study aimed to assess the incidence of and identify predictors for clinically significant loss of muscle mass in this patient population. This was a single-center observational study. We used ultrasound to determine the rectus femoris cross-sectional area (RFcsa) on the first and seventh day of ICU stay. The primary outcome was the incidence of significant muscle wasting. We used a logistic regression model to determine significant predictors for muscle wasting. Ultrasound measurements were completed in 104 patients. Sixty-two of these patients (59.6%) showed ≥ 10% decreases in RFcsa. We did not identify any predictor for significant muscle wasting, however, age was of borderline significance (p = 0.0528). The 28-day mortality rate was higher in patients with significant wasting, but this difference was not statistically significant (30.6% versus 16.7%; p = 0.165). Clinically significant muscle wasting was frequent in our cohort of patients. Patient age was identified as a predictor of borderline significance for muscle wasting. The results could be used to plan future studies on this topic.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03865095, date of registration: 06/03/2019.

Kinetics of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Septic Shock: A Pilot Study.

Septic shock is a major cause of mortality in ICU patients, its pathophysiology is complex and not properly understood. Oxidative stress seems to be one of the most important mechanisms of shock progression to multiple organ failure. In the present pilot study, we have analysed eight oxidative-stress-related biomarkers in seven consecutive time points (i.e., the first seven days) in 21 septic shock patients admitted to the ICU. Our objective was to describe the kinetics of four biomarkers related to pro-oxidative processes (nitrite/nitrate, malondialdehyde, 8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine, soluble endoglin) compared to four biomarkers of antioxidant processes (the ferric reducing ability of plasma, superoxide dismutase, asymmetric dimethylarginine, mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin) and four inflammatory biomarkers (CRP, IL-6, IL-10 and neopterin). Furthermore, we analysed each biomarker's ability to predict mortality at the time of admission and 12 h after admission. Although a small number of study subjects were recruited, we have identified four promising molecules for further investigation: soluble endoglin, superoxide dismutase, asymmetric dimethylarginine and neopterin.

Effect of dexamethasone in patients with ARDS and COVID-19 (REMED trial)-study protocol for a prospective, multi-centre, open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Since December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 virus has infected millions of people worldwide. In patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in need of oxygen therapy or mechanical ventilation, dexamethasone 6 mg per day is currently recommended. However, the dose of 6 mg of dexamethasone is currently being reappraised and may miss important therapeutic potential or may prevent potential deleterious effects of higher doses of corticosteroids. METHODS: REMED is a prospective, open-label, randomised controlled trial testing the superiority of dexamethasone 20 mg (dexamethasone 20 mg on days 1-5, followed by dexamethasone 10 mg on days 6-10) vs 6 mg administered once daily intravenously for 10 days in adult patients with moderate or severe ARDS due to confirmed COVID-19. Three hundred participants will be enrolled and followed up for 360 days after randomization. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio into one of the two treatment arms. The following stratification factors will be applied: age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, CRP levels and trial centre. The primary endpoint is the number of ventilator-free days (VFDs) at 28 days after randomisation. The secondary endpoints are mortality from any cause at 60 days after randomisation; dynamics of the inflammatory marker, change in WHO Clinical Progression Scale at day 14; and adverse events related to corticosteroids and independence at 90 days after randomisation assessed by the Barthel Index. The long-term outcomes of this study are to assess long-term consequences on mortality and quality of life at 180 and 360 days. The study will be conducted in the intensive care units (ICUs) of ten university hospitals in the Czech Republic. DISCUSSION: We aim to compare two different doses of dexamethasone in patients with moderate to severe ARDS undergoing mechanical ventilation regarding efficacy and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT No. 2020-005887-70. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04663555. Registered on December 11, 2020.

Delivery of a Healthy Baby from a Brain-Dead Woman After 117 Days of Somatic Support: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND The care and management of brain-dead pregnant women is surrounded by legal and ethical controversies. Gestational age is directly proportional to newborn survival. We report a case of a brain-dead pregnant woman at the 16th week of gestation and the successful delivery of a healthy child after 117 days of maternal somatic support. CASE REPORT A 27-year-old pregnant woman at 16 weeks' gestation with large intracerebral hematoma after rupture of an arteriovenous malformation was admitted to our intensive care unit. Signs of brain death developed early, and the woman was confirmed to be brain dead after day 6 of hospitalization. The decision-making process regarding course of medical treatment was complex and accompanied by uncertainties arising from the absence of a legal, ethical, and professional framework. A complex multidisciplinary approach was followed. The main aim was to maintain the brain-dead woman's homeostasis to allow for proper development of the fetus. Monitoring of fetal growth was considered the best endpoint, and satisfactory fetus development was achieved. A healthy child was delivered with a birth weight of 2140 g. Her Apgar score was 10/10/10 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively, and favorable outcomes were observed at a 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Brain death during pregnancy is an extremely rare but increasingly common condition. Guidelines for care management are lacking, and reporting these cases may help establish medical treatment in future cases. We show that somatic support of the body of a brain-dead pregnant woman for an extended period of time can lead to successful delivery of a healthy child.

Effect of dexamethasone in patients with ARDS and COVID-19 - prospective, multi-centre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (REMED trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that administration of dexamethasone 20 mg is superior to a 6 mg dose in adult patients with moderate or severe ARDS due to confirmed COVID-19. The secondary objective is to investigate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone 20 mg versus dexamethasone 6 mg. The exploratory objective of this study is to assess long-term consequences on mortality and quality of life at 180 and 360 days. TRIAL DESIGN: REMED is a prospective, phase II, open-label, randomised controlled trial testing superiority of dexamethasone 20 mg vs 6 mg. The trial aims to be pragmatic, i.e. designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention in conditions that are close to real-life routine clinical practice. PARTICIPANTS: The study is multi-centre and will be conducted in the intensive care units (ICUs) of ten university hospitals in the Czech Republic. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Subjects will be eligible for the trial if they meet all of the following criteria: 1. Adult (≥18 years of age) at time of enrolment; 2. Present COVID-19 (infection confirmed by RT-PCR or antigen testing); 3. Intubation/mechanical ventilation or ongoing high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy; 4. Moderate or severe ARDS according to Berlin criteria: • Moderate - PaO2/FiO2 100-200 mmHg; • Severe - PaO2/FiO2 < 100 mmHg; 5. Admission to ICU in the last 24 hours. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Subjects will not be eligible for the trial if they meet any of the following criteria: 1. Known allergy/hypersensitivity to dexamethasone or excipients of the investigational medicinal product (e.g. parabens, benzyl alcohol); 2. Fulfilled criteria for ARDS for ≥14 days at enrolment; 3. Pregnancy or breastfeeding; 4. Unwillingness to comply with contraception measurements from enrolment until at least 1 week after the last dose of dexamethasone (sexual abstinence is considered an adequate contraception method); 5. End-of-life decision or patient is expected to die within next 24 hours; 6. Decision not to intubate or ceilings of care in place; 7. Immunosuppression and/or immunosuppressive drugs in medical history: a) Systemic immunosuppressive drugs or chemotherapy in the past 30 days; b) Systemic corticosteroid use before hospitalization; c) Any dose of dexamethasone during the present hospital stay for COVID-19 for ≥5 days before enrolment; d) Systemic corticosteroids during present hospital stay for conditions other than COVID-19 (e.g. septic shock); 8. Current haematological or generalized solid malignancy; 9. Any contraindication for corticosteroid administration, e.g. • intractable hyperglycaemia; • active gastrointestinal bleeding; • adrenal gland disorders; • presence of superinfection diagnosed with locally established clinical and laboratory criteria without adequate antimicrobial treatment; 10. Cardiac arrest before ICU admission; 11. Participation in another interventional trial in the last 30 days. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Dexamethasone solution for injection/infusion is the investigational medicinal product as well as the comparator. The trial will assess two doses, 20 mg (investigational) vs 6 mg (comparator). Patients in the intervention group will receive dexamethasone 20 mg intravenously once daily on day 1-5, followed by dexamethasone 10 mg intravenously once daily on day 6-10. Patients in the control group will receive dexamethasone 6 mg day 1-10. All authorized medicinal products containing dexamethasone in the form of solution for i.v. injection/infusion can be used. MAIN OUTCOMES: Primary endpoint: Number of ventilator-free days (VFDs) at 28 days after randomisation, defined as being alive and free from mechanical ventilation. SECONDARY ENDPOINTS: a) Mortality from any cause at 60 days after randomisation; b) Dynamics of inflammatory marker (C-Reactive Protein, CRP) change from Day 1 to Day 14; c) WHO Clinical Progression Scale at Day 14; d) Adverse events related to corticosteroids (new infections, new thrombotic complications) until Day 28 or hospital discharge; e) Independence at 90 days after randomisation assessed by Barthel Index. The long-term outcomes of this study are to assess long-term consequences on mortality and quality of life at 180 and 360 days through telephone structured interviews using the Barthel Index. RANDOMISATION: Randomisation will be carried out within the electronic case report form (eCRF) by the stratified permuted block randomisation method. Allocation sequences will be prepared by a statistician independent of the study team. Allocation to the treatment arm of an individual patient will not be available to the investigators before completion of the whole randomisation process. The following stratification factors will be applied: • Age <65 and ≥ 65; • Charlson Comorbidity index (CCI) <3 and ≥3; • CRP <150 mg/L and ≥150 mg/L • Trial centre. Patients will be randomised in a 1 : 1 ratio into one of the two treatment arms. Randomisation through the eCRF will be available 24 hours every day. BLINDING (MASKING): This is an open-label trial in which the participants and the study staff will be aware of the allocated intervention. Blinded pre-planned statistical analysis will be performed. NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): The sample size is calculated to detect the difference of 3 VFDs at 28 days (primary efficacy endpoint) between the two treatment arms with a two-sided type I error of 0.05 and power of 80%. Based on data from a multi-centre randomised controlled trial in COVID-19 ARDS patients in Brazil and a multi-centre observational study from French and Belgian ICUs regarding moderate to severe ARDS related to COVID-19, investigators assumed a standard deviation of VFD at 28 days as 9. Using these assumptions, a total of 142 patients per treatment arm would be needed. After adjustment for a drop-out rate, 150 per treatment arm (300 patients per study) will be enrolled. TRIAL STATUS: This is protocol version 1.1, 15.01.2021. The trial is due to start on 2 February 2021 and recruitment is expected to be completed by December 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered on EudraCT No.:2020-005887-70, and on December 11, 2020 on ClinicalTrials.gov (Title: Effect of Two Different Doses of Dexamethasone in Patients With ARDS and COVID-19 (REMED)) Identifier: NCT04663555 with a last update posted on February 1, 2021. FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol (version 1.1) is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest of expediting dissemination of this material, the standard formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.

Comparison of continuous versus intermittent enteral nutrition in critically ill patients (COINN): study protocol for a randomized comparative effectiveness trial.

BACKGROUND: Enteral nutrition is part of the treatment of critically ill patients. Administration of enteral nutrition may be associated with signs of intolerance, such as high gastric residual volumes, diarrhea, and vomiting. Clinical trials regarding the effects of the mode of administration of enteral nutrition on the occurrence of these complications have yielded conflicting results. This trial aims to investigate whether the mode of administration of enteral nutrition affects the time to reach nutritional targets, intolerance, and complications. METHODS: COINN is a randomized, monocentric study for critically ill adult patients receiving enteral nutrition. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups receiving (1) continuous or (2) intermittent administration of enteral nutrition. Enhancement of enteral nutrition will depend on signs of tolerance, mainly the gastric residual volume. The primary outcome will be the time to reach the energetic target. Secondary outcomes will be the time to reach the protein target, tolerance, complications, hospital and ICU lengths of stay, and 28-day mortality. DISCUSSION: This trial aims to evaluate whether the mode of application of enteral nutrition affects the time to reach nutritional targets, signs of intolerance, and complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03573453. Registered on 29 June 2018.

Dexamethasone Reduces the Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Children Undergoing Endoscopic Adenoidectomy under General Anesthesia Without Increasing the Risk of Postoperative Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication of pediatric anesthesia, but the overall incidence of PONV in patients undergoing adenoidectomy is unknown. The aim of this controlled study was to compare the effect of dexamethasone administration with placebo to reduce PONV in children undergoing endoscopic adenoidectomy under general anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS A randomized placebo-controlled study included 118 pediatric patients who underwent elective endoscopic adenoidectomy under general anesthesia. A dexamethasone-treated (0.15 mg/kg) group (Group D) (n=56) and a placebo group (Group C) (n=62) were randomly assigned. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was recorded on the day of surgery. Postoperative nausea was assessed according to illustrated Baxter Animated Retching Faces (BARF) scale. The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale (scores between 0-10) was used to assess pain. Follow-up was performed on the 14th postoperative day by a telephone call. RESULTS Overall prevalence of postoperative nausea was 25% (30/118) and postoperative vomiting was 14% (17/118). In the first 24 hours following surgery, in Group D, the incidence of nausea and vomiting was 13% and 7%, respectively; in Group C, without pharmacological prophylaxis, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was 37%, and 21%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS A prospective controlled study in children undergoing endoscopic adenoidectomy under general anesthesia showed that dexamethasone (0.15 mg/kg) significantly reduced the incidence of PONV without increasing the risk of postoperative hemorrhage. Dexamethasone is a safe method for the prevention of PONV that may be recommended in pediatric anesthesiology.

Central venous catheter-related thrombosis in intensive care patients - incidence and risk factors: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: One of the complications associated with central venous catheter (CVC) placement is catheter related deep vein thrombosis (CR-DVT). However a literature search revealed little evidence of this recognised complication. The primary aim of this study was to establish the incidence rate and risk factors for the development of CR-DVT in our critically ill adult patients. METHODS: All critically ill adult patients admitted to the medical-surgical ICU with CVC inserted were included in this observational prospective study. After catheter removal we performed duplex ultrasound examination to assess the patency of the vein and establish if CR-DVT was present. RESULTS: A total number of 308 catheters met the inclusion criteria of which 198 were included in the statistical analysis. The CVC was inserted into a subclavian vein (SCV) in 139 (70%) cases and in an internal jugular vein (IJV) in 59 (30%) cases. The 28-day mortality rate was 14.1%. We found CR-DVT during duplex ultrasound examination in 47 (26%) of all cases. 33 (70%) of the CR-DVT were diagnosed in the IJV and 14 (30%) in the SCV. The risk factors for the development of CR-DVT we identified included cannulation of the IJV and the use of treatment dose of LMWH. The effect of CR-DVT on 28-day mortality was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The risk factors for CR-DVT we identified were IJV as a site for CVC cannulation and the use of therapeutic anticoagulation prior to cannulation. Our recommendation would be preferential cannulation of a subclavian vein as opposed to an internal jugular vein in order to reduce the risk of CR-DVT.

[Dynamics of interleukin 6 levels in the patients with cardiogenic and septic shock and in a control group of patients with uncomplicated AMI]. / Dynamika hladiny interleukinu 6 u pacientu v septickém a kardiogenním soku a u pacientu s akutním infarktem myokardu s elevacemi ST.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the leading cause of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Inflammatory response seems to be common response in patients with AMI, especially those with CS. We have therefore conducted a study to determine diagnostic and prognostic utility of interleukin 6 (IL6) levels in the cohort of patients with cardiogenic and septic shock (SS) and in a control group of patients with uncomplicated AMI. METHODS: In this prospective study 71 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 30 patients with cardiogenic shock, 21 patients with septic shock and 20 patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Plasma levels of IL6 were measured at 8 time points. The main endpoint was 3 month mortality. RESULTS: We have shown that the highest IL6 levels during the first week were recorded in patients with septic shock with peak value at admission. The maximum level of IL6 was detected between 12 to 24 hours after the onset of MI among patients with cardiogenic shock. According to Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) statistics levels of IL6 > 357 pg/ml at admission (AUC 0.730, p = 0.031) were typical for patients with CS in comparison with control group of STEMI patients. Values of IL6 > 1 237 pg/ml at admission and > 1 071 pg/ml at 24 hours (after admission?) were typical for thouse in septic shock in comparison with CS patients. We found only a non-significant trend of IL6 for the prediction of mortality in the cohort of CS patients for levels 1 854 pg/ml (AUC 0.769, p = 0.066) sampled 12 hours after admission. There was no association of plasma levels of IL6 with mortality in septic shock patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cardiogenic shock demonstrated more pronounced cytokine response as evidenced by increased levels of IL6 compared to patients with uncomplicated STEMI. Levels of IL6 peaked in SS patients at admission, in CS patients 12-24 hours after admission. In daily clinical practice routine measurement of IL6 levels for prediction of prognosis both in cardiogenic and septic shock are of little value mainly due to significant interindividual variability of IL6 values.

Comparison of parturient - controlled remifentanil with epidural bupivacain and sufentanil for labour analgesia: randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Epidural analgesia (EA) has significant contraindications including coagulation disorders and parturient refusal. One alternative is intravenous self-administered analgesia using the ultra short-acting opioid remifentanil (rPCA). We compared the efficiency and safety of standard epidural analgesia with parturient-controlled intravenous analgesia using remifentanil as well as personal satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled twelve ASA I classified women with singleton pregnancy who delivered vaginally in the period 3/2010-5/2010 and who received rPCA (n=12) in standard analgesic protocol: 20 µg boluses using PCA pump with a lockout interval of 3 min. The control group consisted of 12 pregnant women who received EA (n=12): 0.125% bupivacaine with sufentanil 0.5 µg/mL in top-up boluses every hour until delivery. Data were acquired from standard Acute Pain Service (APS) form and patient medical records (demographic, labour course parameters), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Bromage Scale (BS) and adverse effects of analgesia. RESULTS: There were no demographic or labour course parameter differences between groups (P>0.05). The differences in VAS decrease (P=0.056) and parturient satisfaction (P=0.24) during the whole analgesia administration were statistically insignificant. The main limitation of the study was small sample and enrolment of healthy singleton pregnant women only. CONCLUSION: Remifentanil use in obstetric analgesia is a viable alternative to EA, especially in cases of EA contraindications and parturient disapproval.

Soluble ST2 levels in patients with cardiogenic and septic shock are not predictors of mortality.

BACKGROUND: Soluble ST2 (sST2) is an interleukin-33 receptor. sST2 was found to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with myocardial infarction, sepsis and heart failure. OBJECTIVES: To assess sST2 levels in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) and septic shock (SS), and to evaluate the prognostic value of sST2 for short-term mortality. METHODS: The present prospective observational study evaluated 32 patients with CS, 17 patients with SS and 61 patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI )(control group). Samples of serum were collected eight times and the follow-up time was three months. RESULTS: sST2 levels were elevated from admission in SS patients relative to patients with CS and STEMI, who exhibited peak sST2 levels 24 h after admission. On admission, CS patients had a median (5th percentile; 95th percentile) sST2 level of 62.5 pg/mL (8.3 pg/mL; 315.8 pg/mL) and SS patients had a median sST2 level of 216.4 pg/mL (46.8 pg/mL; 364.4 pg/mL). ROC analysis found sST2 to be a biomarker that could distinguish between CS and SS at admission (area under the curve [AUC] 0.813; P<0.01) with a cut-off value of 210.4 pg/mL. Patients with STEMI had significantly lower sST2 levels at admission (20.3 pg/mL (4.2 pg/mL; 339.8 pg/mL) compared with CS patients. The AUC of the ROC analysis was 0.671 (P=0.007) for the detection of CS in patients with STEMI. Only a weak correlation was observed between sST2 and B-type natriuretic peptide (r=0.376, P=0.05) and sST2 and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (r=0.496, P=0.019). No statistically significant differences were observed in sST2 levels in patients with CS and SS relative to three-month mortality. CONCLUSION: Levels of sST2 at admission are significantly higher in patients with SS compared with CS. sST2 could be a diagnostic marker to distinguish SS and CS as well as CS and STEMI at the time of admission. Levels of sST2 are related to levels of natriuretic peptides in CS but not in SS. sST2 levels are not a suitable prognostic marker for patients with CS and SS.

Mild hypothermia therapy for patients with severe brain injury.

The authors present a group of patients with severe head injuries in which deliberate mild hypothermia was carried out together with the standard treatment protocol according to the European Brain Injury Consortium. Thirty patients with severe head injuries with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3-8 were enrolled into the study. The subjects were divided into two groups. The average age in the hypothermic group of 15 patients was 35 years. The average GCS was 4.5 at the site of accident. Eight patients (53%) sustained associated severe injuries of other organs. The average age of the 15 patients in the normothermic control group was 39 years with an average GCS of 4.3. All the patients in the normothermic group and 11 patients in the hypothermic group underwent neurosurgery, five of them also decompressive craniotomy. Artificial ventilation with continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), arterial blood pressure, jugular bulb oximetry and urinary bladder temperature were instituted in the ICU. Cooling to a core temperature of 34 degrees C in the hypothermic group was achieved by forced air cooling in combination with circulating-water mattress cooling (Blanketrol II, Cincinnati Sub-Zero) and maintained for 72 h. The difference in the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) between the hypothermic and normothermic groups of patients after 6 months was not statistically significant (P value 0.0843). In the hypothermic group, however, good neurological outcome (GOS 4 and 5) was reached in 13 patients (87%), which represents a 40% increase compared with the normothermic control group in which good neurological outcome was reached in 7 patients (47%). Mean normothermia ICP value of 18+/-2 mmHg was significantly (P value 0.0007) reduced during mild hypothermia therapy to 12+/-2 mmHg. Mean normothermia CPP value of 72+/-3 mmHg significantly increased (P value 0.0007) during this time to 80+/-4 mmHg with unchanged systolic arterial pressure (P value 0.9013). There were no cardiac or coagulopathy-related complications. Our results showed that mild therapeutic hypothermia could be useful in improving the outcome and neurological recovery in patients with severe head injuries.