Proteome basis for the biological variations in color and tenderness of longissimus thoracis muscle from beef cattle differing in growth rate and feeding regime.

The proteome basis for the biological variations in color and tenderness of longissimus thoracis muscle from ½ Angus (Bos taurus taurus) × ½ Nellore (Bos taurus indicus) crossbred steers was evaluated in a completely randomized experimental design consisting of four treatments (n = 9 per treatment): 1) feedlot finished, high growth rate (FH); 2) feedlot finished, low growth rate (FL); 3) pasture finished, high growth rate (PH); and 4) pasture finished, low growth rate (PL). The following comparisons were made to evaluate the effects of finishing systems and growth rates on muscle proteome: 1) FH × PL; 2) FL × PH; 3) FH × FL; and 4) PH × PL. Sixteen protein spots were differentially abundant among these comparisons (P ≤ 0.05), which were distinguished in two major clusters, energy metabolism- and muscle structure-related proteins that impacted glycolysis, carbon metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis and muscle contraction pathways (FDR ≤ 0.05). For FH × PL comparison, triosephosphate isomerase (TPI), phosphoglucomutase-1 (PGM1) and phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1) were overabundant in FH beef whereas troponin T (TNNT3), α-actin (ACTA1) and myosin regulatory light chain 2 (MYLPF) were overabundant in PL beef. For the FL × PH comparison, PGM1, phosphoglycerate mutase 2 (PGAM2) and annexin 2 (ANXA2) were overabundant in PH beef. For the FH × FL comparison, AMP deaminase (AMPD1) and serum albumin (ALB) were overabundant in FH beef whereas glycogen phosphorylase (PYGM) was overabundant in FL beef. For the PH × PL comparison, myoglobin (MB) was overabundant in PH beef whereas PYGM and MYLPF were overabundant in PL beef. In non-aged beef, L* was positively correlated with PGM1 (r = 0.54) while tenderness was negatively correlated with PGAM2 (r = -0.74) and ANXA2 (r = -0.60). In 7-d aged beef, color attributes (L*, a* and b*) were positively correlated with PGM1 (r = 0.67, 0.64 and 0.64, respectively) while tenderness was negatively correlated with TNNT3 (r = -0.57), PGK1 (r = -0.52) and MYLPF (r = -0.66). Therefore, finishing systems and growth rate affected the muscle proteome profile, which was related to beef color and tenderness. Additionally, these results suggest potential biomarkers for beef color (PGM1 and PGAM2) and tenderness (ANXA2, MYLPF, PGK1 and TNNT3).

Metabolite profile and consumer sensory acceptability of meat from lean Nellore and Angus × Nellore crossbreed cattle fed soybean oil.

Thirty each Nellore (NEL) and crossbred Angus × Nellore (AxN) were used to evaluate the effect of feeding soybean oil (SBO) and breed on meat sensory acceptability and its relation to muscle metabolite profiles. Cattle were fed for 133 d on two different diets: 1) basal feedlot diet (CON) and 2) CON diet with 3.5% added SBO. No interactions between diet and genetic group were detected for any traits measured. Meat from animals fed SBO diet had lower overall liking, flavor, tenderness and juiciness scores compared to meat from animals fed CON diet. The four most important compounds differing between animals fed CON and SBO diets were betaine, glycerol, fumarate, and carnosine, suggesting that metabolic pathways such as glycerolipid metabolism; glycine, serine and threonine metabolism; glutamine and glutamate metabolism; valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis; and alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism were affected by diets. Nellore beef had a higher overall liking and meat flavor scores than AxN beef. The four most important compounds differing between breeds were glycine, glucose, alanine, and carnosine, which may indicate that metabolic pathways such as glutathione metabolism; primary bile acid biosynthesis; alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism; and valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis were affected by genetic groups. Meat carnosine, inosine monophosphate, glutamate, betaine, glycerol and creatinine levels were correlated with sensory acceptability scores. Meat metabolite profiles and sensory acceptability were differentially impacted by diet and breed.